No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Paramount Community Living And Rehab INC

200 SW 14th, Newton, KS 67114 · Non profit - Corporation · 101 certified beds · (316) 283-4770 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (316) 283-4770 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Feb 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
700 Medical Center Dr · (316) 283-2828 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1701 S Kansas Rd · (316) 284-2333 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1701 S Kansas Rd · (316) 303-2673 · Call to confirm hours
Park
715 Washington Rd · (316) 283-3682 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
210 Southport Dr · (316) 283-5998

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.8%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.0%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.5%6.5%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.4%16.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.0%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.0%22.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.7%18.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.5%73.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.4%22.4%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.1%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.871.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.632.131.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.6%CMS range 43.5–60.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 8.1–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge75.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.0–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
4.40
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.60
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
40.3%
Total nursing turnover
46.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 89.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.40 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.77 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-18)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 91 residents, with one main kitchen and eight kitchenettes. Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with food safety requirements regarding adequate temperatures and sanitary food storage. Findings included:-Observations in the [NAME] House kitchenettes revealed the following: [NAME] House 1212: On 02/16/26 at 08:39 AM a mustard bottle and two jars of cocktail sauce were opened and undated. [NAME] House 1215: On 02/17/26 at 08:19 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) HH brought pureed sausage and gravy to the resident. Upon request, CNA HH checked the temperature which measured was 65 degrees Fahrenheit (F). CNA HH took the plate of food and placed it in the microwave. Recheck of the temperature measured 165 degrees F. CNA HH served the resident and told the resident to be careful with her plate because it was hot. The resident stirred her food and stated it was too hot for her to eat. [NAME] House 1202: On 02/17/26 at 11:19 AM, kitchen staff delivered the lunch meal in foil-covered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 91 residents. The sample included 19 residents with five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform R59 or the resident's representative about the risk and benefits of taking a psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medication. Findings included:- R59's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with behavioral disturbances, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). R59's 11/13/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R59 took antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality), antidepressant (a class of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 91 residents. The sample included 19 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 8 was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications and/or chemical restraints when they failed to ensure both of R8's as needed (PRN) lorazepam (antianxiety medication) had a 14 day stop date or a specified duration with a supporting physician rationale. Findings included:-R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) and anxiety disorder. R8's Significant Change Minimum Data Set, dated 02/13/26, documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted R8 received an antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality), antidepressant (medication used to treat depression), and an antianxiety medication. R8's Care Plan, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 91 residents. The sample included 19 residents with three in the sample reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a written bed hold policy at the time of transfer for Resident (R) 10. Findings included:- R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], which documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS noted R10 received an anticoagulant (blood-thinning medication) routinely. Nurse's Progress notes, dated 02/11/26 at 10:30 PM, documented the facility transferred R10 to the hospital for a critical lab value of potassium (an electrolyte in the blood). R10's EMR lacked evidence that a written bed hold policy was provided at the time of the transfer. On 02/18/26 at 10:45 AM, Concierge GG stated the facility did not provide the written bed hold policy on 02/11/26 because R10 returned to the facility within…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 91 residents; 19 residents were selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set to reflect the condition for Resident (R) 59's falls. Findings included:- R59's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with behavioral disturbances, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). R59's 11/13/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R59 had one fall. R59's 11/13/25 Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R59 had a history of falls. R59's 02/10/26 Quarterly MDS documented R59 could not participate in the BIMS assessment. R59 had memory problems and severely impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 91 residents; the sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent activities for Resident (R) 7. Findings included:- The Electronic Health Records (EHR) for R7 included diagnoses of cerebral palsy (a progressive disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture caused by injury or abnormal development in the immature brain, most often before birth), paralysis of vocal cords and larynx (a disorder where one or both vocal cords cannot move properly due to interrupted nerve impulses, causes hoarseness, breathing difficulties, and swallowing issues), tracheostomy status (opening through the neck into the trachea through which an indwelling tube may be inserted), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). R7's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated for 0130/26, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated cognitively intact. The assessment documented that R7 used a wheelchair for mobility and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 91 residents with 19 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow fall prevention interventions to prevent falls for Resident (R) 59. Findings included:- R59's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with behavioral disturbances, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). R59's 11/13/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R59 had one fall. R59's 11/13/25 Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R59 had a history of falls. R59's 02/10/26 Quarterly MDS documented R59 could not participate in the BIMS assessment. R59 had memory problems and severely impaired decision-making skills.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 91 residents. The sample included 19 residents with three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure emergency equipment was readily available in the event of an accidental extubation (removal of a medical tube) of Resident (R)7's tracheostomy (opening through the neck into the trachea through which an indwelling tube may be inserted) cannula. Findings included:- The Electronic Health Records (EHR) for R7 included diagnoses of cerebral palsy (a progressive disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture caused by injury or abnormal development in the immature brain, most often before birth), paralysis of vocal cords and larynx (a disorder where one or both vocal cords cannot move properly due to interrupted nerve impulses, causes hoarseness, breathing difficulties, and swallowing issues), tracheostomy status (opening through the neck into the trachea through which an indwelling tube may be inserted), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 91 residents. The sample included 19 residents with two residents reviewed for dialysis (blood purifying treatment given when kidney function is not optimum). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for Resident (R) 6 and R13. Findings included:1. R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, stage 5 (the final, most severe stage of chronic kidney disease where kidney function drops to less than 15%, indicating kidney failure) and dependence on renal (kidney) dialysis. R6's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R6 had impairment to one side of her body, upper and lower extremities, and received dialysis services. R6's Care Plan, with an initiated date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 91 residents; the sample included two residents reviewed for bed rail safety. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent from the residents or the resident's legal representative for installation of bedrails for Resident (R) 53 and for R86. Findings included:1. The Electronic Health Records (EHR) for R53 included diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (severe functional limitations, including balance issues, reduced mobility, and possible communication difficulties, requiring a multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach), visuospatial deficit and spatial neglect following cerebral infarction (often disabling, cognitive impairment following stroke, characterized by a failure to detect, report, or orient to stimuli on the side opposite the brain injury). R53's Admit Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 12/24/25, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 92 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the resident kitchenette, on 03/25/24 at 11:07 AM, the following areas of concern were noted in the kitchen of greenhouse 1202: 1. The inside of the toaster had a heavy build-up of crumbs. 2. The top of the stove had dried-on food debris. 3. A large plastic container of corn chips lacked a lid and there were corn chips on the floor. 4. The deep freeze had food debris on the bottom. 5. The silverware drawer contained wet silverware and food debris. 6. There were multiple greasy fingerprints on the hood of the range. During a tour of the kitchenette of the first floor, on 03/25/24 at 01:00 PM, the following areas of concern were noted: 1. The resident refrigerator contained a can of an opened energy drink which was unlabeled and undated. 2. The sink had a brownish substance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 92 residents with 22 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control techniques for Resident (R)9, regarding oxygen (O2) tubing/cannula storage, for R60, related to urinary catheters and perineal care, R242, related to storage of soiled catheter collection device stored next to personal care items of toothbrush and toothpaste, and R78, related to incontinence cares, to prevent the spread of infections in the facility. Findings included: - R9's physician orders revealed the following diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15. R9 received oxygen (O2).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - Review of Resident (R) 37's medical record revealed diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance of staff for dressing and personal hygiene. The Cognitive Loss Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 07/25/23, assessed the resident's risk factors of skin breakdown, weight loss and fluid imbalance. The ADL (Activity of Daily Living) Functional/Rehabilitation CAA dated 07/25/23 did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 92 residents, which included 10 residents residing in one of the six Green Houses. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide unstained towels and washcloths to the residents in one [NAME] House. Findings included: - Interview, on 03/27/24 at 02:45 PM, with Resident (R)43 revealed certified staff does the laundry, and supplies towels and washcloths to the resident, however the towels are often stained, rough and/or worn. Observation at that time revealed a hand towel with a large gray stain over 3 percent of the towel. Observation, on 03/28/24 at 09:06 AM, revealed eight hand towels and two washcloths with stains of varying sizes with rough coarse texture and several with areas of worn texture. Interview, on 03/28/24 at 09:06 AM, with Certified Medication Aide/Certified Nurse Aide (CMA/CNA) AA, revealed all staff on all shift's complete laundry tasks and stained linen should be thrown away, and when the supply is low, more can be ordered. Interview, on 03/28/24 at 10:45 AM, with Administrative Staff A,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 92 residents with 22 selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for four of the 22 residents reviewed. Resident (R)37 for use of support hose, R35 for fluid restriction, R78 for type of music, TV shows and religious preferences and R242 for shaving preferences. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 37's medical record revealed diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 92 residents with 22 residents selected for review which included six residents reviewed for activities. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate activities for five Residents (R)7, R20, R33, R37, and R78, of the six residents reviewed for activities. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 7's medical record, revealed diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The resident rated books, music, animals, and group activities as very…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 92 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for two residents, that included Resident (R)31, regarding the failure to complete the Care Area Assessments (CAA) for nutrition and pressure ulcers (PU) and R 33, regarding the failure to complete CAAs for psychotropic drugs, pain and mood state. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)31's electronic medical record (EMR) included the following diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness) and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 02/06/24, lacked documentation for cognition. The resident had a significant weight loss, without a prescribed weight loss regimen and was at risk for the development of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 92 residents with 22 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans for two residents. Resident (R)9, related to the failure to care plan a fall with a fractured foot that required a special walking boot, and R9, related to skin care for a pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Findings included: - R9's physician orders revealed the following diagnoses: diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) and right great toe fracture (broken toe). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident was dependent on a walker or wheelchair for mobility. The resident had no recent falls. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 92 residents with 22 residents sampled, including five residents reviewed for Activity of Daily Living (ADL). Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care to one dependent Resident (R)241, regarding facial shaving. Findings included: - The Physician's Order Sheet (POS), dated 03/21/24, documented Resident (R)242 had a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the staff assessment for cognition revealed severe impairment. The resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). The Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/15/24, did not trigger. The Medicare 5-day MDS, dated 03/16/24, documented the staff assessment for cognition revealed severe impairment. He was dependent on staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 92 residents with 22 residents selected for review and included three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure alternative methods of pressure relief provided for one Resident (R)20, of the three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)20's medical record revealed diagnoses that included deep vein thrombosis (DVT blood clots) in the right and left leg, heart disease, diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and unstageable pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction and the wound is covered by a layer of dead tissue). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 92 residents with 22 selected for review, which included three residents reviewed for restorative services. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided range of motion (ROM) services for one Resident (R)78, of the three residents reviewed for restorative. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)78's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord) and quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord). The Modification of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 08/06/23, documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She required extensive assistance of staff with all activities of daily living (ADL) and had impairment on both sides of her upper and lower extremities. She received restorative cares for two days of the assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 92 residents with 22 residents included in the sample, including four residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize an anchoring device for one Resident (R)78 and failed to ensure catheter tubing was kept up off the floor for R 242. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)78's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the muscles that control the flow of urine out of the body do not relax and prevent the bladder from fully emptying). The Modification of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She required extensive assistance of two staff for toileting and had an indwelling urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 92 residents with 22 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor one Resident (R)35, for a physician ordered fluid restriction. Findings included: - R35's physician orders revealed the following diagnoses included orthostatic hypotension (blood pressure dropping with change of position), essential (primary) hypertension (elevated blood pressure), viral hepatitis C (inflammatory condition of the liver), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), chronic kidney disease, and fluid overload (increase in the volume of extracellular and/or intravascular fluids). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident used a wheelchair or walker for mobility. The quarterly MDS dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 92 residents with 22 residents selected for review, which included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor one of the five Residents (R)7 for hypotension and bowel movements and one resident, R 41, regarding a failure to follow physician ordered blood pressure parameters. (instructions to hold medication for blood pressures below a threshold). Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 7's medical record, revealed diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-05-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 87 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed the principles of antibiotic stewardship in a proactive manner to ensure residents received antibiotics in a safe and effective manner to prevent unnecessary side effects of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. The facility failed to track and trend infections and causative microorganisms throughout the facility and failed to compile antibiotic use data for prescribing practitioners. Findings included: - Review of the Antibiotic Log, revealed the following areas of concerns: April 2021: One unsampled resident with a wound infection treated with an antibiotic for 14 days without location of wound or causative organism. May 2021: Three unsampled residents with urinary tract infections (UTIs) treated with antibiotics, all without indication of causative organisms. June 2021: One unsampled resident identified with MRSA(methicillin resistant streptococcus aureus) treated with Vancomycin (antibiotic) and lacked source of the MRSA or need for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents with 23 selected for review, including five reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to change the oxygen tubing for Resident (R)73, failed to change the oxygen tubing for R18 and to clean the concentrator and filter, failed to change the oxygen tubing for R68, failed to date the oxygen tubing, humidifier bottle and tubing, nebulizer tubing and store those items in a sanitary manner when not in use as well as the nebulizer kit after cleansing and allowing to air dry for R335, and failed to date the oxygen tubing and nebulizer tubing and kit when changed and to store items in a sanitary manner when not in use for R72. These practices increased the risk of these five residents for developing a respiratory infection. Findings included: - The Discharge Summary, for Resident (R)72, included a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents. The sample included 23 residents with one resident reviewed for choices. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide choices for Resident, (R)30 related to food. Findings included: - Review of the Resident (R) 30's undated Physician Orders, revealed diagnoses included, dry mouth, gastroesophageal reflux (backflow of stomach contents to the esophagus), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documentation included the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact. She reported feeling down. The resident interview regarding preferences revealed she thought it was somewhat important to have snacks available between meals. She received a mechanically altered and therapeutic diet. The Communication Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 03/10/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - Review of Resident (R)68's Physician Order Sheet, dated 03/16/22, revealed diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness,) osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain,) and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat.) The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with normal cognitive function and received oxygen therapy. The ADL (Activity of Daily Living) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 04/13/22, assessed the resident required assistance with ADLs due to generalized weakness and decreased functional ability. The Care Plan, revised 04/08/22, instructed staff the resident received hospice services, which provided equipment and supplies. The Care Plan, instructed staff to monitor for respiratory distress/decreased respirations due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents with 23 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for restorative services. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative services for one sampled Resident (R)27 to maintain or prevent decline in range of motion (ROM) ability. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)27's electronic medical record (EMR), under the Med Diag (Diagnosis) tab, included a diagnosis of muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. She required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, her balance was not steady, and she had impairment on one side of her lower extremities. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment, dated 02/28/22, documented the resident had impaired balance and transition during transfers. The care plan would be initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents with 23 selected for review including two residents reviewed for pain management. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to order one resident's narcotic (class of medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) medication in a timely manner, resulting in four missed scheduled doses and an increased pain level, for Resident (R)63. Findings included: - The Order Summary Report, dated 04/07/22, for Resident (R)63, included diagnoses of neuralgia (nerve pain), pain in unspecified joint, pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) of sacral (area of the lower back near the spine region), and osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed R63 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents with five selected for review of unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility and consulting pharmacist failed to identify the need for baseline and subsequent assessment for extrapyramidal side effect of antipsychotic medications at the initiation of Seroquel (antipsychotic medication used to treat certain mental/ mood conditions)and periodically thereafter during therapy to ensure the resident did not experience adverse effects of this antipsychotic medication. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)70's Physician Order Sheet, dated 03/16/22, revealed diagnoses included vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain) with behavioral disturbance. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severe cognitive deficit and continuous inattention, disorganized thinking, and altered level of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents with five residents selected for review for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess for extrapyramidal (a group of symptoms that may occur due to antipsychotic medication) side effects for one of the five sampled residents (R)70 and failed to ensure as needed psychotropic medications did not exceed 14 day use without physician re-evaluation and specified duration for three of the five sampled residents (R) 70, 68 and 45. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)70's Physician Order Sheet, dated 03/16/22, revealed diagnosis included vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain) with behavioral disturbance. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severe cognitive deficit and received seven days of antidepressant and antianxiety medications during the seven day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-05-09 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents, with 40 residents residing in [NAME] Hall. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to display accurate and identifiable staffing information, on a daily basis, on a Daily Nurse Staffing as required for the 40 residents that reside in the [NAME] Hall for a period of five days. Findings included: - On 05/03/22 at 08:39 AM, the daily nursing staffing posted for [NAME] Hall observed was 04/30/22, a total of five consecutive days without nursing staffing posted. On 05/03/22 at 11:07 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) L reported that the night nurse posted the daily nurse staffing. LN L verified that she was unaware that the daily nurse staffing had not been updated since 04/30/22. On 05/05/22 at 10:21 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) J reported that she was unsure who was responsible to post the daily nursing staffing daily. On 05/09/22 at 09:30 AM, Administrative Nurse E verified the posted daily nursing staffing on 05/03/22 was dated 04/30/22. The night…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CHAFETZ, YISROELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
LAHASKY, EPHRAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2021
SROCZYNSKI, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
EMERALD HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
EVOLVE THERAPY SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
LIMESTONE FISCAL SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
MERCH PAY INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
PRIVATE BANCORP INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
SAUL N FRIEDMAN & COMPANYOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
ZIMMET HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
FLEISCHMANN, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/12/2022
FRANKLIN, BRENDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
GOPIN, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
PANKRATZ, JULIANNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
PIERCE, BARBARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
RAY, STACEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/07/2022
VANBRUNT, AMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/15/2024
WAGNER, GRETCHENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2021
WILLIAMS, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 7%Other / private 6%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$372per resident / day
operating cost
$11,308per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$357per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175385. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next