Andbe Home, INC
201 W Crane Street, Norton, KS 67654 · Non profit - Other · 50 certified beds · (785) 877-2601 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (23) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $30,947 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-13)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.5% | 17.9% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.1% | 4.9% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.2% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.0% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.8% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.7% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.7% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 31.2% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.6% | 22.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.8% | 18.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.67 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.60 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 34.6 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.17 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.47 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards when the facility failed to ensure water temperatures in areas with resident access and in Resident (R)18, R17, R25, R1, and R4's rooms remained at a safe temperature when temperatures above 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) were recorded. This common area and sink were open to the center hallway and accessible to any independently mobile residents. The facility identified seven independently mobile, cognitively impaired residents. This placed twelve residents in immediate jeopardy. The excessively high hot water temperatures of 128-139 degrees F were also recorded in resident room sinks, placing an additional seven residents at risk for burns. The facility failed to identify and implement interventions to prevent R8 from falling which placed the resident at risk of further falls and injuries. Findings included: - On 06/12/24 at 07:53 AM, observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner for the residents who reside in the facility and receive meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included:- On 05/05/26 at 08:18 AM, during the initial tour of the facility's kitchen, observation revealed the following;1. Dietary Staff (DS) BB prepared and served breakfast without a hairnet.2. The double-door stainless refrigerator had the following:A quart-size heavy whipping cream with an expiration date of 01/04/26.Deli-style sliced ham in a gallon-size bag with no open date and not sealed.A yellow-square sliced cheese stored in a gallon bag without an open date or expiration date.Three sausage patties and links were stored in a sandwich-sized bag without a label of contents or an open date.White round sliced cheese stored in a gallon-size bag without a label of contents or an open date.Shredded white and yellow shredded opened and taped shut without an open date.Swiss cheese slices…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews. The facility failed to ensure their Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee adequately identified deficient areas of practice to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct the deficient practices. Findings included: - The facility failed to provide the Medicare/Medicaid Coverage Liability Notice from 10055, and the form 10123 to the resident and//or representative regarding non-coverage of skilled services. Refer to F582. The facility failed to ensure a stop date for Resident (R)5 who had as-needed antianxiety medication without a 14 day stop date or a definitive stop date. Refer to F605. The facility failed to provide R23 or representatives with a bed hold notification when he was admitted to the hospital. Refer to F628. The facility failed to report R4's change of condition following an unresponsive episode and failed to follow up on charting after the incident. Refer to 684. The facility failed to assist R7, R14, and R31 in determining the root causes of the falls, failed to implement effective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)42 or their representative the completed Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN) form 10055 or the CMS Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMOC) form 10123, and failed to provide R6 and R7 with the CMS 10055 form. Findings included: - R42's skilled services ended on 12/26/25. R42 remained in the facility. Upon request, the facility was unable to provide evidence R42 received the CMS 10055 form and the CMS Form 10123. R6's skilled services ended on 03/26/26. R6 remained in the facility. Upon request, the facility was unable to provide evidence R6 received the CMS 10055 form. R7's skilled services ended on 02/03/26. R7 remained in the facility. Upon request, the facility was unable to provide evidence that R7 received the CMS 10055 form. On 05/06/26 at 03:50 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility did not provide R42 the CMS Form 10123 and the CMS Form 10055, and did not provide R6 and R7 with the CMS Form 10055. The facility did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a stop date for three sampled residents, Resident (R) 13, R31, and R5, as needed (PRN) Ativan/lorazepam (a medication that calms and relaxes people). Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R13 documented diagnoses of vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain), violent behavior (the intentional use of physical force or power, either threatened or actual against oneself, another person, or a group), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R13 had severely impaired cognition. R13 required substantial staff assistance with toileting, bathing, and personal hygiene. R13 had physical and verbal behaviors and rejected care four to six days a week. R13's 04/02/26 Care Plan included the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a recapitulation (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) for Resident (R) 38. Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R38 documented diagnoses of fracture of the upper end of the left humerus (broken upper arm), displaced fracture of the distal phalanx of the right ring finger (broken finger), and pain. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R38 had intact cognition. R38 required substantial staff assistance with toileting hygiene, showers, and lower-body dressing. R38 required partial staff assistance for upper body dressing, personal hygiene, mobility, and transfers. R38 had upper and lower functional impairment on one side. The Quarterly MDS, dated 01/05/26, documented R38 had intact cognition. R38 required partial staff assistance for upper body dressing, showers, and mobility. R38 required supervision with transfers, toileting hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply the standards of practice as related to a change of condition for Resident (R) 4, who had a history of vasovagal response (a reflex of the involuntary nervous system that causes a sudden drop in heart rate and blood pressure, often leading to fainting or lightheadedness) when staff failed to follow the care plan on the use of a full-body mechanical lift and instead used a sit-to-stand lift. R4 lost consciousness and staff failed to contact the physician or family and did not assess R4 after the initial incident. Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R4 documented diagnoses of hypotension (low blood pressure, dementia without behavioral disturbances (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin was made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) type two, chronic kidney disease (long term condition where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record, the facility failed to accurately investigate a root cause and implement effective interventions to prevent falls for Residents (R) 7 and R31, who had numerous falls. Findings included: - R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of unspecified dislocation of the hip, cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and syncope (fainting or passing out) and collapse. R7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R7 had intact cognition, functional range of motion impairment on one side of the upper and lower extremities, and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS lacked documentation of R7's functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 6 received the necessary care and services to prevent an ongoing insidious weight loss when staff failed to notify the physician of the weight loss and failed to ensure the physician received the dietician's recommendations for an appetite stimulant. Findings included:- R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of dehydration, low back pain, repeated falls, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), hypokalemia (low level of potassium in the blood), and heartburn. R6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R6 had severe cognitive impairment, hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created), and delusions (untrue, persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue). R6 utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility and required supervision/touching…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 41 received care and services for dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes are removed from the blood) consistent with professional standards of practice, which included a contract for service, nursing assessments, or ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility. Findings included:- R41's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic hypertensive(elevated blood pressure) heart disease, end-stage renal disease (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), depressive disorder, stage three pressure ulcer (full-thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) to the sacral (large triangular bone/area between the two hip bones) region, and shock. R41's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R41 had intact cognition. R41 had functional range of motion impairment of the upper extremity on one side and required substantial/maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to adhere to infection control procedures related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP -an infection control intervention designated to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove used during high contact resident care activities), when emptying the indwelling catheter for Resident (R)8. Findings included: - On 05/07/26 at 12:55 PM, observation revealed R8 sat in a wheelchair in his room. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R entered the room and donned gloves only, no gown. CMA R cleansed the end of the R8's catheter tubing, drained the amber urine from the catheter collection bag into the urine collection container, then wiped off the catheter spout with alcohol. She replaced the end of the catheter spout and closed the clamp. CMA R then removed her gloves and washed her hands. Further observation revealed R8's room lacked a sign posted on the inside of the resident's room that provided instructions on EBP and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE - gown and gloves) when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 12 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 34 residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchen. This placed the 34 residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 06/10/24 at 08:10 AM. observation revealed the nourishment refrigerator/freezer on the right lacked a thermometer. The second refrigerator on the left lacked a thermometer in the freezer and had an expired package of simply steamed cauliflower with an expiration date of July 23, 2023. On 6/11/24 at 08:10 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O verified the finding above and stated dietary staff was responsible for placing the thermometers in the nourishment refrigerator/freezers and discarded the simply steam cauliflower. On 06/11/24 at 11:11 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed the following: The two-door silver fridge lacked a backup thermometer inside it. The fridge had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 34 residents. Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to implement a water management program for the Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as from air-conditioning units for large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, chronic lung disease, or heavy tobacco use are most at risk of developing pneumonia caused by Legionella). This placed the residents in the facility at risk for Legionella pneumonia Findings included: - The facility's Water Temperature Check Log documented temperature checks of laundry, kitchen, common areas, and resident rooms weekly. The facility did not have documentation of Legionella preventative measures including risk assessments and identification of potential problem areas and actions taken. On 06/10/24 at 03:36 PM, Administrative Staff A stated the city came to the facility yearly and tested the water. The facility uses an osmosis water filtration system for drinking water. She verified the facility lacked a Legionella or waterborne pathogen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to dispose of expired medications appropriately. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of receiving ineffective medication. Findings included: - On 06/10/24 at 08:15 AM, observation revealed the north medication cart contained the following expired medications: One bottle of stool softener, 50 milligrams (mg)/8.6 mg senna (laxative), with an expiration date of 12/2023. One bottle of calcium complete, 250 mg, plus 2.5 micrograms (mcg) of vitamin D, with an expiration date of 06/2023. One bottle of liquid Gerilanta (used to treat the symptoms of too much stomach acid) with an expiration date of 12/2023. On 06/10/24 at 08:15 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) J verified the above expired medications should have been disposed of. On 06/10/24 at 08:52 AM, observation revealed the east medication room contained the following expired medications: One bottle of extra strength pain relief Tylenol/diphenhydramine (Benadryl), 500/25 mg, with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote care in a manner to maintain and enhance dignity and respect when staff stood over two residents, Resident (R) 5 and R33, while assisting them to eat. This placed the residents of the facility at risk for impaired dignity. Findings included: - On 06/10/24 at 11:48 AM, observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O assisted residents in the dining room. CNA O stood up while feeding R5 a few bites of food and then walked over and stood over R33 while assisting him to eat. At 12:18 PM, CNA O sat next to R5 and fed her a few bites of food, then at 12:20 PM, she got up and assisted R33 again. At 12:21 PM, CNA O stood over R5 and gave her a bite of food, walked away from the table, came back, and gave her another bite while standing over her. At 12:23 PM, CNA O stood beside R33 to assist him with a drink and cut up his chicken into smaller pieces. At 12:24 PM CNA O sat by R5 and fed her pureed eggroll. At 12:28 PM, CNA O stood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) or urinary tract infection (UTI). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure sanitary catheter care for Resident (R)11. This placed the resident at risk for infection and catheter-related complications. Findings included: - R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R11 had diagnoses of neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the muscles that control the flow of urine out of the body do not relax and prevent the bladder from fully emptying) and urine retention (when your bladder doesn't empty completely or at all). R11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R11 had a urinary catheter and no UTI during the observation period. R11's Care Plan, revised 07/07/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 5 received the required staff assistance with meals in an uninterrupted manner that promoted intake. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for weight loss. Findings included: - R5's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented diagnoses of epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), generalized anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), history of cerebral infarction (stroke), and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 and severely impaired decision-making. The MDS documented R5 required maximal staff assistance for eating. She weighed 93…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate pain management was available for Resident (R) 27 who had chronic pain. This placed the resident at risk for unrelieved pain. Findings included: - R27's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R27 had diagnoses of peripheral (outside, surface, or surrounding area of an organ, other structure, or field of vision) neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet) and absence of left leg below the knee. R27's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R27 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R27 required moderate staff assistance with personal hygiene and toileting. R39 had lower extremity impairment on one side and was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs) except showering. The MDS documented R27…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 34 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility kitchen staff failed to provide food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance when dietary staff failed to follow a recipe while preparing the pureed diet. This placed the resident at risk for impaired nutrition. Findings included: - On 06/11/24 at 11:55, Dietary Staff (DS) CC with Dietary Manager (DM) BB overlooking, stated the facility had one resident who received a pureed diet and five residents who received mechanical soft diets. DS CC placed six three-ounce (oz) pork chops into a steam table pan, transferred them into a blender using tongs, and blended to a mechanically soft consistency. DS CC then transferred an unmeasured amount of mechanical soft pork chop into a steam table pan and placed it on the steam table. Observation revealed DS CC placed the rest of the mechanical soft pork chop in the blender container, added an unmeasured amount of milk, blended the meat to the consistency of mashed potatoes, then transferred the pureed pork…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to prevent the development and transmission of infections by not handling and transporting residents' linens in a safe, sanitary manner. This placed the residents at increased risk for communicable disease and infections. Findings included: - On 08/24/22 at 07:45AM, observation revealed Housekeeping Staff (HS) V walked out of Resident (R) 32's carrying unbagged sheets rolled up in a ball. HS V carried the unbagged soiled linen down the hallway to the soiled utility room. On 08/24/22 at 07:55AM, observation revealed HS V in R 21's room. Further observation revealed HS V took the bed sheets off of R21's bed and rolled them up in a ball, then carried the unbagged soiled linen down the hallway to the soiled utility room. On 08/24/22 at 08:05AM, observation revealed HS V in R37's room. Further observation revealed HS V walked out of R37's room with bed sheets rolled up in a ball and carried unbagged soiled linen to the soiled utility room. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with six reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide scheduled bathing for four sampled residents, Resident (R) 8, R34, R3, and R21. This placed these residents at risk for skin problems and poor hygiene. Findings included: - R8's Physician's Order Sheet, dated 02/07/22, recorded diagnoses dementia (persistent mental disorder marked by memory loss and impaired reasoning), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness), and psychotic disorder (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R8 had moderately impaired cognition, with inattention, disorganized thinking, verbal behaviors, and delusions (untrue beliefs or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to involve the physician in the care and treatment of a pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure) for one sampled resident, Residents (R) 91. This placed the resident at risk for a worsening wound and infection. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/01/22, recorded R91 had diagnoses of hypertension (elevated blood pressure), coronary artery disease (abnormal condition that may affect the flow of oxygen to the heart), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), and vascular dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R91 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of five (severe cognitive impairment) with no behaviors.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-05-07 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Findings included: - On 05/05/26 at 10:00 AM, Administrative Staff A provided an undated Long-Term Care Self-Assessment. Review of the assessment revealed the assessment failed to identify the specific staffing levels needed for each unit and identify the number of Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Nurses (LPN/LVN), Certified Medication Aides (CMA), and Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) needed for each unit, patient acuity, and census. The assessment also lacked staffing levels required for each shift to include evenings and weekends. The assessment did not document the staff competencies and skill sets necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the specific resident populations and did not fully document any contractual agreements to outside providers for services available to residents in the facility for laboratory, radiology, therapy, hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$30,947 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $30,947 — penalty dated 2024-06-13
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-09 for 4 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANDERSON, DEBORAH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/21/2024 |
| MADDEN, CLAY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/01/2021 |
| MAPES, MEGAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/04/2020 |
| MATCHETT, MARVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/01/2023 |
| MAURER, GLENDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/01/2022 |
| MENAGH, AMIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/31/2022 |
| RISEWICK, TARA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/01/2023 |
| WOODYARD, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/31/2022 |
| ANDBE HOME, INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/1966 |
| MCKINLEY, JEFFERY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/18/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175506. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.