Nortonville Health Care Center
412 E Walnut St, Nortonville, KS 66060 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 45 certified beds · (913) 886-6400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $192,235 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-14)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (81%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 27.9% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 4.9% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.6% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 84.2% | 6.5% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.1% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.3% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.2% | 95.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.3% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.9% | 22.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 37.5% | 18.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 31.1 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 81% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
74 citations, most serious first. The 22 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34, with 14 residents in the sample, and one resident reviewed for substance use disorder. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent, identify, and intervene in Resident (R) 11's substance use disorder, which placed residents in immediate danger of serious harm or death. R11' Electronic Health Record revealed a history of substance use disorder, charting to indicate signs and symptoms of active substance use, and two instances of the resident having drug paraphernalia in his room. On [DATE] at 02:14 PM facility staff saw a green tackle box and a red basket on the floor in R11's room which contained pill bottles, lighters, books, and other items scattered next to it. The red basket had a torch, four pill bottles, a red lighter, a large knife, and a black pouch containing a drug pipe. On [DATE] at 09:30 PM staff were asked to check on R11 due to suspicion of drug use, and upon a search they found a crack pipe with methamphetamine still in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility lacked a system for records of receipt through disposition of all controlled medications, in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation and ensure drug records were in order. The facility also failed to ensure a record system to account for all controlled medication which was maintained and periodically reconciled. The facility pharmacy lacked onsite presence in the facility to assist in the destruction of controlled narcotic substances from February 2025 until [DATE]. The facility had a locked cabinet inside the medication room used for narcotic medications awaiting destruction. The administrator did not know who had the key for the locked cabinet and required maintenance staff to cut the lock off of the cabinet on [DATE], revealing the cabinet was full of narcotic controlled medications dating back to 2024. Through record review the facility could not account for 49 separate narcotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents with 14 in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program in accordance with a facility assessment, regulatory requirements, and professional standards of practice. Upon entrance to the facility resident rooms had clothing piled on side tables and on the floors, trash cans in resident rooms were full, and staff present failed to maintain infection control practices when transporting laundry, trash, and multi-resident use medical equipment. The facility further failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for residents at risk for the transmission of infectious agents through wounds, catheter use, and/or other medical devices. The facility lacked evidence they tracked the spread of infection within the facility, assessed residents for the infectious organisms, and implemented interventions to prevent further spread of infections. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 38 residents. The sample included three residents for abuse. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent an incident of resident-to-resident abuse and protect one resident, Resident (R) 2, from abuse. On 11/19/25 at 01:53 PM R1, a cognitively impaired resident with known aggressive behavior, entered the dining area and, without provocation, forcefully punched (with a closed fist) R2. There were approximately seven to eight additional residents in the dining area at the time of the altercation. R1 punched R2 two to three times in the left shoulder while R2 and others began shouting. R2 tried to block R1's punches, and both residents fell from their wheelchairs to the floor. Activity Staff Z, who was present in the dining area, was approximately ten feet from R1 and R2. Activity Staff Z ran toward the residents, yelled for help, and multiple staff members arrived to separate R1 and R2. The facility's failure to continuously monitor R1, as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 23 residents. The sample included nine residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to immediately respond to a change in health status and failed to obtain physician involvement when Resident (R) 1 had a critical lab result and subsequently developed abnormal blood pressure, lower than the physician ordered parameter. The facility further failed to immediately act upon the resident and/or his representative's request to seek acute care for treatment of his declining health situation. On 08/13/24, R1 fell from a full body lift during transfer. On 08/14/24, R1 complained of intermittent back pain and shakiness. On 08/15/24, a laboratory technician notified Licensed Nurse (LN) H of R1's critical creatinine (lab test used to measure how well the kidneys performed their job of filtering waste from the blood) level at 10:50 AM. LN H entered a late entry note on 08/16/24 at 08:43 AM which indicated she called Consultant GG who gave orders on 08/15/24 at 11:37 AM to increase fluids one to two liters and recheck labs on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-26 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 23 residents. The sample included nine residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care for Resident (R) 2's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC-a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the upper arm and threaded into a large vein above the heart) including monitoring the resident's status for complications and providing a sterile dressing change per the standards of care for a PICC line at least every seven days. R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a PICC line in place for administration of intravenous (IV - administered directly into the bloodstream via a vein) antibiotics. R2's clinical record lacked evidence that the staff had changed R2's PICC dressing while he was in the facility. On 08/19/24 R2 went to the acute care hospital for possible sepsis (a threatening systemic reaction that develops due to infections which cause inflammation throughout the entire body). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 34 with 14 sampled and one reviewed for change in condition. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff monitored, educated, and documented effectiveness of treatments regarding a change in condition for Resident (R)9. On 08/23/25, while still on antibiotics for cellulitis (skin infection caused by bacteria) the resident had a change in mental status, refused transport to the hospital, and the facility failed to document continued monitoring of the residents change in status. The facility further failed to document any education provided or reapproach provided after the resident's refusal to be seen. On 09/05/25 the facility notified the resident's provider the resident refused labs the prior day, with no follow up to the resident's refusal documented, no attempts to reapproach the resident, no education provided on the seriousness of obtaining the lab and/or additional monitoring of the resident. On 09/09/25 the resident asked to be transported to the hospital due to pain in the left lower extremity. While at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with four reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure effective interventions, accurate assessments, and consistent monitoring, to prevent the development of a facility acquired stage 3 (full thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) pressure ulcer/injury of the sacrum (large triangular bone/area between the two hip bones) for dependent and at risk Resident (R)7, who required hospitalization for wound care and intravenous antibiotics for sepsis (life threatening systemic reaction that develops due to infections which cause inflammation throughout the entire body). The facility further failed to place effective interventions for R6, with a known history of pressure ulcer/injury development. On 12/02/25 a skin assessment revealed the resident had no new skin issues besides an already identified stage 3 pressure injury to his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-01-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 34 with 14 in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to address Resident (R) 16's complaints of pain in her hip. On 07/19/25 the resident voiced pain in the hip after a self-reported fall. After lidocaine (pain medication) patches and Tylenol (pain) were not effective managing the resident's pain the facility placed an order for hydrocodone-acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication) 5-325 milligrams (mg) on the resident's record on 08/12/25, however failed to obtain the medication until 08/25/25. The resident reported pain almost daily at a 1 to 8 on a pain scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable from 08/12/25 until 08/21/25. The facility further failed to ensure R7, received needed dental care and services. R7 refused her dental visit on 10/30/25. The record lacked evidence of staff attempts to get R7 to a dentist after her 10/30/25 refusal, and approximately two months R7 began complaining of tooth pain. The records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 35. The sample included five residents, with three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders to implement preventative wound interventions for Resident (R) 1. On 06/09/25, Consultant GG assessed R1 for a left heel ulcer, ordered suspension boots, and directed staff to clean the wound daily. Staff were to call the provider if the resident's left heel ulcer opened. The facility failed to input the order for suspension boots into R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and further failed to implement the order or apply boots to R1's left heel. A wound assessment on 06/18/25 revealed the resident's left heel wound had opened up, and R1's EMR lacked evidence the facility had notified the resident's physician. The facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 23 residents. The sample included nine residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 2 with wound care consistent with standards of practice when staff failed to ensure physician involvement for wound status changes and appropriate treatment orders, and failed to assess wound characteristics consistently and when treatment changes were made. These failures resulted in the deterioration of the wound and the worsening of the infectious process. This also placed R2 at risk for increased pain and other wound-related complications. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke - the sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), pressure-induced deep tissue damage (pressure ulcer - localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 23. The sample included nine residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from preventable accidents during a Hoyer lift (full body mechanical lift) transfer. This deficient practice resulted in impaired psychosocial well-being and placed R1 at risk for further complications. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of acquired absence (amputation) of left leg above knee, heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting the right dominant side. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 11/03/23, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R1 required staff dependency for chair/bed-to-chair transfers. The Quarterly MDS dated 07/19/24, documented R1 had a BIMS score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. R1 required staff dependency for chair/bed-to-chair transfers. The Functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0620 — widespreadNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 34 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to establish and implement an admissions agreement that protected the residents' right to personal property. Findings included:- The facility's Skilled Nursing Facility Resident Agreement revealed under part four, page 14, section D Personal Possessions that the resident, under no circumstances, held the facility responsible for or liable of any nature whatsoever for the loss or damage to valuables, personal property, or money brought into the facility. On 01/14/26 at 06:25 PM, Administrative Staff D stated the regional level completed the admission agreement packets and sent them out. She stated when a resident admitted to the facility staff completed an inventory list with the resident and updated it with anything new brought in. Administrative Staff D stated if a resident stated they brought items in and they followed the grievance process; the facility did an investigation to find the item then took ownership after the facility verified the item went missing in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespreadProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a resident centered activities program that incorporated resident interests, hobbies, and cultural preferences for a meaningful life. Findings included:- The activity calendar for January 2026, documented the following activities from 01/01/26 to 01/14/26: 01/01/26 - 02:00 PM Bingo, 07:00 PM free hour. 01/02/26 - 10:00 AM exercise group, 02:00 PM movie and popcorn, 07:00 PM free hour. 01/03/26 - 10:00 AM exercise group, 02:00 PM coloring creations, 07:00 PM free hour. 01/04/26 - Exercise group, table games, and free hour. The scheduled times were cut off of the calendar. 01/05/26 - 10:00 AM Christmas undecorating, 10:30 AM Resident Council, 02:00 PM mani time, 07:00 PM free hour. 01/06/26- 10:00 AM exercise group, 10:00 AM word search, 02:00 PM Bingo, 07:00 PM free hour 01/07/26- 10:00 AM exercise group, 10:30 AM cooking with Activities Director E, 02:00 PM corn hole, 07:00 PM free hour 01/08/26- 10:00 AM exercise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 34 with 14 in the sample. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident as determined by resident assessments, plans of care and utilizing the facility assessment. Findings included:- The facility failed to provide evidence of competencies from Administrative Staff A as requested on 01/11/26 and again on 01/12/26. During an interview on 01/26/25 with Consultant Staff X at 03:51 PM she stated she did not have any proof the facility performed competency evaluations with certified staff. Review of the Sufficient Staff Policy dated 05/15/24 revealed the facility would provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for each resident.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide evidence of no less than twelve hours of in-service education provided to the Certified Nurse Aides annually, which were based on their individual performance reviews. This failure had the ability to affect the care of all 34 residents. Findings included:- The facility failed to provide evidence of competencies and evidence of annual in-service education for the Certified Nurse Aides, as requested from Administrative Staff A on 01/11/26 and again on 01/12/26. During an interview with Administrative Staff A on 01/13/26 at 03:10 PM she stated that they were still looking and could not locate the information, noting they looked through Administrative Nurse B's office but were not able to locate any documentation about annual CNA training based on performance reviews. During an interview on 01/26/25 with Consultant Staff X at 03:51 PM she stated she did not have any proof the facility performed competency evaluations with certified staff. Review of the Sufficient Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review revealed the facility failed to ensure effective administration in order to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This failure affected all 34 residents in the facility. Findings included:- During an extended recertification and complaint survey the following concerns were identified regarding the lack of administrative oversight, which contributed to the following three immediate jeopardy deficiencies as follows: Regarding Accident Hazards (See F689): Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent, identify, and intervene in Resident (R) 11's substance use disorder, which placed residents in immediate danger of serious harm or death R11 admitted to the facility after a referral from a regional hospital. The 08/13/25 hospital referral sheet for admission to the facility identified the resident with a history of alcohol and drug use with the resident reporting current drug use at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The census totaled 34 with 14 in the sample. Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct an effective facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for its residents competently during day-to-day operations. Findings included:- Review of the facility provided Facility Assessment Tool revised 11/2025 revealed the facility had 45 licensed beds with the average number of occupied beds being 32 the last quarter. Review of the Persons Involved in completing the assessment revealed the administrator, director of nursing, social services director, medical director and physical therapy. The document lacked evidence the facility included input from other members of the community as required in section 483.71(b)(1)(ii)(iii) of the State Operations Manual, which include (but not limited to) direct care staff (registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nursing assistants), residents, resident representatives, and family members. The assessment further lacked a plan to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement and maintain a comprehensive Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program and plan, through the lack of effective involvement by governance and leadership. Administrative Staff A could not provide evidence the QAPI program was effective in the identification of quality concerns, when the current survey identified Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care. Findings included:- On 01/13/26 at 06:53PM Administrative Staff A brought the QAPI sign-in sheets to the surveyor. Review of the sign in sheets revealed the Director of Nursing did not attend the July 2025 through January 2026 meetings and the Medical Director had not attended quarterly. During an interview on 01/13/26 at 06:57 PM Administrative Staff A stated the facility did QAPI online on the computer and talked about the same thing every month, so she did not know how to print the prior agendas but pointed to the blank copy and stated it was the same agenda every month. Administrative Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to show evidence the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program developed and implemented action plans to correct identified quality deficiencies cited on prior and current survey, lacked evidence the QAPI program were aware of the systemic issues which rose to the level of Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care on the current survey, and lacked evidence the QAPI program were monitoring facility practices to prevent adverse events. Findings included:- Review of the citations found on the prior recertification survey dated 04/16/25 revealed the facility was cited for deficient practice for the following regulations:F0580 (Notify of Changes (Injury/Decline/Room, etc.) at a DF0623 (Notice Requirements Before Transfer/Discharge) at a DF0625 (Notice of Bed Hold Policy Before/Upon Transfer) at a E*F0689 (Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices) at a D*F0727 (RN 8 Hrs/7 days/Wk, Full Time DON) at a F*F0730 (Nurse Aide Peform Review-12 hr/yr In-Service) at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the required members attended the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings at least quarterly, as required by federal regulation. This failure had the ability to affect all 34 residents. Findings included:- Review of the facility provided Sign in sheets, which appeared to be hand drawn with columns and lines, and had the following handwritten headings: Date, Print Name, Signature, and Title. For the QAPI JUNE handwritten on the top right of the page revealed the following attended:04/10/25 Therapy Staff M04/10/25 Dietary Manager JJ04/10/25 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N (served as SSD at the time)04/10/25 Medical Records II04/10/25 Administrative Nurse B04/10/25 Maintenance Staff JThe 04/10/25 meeting lacked evidence the Administrator, Pharmacy, or Medical Director attended. For the QAPI - May 2025 handwritten on the top right of the page revealed the following attended:05/09/25 Administrative Staff A05/09/25 Business Office Manager (BOM) L05/09/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 34 residents with 14 in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a program for antibiotic stewardship and failed to implement a system to monitor antibiotic use. Record review revealed the facility failed to follow up on prescribed antibiotics, the infectious organisms, and/or the use of antibiotics for residents identified with multi-drug-resistant organisms including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA - per The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention MRSA is a type of staphylococcus that can be resistant to several antibiotics, which anyone can get or carry. The risk for MRSA increases for people in nursing homes, crowded areas, and/or unhygienic places) and multi-drug resistant ESBL (Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBLs) are enzymes produced by certain bacteria, primarily Escherichia coli (E. coli)). These failures led to multiple resident hospitalizations/rehospitalizations, the amputation of an infected left lower extremity, chronic wounds that were slow or non-healing, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 52 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The census totaled 34 with 14 in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide evidence they designated one infection preventionist who was qualified by education, training, experience and/or certification that worked at least part time on the facility infection control program and completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This failure created the likelihood for the transmission of infectious agents, subsequent infection, and caused actual severe infection with significant outcomes. Findings included:- The facility identified Administrative Nurse B as the current Infection Preventionist. The facility failed to provide evidence Administrative Staff B was qualified to fill the role by education, training, experience or certification. Review of the Facility Assessment Tool dated 11/18/25 revealed the facility was licensed for 45 beds, with an average census of 32 residents. The facility identified their common diagnoses related to infectious disease as skin and soft tissue infections, respiratory infections,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The census totaled 34 with 14 in the sample. Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide evidence they offered influenza (highly contagious viral infection) immunizations to residents for the 2025 influenza season, when the vaccines were made available for the year and/or beginning approximately October 1st, 2025. The facility further failed to provide signed consents/declinations and/or evidence of vaccination administration related to the influenza and/or pneumococcal (type of bacterial infection) vaccine for Residents (R) 2, R6, R7, R11, and R16. Findings included:- Review of all resident Electronic Health Records, under the immunizations tab on 01/12/26 for influenza immunizations lacked evidence residents were offered and/or received influenza immunizations at the facility during the 2025 season. Resident charts either reflected the 2024 dates or noted refusals with no dates. Upon request on 01/14/26 at 10:32 AM, the facility was unable to provide influenza, pneumococcal, and Covid-19 vaccination signed consents or declinations or documentation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 34 with 14 in the sample. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to provide nursing and related services to ensure staff were aware of goals and aspects of the program that assured resident safety and attained or maintained the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident as determined by resident assessments, plans of care and utilizing the facility assessment. Findings included:- The facility failed to provide evidence of staff competency evaluations from Administrative Staff A as requested on 01/11/26 and again on 01/12/26. During an interview on 01/26/25 with Consultant Staff X at 03:51 PM she stated she did not have any proof the facility performed competency evaluations with certified staff. See F865, F867. and F868 for outcomes related to the facility's lack of QAPI training and follow up competency evaluations to ensure staff were aware of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 34 with 14 in the sample. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure measure the adequacy of any in-service training provided to staff by the failure to evaluate competencies and skill sets of Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) to ensure the implementation of interventions necessary to meet resident's needs and as identified in the facility assessment. Findings included:- The facility failed to provide evidence of competency evaluations for CNAs from Administrative Staff A as requested on 01/11/26 and again on 01/12/26. During an interview on 01/26/25 with Consultant Staff X at 03:51 PM she stated she did not have any proof the facility performed competency evaluations with certified staff. Review of the Sufficient Staff Policy dated 05/15/24 revealed the facility would provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for each resident.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to respond to and maintain medication regimen reviews (MRR) conducted by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) for R1, R32, R3, and R24. Findings included:- R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) without behavioral disturbance and bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 03/17/25 documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. R1 had no behaviors. R1 received antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality), antidepressant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store schedule II-V controlled narcotic medications in manner in which only authorized staff had access and failed to ensure the quantity stored was minimal in order to identify potential drug diversion and/or missing doses, to include narcotic medications awaiting destruction. The facility had one locked cabinet inside the medication room, which was used for narcotic medications awaiting destruction. The administrator and facility staff did not know who had the key for the locked narcotic destruction cabinet and required maintenance staff to cut the lock off of the cabinet on [DATE], revealing the cabinet was full of narcotic controlled medications which had not been destroyed since at least February 2025. The facility audit revealed at least 55 narcotic medication prescriptions (of an unknown quantity for each) in which the facility could not account for. Findings included:- An onsite…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The census totaled 34 with 14 in the sample. Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide evidence they offered Covid-19 (highly contagious respiratory virus) immunizations to residents who resided at the facility. The facility further failed to provide signed consents/declinations and/or evidence of vaccination administration related the Covid-19 vaccine for Residents (R) 2, R6, R7, R11, and R16. Findings included- Upon request on 01/14/26 at 10:32 AM, the facility was unable to provide Covid-19 vaccination signed consents, declinations, or documentation of vaccination administrations for influenza, pneumococcal, and/or Covid-19 vaccinations for R2, R6, R7, R11, and R16. On 01/14/26 at 12:13 PM, Consultant Nurse C stated she was unable to find requested immunization documentation. During an interview with Consultant Nurse C at 05:45 PM on 01/14/26 she reported the facility Director of Nursing or Social Services would complete the immunization consent/declinations. She stated it was the responsibility of Administrative Nursing Staff B to oversee the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with three residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide Form CMS 10055- Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) to Resident (R) 29 and R42. Findings included:- Upon request of the Medicare Liability Notice, CMS 101123- Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and SNF ABN for R29, the facility provided a NOMNC, but no ABN for R29. The NOMNC documented R29's physical therapy services ended on 07/29/25 due to R29 meeting their goals. R29 signed the NOMNC on 07/25/25. The facility filled out the SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form and indicated the facility initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services with the resident having remaining benefit days. The form documented a SNF ABN was not provided as the facility was unaware the form needed to be completed. Upon request of the NOMNC and ABN for R42, the facility provided a NOMNC, but no ABN for R42. The NOMNC documented R42's Med A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician documented a rationale with risk versus benefit and nonpharmacological attempts prior to the use of antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medications for R1, the facility failed to ensure a 14-day stop date for an as needed (PRN) psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medication for R32, and the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) or provide a rationale against a GDR for psychotropic medications for R1, R32, and R3. Findings included:- R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) without behavioral disturbance and bipolar disorder (a major mental illness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete the Care Area Assessment (CAA) analysis of findings, related to a Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), for Resident (R) 1, R16, and R32, in order to address the underlying cause, risk factors, and other contributing factors to ensure the resident received care based on their individual needs. Findings included:- R1's admission MDS dated 03/17/25, triggered CAAs for cognitive loss/dementia, urinary incontinence/indwelling catheter, and psychotropic drug use. The triggered CAAs lacked completion with analysis of findings. R16's admission MDS dated 07/09/25, triggered CAAs for cognitive loss/dementia and activities of daily living (ADL) functional/rehabilitation potential. The triggered CAAs lacked completion with analysis of findings. R32's admission MDS dated 08/24/25, triggered CAAs for cognitive loss/dementia and behavioral symptoms. The triggered CAAs lacked completion with analysis of findings. On 01/20/26 at 01:01 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, individualized care plan to address Resident (R) 1's dementia diagnosis with behaviors, triggers, and interventions; and failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, individualized care plan to address R16's activities of daily (ADL) status and required assistance with ADLs. Findings included: - R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) without behavioral disturbance and bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 03/17/25 documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. R1 had no behaviors. R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to review and revise Resident (R) 32's comprehensive care plan to include fall prevention interventions following multiple falls in the facility. Findings included:- R32 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of diffuse traumatic brain injury (TBI-an injury to the brain caused by external forces) with loss of consciousness, adult failure to thrive, and other seizure (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles). R32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 08/24/25, documented R32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. R1 had no falls since admission. R32's Quarterly MDS dated 11/04/25, documented a BIMS was not conducted due to R32 being rarely/never understood. R32's Cognitive Loss/Dementia (a progressive mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 34 with 14 sampled and one reviewed for catheter use and urinary tract infection. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 11 who entered the facility with a urinary catheter received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and other catheter associated concerns of wounds to both inner thighs without the use of an anchor for the catheter. The resident admitted to the hospital on multiple occasions, received intravenous antibiotics, and returned to the facility with no monitoring or intervention to prevent further infection or wound development. Findings included:- Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Form 802 also known as the Matrix for Providers provided by the facility on 01/11/26 to the survey team lacked evidence any residents required the use of an indwelling catheter. Question 11 instructs the facility to note residents with an indwelling catheter. Review of R11's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with one resident reviewed for dialysis (blood purifying treatment given when kidney function is not optimum). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and failed to complete assessments after dialysis for Resident (R) 27. Findings included:- R27's electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) and chronic kidney disease stage 4 (CKD - kidneys are moderately or severely damaged and are not properly filtering waste from the blood). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R27 required partial to moderate assistance for sit to stand, chair,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide trauma-informed, individualized care including implementing a resident-specific care plan with identified triggers and interventions related to past trauma for Resident (R) 1. Findings included:- R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) without behavioral disturbance and bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. R1 had no behaviors. The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented R1 had a BIMS score of nine, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. R1 had no behaviors.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one reviewed for dementia care. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide dementia care and services for Resident (R) 1 when the facility failed to assess, identify, record, respond to, and reassess R1's specific behaviors and triggers to promote an environment, which supported R1's individualized care needs. Findings included:R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) without behavioral disturbance and bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 03/17/25 documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. R1 had no behaviors. R1 preferred reading books, newspapers, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents with 14 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 7, who had a history of sepsis, received needed dental care and services. R7 refused her dental visit on 10/30/25. The record lacked evidence of staff attempts to get R7 to a dentist after her 10/30/25 refusal, and approximately two months R7 began complaining of tooth pain. The records revealed R7 had an infection to her left lower molar, which caused her pain, affected her eating, and required antibiotics to treat. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident diagnoses included pain and sepsis. Review of the 08/11/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed R7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident had no rejection of care and was dependent on staff for most of her activities of daily living (ADL). The resident received scheduled pain medication, as needed (PRN) pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 33 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for Resident (R) 1, who was independently mobile, at risk for falls, and had impaired cognition. On 07/28/25 at approximately 06:45 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N let R1 out of the facility doors after R1 had requested to go outside. Staff reported they were unable to locate R1 in the facility and began searching for him at approximately 08:20 AM. Consultant HH thought R1 may have tried to return to his apartment at the Assisted Living (AL), across the street, and went to look for him. R1 was found in his electric wheelchair, sitting under a gazebo, in front of his previous apartment building. R1 drove his electric wheelchair several blocks down the road, into the surrounding neighborhood, after he was asked to return to the facility by staff. Staff followed R1 and got him to return to the facility. The facility's documentation recorded R1 was let out of the facility at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 30 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse coverage for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, placing all residents at risk of a lack of assessment and inappropriate care. Findings included: - A review of June 2024 and March 2025 nursing schedules revealed that no registered nurse was on duty on 06/08/24, 06/09/24, and 03/15/25. On 04/14/25 at 03:00 PM, Consulting Staff GG reported she was able to verify Registered Nurse coverage due to the staffing program, which had changed to a different company. Upon request, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse Coverage policy.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the required annual performance reviews were completed for five of the five staff members reviewed. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of receiving impaired care. Findings included: - A review of the facility nurse and nurse aide performance evaluations revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) H, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) RR, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N, CNA O, and CNA P, randomly selected employees, who had been employed for over a year, lacked an annual review. On 04/16/25 at 04:40 PM, Administrative Nurse D reported she could not locate or verify that the previously listed employees had not had an annual performance review. Upon request, the facility failed to provide an Employee Annual Performance Review policy.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have a system to account for controlled medications' receipt and disposition in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and conduct a periodic reconciliation to account for controlled medications in order to prevent loss or diversion. Findings included: - On 04/14/25 at 03:25 PM, the door to Administrative Nurse D's office, which had a keypad lock, opened easily without entering a code. No staff were present in the office at the time. On 04/15/25 at 02:55 PM, the door to Administrative Nurse D's office opened easily and no staff were present in the office. The charge nurse was in another office and contacted Administrative Nurse D who came in from outside the building. On 04/15/25 at 03:01 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified the emergency kit for narcotic medications was kept in her office. She stated when the emergency kit was received at the facility one of the three drawers was not closed and therefore unlocked.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespreadEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Consultant Pharmacist to review and identify irregularities in the 30 residents' drug regimen during December 2024. This deficient practice placed the 30 residents at risk for adverse consequences related to medication therapy to the extent possible, from a lack of oversight by a licensed pharmacist, and further placed R5 at risk for adverse consequences from medications. Findings included: - R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder, pain in the knee, diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), muscle spasms, repeated falls, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary condition for 30 residents who reside in the facility and received meals from the facility's kitchen, placing them at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 04/15/25 at 11:30 AM, during the tour of the kitchen, observation revealed: Dietary Staff (DS) CC preparing for the midday meal service. DS CC reported that he cooked eggs at the request of the residents. He stated the residents would request over-easy, sunny-side-up, and scrambled eggs. DS CC stated the facility used pasteurized eggs but was not able to verify that the eggs in the refrigerator were pasteurized. The back door entrance to the kitchen's bottom seal did not reach the ground completely, and outside light was visible. The window above the microwave, where bags of bread were stored, had a layer of brown dust on the window seal. The handwashing sink with an eyewash station bottle had dirt throughout the handles,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prioritize improvement, develop and implement action plans, conduct at least one Performance Improvement Project (PIP) annually, and regularly review, analyze, and act on data collected. This deficient practice placed the 30 residents of the facility at risk for a lack of quality improvement activities in their facility. Findings included: - Upon request, the facility did not provide documentation of any PIPs done in 2024 and 2025. On 04/16/25 at 05:20 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility had not started any Performance Improvement Project (PIP) this year and had no documentation of PIPS in the previous year. She stated the facility had seven administrators in the past two years. The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy, dated 06/24/2022, stated the facility would develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program. The QAPI program would include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to have a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee of the required membership which met at least quarterly and received reports from the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP). This deficient practice placed the 30 residents of the facility at risk for impaired care and services that met accepted standards of quality, identification of problems, and opportunities for improvement. Findings included: - The facility had QAA committee sign-in sheets for March 13, 2025, and April 10, 2025, but no others. The sign-in sheets lacked attendance for the medical director or their representative, the administrator (or governance leadership), or the consultant pharmacist. On 04/16/25 at 05:20 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility lacked documentation of the QAA committee meeting for 2024. She stated she had just texted a former employee to find out where the 2024 QAA committee sign-in sheets were. She stated she could not find any in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 30 residents. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to implement a water management program for the Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as from air-conditioning units for large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, chronic lung disease, or heavy tobacco use are most at risk of developing pneumonia caused by legionella). This placed the residents in the facility at risk for infectious disease. Findings included: - On 04/15/25 at 11:30 AM, Maintenance Staff U stated he attended training a couple of months ago to learn about Legionella prevention but had not developed a surveillance system yet. On 04/16/25 at 05:35 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility lacked a surveillance system for Legionella prevention. The facility's Legionella Surveillance policy, dated 06/26/24, stated potable (drinkable) water systems shall be routinely cleaned and disinfected.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 30 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the staff member designated as the Infection Preventionist (IP), who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program, completed the specialized training in infection prevention and control. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for lack of identification and treatment of infections. Findings included: - Upon request, the facility did not provide documentation of a current certified Infection Preventionist employed in the facility. On 04/14/25 at 01:30 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified the facility had no current certified IP. She stated she had only been employed here for four weeks and was unsure if the facility had an infection tracking system prior to that. The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program policy, dated 10/01/2022, stated the infection Preventionist was responsible for oversight of the infection prevention and control program. The infection Preventionist would serve as the leader in surveillance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 30 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an in-service training program for nurse aides that was appropriate and effective, as determined by nurse aide performance reviews and facility assessment, as specific to the needs of the resident population. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of inappropriate care and services. Findings included: - Upon review of the facility's Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) who had been employed for more than a year, random selection revealed CNA O, CNA P, and CNA N, lacked the required 12-hour in-service training. On 04/16/25 at 04:40 PM, Administrative Nurse D reported she was not able to verify the CNA 12-hour in-service required for CNAs. Upon request, the facility failed to provide a CNA-required 12-hour in-service.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 7 a Bed Hold notice when he was hospitalized . This deficient practice placed R7 at risk of not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. Findings included: - R7's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove expired medications from potential use. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of receiving expired or ineffective medication. Findings included: - On 04/14/25 at 03:25 PM, observation in the facility's medication room revealed the following expired stock medications: Three bottles of multivitamins with iron with a manufacturer's expiration date of 02/2025. One bottle of zinc tablets with a manufacturer's expiration date of 11/2024, and five bottles of zinc with a manufacturer's expiration date of 03/2025. Three bottles of Milk of Magnesia, 16 ounces, with a manufacturer's expiration date of 04/2024. A box of 14-milligram nicotine patches with a manufacturer's expiration date of 02/2025. On 04/14/25 at 03:25 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G verified the above medications were expired and should have been removed from possible use. Upon request, the facility failed to provide a policy for medication storage or expired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time Certified Dietary Manager for the 30 residents who reside in the facility and receive their meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk of not receiving adequate nutrition. Findings included: On 04/14/25 at 08:09 AM, observation revealed the kitchen staff finishing up the morning meal and preparing for the midday meal. Dietary Staff BB stated she was the manager and was not a Certified Dietary Manager. Dietary Staff BB stated she had not enrolled in a certification course at this time. Dietary Staff BB reported that the Registered Dietitian came monthly and was available by phone for consultation. Upon request, the facility failed to provide a Certified Dietary Manager Policy.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for immunizations, including pneumococcal (a disease that refers to a range of illnesses that affect various parts of the body and are caused by infection) vaccinations. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess Resident (R) 4 and R14 for eligibility to receive further pneumococcal vaccination. The facility failed to offer, or obtain an informed declination or a physician-documented contraindication for the pneumococcal PCV20 vaccination per the latest guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This placed the residents at risk for pneumococcal infection and related complications. Findings included: - Review of R4 and R14 clinical medical records lacked evidence the facility, resident, or the resident's representative received or signed a consent to receive or informed declinations for the pneumococcal vaccine PCV20. The immunizations noted no pneumococcal vaccination was given historically, had been offered, or declined. On 04/15/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify Resident (R) 6's guardian of the discharge and transfer of R6 to another facility until after his discharge from the facility. This placed the resident at risk for further decline and impaired health and well-being. Findings included: - R6's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), history of traumatic brain injury, aphagia (loss of the ability to swallow), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and convulsions (involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles). R6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R6 required supervision for eating and was dependent on staff for all other activities of daily living. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of facility-initiated transfers or discharge for Resident (R) 7. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between the facility and resident or their representative and possible missed opportunities for healthcare services for R7 and placed R7 at risk for impaired rights. Findings included: - R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify and implement interventions to prevent falls for Resident (R) 5. This placed the resident at risk for ongoing falls and injuries. Findings included: - R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder, pain in the knee, diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), muscle spasms, repeated falls, and intervertebral disc degeneration (the breakdown of bones in the back-spine). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R5 had moderately impaired cognition, and required supervision or touch assistance with activities of daily living, transfers,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 10, who had a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) and aggressive behavior toward others, with supervision, treatment, and services to attain or maintain highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This placed R10 at risk for unmet behavioral and psychosocial well-being needs. Finding included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia with anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R10 had moderately impaired cognition, inattention, disorganized thinking, and an altered level of consciousness, which fluctuated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 30 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 8 remained free from a significant medication error when staff failed to administer R8 seven physician-ordered medications for three days in a row. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for unalleviated pain, decreased ability to participate in rehabilitation, inability to sleep, and psychosocial impairment. Findings included: - R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cellulitis (skin infection caused by bacteria) of left lower leg, anemia (inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), acute embolism (an obstruction in a blood vessel due to a blood clot or other foreign matter that gets stuck while traveling through the bloodstream), thrombosis (clot that developed within a blood vessel) of deep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included two residents reviewed for pharmacy services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the availability of physician-ordered medications for Resident (R) 1 and R2. This deficient practice had the risk for physical complications and less than desired/therapeutic effects of prescribed medications for R1 and R2. Findings included: - R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 01/10/25. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of acute kidney injury (AKI - a sudden decline in kidney function that occurs within a short period), atrial fibrillation (a fib - rapid, irregular heartbeat), and hyperlipidemia (condition of elevated blood lipid levels). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 10/15/24 documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R1 received diuretic (medication to promote the formation and excretion of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-26 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 23 residents and 30 active resident trust fund accounts. The sample included nine residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to distribute quarterly statements to all residents that held trust fund accounts in the facility. This placed the residents at risk for uninformed decisions regarding their trust fund and misappropriation. Findings included: - Review of the Trial Balance as of 08/21/24 revealed 30 total accounts with a balance of $63,621.38. The Trial Balance documented R5 had a current trust fund balance of $3705.47. On 08/26/24 at 02:04 PM, R5's representative and responsible financial party stated she has never received a quarterly statement regarding R5's trust account. She stated she has made inquiries into any remaining balances from R5's trust account since R5 discharged in March 2024 but she has not received any answers or account balances. On 08/26/24 at 02:40 PM Administrative Staff C confirmed that she has never sent out any quarterly statements for any of the trust accounts at the facility. She stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-26 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 23 residents and 30 active resident trust fund accounts. The sample included nine residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the conveyance of personal funds within 30 days of discharge and/or death for Resident (R) 5, R6, R7, R8 and R9. This placed the residents at risk for impaired rights and misappropriation. Findings included: - Review of the Trial Balance as of [DATE] revealed 30 total accounts with a balance of $63,621.38. The Trial Balance documented R5 had a current trust fund balance of $3705.47. R5's Electronic Medical record (EMR) recorded R5 discharged from the facility on [DATE]. The Trial Balance documented R6 had a current trust fund balance of $8342.61. R6's EMR recorded she died in the facility on [DATE]. The Trial Balance documented R7 had a current trust fund balance of $20.46. R7's EMR recorded he died in the facility on [DATE]. The Trial Balance documented R8 had a current trust fund balance of $21.02. R8's EMR recorded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-26 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 23 residents and 30 active resident trusts accounts, held by the facility. The sample included nine residents. Based on observation. Interviews, and record review, the facility failed to hold, safeguard, and manage Resident (R)4's trust fund as required when the facility failed to obtain appropriate authorization to disperse or use monies from R4's trust fund. This placed R4 at risk for impaired rights and potential misappropriation. Findings included: - R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R4 had severely impaired cognition. Review of R4's trust transactions as listed on the Resident Statement Landscape revealed a personal need items debit of $124.61 dated 07/15/24 and a personal need item debit of $300.00 dated 07/18/24. A Withdrawal Receipt with a receipt number W000215 for record number 00006 dated 07/12/24 listed an amount of $124.61 for personal needs items. The receipt included a handwritten note that indicated the resident was unable to sign…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included three residents sampled for abuse. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1, R2, and R3 were free from mental abuse and intimidation. This deficient practice had the risk for further abuse, a decline in psychosocial well-being, and unwarranted physical complications for the affected residents. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), generalized muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal cares. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 06/30/23, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. R1 required extensive assistance with staff for bed mobility, dressing, and toileting; extensive assistance with two staff for transfers and personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 33 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the staff person designated as the Infection Preventionist, who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program, completed the specialized training and possessed the required certification in infection prevention and control. This placed the residents at risk for lack of identification and treatment of infections. Findings included: - On 07/27/23 at 09:00 AM, Administrative Nurse E stated she was responsible for the Infection Prevention and Control Program and lacked certification as an Infection Preventionist. Administrative Nurse E stated she had completed the training modules but had not yet taken the test or received the certification. The Facility Assessment Tool policy, dated 03/23/23 documented the Infection prevention and control program would establish and infection control prevention and control program (IPCP) that would include, at a minimum, the following elements (1) a system for preventing , identifying, reporting, investigating,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a care plan to ensure staff were aware of skin issues and treatments for Resident (R)13, and failed to develop a care plan fo the use of R15, R24, and R20's bed rails. This placed the residents at risk for complications related to uncommunicated and/or unmet care needs. Findings included: - R13's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), colon cancer, cerebrovascular accident (stroke), and right below the knee amputation (BKA). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R13 required staff supervision for eating and extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and hygiene. The MDS documented R13 had range of motion impairment in one lower extremity, used a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with six reviewed for side rails. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment, free from accident hazards, when the facility failed to ensure the opening of the side rails used for Resident (R)11, R24, R8 and R15's were within the acceptable safety limits. This placed the affected residents at risk for injuries related to preventable accidents. Findings included: - On 07/24/23 at 02:35 PM, observation revealed R11 sat in wheelchair in the room. Continued observation revealed an upside down U shaped side rail on the right side of the bed. The upside down U shaped side rail on the upper right side of the bed had an opening which measured approximately 13 inches by 19 inches. On 07/24/23 at 02:33 PM, observation revealed R24 sat in a wheelchair in the room. Continued observation revealed an upside down U shaped side rail on the right side of the bed. The upside down U shaped side rail on the upper right side of the bed had an opening which measured…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with six reviewed for side rails. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the actual side rail placed into use was assessed for safety for Resident (R)11, R24, R8 and R15's side rails. This placed the affected residents at risk for entrapment or injury. Findings included: - R11's diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident (CVA-sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia ( paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), and diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin.) R11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R11 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, facility staff failed to discard outdated vials of influenza (flu) vaccine in the medication room and failed to ensure Resident (R)31's expired insulin (hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) was disposed of. This placed residents at risk for receiving an expired/ineffective dose of the vaccine and R31 at risk to receive expired/ineffective insulin. Findings included: - On [DATE] at 08:44 AM, observation in the facility's medication room revealed 31 vials of influenza (flu) vaccine with expiration date [DATE]. On [DATE] at 09:47 AM, observation of the nurse's medication cart revealed R31's vial of Lispro (fast acting) insulin dated as opened [DATE] and expired [DATE]. On [DATE] at 10:03 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the above findings. The facility's policy for Medication Storage, dated [DATE], stated all medication rooms were routinely inspected by the consultant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a functional and sanitary environment for residents and staff in the facilty kitchen. Findings included: - On 07/24/23 at 09:30 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed the following: A hole in the wall above the three-compartment sink, where the exhaust fan had been removed, approximately 15-18 inch (in) in diameter to outside wall with louvres (a set of angled slats or flat strips fixed or hung at regular intervals in a door, shutter, or screen to allow air or light to pass through) closed, but small gaps of up to one-half by 12 inches. The ceiling by the vent hood had a stained ceiling tile, approximately two by four-foot. One of six ceiling fluorescent light fixtures had a broken cover and one was missing its cover. On 07/25/23 at 1:04 PM, Maintenance Staff (MS) U and Administrative Staff A verified the above findings and agreed the opening where the exhaust fan had been removed should have been sealed against pests. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with one reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide dignity and quality of life for Resident (R)137, by having an uncovered urinary collection bag visible to guests and other residents, placing the resident at risk for embarrassment and an undignified living environment. Findings included: - R137's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid,) hypertension (elevated blood pressure,) chronic kidney disease and palliative care (therapy designed to relieve or reduce intensity of uncomfortable symptoms.) R137's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact), and an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube in the bladder to drain urine). R137's Care Plan dated 07/22/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census 33 residents. The sample included 15 residents with one reviewed for speech therapy rehabilitation, Resident (R)31. Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to provide R31 the frequency of the physician ordered speech therapy sessions. This placed the resident at risk for decline. Findings included: - R31's diagnoses include hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) following cerebral infarction (CVA- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) of right dominant side, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, and reduced mobility. R31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had severely impaired cognition, required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and toileting, was totally dependent on staff for personal hygiene and dressing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-01-14 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the number of nursing (licensed and unlicensed) staff and actual hours worked were posted for all four days of the onsite survey. The facility failed to maintain the posted daily nurse staffing data for a minimum of 18 months. Findings included:- On 01/11/26 at 01:45 PM, an observation revealed the daily nursing staff numbers and hours were not posted in the facility. On 01/12/26 at 12:31 PM, an observation revealed the daily nursing staff numbers and hours were not posted in the facility. Review of daily posted staffing records revealed the facility did not have daily posted staffing sheets after 09/30/25. On 01/12/26 at 04:03 PM, Administrative Staff A stated the facility did not have the daily staffing posted. Administrative Staff A slapped her hand on the wall next to her and stated it normally goes right here, but we do not have it. Administrative Staff A stated, I am just being honest with you; we do not have it. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-07-27 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to deliver mail to the facility residents on Saturdays. Findings included: - On 07/26/23 at 01:00 PM during the resident council meeting, the residents verbalized there was no mail delivery on Saturdays. On 07/26/23 at 01:30 PM, Activity Staff Z stated the Activity Director, and the Social Service Designee would get the mail during the weekdays at the post office box downtown, then deliver the mail to the residents. Activity Staff Z verified the mail should be delivered to the residents on Saturdays and verified the facility did not pick up or deliver mail to the residents on Saturdays. The facility Resident Rights policy, undated, documented the resident has the right to send and receive mail, and emails. The facility failed to deliver mail to the residents in the facility on Saturdays.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$192,235 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $111,378 — penalty dated 2026-01-14
- $13,829 — penalty dated 2025-11-19
- $21,453 — penalty dated 2025-07-31
- $45,575 — penalty dated 2024-08-26
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-01-22 for 49 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175323. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.