Evergreen Community Of Johnson County

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.49 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 70 residents. The sample included 19 with seven reviewed for accidents. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to utilize safe heat therapy practices for Resident (R) 64. This deficient practice resulted in a second degree (potentially painful burn which affects the first and second layer of the skin) burn on R64's right knee. The facility additionally failed to ensure a safe environment related to maintaining R22's wheelchair and bed fall-prevention alarm. This deficient practice placed R22 at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R64's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), seizures (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), muscle weakness, and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). R64's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 78 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for falls. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff followed Resident (R) 1's care planned interventions to prevent falls. As a result of this deficient practice, R1 fell and sustained fractures of the right superior (upper) and inferior (lower) pubic rami (two sections of bone that branch off the pubic body). Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) moderate without behavioral disturbance, dizziness and giddiness, fracture of left pubis (pair of bones forming two sides of the pelvis) subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, orthostatic hypotension (blood pressure dropping with change of position), need for assistance with personal care, lack of coordination, and unsteadiness on feet. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 03/24/23 documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 79 residents with one kitchen and two kitchenettes. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards related to food storage. Findings included: - On 02/23/26 at 11:03 AM, during the kitchen initial tour, observation in the walk-in freezer revealed the following:One resealable bag of three fish fillets that was not labeled and dated.One opened bag of pepperoni, which was not labeled and dated. One opened bag of tater tots placed in a resealable bag; the bag was not dated. One opened bag of cauliflower florets, which was not labeled and dated. On 02/23/26 at 11:10 AM an observation in the kitchen's dry food storage room revealed one opened and undated bag of egg noodles. On 02/23/26 at 11:16 AM an observation in the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator revealed one metal bowl with plastic wrap covering the top. The bowl contained several slices of molded cheddar cheese. On 02/23/26 at 11:21 AM an observation in the kitchen's walk-in produce refrigerator revealed the following:One bag of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 79 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with one resident reviewed for tube feeding (administration of nutritionally balanced liquefied foods or nutrients through a tube). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure R2's tube feeding was labeled with content in the feeding bag and dated with the date the feeding was given. Finding Included:- R2's electronic medical record (EMR), under the Diagnosis tab, recorded diagnoses of muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, hypertension (elevated blood pressure), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R2 had impairment on both sides of her lower body. The MDS documented R6 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 70 residents with one kitchen and two main dining rooms. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to cleaning, food storage, equipment storage, and food preparation practices. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk related to food-borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Finding Included: - On 04/29/24 at 07:04 AM an initial walkthrough of the kitchen was completed. An inspection of a utensil storage rack next to the kitchen main entry revealed two Crock-pot lids and a water pitcher lid stored with the food/beverage side upward. An inspection of the kitchen's fryer station revealed old crumbs and food particles covering the outside of the fryer and the side of the baking oven next to it. An inspection of the kitchen's dry food storage revealed old pieces of food on the floor throughout the storage room. On 04/30/24 at 02:30 PM Dietary Staff CC completed hand hygiene and prepped the dinner puree meal. Dietary Staff CC prepared to make pureed tuna noodle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 70 residents. The sample included 19 residents with two residents reviewed for accommodation of needs related to assistive devices. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)47 with a wheelchair lap meal tray as care planned for his meals. The facility additionally failed to ensure R39's call light remained within reach while unsupervised in her room. This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for impaired quality of life and care. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R47's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain, Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), memory deficit, left-sided hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), left-sided hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), and dementia (progressive mental disorder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 70 residents. The sample included 19 residents with five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)39 received the required assistance with ADLs. This placed R39 at risk for complications including skin breakdown, discomfort, and impaired psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R39's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory), dysplasia oropharyngeal phase (difficulty initiating a swallow), combined systolic and diastolic heart failure (the heart cannot effectively contract with each heartbeat in diastolic heart failure your heart cannot relax between heartbeats), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), and anxiety (an emotion characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts, and physical changes). R39's Quarterly Minimum Data Set dated 02/06/24 documented that a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 70 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with one resident reviewed for activities. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)39 the opportunity to go to the activities she enjoys. This deficient practice placed R39 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R39's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory), dysplasia oropharyngeal phase (difficulty initiating a swallow), combined systolic and diastolic heart failure (the heart cannot effectively contract with each heartbeat in diastolic heart failure your heart cannot relax between heartbeats), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), and anxiety (an emotion characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts, and physical changes). R39's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] lacked documented the interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 70 residents. The sample included 19 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician-documented rationale for extended use of an as-needed psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medication for Resident (R) 29, and R40. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk for unnecessary medication administration thus leading to possible harmful side effects. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), delusion (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a staff interview that indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 70 residents. The sample included 19 residents with one resident reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure collaboration between the nursing home and hospice services to identify hospice-supplied services, supplies, medication, and equipment for Resident (R)47. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for delayed services and uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R47's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain, Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), memory deficit, left-sided hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), left-sided hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). R47's Quarterly Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 72 residents. The facility had one main kitchen and three satellite kitchens. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure food stored in the satellite kitchen refrigerator was properly stored, labeled and dated. The facility failed to ensure that expired items in the satellite refrigerators were discarded. The deficient practice left the resident at risk of food borne illnesses. Findings included: - An inspection of a satellite kitchen/dining closest to the main lobby on 09/13/22 at 08:29 AM revealed the following: One gallon jug of milk sat directly on the serving counter without a cooling ice bath or any way to maintain adequate temperature. A large bin of ice sat on a wheeled cart with the ice scoop stuck directly in the ice. A dish storage cart was stored in the dining room with the clean dishes (plates and bowls) stored eating surface up and uncovered. An inspection of a satellite kitchen area refrigerator on 09/13/22 at 08:49 AM revealed the following: Several pieces of bacon wrapped in a paper towel that was not in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  - On 09/14/22 at 12:03 PM R15 sat in a Broda chair (special wheelchair) in the dining room. Her drink on the table was placed out of her reach. R15 sat in the dining room table from 12:03 PM to 12:25 PM with a drink she was unable to reach until staff sat down next R15 to assist her with lunch. On 09/14/22 at 12:14 PM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M stood beside R68 in the dining room as she assisted R68 with her lunch. On 09/19/22 at 02:01 PM Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R stated staff should sit down next to the resident that they are assisting at meals times and talk to the resident not other staff members. CMA R stated the staff try to deliver the food to everyone at the table around the same time. On 09/19/22 at 02:18 PM Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated staff should always sit next to the residents at meal time to encourage and assist them if needed. LN H stated the staff tried to serve everyone at the same table at the same time. On 09/19/22 at 04:35 PM Administrative Nurse D stated staff should sit down next to the resident when they assist with a meal. Administrative Nurse D…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,913 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $12,854 — penalty dated 2024-05-01
• $10,059 — penalty dated 2023-10-03
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-28 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS