Village Shalom INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 229 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 143 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 55.0 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.34 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.89 on weekdays — 2% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.89 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with six reviewed for pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement preventative measure to prevent facility acquired pressure ulcers for three sampled residents. As a result, Resident (R) 26 developed facility acquired deep tissue injuries (DTI-localized areas of tissue damage of necrosis that develop because of pressure) to his right heel and his right and left outer malleolus (a bony projection on either side of the ankle), a Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss into but no deeper than the dermis including intact or ruptured blisters) pressure ulcer on his left heel, and a Stage 1 (pressure wound which appears reddened, does not blanche, and may be painful but is not open)on his left buttocks (the fleshy round parts…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with five reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 31, who fell in the facility courtyard and fractured (broken) her right arm and right middle finger. The facility further failed to ensure a safe environment for R50, who fell in his room and fractured his nasal bone, fractured his lumbar transverse process (the bony projection on either side of your spine), sustained a laceration (cut) to his left eye, and bruising to his right side. These failures placed the residents at risk for further falls and related injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R31 documented diagnoses of malignancy neoplasm of the colon (colon cancer), confusional arousal (when a sleeping person appears to wake up, but their behavior is unusual or strange), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The facility had one main kitchen, three kitchenettes, and dining areas. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that opened packages of frozen foods were stored in a sealed bag with a label and an open date. The facility failed to ensure staff wore a hairnet when in the kitchen food preparation and serving areas. The facility failed to ensure staff delivered plates of food in a sanitary manner. The facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene after serving residents their plates and or drinks. This placed residents at risk of food-borne illnesses. Findings included: - During the initial tour of the main kitchen area on 06/02/25 at 07:08 AM, the following was noted: Dietary Staff CC was noted not to be wearing a hairnet to cover his hair and was not wearing a beard net to cover his facial hair and beard. In the food prep freezer were three opened brown bags of frozen potato products. The bags had not been placed into a sealed bag and the items had no label or open date present. On 06/02/25 at 12:17…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with three reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to secure pressurized supplemental oxygen tanks in a safe, locked area, and out of reach of the 11 cognitively impaired independently mobile residents. The facility additionally failed to provide Resident (R) 19 with consistent supervision during her meals and ensure her call light remained within reach. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings included: - On 06/05/25 at 07:10 AM, an inspection of an unlocked supply closet in the dining area of the 700 hall revealed 13 fully pressurized supplemental oxygen cylinders stored in floor racks. An inspection of a storage closet next to the supply closet revealed unsecured cleaning chemicals. The containers contained the warning, Keep out of reach of children, hazardous to humans can cause eye irritation, harmful if swallowed. On 06/05/25 at 07:16 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) K stated the rooms should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 65 residents. The facility identified eleven residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene before performing glucose checks, and before performing intravenous (IV - administered directly into the bloodstream via a vein) administration. The facility further failed to sanitize the Hoyer (total body mechanical lift) lift between residents. This defiant practice placed residents at risk of infections. Included findings: - On 06/02/25 at 11:44 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G performed a blood glucose checks for Resident (R)163. LN G cleaned the glucometer (an instrument used to calculate blood glucose), with alcohol wipes, LN G wiped R163's finger with the same alcohol wipe and then wiped the hub of the insulin pen. LN G did not perform hand hygiene before preparing the glucometer. On 06/02/25 at 12:18 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with one reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a dignified care environment for Residents (R) 31. This deficient practice placed R31 at risk for impaired dignity and unmet care needs. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), muscle weakness, overactive bladder, and need for assistance with personal cares. R31's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 04/06/25 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of zero, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted he exhibited wandering and rejection of care behaviors one to three days a week. The MDS indicated he was dependent on staff assistance for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with three residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) form 10055 Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) and the CMS form-10123 Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form was provided to Resident (R) 165. This placed R165 at risk of uninformed treatment decisions and unexpected costs. Findings included: - Review of R165 ' s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Progress Note dated 02/03/25 at 04:41 PM documented staff met with R165's daughter and contacted the physician. Staff spoke to R165 regarding the last day covered and discharge to long-term care (LTC) on 02/07/25. Staff discussed with the NOMNC and the right to appeal. Staff discussed a room for the resident in the neighborhood of preference and would coordinate a transition date. The SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form (CMS-20052) completed by social…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) for Resident (R) 50 and R1, who had a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, or behavior) medications and related complications. This deficient practice placed R50 and R1 at risk for ineffective treatment, unnecessary medication use, and unwarranted side effects.Findings included:- R50's Electronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with three reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 19 with consistent assistance and supervision during mealtime. This deficient practice placed R19 at risk for potential risk related to impaired nutrition and weight loss. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), insomnia (difficulty sleeping), anxiety (cognitive or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and speech/language deficits. R19's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 04/02/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated she was dependent on staff assistance for bathing, transfers, bed mobility, personal hygiene, and dressing. The MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 65 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for daily weights to monitor for congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid) for Resident (R) 50. This deficient practice placed R50 at risk for delay in treatment related to fluid overload and untreated illness. Findings included: - R17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), peripheral vascular disease (PVD - slow and progressive circulation disorder causing narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel), retention of urine, kidney disease, edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with three reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 19's pressure-reducing interventions were implemented correctly when R19's low air-loss mattress pumps were not set within her current weight range. This deficient practice placed R19 at risk for complications related to skin breakdown and pressure ulcers. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), insomnia (difficulty sleeping), anxiety (cognitive or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and speech/language deficits. R19's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 04/02/25 noted a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to address the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommendations for Resident (R) 50's Midodrine (hypotension (low blood pressure) medication). The facility also failed to ensure the physician had documented the rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of a non-approved indication use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat a mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) medication for R50 and R1 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). This deficient practice placed R50 and R1 at risk for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,153 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $16,153 — penalty dated 2023-10-19
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-14 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS