No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Phillips County Retirement Center

1300 State Street, Phillipsburg, KS 67661 · Non profit - Corporation · 40 certified beds · (785) 543-2131 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1150 State St · (785) 543-5226 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
300 State St · (785) 543-5131 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
934 3rd St · (785) 543-5412 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.9%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.4%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection8.7%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%6.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.0%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.7%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication58.8%23.2%18.9%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%4.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.2%22.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.1%18.1%17.1%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.09
RN hours/ resident / day
1.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.21
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.06
RN hoursweekends
38.7%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 29.1 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.09 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.03 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.42 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.10 to 0.06 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-11)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 31 residents. There were 12 residents in the sample with one reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 14 remained free from neglect when the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services, including supervision required by R14 to promote his safety and well-being. On 04/14/24 at approximately 02:00 PM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M assisted R14 into the courtyard off the dining room. CNA M then left for the day while R14 remained outside with no ability to contact the facility or get back inside. Around supper time, at approximately 04:00 to 05:00 PM, staff noted R14's absence. CNA P found R14 outside and R14 was unresponsive. Staff brought R14 inside the facility and assessed his vital signs. R14's body temperature was 104.9 degrees Fahrenheit (F.), and he had a pulse of 144 beats per minute. Staff began cooling measures and R14 became more responsive. R14 went to the Emergency Department…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 29 residents with 12 residents included in the sample and three residents reviewed for accident hazards. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide resident centered analysis after falls and interventions aimed to prevent falls for Resident (R)3, who had multiple falls with incomplete investigations of the causal factors and implementation of interventions to prevent further falls.Findings included:- R3's Electronic Health Record (EHR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and age-related osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk).R3's 10/07/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) could not be completed because the resident was rarely or never understood. Per staff assessment, R3 had memory problems and moderately impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for at least eight continuous hours daily as required. Additionally, the facility failed to employ a full-time RN to serve in the role of Director of Nurses (DON). Findings included:- Observation of the daily staffing posting sheet in the facility on 03/09/26 at 08:00 AM, 03/10/26 at 09:00 AM and 03/11/26 at 10:00 AM revealed no RN hours documented. Review of the Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data Report for fiscal year (FY) Quarter 4 2025 (July 1 to September 30) documented no RN hours on the following dates:07/01 Tuesday (TU); 07/02 Wednesday (WE); 07/04 Friday (FR); 07/05 Saturday (SA); 07/06 Sunday (SU); 07/07 Monday (MO); 07/08 (TU); 07/09 (WE); 07/10 (TH); 07/11 (FR); 07/12 (SA); 07/13 (SU); 07/14 (MO); 07/15 (TU); 07/16 (WE); 07/17 (TH); 07/20 (SU); 07/21 (MO); 07/22 (TU); 07/23 (WE); 07/24 (TH); 07/25 (FR); 07/26 (SA); 07/27 (SU); 07/28 (MO); 07/29 (TU); 07/31 (TH) 08/01 (FR); 08/02 (SA); 08/03 (SU); 08/04 (MO); 08/05…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement the core elements of antibiotic stewardship to ensure an effective infection prevention and control program including antibiotic stewardship for the residents of the facility.Findings included:- Review of the Infection Control Log for tracking and trending infections from March 2025 through February 2026, lacked evidence of organism identification, duration of prescribed antibiotics, and the infections treated. The facility was unable to provide this upon request. On 03/10/26 at 10:39 AM, Administrative Nurse D confirmed she was also the facility's Infection Preventionist. She said she tracked who was taking an antibiotic in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). She stated she was unable to provide tracking and trending for antibiotics. Administrative Nurse D stated the floor nurses would open the infection document for tracking, but the nurses would not fill out the form. She stated the only documents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-11 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 29 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to designate a staff member with the required qualification and certification as the Infection Preventionist, responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program.Findings included: - During the entrance conference Administrative Staff A stated Administrative Nurse D was the Infection Preventionist for the facility. He stated she was a Licensed Nurse (LN) and had been continuing education for infection prevention.The facility provided documentation of continuing education topic for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EHB) and how to implement a surveillance plan for antibiotic stewardship.On 03/10/26 at 10:36 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated she had been doing the Infection Preventionist duties for the facility. She stated she had been doing continuing education hours but did not have her certificate as an Infection Preventionist. Administrative Nurse D stated the facilities plan was for her to take the course and get her Infection Preventionist certificate.The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 29 residents with 12 residents sampled. Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure completion of four residents comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments related to completion of the Care Area Assessments (CAA). Findings included:- R1's 09/28/25 Annual MDS triggered the following CAA areas, but were not completed:Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Functional / Rehabilitation PotentialUrinary Incontinence and Indwelling CatheterFallsNutritional StatusDehydration/Fluid MaintenanceDental CarePressure Ulcer/InjuryPsychotropic Drug Use R3's 10/07/25 Annual MDS triggered the following CAA areas, but were not completed:Cognitive Loss / DementiaCommunicationUrinary Incontinence and Indwelling CatheterBehavioral SymptomsFallsPressure Ulcer/InjuryPsychotropic Drug UsePain R4's 08/25/25 Annual MDS triggered the following CAA areas, but were not completed:Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Functional / Rehabilitation PotentialUrinary Incontinence and Indwelling CatheterNutritional StatusPressure Ulcer/InjuryPhysical RestraintsPain R20's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 29 residents, with 12 residents sampled. Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure accurate completion of five residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments related to the utilization of bedrails as restraints. Findings included:- R2's 01/20/25 Quarterly MDS documented bed rails were utilized as physical restraints daily during the look-back period. R4's 11/25/25 Quarterly MDS documented bed rails were utilized as physical restraints daily during the look-back period. R10's 01/16/26 Quarterly MDS documented bed rails were utilized as physical restraints daily during the look-back period. R11's 02/15/26 Quarterly MDS documented bed rails were utilized as physical restraints daily during the look-back period. R24's 12/20/25 Quarterly MDS documented bed rails were utilized as physical restraints daily during the look-back period. On 03/10/26 at 04:06 PM, Administrative Nurse D confirmed she had indicated bed rails as restraints on the MDS assessments of residents in the facility whose beds had bed rails installed on them,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 29 residents, with one medication room, three medication carts, and one treatment cart. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure medication storage for unauthorized staff and residents when licensed nursing staff left a medication cart unlocked and unsupervised. Findings included:- During an observation on 03/09/26, at 02:08 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H approached a medication cart parked directly outside of the nurse's station. She prepared medications in a small cup, locked her computer screen, and walked away from the medication cart that remained unlocked. LN H then walked down the hall into a resident's room, leaving the unlocked medication cart unattended by staff. The medication cart's lock remained outward, indicating the lock was not engaged, which left the cart accessible to anyone who attempted to access it. When the LN returned to the cart, she logged into her computer, prepared medications for another resident, locked her monitor screen and after closing the medication drawer she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The facility identified two residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) mask and R9, R7, and R6's nebulizer (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) masks were stored in a sanitary manner when not in use. The facility failed to ensure staff were wearing proper personal protective equipment (PPE) for EBP when doing direct care. The facility failed to transport dirty laundry using acceptable infection control practices. Findings included:- On 03/09/26 at 07:48 AM, during the initial walk-through of the facility, R1's CPAP mask laid directly on her bedside table. R1's CPAP mask was not stored in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dependent Resident (R)20 was clothed appropriately when sitting in the TV area with her peers.Findings Included:- R20's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), pain, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R20's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)21's as-needed lorazepam (antianxiety medications that calm and relax people) cream had a 14-day stop date, or a specified duration with a physician's rationale for extended use.Findings included:- R21's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin),R21's Quarterly Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R21 needed substantial/maximal assistance for all activities of daily living except eating. The MDS documented R21 received an antidepressant (a class of medications used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 31 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a full-time Registered Nurse as Director of Nursing (DON) and failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week placing all residents who resided in the facility at risk of lack of inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the January - December 2023 nursing schedule revealed no Registered Nurse for eight consecutive hours on more than 50 dates. On 05/15/24 at 09:44 AM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility did not employ a full-time RN as DON. Administrative Staff A verified the lack of Registered Nurse coverage on the dates reviewed and stated he had not been able to get an RN for eight consecutive hours. Administrative Staff A stated he was unable to get an RN except every once in a while from an agency. The facility's Job Description-Director of Nursing Policy, undated, documented the purpose under the direction of the facility administrator, the DON's primary responsibility was to ensure the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to implement a water management program for the Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as from air-conditioning units for large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, chronic lung disease, or heavy tobacco use are most at risk of developing pneumonia caused by legionella) and other waterborne pathogens. This placed the residents in the facility at risk for infectious disease. Findings Included: - On 05/16/24 at 11:00 AM, Maintenance Staff U verified he was not aware of any routine facility water management checks and verified the 300 hall was presently not in use. Maintenance Sraff U stated staff do not flush water in the unoccupied rooms but did occasionally use the shower room in the 300 hall for one resident at the facility. On 05/16/24 at 11:20 AM, Administrative Staff A verified the city checked the water monthly but stated he did not have any records of the monthly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards with staff left a gallon chemical bottle in an unlocked bottom cabinet in one of three kitchenettes. This placed the 12 cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents at risk for preventable accidents or injuries. Findings included: - On 05/13/24 at 11:44 AM, observation revealed an unlocked cabinet underneath the sink, in a kitchenette, located off the family dining room. The unlocked cabinet contained a plastic gallon bottle of Attack [NAME] Enzyme (a molecule that enhances cleaning performance while decreasing environmental impact) odor digester, drain opener, and maintainer. The label on the bottle reads Keep out of reach of children, avoid contact with eyes, and may cause skin irritation. On 05/13/24 at 11:48 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G verified the above finding and stated the cabinet should be locked. LN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to report an incident of neglect for Resident (R) 14 to the State Agency as required. This placed the resident at risk for ongoing neglect. Findings included: - R14 ' s Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk) spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities,) and muscle weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had intact cognition, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. The resident required extensive staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and was dependent on staff for chair-to-bed transfers and sit-to-lying positioning. R14 used a wheelchair for mobility. The resident received opioids (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident of neglect for Resident (R)14. This placed R14 at risk for unidentified and ongoing neglect. Findings included: - R14 ' s Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk) spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities,) and muscle weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had intact cognition, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. The resident required extensive staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and was dependent on staff for chair-to-bed transfers and sit-to-lying positioning. R14 used a wheelchair for mobility. The resident received opioids (a class of medications to relieve pain),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to review and revise Resident (R) 26's Care Plan with interventions for the care of R26's stasis ulcers (open wound caused by problems with blood flow (circulation ) in your leg veins) on her shins. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R26's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R26 had diagnoses of weakness, neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet), and localized edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues). R26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R26 required partial to moderate staff assistance with most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician acknowledged and responded to the Consultant Pharmacist's recommendation for the required stop date for Resident (R)19's as needed (PRN) antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people) medication. This placed R19 at risk for unintended effects related to psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) drug medications. Findings include: - R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear,) and hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure.) R19's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R19 had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS recorded R19 was independent with most activities of daily living (ADL.) The MDS recorded R19 received an antianxiety and antidepressant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a 14-day stop date or a specified duration with rationale for R19's ongoing as-needed (PRN) antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people) medication. This placed R19 at risk for unintended effects related to psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) drug medications. Findings include: - R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear,) and hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure.) R19's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R19 had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS recorded R19 was independent with most activities of daily living (ADL.) The MDS recorded R19 received an antianxiety and antidepressant (medication used to treat depression) medication during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications appropriately when staff did not label Resident (R)4s' insulin (a hormone that allows cells throughout the body to uptake glucose) flex pens with the date opened and discard date on one treatment cart. These deficient practices placed the affected resident at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included: - On 05/13/24 at 10:30 AM, observation of the treatment cart revealed the following: R4's Basaglar (long-acting insulin) flex pen lacked an open date and discard date. On 05/13/24 at 10:35 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the nurses were to date the flex pens when opened and discard the expired insulin and expired medications. The facility's Medication Storage and Labeling policy, undated, documented medications and biologicals in medication rooms, carts, boxes, and refrigerators were maintained within secured (locked) locations, clean and sanitary, and maintained temperatures in accordance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for hospice (a type of health care that focuses on the terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life) services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care, which coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice, was developed and available for Resident (R)12. This placed R12 at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care. Findings included: - R12's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure,) aphasia (a condition with disordered or absent language function), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion. R12's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R12 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for immunization. Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to obtain the resident or the DPOA signed consent to receive the influenza immunizations for Resident (R) 4, R13, and R18. This placed the residents at risk for influenza infection and related complications. Findings included: - Review of R4, R13, and R18's clinical medical records lacked evidence the facility or the resident's representative received or was offered the current influenza vaccine during the flu season. On 05/16/24 at 11:00 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated residents were offered the influenza vaccinations yearly and the facility sent out the consent forms. Administrative Nurse D said the facility did not receive all the forms back and did not follow up, so some residents did not receive the yearly flu vaccinations. Administrative Nurse D verified some of the residents' representatives were hard to get ahold of and did not return the forms. The facility's Immunization Policy, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-16 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to deliver mail to the facility residents on Saturdays. This placed the residents at risk for impaired psychosocial wellbeing. Findings included: - On 06/13/22 at 01:00 PM during the resident council meeting, the residents verbalized there was no mail delivery on Saturdays. On 06/13/22 at 01:45 PM, Administrative Staff A stated the housekeeping staff were supposed to get the mail on the weekend, then deliver the mail to the residents. Administrative Staff A verified the mail should consistently be delivered to the residents on Saturdays; Admisnitrative Staff A verified the facility did not always deliver mail to the residents on Saturdays. The undated facility policy Resident Rights, documented the resident has the right to send and receive mail, and to receive letters, packages, and other materials delivered to the facility through any other means than a postal service. The facility failed to deliver mail to the residents in the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan with interventions to prevent accidents for three sampled residents, Resident (R) 11, R18, R30 and R10, who had falls. This placed the residents at risk for further injury and skin breakdown. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R11 had diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), depression ( abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness, and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R11 had severely impaired cognition, required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility and was independent with transfers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with nine reviewed for falls. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, accident free environment when the facility failed to prevent a skin tear and loss of a toenail while getting Resident (R)19 into the facility whirlpool, failed to implement meaningful, resident centered interventions for four sampled residents, R11, R18, R30 and R10, who were at risk and had falls. The facility further failed to ensure environment was as free of hazards as possible when the facility stored chemicals in unsecured areas accessible to residents. This placed the residents at risk for falls, and accident related injury . Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R19 recorded diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) affecting the left non-dominant side, dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prepare, store, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions for the 29 residents in the facility who received their meals from the facility kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 06/12/22 at 07:45 AM, during initial tour, observation revealed the following: Seven 18 inches by 3 foot fluorescent lights, located above the food preparation area, with plastic light covers, with a brownish speckled discolored material in the light cover with one light cover with approximately eight inch crack. Continued observation revealed the stove hood had a grey fuzzy substance along the edges of the hood with grey fuzzy substance covering the two fire suppression spigots over the stove and on the louvers of the stove hood exhaust. On 06/13/22 at 01:10 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the overhead fluorescent light fixture with brown substance in the covers and one cracked light cover.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for notification of change. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician in a timely manner when Resident (R) 18 developed a change from her baseline/normal behaviors. This placed the resident at risk for physical decline and delayed treatment. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R18 had diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurological disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, mask like faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). emotional disorder (chronic and often recurrent psychiatric disorders that are associated with significant impairment in quality of life, productivity, and interpersonal functioning), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and intellectual impairment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-16 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for restraints (any manual method, physical or mechanical device, equipment, or material that is attached or adjacent to the resident's body, cannot be removed easily by the resident, and restricts the resident's freedom of movement or normal access to his/her body). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a physician's order and an assessment for Resident (R) 30's a merry-walker (an enclosed framed wheeled walker), placing the resident at risk for complications related to physical restraints. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R30 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to administration staff for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 19, who had a skin tear of unknown origin on his right hand. This placed the resident at risk for further injury and unidentified abuse or mistreatment. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R19 recorded diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) affecting the left non-dominant side, dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and contracture of the left hand (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated 05/12/22, documented R19 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent upon two staff for transfers, toileting and extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and dressing. The MDS further documented R19 did not have any skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for skin issues. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide preventative interventions related to skin issues for two sampled residents, Resident (R)25 who developed a non-pressure skin issues and R19, who experienced a skin tear of unknown origin. This deficient practice placed R25 and R19 at increased risk for skin injuries. Findings included: - R25's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 05/17/22, documented diagnoses of an open wound to the buttock. The Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R25 required supervision for eating and extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, and dressing. The MDS documented R25 had an open lesion on her buttocks. The Pressure Ulcer Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 02/20/22, documented R25 had a diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for pain. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide interventions during wound care to manage Resident (R) 25's distress and pain. This placed the resident at risk for prolonged and unnecessary pain or distress. Findings included: - R25's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 05/17/22, documented diagnoses of open wound of buttock, and dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning). The Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R25 required supervision for eating and extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, and dressing. The MDS documented R25 had an open lesion on her buttocks, received scheduled pain medication, had vocal complaints of pain daily, and received opioid medication seven days of the look back period. The Pressure Ulcer Care Area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-16 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for side rails. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess Resident (R) 17's bed side rails for safety, This deficient practice placed R17 at risk for entrapment or injury. Findings included: - R17 was admitted to the facility 04/28/22 for skilled care related to muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R17 required assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and dressing. The MDS documented R17 had a fall prior to admission, no falls since admission, and no restraints were used. The ADL Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 05/11/22, documented R17 needed staff assistance to get in and out of bed and was independent in rolling left and right once in bed. The Care Plan, dated 04/28/22, lacked side rail information. R17's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to respond to the consultant pharmacist (CP) notification of the inappropriate diagnosis for antipsychotic medications (type of psychiatric medication which are available on prescription to treat psychosis and are licensed to treat certain types of mental illness) for two of five residents reviewed, Resident (R)5 and R10. This deficient practice placed R10 and R5 at risk for continued use of antipsychotic medications without an appropriate diagnosis. Findings included: - R5's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 05/10/22, documented diagnoses of anxiety disorder (persistent feeling of anxiety or dread), vascular dementia (dementia caused by an impaired supply of blood to the brain), and recurrent major depression (persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review two of five residents reviewed, Resident (R)5 and R10 had an inappropriate diagnosis for antipsychotic medications (type of psychiatric medication which are available on prescription to treat psychosis and are licensed to treat certain types of mental illness). This deficient practice placed R5 and R10 at risk for continued use of antipsychotic medications without an appropriate diagnosis. Findings included: - R5's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 05/10/22, documented diagnoses of anxiety disorder (persistent feeling of anxiety or dread), vascular dementia (dementia caused by an impaired supply of blood to the brain), and recurrent major depression (persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered per physician orders for Resident (R) 18, who received the wrong dosage of Sinemet (dopamine promoter medication) nine times a day for eight days. This placed R18 at risk for adverse side effects and complications related to medications errors. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R18 had diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurological disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, mask like faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). emotional disorder (chronic and often recurrent psychiatric disorders that are associated with significant impairment in quality of life, productivity, and interpersonal functioning), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-03-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough facility wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Findings included:- On 03/09/26 at 10:45 AM, Administrative Staff A provided an undated Long-Term Care Self-Assessment.Review of the assessment revealed the following:The assessment failed to identify the specific staffing levels needed for each unit and identify the number of Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Nurses (LPN/LVN), Certified Medication Aides (CMA), and Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) needed for each unit, patient acuity, and census. The assessment lacked staffing levels required for each shift to include evenings and weekends.The assessment failed to fully document the condition reports of the residents in the facility or document any potential extenuating circumstances that would make the condition report unusual.The assessment failed to document staff competencies…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 17E658. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next