Redbud Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 34 beds and averages 32.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Actual harm · G2026-03-23 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 33 residents, with 15 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property through diversion. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of medications for 15 cognitively impaired residents including some controlled substances, which resulted in missed medications for the affected residents. Findings included: The Facility Incident Report, dated 02/13/26, documented on 02/08/26 at 06:30 AM, Laundry Staff U went into the soiled utility room to pick up dirty laundry. When Laundry Staff U was transferring the dirty laundry to the laundry bin, she came across a black trash bag that made a noise when she picked it up. Laundry Staff U opened the bag and saw a bunch of pills. She took the pills to the LN G. LN G notified the facility's administrative staff. Upon investigation by Administrative Nurse D and Administrative Staff A, camera footage revealed, the laundry bin was last emptied at 08:03 PM on 02/07/26. At 08:10 PM Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R removed a black trash bag from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2026-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 33 residents, with three residents reviewed for falls and supervision. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the care planned supervision for cognitively impaired Resident (R) 1 (who had a history of falls, dizziness, and weakness) to prevent a fall with major injury. On 01/08/26 at 08:57 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G assisted R1 to the north patio smoking area, placed a smoking apron on R1, and lit R1's cigarette. LN G left R1 outside on the patio and went back inside the facility, which left R1 without direct supervision. While inside, LN G stepped away for a moment and heard R1 yell for help at 09:05 PM. LN G went outside and discovered R1 on the ground on his left side. R1 required emergency medical transport to a local hospital and surgery to repair his broken left hip. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of paroxysmal (a sudden, intense, recurring onset of symptoms) atrial fibrillation (rapid,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to disinfect a glucometer (blood sugar reading machine) between resident use and sort soiled laundry in a sanitary manner. This placed the residents at risk for infectious disease processes. Findings included: - On 03/11/25 at 07:31 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G obtained a blood sugar reading for Resident (R) 6 by using a multiuse glucometer. LN G then placed the glucometer on top of the treatment cart. LN G then left the glucometer on the top of the cart and went on to perform other nursing tasks. On 03/11/25 at 07:52 AM, LN G returned to the treatment cart and retrieved the glucometer to obtain another resident's blood sugar level. LN G then took the unsanitized glucometer into another resident's room to obtain a blood sugar reading. LN G stated she had not sanitized the glucometer between resident use. On 03/11/25 at 10:01 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality when administering insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) with an insulin pen (an injection device used to deliver preloaded insulin). This placed the seven residents who received insulin at risk of receiving an inaccurate dose. Findings included: - On 03/11/25 at 08:00 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G administered Lantus and Aspart (manufacturer named) insulin subcutaneously (beneath the skin) without priming the insulin pen to Resident (R) 11. LN G verified she had not primed the insulin prior to administration of the insulin and was unaware of the manufacturer or facility policy to do so. On 03/11/25 at 09:59 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated she was unaware of the need to prime the insulin pens prior to dialing the ordered units of insulin. The facility's Insulin Administration policy, dated 09/2014, documented that the nursing staff will have access to specific…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five residents reviewed for immunizations. Residents (R) 11 and R13 lacked the pneumococcal vaccination (helps protect against serious illnesses like pneumonia). Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the latest guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to administer a pneumococcal vaccine following written consent. This deficient practice placed the R11 and R13 at risk of acquiring, spreading, and experiencing complications from the pneumococcal disease. Findings included: - A review of immunization records revealed R11 and R13 lacked the CDC recommended pneumococcal immunizations. On 09/03/24 R11 and 08/27/24 R13 had signed consent on the Consent Form for Flu and Pneumonia Vaccine to receive the pneumonia vaccine. Both R11 and R13 lacked documentation of having received the CDC recommended pneumococcal immunizations. Administrative Nurse D was unable to provide documentation R11 and R13 had received the appropriate pneumococcal vaccinations. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$24,779 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,015 — penalty dated 2026-03-23
• $10,764 — penalty dated 2026-01-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in KS