Prairie Sunset Home INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 36.2 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.50 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-06-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 31 residents with 12 residents in the sample, including two residents sampled for accident hazards. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and appropriate interventions to prevent further falls for Resident (R) 28. The resident had a history of multiple falls and fell while attempting to self-toilet and sustained a fractured humerus (bone of the upper arm). Findings included: - R28's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), diabetes mellitus type 2 (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner to prevent possible food-borne illness to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - On 03/03/25 at 08:03 AM during an initial tour of the main kitchen, refrigerator, freezer, and dry food storage areas, the following areas of concern were observed: Observation of the storage room revealed: One undated bag of tortilla chips left open to air and laying on the counter. One undated bag of coconut flakes loosely rolled shut on a shelf. One undated, open box of baking soda box with discoloration and water damage to the box. One undated, open box of baking soda. Observation of the refrigerator revealed open and undated items including a bottle of soy sauce, large jug of barbeque sauce, [NAME] jug of ketchup, large jug of salad dressing, large jug of picante sauce, large tub of beef base, and a large tub of chicken base. Observation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for the residents of the facility, in two of four resident halls. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the facility on 03/04/25 at 01:25 PM, revealed the following areas of concern on hall 400: 1. One hall had three resident private bathrooms with incontinent products resting directly on the bathroom floor and lacking a barrier. 2. One hall had a trash can for disposal of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) outside of a resident room with disposed personal protective equipment (PPE) coming out of the partially covered trash can. 3. One resident room had multiple items on the closet floor. 4. The medication room had one box, which contained approximately 75 cards of assorted medications to be returned to the pharmacy resting directly on the floor and lacking a barrier. The facility policy for Infection Control, revised 06/22, included:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 15 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a resident centered comprehensive care plan for one Resident (R) 14, regarding non-pharmacologic interventions for pain. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)14's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of chronic pain (physical suffering or discomfort caused by illness or injury). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. She received as needed (PRN) pain medication and non-pharmacological interventions (interventions not based on medication) for pain. She rated the worse pain in the past five days to be five out of 10 on the one to10 pain scale (scale used to rate pain with zero being no pain and 10 being the worse pain possible). She received opioid medication (a class of drugs healthcare…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 15 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for pain. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to offer non-pharmaceutical interventions for pain for one Resident (R)17, who has chronic pain. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)14's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of chronic pain (physical suffering or discomfort caused by illness or injury). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. She received as needed (PRN) pain medication and non-pharmacological interventions (interventions not based on medication) for pain. She rated the worse pain in the past five days to be five out of 10 on the one to 10 pain scale (scale used to rate pain with zero being no pain and 10 being the worse pain possible). She received opioid medication (a class of drugs healthcare providers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 15 residents sampled including five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor five Residents (R) 26, and R 34, regarding failure to monitor the side effects of psychotropic (drugs that affect the brain and central nervous system, altering mood, thoughts, emotions, and behavior) and antipsychotic (drugs that treat psychotic symptoms like hallucinations and delusions) medications and the failure to obtain a stop date for R 18's antianxiety (drugs that treat anxiety disorders) medication, Ativan. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)26's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings pf sadness). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 31 residents. The facility had one main kitchen. The kitchen served food to one main dining area. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store food in the main kitchen refrigerators due to foods left uncovered, boxes placed directly on the floor in the freezer and dry storage area, and staff failed to discard expired foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, to prevent food borne illness to the residents. Findings included: - During the brief initial tour of the kitchen, on 06/12/23 at 07:40 AM, observation revealed the following concerns: 1. The walk-in refrigerator had one undated, large sheet pan of yellow cake. One undated, large tub of salad mixes with cheese, five 32 ounce (oz.) tubs of yogurt with a use by date of 04/16/23. There was one three-pound (lb.) tub of ricotta cheese with a use by date of 06/02/23, six four-ounce yogurt cups with a use by date of 06/06/23, and a one five lb. tub of cottage cheese with a use by date of 06/09/23. Furthermore, a rolling cart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 31 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans for Resident (R) 28, related to falls. Findings included: - R28's electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), diabetes mellitus type 2 (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating moderate impairment in cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for daily cares and was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 31 residents, with 12 sampled, including one resident sampled for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with standard of practice for the one sampled Resident (R) 30 to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene related to showers, nail care, and facial hair removal. Findings included: - The 06/12/23 Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R30 had the following diagnoses of presence of artificial hips right and left (surgery to replace hip joints with artificial parts) and emphysema (long-term, progressive disease of the lungs characterized by shortness of breath). The 05/27/23 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 14, indicating intact cognition. R30 required physical help of one staff for bathing/showering. The 05/27/23 ADL Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R30 would require continued assistance from staff. The 04/12/23 Significant Change MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 91 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident sampled for bowel/ bladder incontinence. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an individualized toileting plan for Resident (R) 28, to ensure the resident remained as continent as possible. Findings included: - R28's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), diabetes mellitus type 2 (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating moderate impairment in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 31 residents with 12 residents included in the sample which included five residents selected for review of influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID vaccines. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident/resident representative received information/education regarding the benefits, risks, or medical contraindications of pneumococcal for three Residents (R), including R26, R23 and R35. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic health record (EHR) for Resident (R) 26, lacked documentation of any pneumococcal vaccine or declination of the vaccine provided to the resident and/or their representative to demonstrate the benefits verses risk of receiving the vaccine. The record lacked documentation the resident had been offered or provided an opportunity to receive the vaccine. Review of the EHR for R 23 lacked documentation of any pneumococcal vaccine or declination of the vaccine provided to the resident and/or their representative to demonstrate the benefits verses risk of receiving the vaccine. The record lacked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS