Apostolic Christian Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 58.6 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 60 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe environment, free from preventable accidents for Resident (R) 1. On 05/29/24 at 12:15 PM, Transportation FF strapped R1's wheelchair into the facility's transportation van but did not place the seatbelt around R1. When Transportation FF braked before making a turn, R1 slid out of her wheelchair onto the van floor. R1 was taken to the hospital for evaluation where she was found to have left tibia (bone in the lower leg) and fibula (bone in the lower leg) fractures as a result of the accident. This failure placed R1 in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of pain, fibromyalgia (condition of musculoskeletal pain, spasms, stiffness, fatigue, and severe sleep disturbance), and weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/17/24, documented R1 had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with 10 reviewed for falls. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided Resident (R)52 with his call light when he went to bed, resulting in a fall in which R52 obtained a right trimalleolar ankle fracture (a break in the lower leg section that form your ankle joint). The facility further failed to assess residents for safe lift chair use, after falls out of a lift recliner for R52 and R36. The facility failed to follow R36 and R46's plan of care which resulted in falls and failed to implement meaningful, resident centered interventions for R14 and R57. This placed the residents at risk for further falls and avoidable injuries. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R52 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (a type of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 58 residents and one kitchen. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the services of a full-time certified dietary manager for the 58 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 12/16/24 at 07:26 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, Dietary Staff BB stated she had started the certified dietary manager course three years ago. Dietary Staff BB stated she had completed three months of the course before staffing shortages at the facility required her to return full-time in dietary. Dietary Staff BB stated the Registered Dietician (RD) came to the facility monthly. On 12/18/24 at 01:10 PM, Administrative Staff A stated he was aware Dietary Staff BB was not certified. Administrative Staff A stated that was something that he would investigate. The Facility's Dietitian policy revised November 2024 documented that a qualified, competent, and skilled dietitian would help oversee the food and nutrition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-18 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during day-to-day operations and emergencies. This failure affected all 58 residents residing in the facility. Findings Included: - On 12/18/24 an inspection of the Facility Assessment was completed. The assessment was revised on 06/28/2024. A review of the evaluation revealed the following: The assessment identified the average daily staffing required for the facility but failed to identify the specific staffing levels needed and the number of Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Nurses (LPN/LVN), Certified Medication Aides (CMA), and Certified Nurse's Aides (CNA) needed for each unit, shift, and per census. The assessment lacked staffing levels required for each shift, including evenings and weekends. On 12/18/24 at 12:45 AM, Administrative Staff A stated the facility assessment was just revised. He stated he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents with five reviewed for accommodation of needs. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents were provided foot pedals during wheelchair transports for Resident (R) 23, R36, R46, R34, R40, and R33. This placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries due to unmet care needs. Findings Included: - On 12/16/24 at 08:16 AM, R23, a severely cognitively impaired resident, sat upright in his Broda chair (specialized wheelchair with the ability to tilt and recline). R23 had socks on both feet. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O pushed R23 in his Broda chair and R23's feet slid along the floor before he lifted his legs. On 12/17/24 at 07:18 AM, Staff pushed R36 in her wheelchair with no foot pedals. Staff repeatedly told R36 to keep her feet up. On 12/17/24 at 07:20 AM, Staff pushed R46, a cognitively impaired resident, in her wheelchair with no foot pedals. Staff repeatedly asked R46 to keep her feet up. On 12/17/24 at 09:47 AM, R23 sat upright in his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 with five residents reviewed for drug regimen review. Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consulting Pharmacist (CP) identified and made recommendations related to Residents (R) 55, R8, R52, and R32's indications for their antipsychotic medications (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality). This placed the residents at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications and related complications. Findings Included: - The Diagnosis tab within R55's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), fatigue, and pain. R55's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eleven indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she was independent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - The Diagnosis tab of R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), protein-calorie malnutrition, bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), delusions (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue), chronic pain, hypertension (high blood pressure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), insomnia (inability to sleep), chronic pain, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and dysuria (painful urination), The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of three which documented severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R32…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to keep Resident (R) 112's protected health information (PHI) private on a medication cart parked in the main dining room. This placed R112 at risk for impaired privacy. Findings included: - On 12/17/24 at 07:37 AM, an observation revealed a medication cart parked in the main dining room with a laptop computer sitting on the top, Licensed Nurse (LN) G walked away from the medication cart and into the dining room. LN G left the computer screen unlocked and open and R112's PHI was on the screen, visible to all who passed by the medication cart. The information visualized included R112's medications, date of birth , allergy information, and code status. On 12/18/24 at 11:55 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated the medication cart should be double locked, the computer screen should be closed, or the PHI should be hidden from view. On 12/18/24 at 12:20 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she expected the nursing staff to close the computer screen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents with 15 reviewed for care plan revisions. Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to revise Resident (R) 33's Care Plan to reflect his increased behavioral episodes. The facility additionally failed to revise R32's Care Plan to reflect her sleeping preferences. This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - The Diagnosis section within R33's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), seizures (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles), spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), insomnia (difficulty sleeping), aphasia (difficulty speaking), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), and cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents with two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pressure-reducing heel protectors or boots were in place for Resident (R) 34 who had a pressure-related injury on her left heel. These deficient practices placed R34 at risk for complications related to further skin breakdown and worsening of pressure ulcers. Findings included: - R34's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of a pressure ulcer of the left heel, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents with five reviewed for accidents. Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe care environment related to the use of Resident (R)35's fall prevention interventions for his wheelchair. This deficient practice placed R35 at risk for preventable falls and injuries. Findings included: - The Diagnosis tab within R35's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) restlessness, agitation, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), muscle spasms, muscle weakness, and repeated falls. R35's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented he required partial to moderate assistance with dressing, transfers, bed mobility, bathing, personal hygiene, and personal hygiene. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The facility identified one resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the blood pressure cuff, pulse monitor, and oxygen saturation equipment were sanitized after each resident's use. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings included: - On 12/16/24 at 07:47 AM, License Nurse (LN) I obtained a resident's blood pressure and pulse in the main dining room. LN I did not sanitize the pulse monitor or blood pressure cuff before or after resident use. On 12/17/24 at 07:18 AM, LN G obtained a resident's blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and pulse in the main dining room. LN G did not sanitize the blood pressure cuff, oxygen saturation monitor, or pulse monitor before or after resident use. On 12/18/24 at 07:42 AM, LN G obtained the resident's blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,397 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,397 — penalty dated 2024-06-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS