Mennonite Friendship Communities INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 139 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 75.4 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included six residents with one resident reviewed for involuntary discharge. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the involuntary discharge notice issued to Resident (R)1 or their representative contained a statement of appeal rights, the location to which the resident would be discharged and the contact information for the required state agencies (SA). The facility additionally failed to ensure the reason for the involuntary discharge was documented in the resident's medical record. This placed the resident at risk for impaired rights and inappropriate discharge. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented diagnoses that included respiratory failure (severely impaired lung function) with hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), hypothyroidism (a condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland), weakness, and a need for assistance with personal careR1's Discharge - Return Not Anticipated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included six residents with one resident reviewed for involuntary discharge. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a written discharge summary, recapitulation of the stay or reconciliation of medications for Resident (R) 1 who discharged . This placed the resident at risk for impaired rights related to continuity of care and missed community healthcare services. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented diagnoses that included respiratory failure (severely impaired lung function) with hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), hypothyroidism (a condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland), weakness, and a need for assistance with personal careR1's Discharge - Return Not Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R1 had a planned discharge from the facility to another long-term care facility on 06/27/25.R1's EHR under the Physician Orders did not contain an order to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards when staff left an activated steam table in an unlocked closet, with an unsecured gate, and the coffee station left accessible to residents with an unclosed gate. This placed the eight cognitively impaired independently mobile residents at risk for preventable accidents or injuries. Findings included: - On 01/13/25 at 10:10 AM observation revealed an activated steam table located in the 100-hall dining room in an unlocked open bifold door closet, with an unlocked combination padlock on the left-hand side of the trifold wooden white gate, in front of the closet. On 01/13/25 at 10:11 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M verified that there was an activated steam table located in the 100-hall dining room in an unlocked bifold door closet, with an unlocked combination padlock on the left-hand side of the trifold wooden white gate. CNA M stated she was unaware who was responsible for keeping the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician for blood sugars outside of physician ordered parameters for one resident, Resident (R) 34. This placed the resident at risk for hyperglycemic (greater than normal amount of glucose in the blood) and hypoglycemic (less than normal amount of sugar in the blood) episodes related to delayed physician involvement. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R34 documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose type 2, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (a mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R34 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to verify the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) received transmissions of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) containing the Resident Assessment Instruments (RAI) for two of 65 residents, R34 and R37. Findings included: - R34's Comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], was completed and signed but not submitted to CMS. R37's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], was submitted but not received by CMS. On 01/14/25 at 01:00 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) K verified the two resident's MDS had not been received by CMS and stated she was responsible to ensure they were submitted and accepted. The facility's MDS Process policy, dated 11/2022, stated staff were to transmit the MDS within seven days of completion. The facility failed to verify CMS received transmissions of the MDS containing the Resident Assessment Instruments for R34 and R37.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents of which one was reviewed for the G-Tube (Gastrostomy- surgical creation of an artificial opening into the stomach through the abdominal wall) feeding management. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the nurse failed to listen for the placement of the G-tube before administering medications and nutritional feeding for Resident (R)45. This placed the resident at risk for complications related to the feeding tube. Finding included: - R45's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of recorded a diagnosis of dysphasia (swallowing disorder), and cerebral infarct (damage to tissue in the brain due to loss of oxygen in the area). R 45's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R45 had short- and long-term memory loss with severely impaired cognition. The MDS recorded R45 required extensive assistance with transfers, bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The MDS recorded the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the lack of an appropriate indication or required physician documentation for Resident (R) 38's and R27's use of an antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication and for the lack of a specific 14-day stop date for R38's as needed (PRN) Ativan (an antianxiety medication). This placed the residents at risk for inappropriate use of medication and related complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R38 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavior disturbance (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of blood sugars outside of physician ordered parameters for one resident, Resident (R) 34. This placed the resident at risk for hyperglycemic (greater than normal amount of glucose in the blood) and hypoglycemic (less than normal amount of sugar in the blood) episodes and adverse effects related to medications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R34 documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose type 2, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (a mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R34…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The Facility had a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)38 and R27 had an approved diagnosis or a physician-documented rationale which included risks versus benefits for R38's use of Seroquel (antipsychotic - class of medications used to treat major mental conditions which cause a break from reality) and for R27's use of Risperdal (an antipsychotic medication) The facility further failed to ensure a 14-day stop date to be reassessed on a regular basis for R38. This placed the residents at risk for unnecessary medications and related complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R38 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavior disturbance (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents with six reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders when administering medication to Resident (R) 27, resulting in a medication error continuing for 4 days. This placed R27 at risk for adverse effects from the medication. - R27's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) and recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD - mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R27 had verbal behaviors, was independent with eating, wheelchair mobility, required supervision for walking, and moderate staff assistance for dressing and transfers. The MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,498 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,498 — penalty dated 2025-02-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS