No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Leisure Homestead At Stafford

405 Grand Avenue, Stafford, KS 67578 · Non profit - Corporation · 37 certified beds · (620) 234-5208 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (620) 234-5208 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
609 E 1st Ave · (620) 549-3251 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
329A N US Highway 281 · (620) 377-5633 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
130 S Main St · (620) 234-6025 · Call to confirm hours
Park
400 E Crawford St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
420 S Buckeye St · (620) 234-5424

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased36.2%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%4.9%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%1.6%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.8%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.5%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened38.0%16.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.1%23.2%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.2%4.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.5%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.6%18.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.9%1.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.931.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.212.131.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.14U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

RN hours/ resident / day
LPN hours/ resident / day
Aide hours/ resident / day
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
RN hoursweekends
36.7%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 37 beds and averages 35.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-20)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-21)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 35 residents, one kitchen and one kitchenette. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the potential for foodborne bacteria. This placed the residents at risk of food-borne illnesses.Findings included:- During an initial tour of the kitchen on 08/18/25 at 11:03 AM, the following areas of concern were noted: The reach-in refrigerator/freezer unit had seven of eight wired shelves with large areas of missing protective and plastic coating, making them unsanitizable.The two-door reach-in freezer had eight wired shelves with large areas of missing protective and plastic coating, making them unsanitizable.The dry storage rack by the back door had a heavy build-up of dirt on the bottom rim of the shelving unit.One red and three white plastic cutting boards were heavily gouged.The area next to the steam table had two shelves which held items such as assorted syrups and breakfast items had littered food debris.Three plastic containers used to store dry cereal had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews, record reviews and observation, the facility staff failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) for Resident (R)1 who had a Foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). The facility failed to follow adequate hand hygiene and infection control practices related to catheter bags and tubing as well as sanitary storage of nebulizer (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs). This deficient practice placed the residents at increased risk for infections. Findings included:- Observed on 08/18/25 at 08:35, R22 was in his recliner in his room with his nebulizer on his overbed table. The nebulizer had fluid in it, and the face mask had a greasy film on it. R22 stated staff did not rinse out his nebulizer after each use and said he did not do it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews, record review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure residents had safe and properly maintained resident care equipment. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for infection and decreased comfort.Findings included:- Observed on 08/18/25 at 11:08 AM, the leg pad on one sit-to-stand lift (medical devices designed to assist individuals with limited mobility in transitioning from a seated to a standing position) had a large, missing chunk from the leg pad, the foam resident grips were missing pieces, and there was exposed rust on the legs. Observed on 08/19/25 at 03:15 PM, the second sit-to-stand had multiple large areas of the foot base with exposed rust, the right resident hand-hold had approximately half the foam missing, exposing metal, and the left hand-hold foam was ripped, exposing metal. During an interview on 08/18/25 at 11:08 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M stated that the sit-to-stand (one) damage had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 35 residents, the sample included 12 residents. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to inform Resident (R) 29 and/or his representative regarding the risks related to psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications. These practices had the potential to lead to uninformed decisions regarding treatment.Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R29 included diagnoses of unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition (when a person experiences psychotic symptoms but the specific cause isn't clear, and it's not linked to substance use or a known medical condition), neuroleptic induced parkinsonism (a form of drug-induced parkinsonism that occurs as a side effect of certain medications, particularly those used to treat psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia), extrapyramidal and movement disorder (movement disorders as a result of taking certain medications), schizophrenia (a mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 38 and/or their representative with a written notice specifying the duration and cost of the bed hold policy, at the time of the resident's transfer to the hospital and failed to provide a written notification to the resident and/or his representative for the reason of the resident's transfer to the hospital in a language easy to understand. This placed the resident at risk of not understanding bed hold policy or the reason of the transfer. Findings included:- R38's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). R38's EMR documented a Progress Note which noted R38 transferred to the hospital on [DATE].R38's EMR lacked documentation of a bed hold and lacked documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide weekly wound assessments for Resident (R) 1. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for developing pressure injuries and delayed wound healing. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed a diagnosis of Stage 4 (a deep pressure wound that reaches the muscles, ligaments, or even bone) pressure ulcer of the left heel, chronic osteomyelitis (bone infection) of the left foot and ankle, Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss into but no deeper than the dermis including intact or ruptured blisters) of the right foot, and Stage 2 pressure ulcer of the buttock dated 07/27/25. R1's 06/25/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents, which included one resident reviewed for accident hazards. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary supervision and assistance required for safe ambulation for Resident (R) 6. This placed R6 at risk for falls and fall-related injuries. Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed that R6 included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness (difficulties with memory, concentration, decision-making, problem-solving, and understanding, as well as changes in behavior and communication), a need for assistance with personal care (assistance with activities of daily living [ADLs] that an individual is unable to perform independently due to illness, disability, or advanced age), and repeated falls (two or more falls within a specific time frame, typically a year or six months).The 07/23/25 admission Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to handle, store, process, and transport linens so as to prevent cross contamination and the spread of infection in the laundry and throughout the facility. Furthermore, the facility failed to perform required hand hygiene between residents during the delivery of clean linen and passing ice water. Additionally, the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care in maintaining respiratory equipment to prevent the spread of infection for three residents (R)9, R31, and R7. Findings included: - On 09/21/23 at 11:06 AM, the laundry tour with Laundry/Housekeeping staff I, and Assistant Maintenance Supervisor J, revealed the following concerns: 1. The soiled linen room/sorting room lacked available Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) goggle/face shield for sorting soiled clothing and linens. 2. The laundry processing area had three unsanitizable wired laundry baskets due to split rubber gaskets around the top of the baskets and rust on the wires. One basket had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 33 residents with a sample of 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan with relevant interventions following falls to prevent further falls for four sampled residents (R)16, R10, R32, and failed to revise the care plan for R21, related to compression stockings. Findings included: - Resident (R)16's Physician Orders, dated 09/11/23, included diagnoses of muscle spasms, sprain of the left ankle, left hand pain, rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting many joints, including those in the hands and feet), left and right shoulder pain, and obesity (severe overweight). The admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS) dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status, (BIMS) score of 13, indicating cognitively intact. She required extensive assistance of staff for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and walking in the room. The resident used a walker and wheelchair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 33 residents with a sample of 12 residents which included four residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation to determine contributing factors and causes of falls to implement appropriate immediate new interventions following falls for Resident (R)16, R10, R7, and R32. Findings included: - Resident (R)16's Physician Orders, dated 09/11/23, included diagnoses of muscle spasms, sprain of the left ankle, left hand pain, rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting many joints, including those in the hands and feet), left and right shoulder pain, and obesity (severe overweight). The admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS) dated [DATE], documented the resident with Brief Interview for Mental Status, score of 13, indicating cognitively intact. She required extensive assistance of staff for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and walking in the room. The resident used a walker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 10 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 33 residents with 12 selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set MDS for one sampled resident, Resident (R)7, with a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure - a machine used to provide continuous airway pressure in people diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea [OSA - a condition in which a person cannot maintain an open airway while sleeping]). This placed the resident at risk for uncommunicated care needs. Findings include: - R7's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented OSA (a condition in which a person cannot maintain an open airway while sleeping). The 10/12/22 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident required limited assistance of one staff for dressing and personal hygiene, otherwise was independent with cares. Documented that R7 was not receiving non-invasive mechanical ventilation (CPAP). The 10/12/22 Care Area Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 33 residents with 12 selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply TED hose (thrombo-embolic-deterrent - specialized compression stockings designed to help manage swelling of the feet/legs) every morning and remove them every night for Resident (R) 21. This deficient practice had the potential to place R21 at an increased risk for development of additional medical problems. Findings included: - R21's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included a diagnosis of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right side, localized edema (swelling resulting from excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and venous insufficiency. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 33 residents with 12 residents sampled, including four residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to properly clean and store the nebulizer (a device for administering inhaled medications) for Resident (R)9 and R31 in accordance with the standards of care. In addition, the facility failed to disassemble and clean the CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure - a machine used to provide continuous airway pressure in people diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea [OSA - a condition in which a person cannot maintain an open airway while sleeping]) and to correctly store distilled water used for humidification in the CPAP for R7. Findings included: - R7's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented OSA (a condition in which a person cannot maintain an open airway while sleeping). The 10/12/22 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident required limited assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 37 residents with one main kitchen, which prepared and served food for all residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to handle and store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when dietary staff did not prepare food for storage or date and store foods in a sanitary manner. Findings included: - On 12/06/21 at 07:40 AM initial tour of main kitchen revealed the following: In the refrigerator the following foods were not dated: shredded cabbage, green peppers, shredded lettuce, cauliflower, and broccoli, there was also a container of carrot salad, a thawed frozen TV dinner, and a plate of brownies all opened and undated. In the freezer there was a bag of unidentifiable frozen meat in a package open to air and undated, and a large bag of frozen dough for rolls open to air and undated. In the dry storage area, there was a large bag of cake mix open and undated. All food items removed and discarded by Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) O. Observation on 12/06/21 at 08:45 AM CDM O placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 37 with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff administered Tylenol (pain medication) as ordered by the physician for Resident (R)12. Findings include: - R12's Physician's Orders dated 09/10/21 included a diagnosis of pain, unspecified, and an order for Tylenol 650 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth three times a day. The Care Plan dated 11/11/21 informed staff R12 had arthritis in the neck, low back pain, and right shoulder pain. R12 received Tylenol 325 mg two tabs every eight hours for pain. The Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) for September 2021 revealed staff failed to give R12 the 05:00 AM dose on five days. The October 2021 MAR lacked documentation of administration of the Tylenol for 9 days. The November 2021 MAR lacked documentation staff administered the Tylenol on nine days Observed on 12/07/21 at 11:59 AM, revealed R12 sat in the television area, watching the staff and other residents, without indications of pain.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    - R12's signed physician orders dated 09/10/21 revealed the diagnosis of hypertension (HTN, elevated blood pressure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating severely impaired cognition. The resident required one staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The resident received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications 7 days of the 7-day observation period. A gradual dose reduction attempted on 02/04/21. The 09/27/21 Quarterly MDS revealed no significant changes since the 03/27/21 MDS. Review of the 11/11/21 Care Plan revealed R12 had HTN and received Metoprolol Tartrate (antihypertensive medication) 25 milligrams (mg) twice daily (BID) for HTN and the staff were to monitor for side effects such as orthostatic hypotension (blood pressure dropping with change of position) and tachycardia (increased heart rate) and report significant changes to the physician. The staff were to monitor the resident for malignant hypertension (very high blood pressure that comes on suddenly and quickly) such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 37 residents, with 12 in the sample, and five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the efficacy of blood pressure medications for Resident (12), when stafff failed to administer the medicaiton as ordered, and failed to document why the staff did not administer the medication as ordered. Findings included: - R12's signed physician orders dated 09/10/21 revealed the diagnosis of hypertension (HTN, elevated blood pressure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating severely impaired cognition. The resident required one staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The resident received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications 7 days of the 7-day observation period. A gradual dose reduction attempted on 02/04/21. The 09/27/21 Quarterly MDS revealed no significant changes since the 03/27/21 MDS. Review of the 11/11/21 Care Plan revealed R12 had HTN and received Metoprolol Tartrate (antihypertensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 37 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)22's did not receive unnecessary medications when staff admnistered an as needed (PRN) psychotropic (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medication from an order dated 10/12/20 (almost 14 months prior and without a duration for use) and the staff continued to administer the PRN psychotropic medication. The medical record lacked a physician rationale for the continued adminsitration of the PRN psychotropic medication, Ativan, for R22. Findings included: - Resident (R)22's signed physician orders dated 12/02/21 revealed the following diagnoses: major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 37 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) appropriately, during toileting cares observation for Resident (R)22. Findings included: - R1's signed Physician Orders dated 10/05/21 revealed the following diagnoses: macular degeneration (progressive deterioration of the retina, bilateral), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 08/11/21 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident had no behaviors. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff with daily care. The resident received an antipsychotic and antianxiety medication 7 days of the 7-day observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-08-20 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to display accurate, publicly accessible, and identifiable staffing information, daily, for the 35 residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: - Review of the facility's Daily Staffing Sheets, from 07/01/25 through 08/18/25, revealed the actual hours worked had not been completed on the daily staffing sheets. On 08/19/25 at 02:33 PM, Administrative Nurse D confirmed the Daily Staffing Sheets lacked the actual hours worked. The facility policy for Required Posting of Nursing Staff, revised 01/2023, included: Nursing facilities are required to post individual shift data and the total hours worked each day by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff who are directly responsible for resident care.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LEISURE HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 07/16/2012
BRENSING, TAMARAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2023
HILDEBRAND, DONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/05/2021
YOUNIE, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2014
ZIMMERMAN, NANCYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2024
GILLESPIE, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2000
MESCHBERGER, ANITAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2002
FARMER, FREDRICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2000

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 3%Other / private 26%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$235per resident / day
operating cost
$7,153per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$231per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175530. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next