Tonganoxie Terrace
1010 East Street, Tonganoxie, KS 66086 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (913) 369-8705 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $47,317 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-29)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.1% | 17.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.2% | 4.9% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.7% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 16.9% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.3% | 16.2% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.5% | 23.2% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.3% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 4.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.0% | 22.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.1% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 7.5% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.4% | 73.8% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.0% | 22.4% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.0% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.06 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.92 | 2.13 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.4%CMS range 32.3–55.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 8.3–16.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 32.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 4.8–16.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 69.0 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.00 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 71 residents. Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented care and treatment consistent with standards of care when staff failed to follow a physician order to assess Resident (R) 1's blood glucose levels four times daily. The facility failed to ensure staff transcribed and performed physician ordered blood glucose checks for R1. On [DATE] R1 readmitted to the facility as an emergency admission. Licensed Nurse (LN) I called the emergency room (ER) physician for order clarification and received orders for a Accu-checks (use of a handheld machine to test blood sugar levels) four times daily for seven days. LN H entered the Accu-check order into the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) incorrectly. As a result, staff did not perform the Accu-checks. On [DATE] staff found R1 lethargic and unable to follow commands. Staff checked a blood glucose level, and it was 21 milliliters to deciliters (mL/dL) (blood sugar below 70 mg/dL is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-01-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with one reviewed for pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to initiate effective interventions to prevent the development of the left lateral (pertaining to the side, away from the middle) foot and left middle toe facility acquired pressure ulcers for Resident (R) 44.Findings included: - R44's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition in which brain function is disturbed either temporarily or permanently due to different diseases or toxins in the body), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), fracture right femur (thigh bone), pneumonia (a lung infection that causes inflammation and fluid or pus to fill the air sacs of the lungs), and nicotine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care for Resident (R) 1's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC-a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the upper arm and threaded into a large vein above the heart) including monitoring the resident's status for complications, assessing PICC insertion site, performing PICC line flushes, and providing a sterile dressing change per the standards of care for a PICC line at least every seven days. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the blood), sepsis due to Serratia (a severe, life-threatening bloodstream infection often related to indwelling medical devices), multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), and chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure (occurs when the heart muscle both fails to contract effectively and becomes too stiff to relax and fill…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 1 with the necessary behavioral health care and services, that included adequate supervision to prevent unwanted touching by R1 to other residents. Findings included:- R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of personal history of traumatic brain injury (TBI-an injury to the brain caused by external forces). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 03/14/26 documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. R1 had no behaviors in the assessment period. The Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R1 had a TBI that affected her cognition. R1's 04/09/26 Care Plan documented she had a behavior problem related to sexual inappropriateness. The Care Plan documented an intervention, dated 04/09/26, that directed, if reasonable, staff to discuss R1's behavior and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0574 — widespreadThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform the residents of the posting of the Ombudsman (an independent, neutral official who investigates, reports on, and helps resolve complaints) and State Agency contact numbers.Findings included:- On 01/27/26 at 01:15 PM, the State Agency and Ombudsman information posters were located in the front portion of the building lobby/hallway area. The resident council minute review from 01/2025 through 01/2026 lacked information regarding the Ombudsman and State Agency posting.On 01/28/26 at 03:29 PM, the Resident Council President, Resident (R) 12, reported that the council had not been informed of the Ombudsman and State Agency contact information.On 01/29/26 at 11:45 AM, Activity Staff Z reported sharing information regarding the Ombudsman and State Agency reporting during the resident council meetings, but had not recorded this information in the resident council meeting minutes.On 01/29/26 at 01:45 PM, Administrative Staff A stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident council of the state inspection report.Findings included:- On 01/27/26 at 01:15 PM, the State Agency inspection book was located in the front lobby. The resident council minutes' review from 01/2025 through 01/2026 lacked information regarding the location of state inspection results.On 01/28/26 at 03:29 PM, the Resident Council President, Resident (R) 12, reported that the council had not been informed of the location of the state inspection results.On 01/29/26 at 11:45 AM, Activity Staff Z reported she had not included the location of the State Agency's inspection report. Activity Staff Z reported sharing information regarding the Ombudsman and State Agency reporting during the resident council meetings, but had not recorded this information in the resident council meeting minutes.On 01/29/26 at 01:45 PM, Administrative Staff A stated the information should be reviewed with the council at least annually.The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 70 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough facility-wide assessment to determine necessary care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies.Findings included:- On 01/28/26 at 09:00 AM, Administrative Staff A reported looking for the assessment but had not located it when the facility assessment was requested a second time.On 01/29/26 at 10:00 AM, Administrative Staff A reported that she could not locate the facility assessment, which she had completed and provided for the survey process on 01/27/26, along with a Quality Assurance Assessment (QAA) committee to be reviewed on 02/18/26.The facility's Facility Assessment policy, dated 04/01/25, documented that the facility conducts and documents a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies. The purpose of the policy is to establish responsibilities and procedures for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to place an open date on the Lantus (long acting insulin) pen (disposable, prefilled injection pen) in one of two nurse medication carts. The facility failed to consistently record refrigerator temperatures in the medication room. The facility further failed to lock an emergency (ER) cart, which had medications accessible to residents, with an expired Narcan (a medication that readily reverses an opioid, a narcotic pain medication).Findings included:- On [DATE] at 08:30 AM, observation revealed, in the 400 hall nurse medication cart, Resident (R) 58's Lantus pen lacked an open date. On [DATE] at 08:30 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) K verified the Lantus pen was open, and stated staff should date a Lantus pen when they open it. On [DATE] at 02:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated staff should date insulin pens when they open them The facility's Medication Storage Policy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 70 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner when dietary staff did not complete hair coverage with the hairnet and beard cover. This deficient practice placed the residents of the facility who received meals from the facility at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: - On 01/27/26 at 08:00 AM, observation revealed dietary staff in the facility kitchen preparing and serving breakfast to the residents. Dietary Staff (DS) CC had a beard and mustache and lacked a beard or facial cover while preparing drinks for the residents. On 01/28/26 at 11:00 AM, observation revealed DS DD had a beard and mustache and wore a beard cover but did not cover his mustache and was washing the dishes and preparing salads for lunch. On 01/28/26 at 11:40 AM, observation revealed DS EE walked through the dining room door to the back of the kitchen and grabbed a hair net then proceeded to walk through the kitchen where the staff were preparing the lunch meal and rolled her mid length…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program failed to provide good faith efforts to identify multiple issues of concern for 33 residents residing in the facility.Findings included:-The facility failed to document the review of resident rights with the resident council. Refer to F 574.The facility failed to inform the resident council where the survey result book or contact the ombudsman and the state agency was kept. Refer to F577.The facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of R16's Morphine. Refer to F600.The facility failed to provide R2, R4, and R74 a bed hold notification and failed to notify the ombudsman when they were transferred to the hospital. Refer to F628.The facility failed to update R3's Care Plan when R3 received a leg injury to prevent further leg injuries. The facility failed to update R44's care plan with a smoking section. Refer to F657.The facility failed to consistently provide R69 and R20 bathing as per their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a risk assessment to identify risks and implement a water management program to mitigate the risk of Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as from air-conditioning units for large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, chronic lung disease, or heavy tobacco use are most at risk of developing pneumonia caused by Legionella) and other waterborne pathogens. The facility failed to adhere to infection control procedures with wound care for Resident (R) 1 who had an open abdominal wound and a gastrostomy tube (G-tube surgically placed through an artificial opening into the stomach) and staff administered medications through the tube who had enhanced barrier precautions (EBP -an infection control intervention designated to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with five residents reviewed for immunizations, Resident (R) 16, R31, R43, R55, and R56, to include pneumococcal (a disease that refers to a range of illnesses that affect various parts of the body and are caused by infection) vaccinations. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to offer, obtain an informed declination, or a physician documented contraindication for the pneumococcal PCV20 vaccination per the latest guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).Findings included:- Review of the clinical medical records lacked evidence the facility or the resident representative received or signed a consent to receive or informed declination for the pneumococcal vaccine PCV20 for the following residents.Review of R16's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R16 had not been offered or received a pneumococcal PCV20 vaccine since admission.Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with three residents reviewed for discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 20 and R2 with written information regarding the facility's bed hold policy when the residents were transferred to the hospital and failed to notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of their facility-initiated discharge to the hospital.Findings include: - Resident (R) 20's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM -when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the muscles that control the flow of urine out of the body do not relax and prevent the bladder from fully emptying), patient's noncompliance with other medical treatment and regimen, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and implement interventions to prevent further injuries to the lower extremities of Resident (R) 3 and R44's smoking activity.Findings included:- R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of adult failure to thrive (includes not doing well, feeling poorly, weight loss, and poor self-care that could be seen in elderly individuals), congestive heart failure (CHF -a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), severe protein-calorie malnutrition, lymphedema (swelling caused by accumulation of lymph), muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to provide necessary services for two of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL): Resident (R) 69 and R20.Findings included:- R69's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R69 had diagnoses of vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain) and sequelae of cerebral infarction (commonly known as a stroke, when blood flow to the brain is blocked or a blood vessel inside or on the surface of the brain bursts). R69's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R69 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R69 required substantial, maximal staff assistance with showering. R69's Care Plan, revised 12/25/25, documented R69 required substantial staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when the staff failed to provide Resident (R) 6 treatment for low blood sugar before transferring to the hospital. The facility failed to provide documentation related to R3's and R20's transfer to the hospital. Findings included:- R6's Electronic Medical Record, (EMR) documented R6 had a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM -when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). R6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented that R6 received insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) for seven days during the look-back period. R6's Care Plan revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to fully investigate Resident (R) 25's unwitnessed fall to identify causative factors and implement interventions to prevent further falls. The facility further failed to accurately identify R44's tobacco use and assess his ability to safely smoke independently. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), hypertension (HTN -elevated blood pressure), and muscle weakness. R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 00, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS recorded the resident was dependent on staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and implement a system to accurately reconcile the disposition of controlled medications and failed to account for all controlled substances.Findings included:- On 01/29/26 at 10:00 AM, observation of a controlled substance reconciliation revealed one bottle of morphine (narcotic pain medication with high potential for abuse) 20 milligrams (mg) per milliliter (ml) concentrate was unaccounted for.Review of the Pharmacy Spreadsheet revealed the morphine was listed with a prescription number, medication name and date of delivery. The missing medication belonged to Resident (R) 16.On 01/27/26 at 02:55 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) K stated that at the end of her shift, she counted the narcotics with the oncoming nurse and compared them with the controlled drug administrative record. LN K stated that if the count was off, staff would recount, and if it was still inaccurate, the nurses reported the discrepancy to the director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included nine residents, with two residents reviewed for involuntary discharge. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to include the required information on an emergency discharge notice for Resident (R) 1 and on a 30-day discharge notice for R2. This deficient practice had the risk for miscommunication between the facility and resident/family, a possible missed opportunity for healthcare services, and involuntary discharge for R1 and R2.Findings included:- R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE].R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of other Schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), diffuse traumatic brain injury (TBI- an injury to the brain caused by external forces) with a loss of consciousness, affective mood disorder (category of mental health problems,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included nine residents, with three residents reviewed for discharge. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to document a recapitulation of stay for Residents (R) 2, R3, and R4. This deficient practice had the risk for miscommunication of services received during the stay in the facility and if post-discharge care needs for the affected residents.Findings included:- R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 07/31/25.R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), repeated falls, and generalized anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear).The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 03/04/25, documented R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R2's overall goal was to remain in the facility, and she had no discharge plan.The Quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included nine residents, with three residents reviewed for bathing. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing for Residents (R) 5 and R6. This deficient practice had the risk of poor hygiene and decreased self-esteem and dignity for the affected residents.Findings included:- R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness and unsteadiness on feet.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 03/14/25 documented R5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. R5 required substantial/maximal assistance with bathing.The Quarterly MDS dated 06/04/25, documented R5 had a BIMS score of 13, which indicated intact cognition. R5 required partial/moderate assistance with bathing.The Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 03/21/25 documented R5 reported weakness to upper and lower extremities as well as decreased range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 85 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement a water management program for Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as air-conditioning units in large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, chronic lung disease, or heavy tobacco use are most at risk of developing pneumonia caused by legionella). The facility further failed to ensure adequate infection control practices related to catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care. These deficient practices placed the residents at increased risk for transmission of infectious diseases. Findings included: - On 03/20/24 at 02:39 PM, Maintenance Staff U and Administrative Staff A reported they were not aware of a required water management program to prevent waterborne pathogens (organisms causing disease) and verified the facility had no current program. The facility's Water Management Plan policy, dated 04/01/22, documented the intent and content of this policy as one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-20 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 85 residents, with 18 residents included in the sample. Five nurse aide staff were reviewed for the required training. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the required 12 hours of in-service education for Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R, CMA RR, and CMA SS. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of receiving impaired care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's 12-hour annual in-service documentation revealed CMA R, CMA RR, CMA SS, and CNA P lacked documentation of the required 12 hours of in-service education. On 03/20/24 at 10:34 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated she served the role of Director of Nursing since 11/2023. Administrative Nurse D stated she should have a skills fair for in-service and competency assessment related to nursing care. Administrative Nurse D verified the lack of evidence the sampled CNA staff had the required 12 hours of in-service. The facility's Competency of Nursing Staff policy, undated, documented all nursing staff must meet the specific competency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 85 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an environment free from preventable accident hazards for Resident (R) 29 who burned his fingers his fingers while smoking. The facility further failed to assess R41 for the ability to smoke safely and failed to provide interventions to prevent injuries and falls for R46 and R31. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for injuries related to accidents. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R29 admitted to the facility 11/29/23 with diagnoses of neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (lacks bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or nerve problems), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and pneumonia (inflammation of the lungs). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 85 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with eight reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) failed to identify and report medications administered outside of physician-ordered parameters for Resident (R) 15, R31, and R6 and failed to identify and report an inappropriate indication for Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication used to treat severe mental disorders) for R4. This placed the residents at risk for adverse side effects, physical decline, and unnecessary medications. Findings included: - R15's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough sepsis made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypotension (low blood pressure), and heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 85 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date Resident(R)34 and R13's insulin (a hormone that allows cells throughout the body to uptake glucose) flex pen when opened and failed to discard R38's insulin flex pen when outdated. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included: - On 03/13/24 at 08:25 AM, observation of the facility's 300 and 400 medication carts revealed the following: R34's Humalog (fast-acting insulin) flex pen lacked an open date and discard date. R13's Humalog lacked an open and discard date. R38's Lantus (long-acting insulin) vial had an opened date of 02/06/24 (discard date of 03/05/24). On 03/20/24 at 09:00 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the nurses were to date the insulin when opened and discard the outdated insulin. Administrative Nurse D said the night nurse should check the carts for expired medications and every nurse that administered medications should review the insulin to be sure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 85 residents. The sample included 18 residents with four reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff identified injuries of unknown origin as potential allegations of abuse and report to the administrator to investigate. This placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing abuse and/or mistreatment. Findings included: - R46's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid,) diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin,) osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk ), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), and anxiety. R46's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], recorded the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 85 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to investigate Resident (R)46's injuries of unknown origin to rule out possible abuse or neglect. This placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing abuse or neglect. Findings included: - R46's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid,) diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin,) osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk ), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), and anxiety. R46's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of three indicating severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 85 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for Resident (R)31, R77, and for R29. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R31 documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) without behavioral disturbance, diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough sepsis made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R31 had severely impaired cognition and required substantial/maximum assistance for toileting, dressing, personal hygiene, partial/moderate assistance with transfers, and mobility. R31 had no functional limitations, had one fall with injury since admission, received insulin, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 85 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review and revise the care plan with interventions to address Resident (R) 30's pain and R46's skin tears. This deficient practice placed R30 and R46 for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of alcohol dependence, chronic pain in the right shoulder, and dorsalgia (physical discomfort occurring anywhere on the spine or back). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. R30 had no rejection of care behavior. The MDS documented R30 had no range of motion (ROM) impairment, used a wheelchair, and required partial moderate assistance for bathing. The MDS documented R30 received scheduled and as-needed (PRN) pain management but no non-medication pain relief for almost constant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 85 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene including bathing for Resident (R) 4, R41, and R30. This placed the residents at risk for impaired health and decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of Alzheimer's (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat). R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] recorded R4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated severely impaired cognition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 85 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five reviewed for urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag) or urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent potential infection of the urinary system for Resident (R) 29 and R17 during care for their urinary catheters and failed to promote dignity with a privacy bag. This deficient practice placed R29 and R17 at risk for urinary infections and other catheter-related complications. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (lacks of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or nerve problems), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), urinary tract infection (UTI-an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 85 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for pain. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide non-medicinal pain relief measures and promote effective pain management for Resident (R) 30, who experienced almost constant severe pain. This deficient practice placed R30 at risk for ongoing severe pain and impaired quality of life. Findings included: - R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of alcohol dependence, chronic pain in the right shoulder, and dorsalgia (physical discomfort occurring anywhere on the spine or back). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. R30- had no rejection of care behavior. The MDS documented R30 had no range of motion (ROM) impairment, used a wheelchair, and required partial moderate assistance for bathing. The MDS documented R30 received scheduled and as-needed (PRN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 85 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two reviewed for dementia (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary dementia care and services to attain or maintain the highest level of practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for Resident (R)26 and R77. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of life. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R26 recorded diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment (problems with a person's ability to think, learn, remember, use judgment, and make decisions). cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), and cerebral infarction (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 85 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with eight reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of blood sugars outside of ordered parameters for Resident (R) 31 and further failed to monitor R31's blood pressure before administration of medication for high blood pressure. The facility failed to hold blood pressure medication and insulin (medication that lowers the level of glucose [a type of sugar] in the blood) when the medication was out of the physician-ordered parameters for R6. This placed the residents at risk for adverse effects related to medication. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R31 documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) without behavioral disturbance, diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough sepsis made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 85 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with eight reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of Resident (R)4's antipsychotic (a medication used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment testing) medication. This placed R4 at risk for unintended effects related to psychotropic (alters mood or thought) drug medications. Findings include: - R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of Alzheimer's (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 85 residents. The sample included 18 residents with eight reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for Resident (R) 15. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for adverse medication reactions and physical decline. Findings included: - R15's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough sepsis made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypotension (low blood pressure), and heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R15 had moderately impaired cognition and required substantial/maximum assistance for toileting, showering, and personal hygiene. R15 required supervision for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 resident. The sample included 21 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary condition for the 68 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen, placing them at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: - On 08/31/22 at 08:35 AM during the initial tour of the kitchen observations revealed the following: The steam table water pans had brown water, food debris and brown sediment on the bottom and around the inside edges of the pan. The large silver refrigerator temperature log for August 2022 lacked documentation for 10 days out of 31 days of the month. The large silver freezer temperature log for August 2022 lacked documentation for 10 days out of 31 days of the month. The overhead fluorescent lights had dead bugs. The kitchen ice machine had a sticker on the front that read Ice machine monthly cleaning. The sticker had staff initials for January and March only.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-07 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure their (QAA) Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee adequately identified deficient areas of practice and to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct the deficient practices for the 68 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician with a change in the resident behavior/mood, a resident refusing medication, and unresponsive episode. Refer to 550. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the resident the choice to continue with Medicare skilled services. Refer to 582. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate post unwitnessed resident falls. Refer to 610. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident that had displayed behaviors in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 68 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to adhere to infection control policies during an outbreak of COVID-19 (highly contagious, potentially life-threatening respiratory virus), which placed the resident and staff at risk for possible exposure of respiratory illness. Findings included: - On 09/01/22 at 12:17 PM observation reveal Dietary Staff (DS) DD observed delivering meals to Droplet Isolation room of a COVID-19 positive resident. A sign was posted on the door giving instructions on PPE use (gown, gloves, face/eye protection, KN95 mask and shoe covers). The room also had a plastic tote with PPE supplies place outside the room doorway. DS DD entered the room only wearing a KN95 mask. DS DD exited the room and returned to the kitchen area. DS DD verified she had not worn full PPE in the COVID-19 isolation room and was not aware she had to. Administrative Staff A escorted DS out of area explaining isolation precautions. On 09/06/22 at 02:30 PM observation revealed Housekeeper U clean a COVID-19 droplet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-07 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 68 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff person designated as the Infection Preventionist (IP) who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) completed the specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings included: -On 08/31/22 upon initial entrance of the facility for recertification survey, Administrative Staff A identified Administrative Nurse E as the IP. On 09/06/22 at 04:12 PM Administrative Nurse E reported she lacked certification as an Infection Preventionist. On 09/09/22 the facility provided certificates of completion of some modules ( one through four) of Infection Preventionist training by Administrative Staff A but did not include all modules required for certification. The facility's Infection Control Preventionist policy, dated 08/2022, documented individual (s) as the infection preventionist who are responsible for the facility Infection Control program. The Infection Control Preventionist is to have completed specialized training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician for Resident (R) 30, who had multiple days of refusing her medications for several months; R47, who had a history of seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain) and had an unresponsive episode; R37, who had a history of sexual behavior and had an alleged incident with another resident, and R59, who had an unresponsive episode in the shower. This placed the resident's at risk for further physical, emotional, and mental decline. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R30 had diagnoses of lupus (a chronic, inflammatory, connective tissue disease that can affect the joints and many organs), epilepsy (a neurological disorder marked by sudden recurrent episodes of sensory disturbance, loss of consciousness, or convulsions, associated with abnormal electrical activity in the brain), anoxic brain damage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents with eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, including bathing for seven of the eight residents reviewed for ADLs, Resident (R)8, R55, R19, R23, R30, R67 and R15. This placed the residents at risk for poor personal hygiene. Findings included: - R8's Physician's Order Sheet, dated 08/01/22, recorded diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure,) dementia with behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion,) anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear,) and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder.) R8's Annual Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had severely impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to properly date and store insulin pens (medications used to treat a chronic condition that affected the way the body processed blood sugar) label, and failed to store drugs and biologicals at a safe room temperature in the south hall medication room. This deficient practice had the risk of physical complications and ineffective treatment for affected residents. Findings included: - On [DATE] at 08:35 AM Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R unlocked the medication room. The medication room temperature was warm, and the handwashing sink did not work. The August Refrigerator, Freezer and Room Temperature Log recorded only five days of 31 days of room temperature which read of 80 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and refrigerator temperature reading of 39 degrees F. On [DATE] at 08:45 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) G was present at the south hall treatment cart when observation revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents of which five where reviewed for immunization status. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to offer and provide and/or obtain informed refusals for Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccinations for Resident (R) 15, R25, R39, R67 and R47. This placed the affected residents increased risk for illness and infection. Findings included: - R15's clinical record lacked evidence the pneumococcal vaccine was offered, or an informed refusal was obtained. R25's clinical record lacked evidence the pneumococcal vaccine was offered, or an informed refusal was obtained. R39's clinical record lacked evidence the pneumococcal vaccine was offered, or an informed refusal was obtained. R67's clinical record lacked evidence the pneumococcal vaccine was offered or an informed refusal was obtained. R47's clinical record lacked documentation of influenza history and lacked evidence the pneumococcal vaccine was offered, or an informed refusal was obtained. On 09/06/22 at 04:12 PM Administrative Nurse D stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-07 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents with five residents reviewed for COVID-19 (an acute respiratory illness in humans caused by coronavirus, capable of producing severe symptoms and in some cases death) vaccination review. Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to offer and administer or obtain a signed declination for the COVID-19 booster vaccination for Resident (R) 15, R25, R39, R67 and R47. This deficient practice placed the residents at increased risk for unwarranted complications related to COVID-19 and the risk to spread illness and infection to the residents. Findings included: -Resident (R) 15 clinical record lacked evidence of an offer and/or informed refusal for COVID-19 second primary dose and second booster documentation. R25's clinical record lacked evidence of an offer and/or informed refusal for COVID-19 second booster. R39's clinical record lacked evidence of an offer and/or informed refusal for COVID-19 primary and second COVID-19 booster. R67's clinical record lacked evidence of an offer and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide three sampled residents, Resident (R) 39, R49 and R320 (or their representative) the completed Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN) form 10055, (CMS) Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services. This placed the residents at risk to make uninformed decisions about their skilled care Findings included: - The Medicare ABN form 10055 informed the beneficiary that Medicare may not pay for future skilled therapy services. The form included an option for the beneficiary to receive specific services listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment. The form stated 1) I understand if Medicare does not pay, I will be responsible for payment, but can make an appeal to Medicare, (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill Medicare, I am responsible for payment for services, (3) I do not want the listed services. The facility lacked documentation staff provided R39, or her representative, the completed form 10055…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for Resident (R) 47. This placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R47 listed diagnoses of epilepsy (a neurological disorder marked by sudden recurrent episodes of sensory disturbance, loss of consciousness, or convulsions, associated with abnormal electrical activity in the brain), type 2 diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and acquired absence of left leg below the knee (one or more limbs are surgically removed). The admission 5 -day Medicare Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R47 had intact cognition and was dependent upon two staff for transfers. R47 required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents of which three were reviewed for falls and behaviors. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise Resident (R)30's care plan for medication refusals and failed to place resident centered interventions to prevent falls on the care plan for R47 and R15. This placed the residents at risk for physical and mental injury due to unmet care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R30 had diagnoses of lupus (a chronic, inflammatory, connective tissue disease that can affect the joints and many organs), epilepsy (a neurological disorder marked by sudden recurrent episodes of sensory disturbance, loss of consciousness, or convulsions, associated with abnormal electrical activity in the brain), anoxic brain damage (caused by lack of oxygen to the brain), encephalopathy (any diffuse disease of the brain that alters brain function or structure), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 resident. The sample included 21 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide staff support to assist and maintain activities of daily living for Resident (R) 15, which placed the resident at risk for decline and injury. Finding included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R15's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), old myocardial infarction (heart attack), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- psychiatric disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress, such as natural disaster, military combat, serious automobile accident, airplane crash or physical torture), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS-a nervous system disease that weakens muscle and impacts…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 68. The sample included 21 residents with two residents reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure staff provided assessment, ongoing monitoring and physician involvement for Resident (R) 59 who had an unresponsive episode and R47 who had seizure activity. This placed the residents at increased risk for physical complication, unidentified adverse outcomes, and delayed treatment. Findings Included: - R59's Medical Diagnosis section within the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods) with psychotic(any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) features, anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - progressive and irreversible condition characterized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to investigate a root cause analysis to prevent falls for two of four residents reviewed for falls, Resident (R) 15 and R47. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for further falls and injury. Findings included: - -The Medical Diagnosis section withing R15's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), old myocardial infarction (heart attack), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS-a nervous system disease that weakens muscle and impacts physical function, also known as [NAME] Gehring's disease). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R15 had intact cognition, required supervision of one staff with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents with six residents reviewed for nutritional status. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor, address and ensure interventions and assistance was provided to prevent a continued weight loss for Resident (R) 15, who required assistance with eating. This placed R15 at risk for continued unintentional weight loss and impaired nutritional status. Finding included: -The Medical Diagnosis section withing R15's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), old myocardial infarction (heart attack), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- psychiatric disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress, such as natural disaster, military combat,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with one reviewed for dialysis (process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to perform physical assessments on Resident (R) 23, after his return from dialysis. This placed the resident at increased risk for unidentified complications related to dialysis or delay in treatment. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R23 documented diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), end stage renal disease (kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis), and celiac disease (the small intestine is hypersensitive to gluten [a mixture of two proteins] leading to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents with three reviewed for behavioral and/or emotional status. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for Resident (R)30. This placed the resident at risk for unaddressed and ongoing behavioral health issues and impaired psychosocial wellbeing. Findingls inlcuded: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R30 had diagnoses of lupus (a chronic, inflammatory, connective tissue disease that can affect the joints and many organs), epilepsy (a neurological disorder marked by sudden recurrent episodes of sensory disturbance, loss of consciousness, or convulsions, associated with abnormal electrical activity in the brain), anoxic brain damage (caused by lack of oxygen to the brain), encephalopathy (any diffuse disease of the brain that alters brain function or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with one reviewed for medication availability. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure availability of physician ordered medications for Resident (R)321. This placed the resident at risk for ineffective medication regimen and physical decline. Findings included: - R321's Physician Order sheet, dated 03/19/22 documented diagnoses chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), sepsis (a systemic reaction that develops when the chemicals in the immune system release into the blood stream to fight an infections which cause inflammation throughout the entire body instead. Severe cases of sepsis can lead to the medical emergency, septic shock,) bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), peritoneal abscess (tissue that lines the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility at a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 59 consistently received medications as ordered by the physician and failed to follow up on consistent refusal of physician ordered medications for R30. This placed the residents at increased risk for ineffective medication therapy. Findings included: - R59's Medical Diagnosis section within the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods) with psychotic(any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) features, anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 68 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis for Resident (R)8's Seroquel (an antipsychotic -medication used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing), failed to report to ther physician multiple refusals of R30's psychotropic (altering mood or though) medication and failed to monitor behaviors for R59 who received multiple psychotropic medication including an antipsychotic. This placed the residents at increased risk for negative side effects related to medications and unnecessary psychotropic medication use. Findings include: - R8's Physician's Order Sheet, dated 08/01/22, recorded diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure,) dementia with behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$47,317 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $33,920 — penalty dated 2026-01-29
- $13,397 — penalty dated 2023-08-31
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-27 for 1 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAVAS-MIGUELOA, LUIS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 34% | since 11/01/2023 |
| MARCOTTE, RICHARD | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 11/01/2023 |
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $241K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175215. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.