No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Countryside Health Center

440 SE Woodland Avenue, Topeka, KS 66607 · For profit - Corporation · 97 certified beds · (785) 234-6147 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Call the home — (785) 234-6147 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 16 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1130 N Kansas Ave · (785) 354-1777 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
121 SE 6th Ave · (877) 232-4601 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
El Rodeo0.7 mi
1706 SE 6th Ave · (785) 267-5407 · Call to confirm hours
Park
300 SE Arter Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2622 SE 6th Ave · (785) 235-1748

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.8%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.1%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.8%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication49.9%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.2%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.4%22.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table84.4%18.1%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
0.33
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.19
Aide hours/ resident / day
1.86
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
38.6%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 90.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.86 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 1.96 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-30)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-30 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 95 residents. The sample included 19 residents, two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA), and three Certified Medication Aides (CMA) were reviewed for yearly performance evaluations and the associated in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure five of the two CNAs and three CMA staff reviewed had yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's staffing list revealed the following CNAs and CMAs were employed with the facility for more than 12 months: CMA T, hired on 04/18/18, had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. CMA S, hired on 11/27/20, had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. CNA M, hired on 01/21/23, had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. CMA R, hired on 01/08/24, had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. CNA N, hired on 03/25/24, had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. On 04/29/25 at 10:12 AM, Administrative Staff A stated the employee's supervisor was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 95 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during day-to-day operations and emergencies. This failure affected all 95 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: - On 04/28/25, Administrative Nurse D provided a Facility Assessment updated 01/30/25. A review of the assessment revealed the following: The assessment identified the required staffing needs per day but failed to identify the specific staffing needs by shifts for the weekends. On 04/29/25, a review of the facility's Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ - Staffing Data Report) from 04/01/24 to 03/31/25 revealed excessively low weekend staffing triggered on all four quarters. On 04/30/25 at 08:41 AM, Administrator A stated the nursing hours were set by the corporate office, and the assessment was recently updated to reflect the hours needed for days and nights. He stated the assessment did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-30 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 95 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ - Staffing Data Report). This placed the residents at risk for impaired care due to unidentified staffing issues. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year 2024, all four quarters indicated the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. On 04/29/25 at 09:10 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated that the weekend staffing was not low. Administrative Nurse D stated that the level of weekend staffing was the same as during the week for direct care staff. Administrative Nurse D stated there must be an error in the reporting of the hours. The facility's Competent and Sufficient Staffing policy, dated 09/2024, documented direct care staffing information was submitted to the payroll-based journal (PBJ) system on the schedule specified by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 95 residents. The facility identified 85 residents who had requested to be full code (term used to indicate the desire to receive resuscitative measures in the event of cardiac arrest). Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a system to ensure nursing staff maintained current cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR - a life-saving medical procedure that consists of chest compressions to allow oxygenated blood to circulate to vital organs, such as the brain and heart and artificial ventilation) certification for healthcare providers. This deficient practice placed these residents who desired CPR if needed at risk for inadequate resuscitative measures. Findings included: - On [DATE] at 12:32 PM, CPR verification wass requested for the following dates and shifts: day shift on [DATE] and [DATE], evening shift on [DATE] and [DATE], and night shift on [DATE] and [DATE]. The facility was unable to provide verification of CPR certification for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 95 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with two medication rooms. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to properly label and store medications in the medication room, and further failed to secure medication carts containing residents' insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) pens and needles. This placed the residents at risk for adverse outcomes or ineffective medication regimens. Findings included: - On 04/28/25 at 07:05 AM, a medication cart sitting in the dining room was unlocked, and the medication cart had an insulin pen laid on top of the cart. The medication cart had a box that included an insulin pen, needles, and a glucose monitor in a plastic box. The medication cart revealed several residents' insulin pens and needles. On 04/30/25 at 8:15 AM, the medication refrigerator contained an opened, undated vial of tuberculin test serum(method of determining whether a person is infected ). On 04/30/25 at 10:55 AM, the medication cart in the commons area was unsecured.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 95 residents. The facility identified three residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement signage or indicators within the physical environment to alert staff and visitors of the required EBP and personal protective equipment (PPE) for Resident (R) 36 and R52. The facility additionally failed to cover linens in the hallways and further failed to ensure the dirty laundry sorting area was equipped with a gown and mask. This defiant practice placed the residents at risk of infectious diseases. Findings included: - On 04/28/25 at 07:15 AM, an inspection of R36's room revealed no EBP indicator signage to inform visitors or staff. On 04/28/25 at 07:15 AM, an inspection of R52's room revealed no EBP indicator signage to inform visitors or staff. On 04/28/25 at 7:42 AM, Laundry Staff U pushed a cart of blankets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 95 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a plan of care, and implement skin care interventions for Resident (R) 36, who developed at Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss into but no deeper than the dermis including intact or ruptured blisters) pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). This deficient practice placed R36 at risk for pain, complications, and possible infection associated with pressure ulcers. Findings included: - R36's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), seborrheic dermatitis (chronic skin condition characterized by inflammation and scaling), schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 95 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to recognize or address the potential for developing a pressure ulcer. The facility failed to identify the risks, develop a plan of care, and implement interventions when Resident (R) 36 developed at Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss into but no deeper than the dermis including intact or ruptured blisters) pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). This deficient practice placed R36 at risk for pain, complications, and possible infection associated with pressure ulcers. Findings included: - R36's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), seborrheic dermatitis (chronic skin condition characterized by inflammation and scaling), schizoaffective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 96 residents. The sample included 19 residents, with four residents reviewed for trauma-informed care (treatment or care directed to prevent re-experiencing or reducing the effects of traumatic events). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify trauma-based triggers related to Residents (R) 45's and R10 post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress) and failed to implement individualized interventions to prevent re-traumatization. These deficient practices placed R45 and R10 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and ineffective treatment. Findings included: - R45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), nicotine dependence on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 87 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, for the 87 residents who resided in the facility. This placed the facility and residents at risk for inadequate nurse guidance and decreased quality of care. Findings included: - Review of the Registered Nursing Staffing Schedule for May, June and September 2022, recorded the facility lacked a RN for eight consecutive hours on the following dates: 05/22/22, 05/30/22, 06/04/22, 06/05/22, 06/18/22, 06/19/22 and 09/05/22. On 08/10/23 at 08:50 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the facility did not have a RN in the building or working as a charge nurse for the above documented dates. The facility's Nursing Services policy, dated 04/17/18 recorded the facility would provide nursing services to maintain resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being of each resident. The policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 6 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-15 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 87 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to employ a full time certified dietary manager for the 87 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. This deficient practice placed the 87 residents at risk for receiving inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 08/09/23 at 08:32 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) BB supervising staff in the kitchen. DS BB stated the facility did not have a Dietary Manager and the administrator and director of nursing supervised the dietary department. On 08/14/23 at 09:34 AM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility did not have a certified dietary manager since the last one quit. He stated the Registered Dietician, who checked the kitchen, came to the facility monthly and the director of nursing placed the food orders with vendors. The facility's Director of Dining Services Roles and Responsibilities policy, dated 04/03/20, stated the Director of Dining Services meets one of the following requirements: is a qualified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 87 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label Resident(R)41, R53, R65, R72, R55 and R56s' insulin (hormone which allows cells throughout the body to uptake glucose) flex pens and non-insulin flex pens with the date opened and expiration date and failed to discard expired stock medication on one medication cart. These deficient practices placed the affected resident at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included: - On 08/09/23 at 08:30 AM, observation of Hall D medication cart revealed the following: Magnesium Oxide (antacid or used to treat low magnesium) 400 milligrams (mg) 100 tablets expired 06/2023. On 08/09/23 at 09:15AM, observation of the Hall A and B treatment cart revealed the following: R41's Ozempic (insulin medication used to help the body make and release insulin) flex pen lacked an open date and expiration date. R53's Victozia (non-insulin injection used to lower blood sugar) flex pen lacked an open date and expiration date. R65's Novolog (rapid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 87 residents. The sample included 18 residents of which Resident (R) 14 was reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to promote dignity for R14 who had a urinary catheter (a tube in the bladder to drain urine). This placed the resident at risk for embarrassment and an undignified experience. Findings included: - R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented he had diagnoses of kidney failure (severe failure of kidneys to function), neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control due to a disease process), and schizophrenia (serious mental condition). R14's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a urinary catheter. The urinary catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 07/20/23, documented the resident had end stage kidney failure and neurogenic bladder and required the use of a urinary catheter. The updated Urinary Catheter care plan, dated 07/12/23, instructed staff to cover the urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 87 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a written notice of bed hold for Resident (R) 11 when he was hospitalized . This placed the resident at risk of being unable to return to the facility and in his prior room. Findings included: - R11's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of heart disease and high blood pressure. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R11 was independent with most activities of daily living and received pain medication. The Cardiac Care Plan, dated 07/08/23 directed staff to provide cardiac and respiratory medications or treatments as ordered, including Nitrostat (a medication that dilates blood vessels) for chest pain, as prescribed by his physician and observe for medication effectiveness. The Progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 87 residents. The sample included 18 residents with Resident (R) 14 reviewed for Hospice services. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure R14 had a hospice plan of care in place and available for facility staff direction on hospice provided care. This deficient practice placed R14 at risk for unmet hospice care/services and a decline in his well-being. Findings included: - R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented he had diagnoses of kidney failure (severe failure of kidneys to function), neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control due to a disease process), and schizophrenia (serious mental condition). R14's Significant Change Minimum Data Set(MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident received hospice services. Review of the EMR documented hospice services for end stage kidney failure started 07/13/23. Further review of the EMR lacked a facility hospice care plan which contained the hospice contact information, frequency of visits,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 87 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain activities of daily living (ADLs) for two sampled residents, Resident (R)71 and R78. This placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene and decline in ADLs. Findings included: - R71's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 12/06/21, documented diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) affecting right dominant side, restlessness and agitation (feeling of aggravation or restlessness brought on by a provocation or a medical condition), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with behavioral disturbance. The Annual Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 17E528. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next