Wellsville Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 24.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 50.4 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.91 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.91 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-05-21 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a full-time Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) for the residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. Findings included: - On 05/20/26 at 11:00 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified she was the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) for the two facility kitchens but continued to work at another facility as well.During an interview on 05/21/26 at 09:35 AM, Administrative Staff A stated there should be a full-time CDM on site, and this was the expected transition for Dietary Staff BB. Administrative Staff A verified there should be a qualified dietician or other clinically qualified nutrition professional working full-time in the facility, to oversee the kitchen staff and dietary needs of the residents.During an interview on 05/21/26 at 11:05 AM, Consultant GG verified she was overseeing seven facilities kitchens and currently visits this facility on Fridays, then verified that neither she nor the CDM are working over 35 hours a week at the current facility.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective sanitizing of dishes when the sanitizer did not reach 120 degrees Fahrenheit, in one of the facility's two kitchens. Findings included:- During an observation on 05/20/26 at 12:15 PM, Dietary Staff EE ran a cycle of glassware through the sanitizer, in the secondary kitchen, and verified the temperature was 111 degrees Fahrenheit (F). During an interview on 05/20/26 at 12:30 PM, Maintenance Staff U confirmed the temperature on the sanitizer should be 120 degrees F. On 05/20/26 at 03:00 PM, Maintenance Staff U stated the temperature on the sanitizer was adjusted to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility's undated Dietary Services Leadership & Shared CDM Policy stated residents are to receive safe, sanitary, and nutritionally adequate meals in accordance with physician orders, resident preferences and regulatory requirements.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement adequate infection control practices when staff failed to perform hand hygiene and failed to sanitize shared equipment. Findings included:- On 05/20/2026 at 01:25 PM, an observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) P and CNA N used a Hoyer lift (full body mechanical lift) for Resident (R) 35 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) and transferred the resident from the wheelchair to the bed to change the resident's soiled brief. CNA P and CNA N washed their hands and applied personal protective equipment (PPE- equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses before transferring and changing resident). CNA P and CNA N removed the soiled brief and applied a clean brief without changing gloves and performing hand hygiene. The two CNA staff then removed their PPE and placed it in the trash.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform Resident (R) 5 or her representative about the risk and benefits of taking an antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders).Findings included:- R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness).R5's 06/10/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS recorded R5 took a diuretic (a medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine), opioid (a class of controlled drugs used to treat pain), hypoglycemic (a type of medication to treat high blood glucose levels), and an anticonvulsant.R5's Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R5 received pain medications and diabetic medications.R5's Psychotropic Drug Use CAA was not triggered.R5's Care Plan documented R5 took an antidepressant for a diagnosis of major depressive disorder to improve functioning and reduce symptoms on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and monitor a psychotropic medication for Resident (R) 27, who received Ambien (a psychotropic medication used to induce sleep) nightly.Findings included:- R27's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: insomnia (inability to sleep) and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness).R27's 09/08/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS recorded R27 took an antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders), anticoagulant (a class of medications used to prevent the blood from clotting), and opioid (a class of controlled drugs used to treat pain). The MDS did not accurately document that R27 took a hypnotic (a class of medications used to induce sleep).R27's 09/08/25 Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R27 took pain medication which managed her pain well but lacked documentation of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 2, and R54 a written notification of transfer to the resident and/or his representative as soon as practicable and failed to send a copy of that notification to the ombudsman. The facility also failed to provide R2 or the representative with the bed-hold upon discharge to the hospital.Findings included: 1. R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of sepsis (a life-threatening systemic reaction that develops due to infections that cause inflammation throughout the entire body) and urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system).R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) tab documented a Discharge MDS on 11/20/25, 01/23/26, 03/14/26, and 04/26/26.R2's Nurse's Note, dated 11/21/25 at 01:50 AM, documented R2 returned to the facility after having the nephrostomy tubes changed, at 09:10 PM, R2 had a temperature of 102 Fahrenheit (F), and was sweating and had low back pain. The doctor was notified and advised staff that R2 likely required evaluation at the hospital due to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess Resident (R) 5 and R27.Findings included:1. R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness).R5's 06/10/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS recorded R5 took a diuretic (a medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine), opioid (a class of controlled drugs used to treat pain), hypoglycemic (a type of medication to treat high blood glucose levels), and an anticonvulsant. The MDS did not accurately document that R5 took an antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders).R5's 06/10/25 Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R5 received pain medications and diabetic medications.R5's 06/10/25 Psychotropic Drug Use CAA was not triggered due to not being accurately assessed on the MDS.R5's Care Plan documented R5 took an antidepressant for a diagnosis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify and implement resident-centered interventions and monitor effectiveness of interventions to prevent falls for Resident (R) 3 who was at high risk for falls. Findings included:- R3's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented diagnoses of pneumonitis (an infection in the lungs due to inhalation of food and vomit), sepsis (a life-threatening systemic reaction that develops due to infections that cause inflammation throughout the entire body), polyosteoarthritis (degenerative changes to many joints characterized by swelling and pain), encephalopathy (a broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system), overactive bladder (a sudden, uncontrollable urge to urinate that is difficult to postpone), and diarrhea.R3's Annual Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 2 received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible by failing to keep the urine collection bag attached to the nephrostomy(an artificial opening created between the kidney and the skin which allows for the urinary diversion) tubes below the level of the kidney.Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of sepsis (a life-threatening systemic reaction that develops due to infections that cause inflammation throughout the entire body) urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system), and a kidney infection.R2's 07/06/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R2 had an indwelling catheter and took antibiotics.R2's 07/06/25 Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R2 was in isolation for a UTI and had nephrostomy tubes in both kidneys, which staff are managing.R2's EMR contained Discharge Instructions for Nephrostomy Tube Care, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchen on 08/20/24 at 07:41 AM, the following areas of concern were noted: 1. The trash can in the dish washing area contained dried-on food and liquid substances on all sides and the lid. 2. The trash can by the hand washing sink contained dried-on food and liquid substances on all sides and the lid. 3. The shelf underneath a preparation table which held plastic pitchers, cutting boards and clean eating utensils, contained food debris. 4. The inside of the microwave contained dried-on food on all sides and the top. 5. Four colored cutting boards contained deep grooves and were discolored. 6. An oscillating fan had a build-up of dust in the slats of the fan. 7. One side of the stove had dried-on food substances. 8. One of two reach-in freezers had a build-up of food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $624K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS