Homestead Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 43.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.21 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.87 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 42 residents with two reviewed for urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag) management. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure appropriate indwelling urinary catheter care for Resident (R)1. On 12/24/23 at approximately 08:30 PM Licensed Nurse (LN) G flushed R1's indwelling urinary catheter, without a physician order, and used a non-sterile 60 milliliter (ml) syringe from R1's bathroom, which possibly contained some bleach and water mixture (used to clean R1's dependent drainage bag). R1 complained of burning pain immediately upon injecting the flush and LN G realized she performed the flush on the wrong patient. LN G then flushed the catheter again with the same non-sterile 60 ml syringe using tap water from the sink to take out whatever was making it burn. Approximately 15 minutes later, R1 requested Tylenol (analgesic medication) for pain and LN G flushed R1's urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 42 residents with two reviewed, Resident (R)1 and R2, for urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag) management. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure nursing staff competency when LN G flushed R1's indwelling urinary catheter, without a physician order, and used a non-sterile 60 milliliter (ml) syringe from R1's bathroom, which possibly contained some bleach and water mixture (used to clean R1's dependent drainage bag) on 12/24/23 at approximately 08:30 PM. R1 complained of burning pain immediately upon injecting the flush and LN G realized she performed the flush on the wrong patient. LN G then flushed the catheter again with the same non-sterile 60 ml syringe using tap water from the sink to take out whatever was making it burn. Approximately 15 minutes later, R1 requested Tylenol (analgesic medication) for pain and LN G flushed R1's urinary catheter again, using a new syringe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - Resident (R) 35's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of unspecified dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The 06/20/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. R35 had a total mood severity score of 03, indicating minimal depression and there were no behaviors. She was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs), with toileting hygiene, dressing, personal hygiene, ambulation, and transfers. R35 required set up for meals and moderate assistance with bathing. The MDS indicated R35 experienced no falls since admission. The 06/20/24 Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R35 had potential for falls and injury related to unstable blood glucose control, decreased safety awareness, and a history of falls prior to admission. The 08/26/24 Care Plan documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-14 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for the residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included:- Upon request the facility was unable to provide evidence of a Certified Dietary manager (CDM). On 05/12/26 at 07:40 AM, Dietary Manager BB revealed the facility does not have a CDM and said License Nurse (LN) G does act as the CDM when needed. On 05.13/26 at 11:30 AM, Administrative Staff A revealed the Registered Dietitian monitors the kitchen and dining and Dietary Manager BB oversees the ordering for the kitchen and attends the food meetings. Administrative Staff A stated three CDM have left and the facility was currently advertising for a CDM. The facility did not provide a policy as requested on 05/14/26.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent potential food borne bacteria. Findings included:- On 05/12/26 at 07:40 AM, an initial tour of the main kitchen revealed refrigerator temperatures were missing for the following date: 05/04/26, 05/05/26, 05/06/26, 05/07/26, 05/09/26 and 05/10/26. During the tour three male dietary staff wearing beard guards without covering mustaches, including Dietary Manager BB. Additionally, the hand-washing station lacked a foot activated trash can, and the dishwasher chemical sanitization needed repaired. the staff did not use the three-sink sanitation until asked about their procedure, The three-sink sanitation was started. On 5/12/26 at 07:40 AM Dietary Staff BB revealed the dishwasher was not working properly and a repairman would be coming out that day to fix the issue. On 05/12/26 at 11:30 AM interview with Administrative Staff A revealed she expected the staff to keep refrigerator temperatures documented daily; staff to wear the beard net properly to cover…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate infection control practices related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions, EBP (a infection control measure using gowns and gloves during high-contact care) and cleaning of the Hoyer lift (mechanical device used to transfer individuals between surfaces) and proper handwashing between clean and soiled during resident care. Findings included:- On 05/12/26 at 09:17 AM, an observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O and Certified Nurse Aide CNA R transferred Resident (R) 33 from the recliner to the wheelchair using the Hoyer lift. After finishing the transfer, the lift was placed in the slot in the hallway without wiping it down. On 05/12/26 at 09:25 AM, an observation revealed CNA P obtained the Hoyer lift from the slot in the hallway, took the lift in to use on R11 without cleaning the lift prior to use. On 05/13/26 at 10:30 AM, an observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) H was already in the room with gloves on, assisting R42 to get up for the day. CNA Q entered the room and washed hands before…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a scale to obtain resident weights that was operational.Findings:- On 05/13/26 at 04:41 PM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R stated the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) got the residents' weights monthly and when needed. CMA R stated she would weigh Resident (R) 5 but would have to make sure the scale was working, as it had been down. CMA R returned and stated it was still broken so she was unable to weigh R5. Review of R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed a lack of documentation of weights for 04/29/26, 05/06/26, and 05/20/26. On 05/14/26 at 03:09 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated that all residents use the scale to weigh. The scale was down since 04/28/26 and was sent to be fixed on 05/04/26. They have been unable to weigh any residents since then. On 05/14/26 at 03:09 PM, Administrate Staff A stated she called several places to rent a scale and was unable to get one. The facility policy Maintenance Service, dated 03/2025, documented the maintenance department is responsible for maintaining the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to ensure acceptable parameters of nutritional status for Resident (R) 5 when the facility failed to identify weight loss, implement interventions and recommendations to prevent further loss, notify the registered dietician or the physician of the weight loss, and failed to ensure working scales in the facility. Findings included:- R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), need for assistance with personal care, and hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created). R5's 04/06/26 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance of pureed foods for Resident (R) 33. Findings included: On 05/13/26 at 11:15 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff CC placed stew into the blender to puree the food for R33. The recipe book present showed how to cook meat and gravy, it did not show a recipe for pureed food. Dietary Staff CC reported they only put about one fourth of water into the stew and stated they did not have a recipe book to follow Dietary staff CC did not use a measuring device for an accurate amount of fluid used. On 05/13/26 at 11:20 AM, Dietary Manager BB attempted to show the recipes which indicated how to cook beef and gravy. Dietary Manager BB then revealed the kitchen did not have recipes for pureed foods. On 5.13.26 at 11:30 AM Administrative Staff A revealed she expected the kitchen staff to puree the food correctly and confirmed the facility had recipes and the staff just needs to use them. The facility did not provide a policy regarding proper food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 13 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately revise four resident's care plans after falls experienced by Residents (R)37, R35, R21, and R12. Additionally, R9's hearing bilateral hearing aides were not addressed on the resident's care plan. This placed the residents at risk for uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - Resident (R)37's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses, which included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), weakness, and falls. The 08/14/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. R37 had a total (mood) severity score of zero, which indicated no depression. R37 required set up assistance for oral care and eating. R37 required moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), with personal hygiene, and transfers.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 12 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two medication carts observed were locked while unattended. This deficiency had the potential to affect 21 residents located on the North Unit. Findings included: - During an observation on 08/27/24 at 12:05 PM, an unlocked medication cart was observed on the North Unit. Licensed Nurse (LN) Q was seated behind the nurse's station desk with her back towards the unlocked medication cart that was positioned on the outside of the nurse's station. LN Q had been communicating with a hospice nurse. The medication cart drawer was opened without LN Q noticing. During an interview on 08/27/24 at 12:06 PM, LN Q confirmed that the medication cart was the nurses' treatment cart and should not have been left unlocked as the cart contained medications and treatment supplies. LN Q then locked the cart. During an interview on 08/28/24 at 10:07 AM, Administrative Nurse B confirmed the nurses' medication/treatment cart should be locked at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents, with 12 residents sampled, including one resident sampled for advanced directives (a written document which indicated the medical decisions for health care professionals when the person could not make their own decisions). Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 35 who was cognitively intact sign a completed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR- or no code, a legal document or order that means the person does not desire CPR in the event of cardiac arrest), instead they had a family member sign the directive. Findings included: - Resident (R) 35's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of unspecified dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The [DATE] admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. R35…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain effective infection control measures when Certified Medication Aide (CMA) H poked a straw through a potentially contaminated plastic film on the top of a cup containing a house supplement shake and then assisted a resident in drinking part of the shake. This deficient practice had the potential to contaminate the shake and lead to food-borne illness. Findings included: - On 08/28/24 at 11:04 AM, CMA H knocked over a cup that contained an unknown liquid and covered with a plastic film that sat on the medication cart. CMA H picked up the cup, removed a straw from the paper wrapper, and poked the straw through the plastic film. CMA H then walked into Resident (R) 1's room and assisted R1 in drinking approximately half of the liquid. On 08/28/24 at 11:11 AM, CMA H identified the liquid as a house supplement nutritional supplement shake and confirmed that she poked the straw through the potentially contaminated plastic film. CMA H stated that she should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$59,829 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $37,375 — penalty dated 2024-08-28
• $22,454 — penalty dated 2024-01-04
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-26 for 19 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS