No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Seasons at Alexandria

7341 E Alexandria Pike, Alexandria, KY 41001 · Non profit - Corporation · 117 certified beds · (859) 694-4450 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0607) — most recent Jun 20245 immediate-jeopardy citations$246,139 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Jun 2024
  • inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $246,139 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-15)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
(859) 635-9440 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6711 Alexandria Pike · (859) 635-8822 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6711 E Alexandria Pike · (859) 635-8800 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3965 Alexandria Dr · (859) 635-4125 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1054 Poplar Ridge Rd · (859) 635-4160

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.3%13.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.4%6.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.1%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.1%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.9%29.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.4%96.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.0%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.7%19.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.5%16.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.1%1.7%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%83.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.7%24.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.1%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.091.941.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.032.141.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 212 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.6%CMS range 54.6–67.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 7.8–12.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge47.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge36.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.4–9.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.77
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
50.3%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 108.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.43 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.77 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.60 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-15)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2022-05-26)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document, and review of the facility's documents, policies, and procedure, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for the total census of 99 residents. On [DATE], the Local Health Department (LHD) informed the facility that Resident (R) 121 had been diagnosed with Legionnaire's disease while in the hospital. Testing conducted by a third-party water specialist revealed positive areas for legionella in the facility. On [DATE] uncontrolled levels of growth were identified in the hot shower of room [ROOM NUMBER] and in the cooling tower. Before this incident, there was no written water management program in place, and the facility was not actively flushing dead legs (an area of piping system where…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for five of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 4, R37, R38, R40, and R41. R4, who was left unsupervised outside in 90-degree weather for 30 to 45 minutes on 08/04/2024 required a transfer to the Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation of mental status changes and a temperature of 105 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and as of 08/07/2024, the resident had not yet returned to the facility. Review of R4's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) revealed no care plan interventions in place for supervision while he was outside. Additionally, it was reported by staff R4 went outside to the courtyard daily with R37, R38 and R40. R38, R40, and R41 were observed by the State Survey Agency (SSA) Surveyor outside the facility in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the website localconditions.com, review of the website my.clevelandclinic.org, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 4. On 08/04/2024, R4 was assisted outside in his wheelchair by State Trained Nurse Assistant (STNA) 40 and was left unattended in 90 degree Fahrenheit (F) weather for 30 to 45 minutes. R4 required transfer to the Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation of mental status changes, a temperature of 105 degrees F, and as of 08/07/2024, the resident had not yet returned to the facility. The facility's failure to have an effective system in place to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents is likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death if immediate action is not taken. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 08/09/2024 at 42 CFR 483.25 Accidents and Supervision (F689) with a Scope and Severity (S/S) of a J.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to protect two (2) of thirty-nine (39) sampled residents (R) from physical and verbal abuse by staff (R24 and R11). During the first week of May 2024 (exact date unknown), State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) 20 witnessed STNA 9 providing care to R24, and observed STNA 9 being rough while providing care to the resident. However, STNA 20 failed to report the incident of possible physical abuse by STNA 9 towards R24 to administrative staff. Therefore, STNA 9 continued to work, and on 05/19/2024, STNA 9 held R11's wrist and hit the resident repeatedly with her fist in the left upper arm. STNA 8 heard STNA 9 state to R11, I told you not to hit me. I hit harder than you and you don't hit women. The incident resulted in R11 sustaining a large bruise to the left upper arm. The facility's failure to have an effective system in place to ensure residents were protected from verbal and physical abuse is likely to cause…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure its staff implemented the facility's abuse policy regarding reporting allegations of physical abuse for one of 39 sampled residents, (R) 24. State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) 20, during the first week of May 2024 (exact date unknown), observed STNA 9 being rough when providing care for R24. Review of the facility's abuse policy dated 11/01/2023, revealed employees must always report abuse or suspicion of abuse immediately to the Administrator or designee. STNA 20 failed to report the allegation of abuse to the Administrator or designee, and STNA 9 continued to work providing care to facility residents. As a result of STNA 20's failure to report the abuse allegation as per facility policy, STNA 9 was allowed to hit R11 on 05/19/2024, repeatedly with her fist in the resident's left upper arm and verbally abuse him during provision of care. The incident resulted in R11 sustaining a large bruise to the left upper arm. Refer to F600. The facility's failure to ensure its staff implemented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's nursing assistant (State Registered Nurse Assistant/SRNA) job description and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (1) of twenty-six (26) sampled residents (Resident #81). The facility's assessed and care planned Resident #81 to require the extensive assistance of two (2) staff for transfers and bed mobility. However, on 04/17/2022, State Registered Nurse Aide (SRNA) #14 attempted to transfer Resident #81 from a chair to the bed, without assistance from another staff member. The transfer was unsuccessful, resulting in a fall. Three (3) days later, Resident #81 complained of severe pain and underwent imaging three to the right ankle that resulted in a diagnosis of a nondisplaced intra-articular fracture of the medial tibia. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, last reviewed 11/30/2021, revealed the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's investigative report, review of the facility's job description, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one (1) of twenty-six (26) sampled residents (Resident #81). According to Resident #81's Comprehensive Assessment, two (2) or more staff members were required to assist the resident for transfers and bed mobility. However, on 04/17/2022, Resident #81 sustained a fall when one (1) staff member, State Registered Nurse Aide (SRNA) #14 transferred the resident from a chair to the bed, with no assistance. Three (3) days later, Resident #81 complained of severe pain and underwent imaging to the right ankle that resulted in a diagnosis of a nondisplaced intra-articular fracture of the medial tibia. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Process, undated, revealed prior to or within six (6) hours of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure food items located in dry storage, the walk-in refrigerator, the number five kitchen reach-in refrigerator, and unit nourishment refrigerators were properly labeled and dated, and that expired food items were discarded. This deficient practice affected all 99 current residents.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Food and Supply Storage, revised 01/2024 revealed foods past the use-by, sell-by, best-by, or enjoy-by date should be discarded. Further review revealed unused portions and opened packages of food should be covered, labeled, and dated.Observation during an initial brief kitchen tour on 08/12/2025 at 10:53 AM revealed one pork ham with a discard date of 08/11/2025 located in the walk-in refrigerator; an undated, opened package of devil's food cake mix, an undated, opened 11 pound tub of chocolate fudge icing, and an expired loaf of bread located in dry storage; and an expired container…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's document and policies, the facility failed to ensure medications designed for multiple administrations were labeled to identify the specific resident for whom it was prescribed and/or the date the medication was opened in 1 of 7 sampled medication carts for the Maple Unit. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the provision of appropriate environmental controls to preserve the integrity of medications in 1 of 7 sampled medication refrigerators, the Maple Unit medication storage refrigerator. Also, the facility failed to ensure when medications were prepared or compounded for use, a label containing the required information was attached to the compounded medication label for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident (R) 56 The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, last revised date [DATE], revealed staff should enter the date opened on the label of medications with shortened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 2 residents investigated for ADLs, Resident (R) 122.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), dated 10/23/2024, revealed, The facility will provide care and services for activities of daily living including, bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care. Further review revealed, A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Review of R122's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 08/08/2025 with diagnoses including COVID-19 and syncope.Review of R122's admission Minimum Data Set [MDS], with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/15/2025, revealed the facility assessed to resident to have a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents' food was served in a safe manner, and ensure all staff practiced proper hand hygiene procedures during the supper meal service on 05/28/2024. Observation of the supper meal on 05/28/2024, revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA)7 failed to wash her hands with soap and water, dry her hands thoroughly with a single-use towel, and turn off the faucet with a clean towel while serving residents' supper meal trays. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, implemented 11/08/2022, revealed, Hand hygiene is a general term for cleaning your hands by handwashing with soap and water or the use of an antiseptic hand rub, also known as alcohol-based hand rub [ABHR]. Continued review revealed Hand hygiene technique when using soap and water: Wet hands with water. Apply to hands the amount of soap recommended by the manufacturer. Rub hands together vigorously for at least 20 seconds, covering all surfaces of the hand and fingers. Rinse hands with water.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Infection Prevention during Blood Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Administration, and Environmental Cleaning Procedures: Best Practices for Environmental Cleaning in Healthcare Facilities, review of the manufacturer's instructions for use, review of [NAME] (2014) Manual of Nursing Practice 10th edition, and review of the facility's policies and procedures, it was determined the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment. The facility also failed to help prevent and control the development and transmission of communicable diseases and to implement interventions per the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Kentucky Department for Public Health's (Health Department) state guidelines for COVID-19. Observations, on 05/24/2022 before lunch, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to handle kitchen equipment in a sanitary manner in the dish room. Observations, on 05/24/2022, of Utility Aide #1 revealed he touched the clean top and bottom covers for clean plates with contaminated ungloved hands. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Sanitation and Infection Prevention/Control: Hand Hygiene, dated 01/2022, revealed, under Disposable, that non-latex gloves must be worn when handling soiled dishware, clean utensils, dishes, and equipment. Per the policy, hands must be washed before putting on and after removing disposable gloves when working in the kitchen. Further, it stated disposable gloves must be changed and hands washed when the gloves were dirty and when moving from one task to another; for example, from handling dirty dishes to handling clean dishes. Observation of Utility Aide #1, on 05/24/2022 at 9:30 AM, revealed he was in the dish room and walked from the soiled side of the dishwasher, handled the soiled dishware, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility Policy, it was determined the facility failed to provide food and drink that is palatable, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Observations of test trays from the breakfast meal on 05/16/19 on the [NAME] Unit, Hickory Unit, and Walnut Unit, revealed point of service temperatures for hot foods were below one hundred thirty-five (135) degrees Fahrenheit (F) which was not in accordance with facility policy. In addition, point of service temperatures were observed above forty (40) degrees F for cold foods, which was not in accordance with facility policy. The findings include: Review of the facility Policy titled, Meal Service: Taste & Temperature Control/Food Holding, dated 01/2016 revealed food is maintained at proper temperatures during service to meet resident expectation for palatability and to ensure food safety principles are maintained to prevent foodborne illness. Continued review of the Policy, revealed cold foods such as milk,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility Policy, it was determined the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Observation of the walk-in refrigerator in the kitchen, on 05/04/19, revealed two (2) one (1) gallon jars of sweet pickle relish which were open and undated. In addition, observation of the stand-up refrigerator in the kitchen, on 05/04/19, revealed one (1) sixteen (16) ounce bottle of mayonnaise with the cap broken off. The findings include: Review of the facility Policy, titled Receiving & Storage, dated 01/2016, revealed it was the policy of the facility that proper procedures will be utilized for all dry and refrigerated food storage. Further review revealed all items are dated when received. Continued review revealed products must be checked to detect unacceptable items. Observation on 05/14/19 at 10:31 AM, of the walk-in refrigerator in the kitchen, revealed two (2) one (1) gallon jars of North Star Pickle Company sweet relish that had been opened, but were not dated with the open date. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's Policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was revised for one (1) of twenty three (23) sampled residents (Resident #91). Resident #91's indwelling urinary catheter was discontinued on 04/26/19 as per Physician's Orders; however, the CCP was not revised related to the discontinuation of the Foley catheter. The findings include: Review of the facility's Policy, titled Care Plan, dated 10/18/18, revealed the individualized CCP would include measurable goals and periods to meet each resident's medical, physical and psychosocial need that is identified during the assessment. A complete re-evaluation is performed at least quarterly, or with any significant change. Additionally, each residents CCP is updated based on the target dates used for each goal by the interdisciplinary team, as well as any time the plan of treatment or resident needs dictate. Review of Resident #91's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's Policies, it was determined the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene procedures were followed by staff involved in direct resident contact. Observation on 05/14/19 of Dietary Aide #5, during afternoon meal service on the Maple Unit, revealed the Aide touched multiple objects and surfaces, then failed to perform hand hygiene and don new gloves prior to returning to food service. The findings include: Review of the facility's Infection Control Guidelines, Policy, reviewed 10/31/17, revealed it was facility policy to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment. Further review revealed all staff shall wash their hands after handling contaminated objects. Observation on 05/14/19 at 11:50 AM, on the Maple Unit, revealed Dietary Aide #5 opened the dishwasher and reached into the dishwasher with gloved hands and retrieved a knife. Dietary Aide #5 failed to perform hand hygiene and don new gloves before cutting a resident's sandwich.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$246,139 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $19,955 — penalty dated 2025-08-15
  • $226,184 — penalty dated 2024-06-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CHILELLI, JUSTINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
DORSEY, JOSHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/01/2019
DRESSMAN, JIMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/08/2017
EPPLEN, STEVEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
HAMBERG, JOYCEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
LEVERMANN, JACKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
MACKE, DAVEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
MCINTOSH, EFFIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2020
RICHARDSON, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
SANTOS, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/10/2018
SCHREINER SPILLE, CHRISTINAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
PAVLOU, MARIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
STROUD, REVAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
CONCEPT REHAB, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
HARGIS & ASSOCIATES, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-98.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 35%Medicare 6%Other / private 59%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$606per resident / day
operating cost
$18,424per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$306per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kentucky Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kentucky
$9,718/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,528/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 185484. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next