Auburn Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 62.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 86% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to implement the care plan related to advance directives for one (Resident (R) 1) of 19 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. R1's care plan identified the resident as a Full Code (indicating that Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) should be performed if the resident was found without vital signs.); however, staff failed to implement the care plan, and no lifesaving measures were attempted.On [DATE], at 3:10 PM the Administrator was provided a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and was notified that the failure to implement the resident's care plan by performing CPR in accordance was likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death. This failure constituted IJ at 42 CFR 483.21 (b) F656. The IJ was determined to exist on [DATE], when staff failed to implement R1's care plan and initiate CPR when the resident was found without pulse or respiration.The facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-07 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was initiated for one (Resident (R) 1) of 19 sampled residents reviewed for Advance Directives. Staff found R1 unresponsive on 11/09/2025 without pulse or respiration. R1 was a Full Code status (indicating that CPR should be performed if the resident was found without vital signs); however, no lifesaving measures were attempted. On 03/04/2026 at 3:10 PM, the Administrator was provided a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and was notified the failure to ensure residents were provided CPR was likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death. This failure constituted IJ at 42 CFR 483.24 F678, as well as Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) at 42 CFR 483.24, Quality of Care. The IJ was determined to exist on 11/09/2025, when R1 was found without pulse or respiration and CPR was not initiated.The facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan on 03/05/2026. The plan alleged the IJ was removed on 03/05/2026. A Partial Extended Survey and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-12 · tag F0645 — widespread
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review it was determined the facility failed to accurately complete the Preadmission Screening process for individuals with a mental disorder and/or individuals with intellectual disabilities for nine (Resident (R)3, R8, R9, R12, R15, R17, R25, R33, and R42) of nine sampled residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). The systemic failure to ensure the PASARR process is completed as required has the potential to affect all residents who must be screened using this process upon admission. The findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), created 09/2025, revealed the purpose was to determine if an individual seeking admission had a serious mental illness (SMI), intellectual disability (ID), or related conditions (RC) and determine eligibility for nursing facility placement and health related services. The protocol was to utilize the Kentucky Level of Care System…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy's, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete, accurate, and maintained for 8 of 25 sampled residents (R3, R4, R9, R12, R15, R17, R25, R58).The findings include: Review of an undated Medical Records policy revealed appropriate medical/clinical records should be maintained for each resident. Review of an undated facility policy, titled, Charting and Documentation, revealed All services provided to the resident, or any changes in the resident's medical or mental condition, should be documented in the resident's medical record. Per the policy, interpretation and implementation included that All observations, medications administered, services performed, etc. must be documented in the resident's clinical records. 1. Review of the admission record for R4 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 06/24/2025 with diagnoses including nondisplaced fracture of olecranon of left ulna, unspecified dementia, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. The QAPI program failed to identify concerns regarding the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process, affecting nine (Resident (R)3, R8, R9, R12, R15, R17, R25, R33, and R42) of nine sampled residents reviewed for this mandatory screening. In addition, the QAPI program failed to identify issues for four (R6, R8, R22, R33) of four sampled residents reviewed for advance directives, who were not given the opportunity to formulate advance directives, or for whom the process was not accurately completed, with all required documentation. The failure to ensure that the QAPI program systematically reviewed care areas, identified outliers and problems, and implemented action to correct these areas has the potential to affect all 56 residents in the facility. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Food items were not dated or labeled at the time of storage. Opened food was not covered and/or sealed to prevent contamination. Food in the dry storage area was not free from the potential for contamination, as it was stored in bins on a top shelf approximately 8 inches from the ceiling/sprinkler heads. The failure to ensure food was stored, sealed, and/or dated after opening had the potential to affect 56 of the 56 facility's residents who consumed food from the kitchen.The findings include:Review of an undated facility policy. titled Food Storage, revealed food storage areas should be maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Interpretation and implementation of the policy included that food services staff would store all foods or food items not requiring refrigeration, at least 18 inches from sprinkler heads. In addition, the policy noted that prepared food stored in the refrigerator until service…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were completed and reviewed for four (Resident (R)6, R8, R22 and R33) of four sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives. R22 had missing and conflicting information regarding code status. R6, R8, and R33 did not have advance directives or evidence that they were given the opportunity to formulate or decline one. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directives Standard of Practice, revised 04/2025, revealed that on admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an Advance Directive and if not, determine whether the resident would like to formulate an Advance Directive. Upon admission should the resident have an Advance Directive, copies will be made and placed in the resident's medical record/scanned into the electronic medical record (EMR). Further review of the policy revealed, the facility will periodically assess the resident for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for five (Resident (R) 10, R22, R35, R53, and R57) of five residents reviewed for the environment. The residents, who all resided on one of the three halls in the facility, had missing or broken floor tiles in their rooms and/or expressed concern with housekeeping and maintenance.The findings include:Review of a facility policy titled, Resident Rights, reviewed 04/01/2025, revealed, The resident has the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment.Review of a facility policy titled, Homelike Environment Standard of Practice, reviewed 10/01/2020, revealed The purpose of this policy is that residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. 1. Review of R10's Facesheet revealed R10 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Per R10's Annual Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure expired drugs/biologicals were not available for resident use. Two different expired influenza vaccines were stored in one of the facility's two medication refrigeratorsThe findings include: Review of a facility policy, titled Medication Administration Standard of Practice, revised 04/01/2025, revealed that medications that were expired or beyond the usage date should not be administered.Review of a facility policy titled, Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals Standard of Practice, reviewed 10/01/2020, revealed Drugs and biologicals must be labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the expiration date when applicable. The policy further stated that expired and or discontinued medication shall be removed for the medication storage area for timely return to the pharmacy and or documented destruction.Observation of one of the facility's two medication storage refrigerators, on 09/10/2025 at 1:00 PM, revealed two separate expired influenza vaccinations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of seven sampled residents (R 7). During an observation on 04/09/2025 at 10:20 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 failed to sanitize her hands between glove changes. Further, LPN 1, failed to wear gown, mask, and eye protection while providing care to a resident on contact precautions. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Control, dated 08/2001 revealed the facility would provide a safe sanitary and comfortable environment. Review of the facility policy titled, Handwashing, dated 08/2001 revealed handwashing was regarded as the single most important means of preventing the spread of infections. All personnel should follow the established handwashing procedures to prevent the spread of infection and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-04-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment to prevent a urinary tract infection for one (1) of fifteen (15) sampled residents (Resident #41). Observation revealed facility staff failed to change gloves, wash their hands, and obtain clean water between dirty and clean tasks while providing indwelling urinary catheter care for Resident #41. The findings include: Review of the facility's, Catheter Care Policy, undated, revealed the policy stated, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care. Female: 9. Gently separate the labia and expose the urinary meatus. 10. Wipe from front to back with a clean cloth moistened with water and perineal cleaner. 11. Use a new part of the cloth or different cloth for each side. 12. With a new moistened cloth, starting at the urinary meatus moving out, wipe the catheter making sure to hold the catheter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-04-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of fifteen (15) sampled residents, Resident #34, received food that accommodated the resident's food preferences in his/her meals served by the facility. Interview and observation revealed the facility failed to honor Resident #34's preferences/dislikes of mashed potatoes and beans by serving those food items to the resident. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Food Choice, revised 12/20/2021, revealed upon admission, or within twenty-four (24) hours of admission, the Dietician or nursing staff were to identify a resident's food preferences by asking a list of questions, in reference to foods that they liked and disliked. Continued review revealed the Dietary Manager was responsible in relaying the information obtained into the resident's diet card. Per review of the policy, dietary staff members were in charge of checking residents' meal tickets before sending…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,850 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $12,425 — penalty dated 2026-03-07
• $12,425 — penalty dated 2026-03-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY