Edgemont Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 65.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.95 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 100% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-07-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to provide 2 (Resident (R) 54 and R10) of 21 sampled residents the right to reside and receive services with reasonable accommodation of the resident's needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or others. The facility moved or removed personal items, furnishings, and/or equipment without consideration of resident preferences and accommodation of each resident's individual needs. This failure caused R54 emotional distress over a sustained period of time and the resident was tearful as she related that the facility moved and mounted her television on the wall in a place where she had difficulty seeing it due to her physical limitations, as well as removed shelving that housed her personal collectibles. The findings include: Review of the facility's Homelike Environment Policy, revised 07/08/2023, revealed that it was the policy of the facility to provide a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and/or mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for three (Resident (R)4, R46, and R36) of 21 sampled residents. The findings include:Review of the facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 04/26/2017, revealed the facility was to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with the resident rights. Further review revealed the care plan was to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs.1.a. Review of Resident (R)4's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 05/18/2019. At this time, the resident had no pressure ulcers. Review of R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/15/2024 revealed the resident was still free from pressure ulcers. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-07-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to prevent development of pressure ulcers for one (Resident (R) 4) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. R4, who required staff assistance with turning and repositioning, was not care-planned with specific intervention for these services. The resident then developed a facility-acquired Stage III pressure ulcer in 01/2025. The Stage III pressure ulcer failed to heal as expected, and was present for 175+ days, as R4 failed to receive pressure relief as needed. The findings include:Review of R4's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 05/18/2019. Further review revealed her diagnoses at the time of the 07/25/2025 survey included unspecified dementia, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and a Stage III pressure ulcer of the right buttock. Per this face sheet, the pressure ulcer diagnosis was classified as occurring During Stay and was added to this face sheet on 06/10/2025,Review of R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures that established a protocol for the determination of capacity to consent to sexual contact for 2 of 4 sampled residents, Resident (R) 4 and R13. Observations by staff on 07/27/2025 and 07/28/2025 revealed R4 and R13 were engaged in sexual behavior with one another. However, the facility's policy did not address the requirement to assess residents' capacity to consent to a sexual relationship and there was no evidence the facility assessed the residents for their capacity to consent to a sexual relationship.Additionally, the facility's policy failed to contain the eighth required component, in which the facility must coordinate situations of abuse with the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigation Policy Statement, dated 11/14/2016, revealed one of the seven components of the policy included prevention. Prevention was defined by identification,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-25 · tag F0577 — widespread
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post notice of the availability of the most recent survey results and failed to post those results in a place that was readily accessible to residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents' rights to be fully informed by being able to review that information upon request. The findings Include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised 04/12/2024, revealed residents have the right to receive all forms of communication while residing within the facility, and the facility would assist residents in exercising his/her rights.Observation during a tour of the facility on 07/22/2025 at 10:00 AM revealed there was no notice that indicated the location of the most recent state survey results and there was no visible physical account of the previous survey results.During an interview with the resident council on 07/22/2025 at 10:30 AM, they stated a majority of residents in attendance had never seen the facility's survey results. They stated they were not aware of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of National Weather Service records, the facility failed to ensure each resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility failed to promptly respond to problems with its cooling system and ensure that the facility was maintained at a safe, comfortable temperature, with temperatures in resident areas noted as high as 90 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The failure to provide safe, comfortable temperatures had the potential to affect all residents of the facility and constituted Substandard Quality of Care (SQC). In addition, multiple resident rooms (Rooms 209, 302, 317, and 320), a common resident gathering area, and the main dining hall needed repair and/or or cleaning. The findings include: In an interview with Ombudsman1 on 07/23/2025 at 9:32 AM, she stated she was first made aware that the facility's air conditioning (AC) was broken on 06/19/2025, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-25 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies. The facility assessment failed to provide documented information to inform staffing decisions to ensure sufficient staffing to meet residents' needs for each shift and unit, develop and maintain a plan to maximize recruitment and retention of direct care staff, and inform contingency planning for events that did not require activation of the facility's emergency plan, but did have the potential to affect resident care, such as the availability of direct care nurse staffing or other resources for resident care. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, with a census of 65.The findings include: Review of the facility assessment, dated 2025, revealed the facility failed to include information on how they determined the staffing levels needed for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, staff time punch data, and Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by the resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility with a census of 65.The findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) for Fiscal Year Quarter 2, 01/2025 through 03/2025, revealed the facility triggered for one-star staffing and excessively low weekend staffing. Review of the facility's staffing agency invoices and the facility's document Calculated Time by Calendar Day, dated 02/01/2025 through 02/10/2025 revealed the facility was short of the Administrator's stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. They did not include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 4 medication carts. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Drugs and Biologicals, not dated, revealed that it was the policy of the facility that all drugs and biologicals be properly stored in the containers in which they were received. Further review revealed the policy did not mention dating opened multi use medications upon opening them. Observation on 07/22/2025 at 7:55 AM of the medication cart from the 100/200 Hallway labeled RN revealed the medication cart had seven bottles of eye drops, two inhalers, two bottles of cough syrup, two bottles of lactulose, two bottles of polyethylene glycol, and two bottles of nasal spray. Further review revealed all of these medications were opened without dates to when they were opened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Review of the facility's Infection Control Plan policy, not dated, revealed the purpose of the infection control plan was to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for all residents and staff. Review of the facility's Handwashing policy, not dated, revealed all personnel shall follow the established handwashing procedure to prevent the spread of infections and disease to other personnel, residents, and visitors. Wash hands for approximately 10-15 seconds, performed under the following conditions: h) After handling items potentially contaminated with blood, body fluids, excretions, or secretions: The use of gloves does not replace handwashing. 1. Observation of wound care for Resident (R)32 on 07/23/2025 at 1:30 PM revealed Registered Nurse (RN)1 and State…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition. The mechanical lift scale was broken, and staff reported the lift function did not always work. The facility had 4 residents who used a Hoyer lift for weights.The findings include:Review of the lift company service invoice dated 07/02/2025 revealed the Field Service Technician found the cable to the scale on the lift had been cut. Further review revealed the Field Service Technician quoted a price to replace the scale.Review of the facility's document Nurse's Report Sheet, dated 07/23/2025 revealed staff could not obtain a weight for R53 due to the lift not working.Observation on 07/24/2025 at 10:05 AM revealed State Registered Nurse Aide (SRNA)4 demonstrated the scale function on the lift scale. Observation revealed the scale did not turn on so that residents could be weighed.In an immediate interview, SRNA4 stated the battery for the lift was fully charged, so that was not the cause of the malfunction. She stated it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 2 of 21 sampled residents, Resident (R)4 and R36.The facility failed to ensure R36's visual privacy while she was undressed.The facility failed to ensure R4's catheter collection bag was covered.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, dated 04/12/2024, revealed the facility was to protect and promote the right of each resident to a dignified existence. Further review revealed the facility would provide an environment that enhanced the resident's quality of life and recognized the resident's individuality.1) Review of R36's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 05/21/2018. Further review revealed her diagnoses included Huntington's disease (a severe neurological disorder), Alzheimer's disease, restless leg…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident from misappropriation of property for 2 of 2 residents investigated for personal property. Resident (R) 24 and R10 filed grievances for missing clothing, but the facility failed to reimburse the residents for their missing items.The findings include:Review of the facility's document, Notice of Resident Rights and Responsibilities, dated 03/27/2024, revealed residents had the right to keep and use their personal belongings, and to have the facility protect their property from theft.1) Review of R24's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/30/2025 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 06/02/2021. Further review revealed the facility assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Continued review revealed R24 responded Very Important when asked how important it was to her to take care of her personal belongings.Review of the facility's form…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$133,225 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $133,225 — penalty dated 2025-07-25
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-26 for 37 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY