Florence Park Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 26.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 127.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, review of the glucometer's (used to measure blood glucose values) directions for use, review of the facility's disinfection wipes' directions for use, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent and control the development and transmission of communicable diseases for 3 of 29 sampled residents who required blood glucose monitoring, Resident (R) 67, R70, and R41; for 1 of 31 sampled residents for indwelling catheter collection bag resting on the ground, R8; for 3 of 31 sampled residents where staff did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) or perform required hand hygiene for residents who were required to be in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), R67, R81, and R129; and for all 130 current residents due…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary pain management as ordered when it did not safeguard and account for controlled substances to prevent diversion by staff. This deficient practice resulted in ordered pain medication not being available for administration causing unmanaged pain and discomfort for 3 of 9 sampled residents reviewed for pain, Resident (R) 1, R3, and R4. On 10/25/2025, a comparison of the medications on hand with the documented controlled substance record sheets revealed the narcotic counts for the C-Hall medication carts were inaccurate. The investigation into the discrepancies showed that residents had not received their scheduled narcotic pain medications. During this time, R1, R3, and R4 were not administered their ordered pain medication.An investigation into drug diversion was initiated after Registered Nurse (RN) 1 observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 repeatedly removing pills from the medication cart drawer, concealing them in medication cups, and then her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the controlled substance log titled Individual Patient Controlled Substance Administration Records [IPCSAR], and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to ensure the proper documentation of controlled substances in accordance with professional standards of practice when nursing staff did not accurately complete and reconcile controlled narcotic record sheets at the time of removal for the A, B, and C Hall medication carts. In multiple instances, the IPCSAR sign out time, which should reflect the actual time the narcotic was removed from the narcotic bubble pack, instead reflected the ordered time and did not correlate with the medication administration time documented on the Medication Administration Record [MAR]. These repeated omissions demonstrated ongoing noncompliance with the required narcotic documentation practices and created an unacceptable risk for diversion and inaccurate medication records and comprised resident safety for 11 of 11 sampled residents, Resident (R) 2, R17, R20, R23, R31, R37, R42,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, document review, review of the Quality Assurance/Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QA/QAPI) Committee minutes, review of the facility's Plan of Correction (PoC), and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to implement and sustain its Plan of Correction (PoC) related to monitoring of the narcotic sign-out sheets and timely administration of pain medications, as evidenced by the facility not thoroughly performing an audit process, and the QA/QAPI/ Committee failing to provide effective oversight and follow-up of identified concerns. This deficient practice limited the facility's ability to identify, correct, and prevent recurrence of narcotic medication timing and documentation concerns and ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services, through a functioning QAPI/QAA monitoring and governance system.See F697 and F755The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement [QAPI], revised 04/28/2025, indicated the facility would develop, implement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services. The facility failed to ensure pain medications were administered timely to residents in accordance with the physician orders and the comprehensive care plan (CCP) for 4 of 8 sampled residents, Resident (R) 68, R73, R122, and R127. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Policy and Procedure for Pain Management, reviewed 01/2024, revealed the facility would ensure pain management was provided to residents, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the residents' goals and preferences.Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team Policy Statement, reviewed 04/28/2025, revealed the facility must develop an individualized, comprehensive care plan for each resident within seven days of completing the comprehensive assessment. The care plan was based on a comprehensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored, labeled, secured, and maintained in accordance with acceptable standards of practice for 2 of 3 Medication Rooms.Observation on 01/14/2026 of Unit A and Unit B Medication Rooms revealed numerous medications from other facilities that residents brought with them upon admission were stored with clean supplies. In addition, on Unit A, an opened bottle of tuberculosis (TB) serum was not dated or labeled. On Unit B, an opened insulin pen was not dated or labeled.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, dated 04/28/2025, revealed medications were to be administered in a safe and timely manner. The policy revealed that when staff opened a multi-dose medication container, the date opened must be recorded on the container. The policy also required insulin pens to be clearly labeled with the resident's name or other identifying information.Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, undated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was supported in exercising their right to self-determination, including choices related to personal care, to maintain their autonomy and dignity for 2 of 31 sampled residents, Resident (R) 53 and R1. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Policy and Procedure for Resident Rights and Advance Care Planning, dated 08/2026, revealed that employees shall treat all residents with respect, dignity, and full recognition of each resident's rights. The policy further revealed the facility would make every effort to assist residents in fully exercising their rights.Review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity, dated 08/2021 and reviewed on 04/28/2025, revealed the facility would treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life. The policy revealed the facility would protect and promote resident rights by assisting residents in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's documents and policies, the facility failed to provide a resident environment that was consistently clean, comfortable, and home-like for 1 of 31 sampled residents, Resident (R) 2. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Policy and Procedure for Residents Rights and Advance Care Planning, dated 08/2016, revealed employees shall treat all residents with respect, dignity, and with full recognition of each resident's rights. Per the policy, the facility would make every effort to assist residents in fully exercising those rights.Review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity, dated 08/2021 and reviewed on 04/28/2025, revealed the facility would treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life. Review of R2's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/23/2025 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, and depression. Review of R2's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's documents and policy, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative of the bed hold notice and the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understood as soon as practicable for 2 out of 7 residents investigated for transfer and/or discharge, Resident (R) 8 and R24. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer and Discharge [including (Against Medical Advice) AMA], dated 04/28/2025, stated, The facility's transfer/discharge notice will be provided to the resident and the resident's representative in a language and manner in which they can understand. 1. Review of R8's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 03/24/2025 with diagnoses of diabetes, cognitive communication deficit, and dementia.Review of R8's quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS], with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/12/2026, revealed the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the residents' medical needs for 1 of 31 sampled residents, Resident (R) 28. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team Policy Statement, reviewed 04/28/2025, revealed the facility must develop an individualized, comprehensive care plan for each resident within seven days of completing the comprehensive assessment. Per the policy, the care plan was based on a comprehensive assessment and developed by the care planning interdisciplinary team (IDT), but it did not address staff implementing or following a resident's care plan.Further review of the facility's policy titled, Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team Policy Statement, reviewed 04/28/2025, revealed the policy referenced a related document, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered. The State Survey Agency (SSA) Surveyor requested that additional care plan policy from the Director of Nursing on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's Fall Investigation, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from accidents and received adequate supervision and an assistive device to prevent accidents for 1 of 31 sampled residents, Resident (R) 14. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Falls and Falls Risk Management, revised 04/28/2025, revealed that staff would identify and implement relevant interventions to minimize serious consequences of falling. The policy further stated that staff would monitor residents' responses to interventions intended to reduce falls or the risks of falling.Review of R14's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/02/2021 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, dependence on a wheelchair, and difficulty walking.Review of R14's quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS], with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/13/2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding, Resident (R) 28.The findings include:The State Survey Agency (SSA) Surveyor requested the facility's enteral feeding policy from the Administrator on 01/13/2026 at approximately 9:30 AM and on 01/23/2026 at 3:34 PM via email. The policy was not provided.Review of the admission Record found in R28's electronic health record (EHR), revealed the facility admitted the resident on 05/12/2025 with diagnoses to include dysphagia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and hemiplegia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS], found in R28's EHR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/23/2025, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] score of zero out of 15, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed R28 was dependent (helper did all of the effort) for activities of daily living (ADL)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY