Glasgow State Nursing Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 63.2 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.32 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 7.28 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.56 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of facility's policy, the facility failed to implement the care plan for one of nine sampled residents (Resident #1) R1. The facility assessed R1 as a high risk for wandering and developed a care plan with interventions that addressed that behavior. The facility failed to ensure the care plan interventions were implemented. On 06/24/2024 at 6:09 AM, R1 exited Pod 2 (where he resided), a secured unit, behind a kitchen staff member, who did not ensure the door was secured after going through the doors. A Housekeeper passed R1 in the hall; the Housekeeper failed to intervene. R1 proceeded to the front lobby where the Security Guard was stationed and also failed to intervene when R1 went out the front door. A Registered Nurse (RN) on her way to work, observed R1 walking on the sidewalk near the end of the street, and notified the facility at 6:20 AM of that information. R1 was approximately 0.6 miles from the facility when the RN observed him. R1 exited the front door at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document and policy review, and Google Maps, the facility failed to provide effective monitoring and supervision to prevent elopement for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents assessed for high elopement risk Resident #1 (R1). The facility assessed R1 as being at risk for wandering and care planned the resident for being a wandering risk. R1's care plan interventions included: ensuring all doors were closed securely when entering or exiting the resident's pod (unit), redirecting the resident away from doors, and observing for wandering behavior with redirection as needed. However, on 06/24/2024, facility staff failed to follow the resident's care plan interventions and allowed R1, who ambulated independently, to exit the facility without staff's knowledge at 6:09 AM. R1 was located by a staff person, walking on the sidewalk down the street, 0.6 miles from the facility. The staff notified the facility at 6:20 AM. The facility's failure to have an effective…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2023-12-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents, Resident #45 and Resident #39. 1. On 11/23/2023 at 3:50 PM, it was noted Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #4 abused Resident #45. The facility investigated the incident, and CNA #4 was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Resident #45 was noted to have behaviors the day of the incident, and tried to get up into other people's personal space. CNA #4 pushed Resident #45's chair under the table in the common area of the Pod which resulted in the resident sustaining a skin tear. It was also reported the CNA hit Resident #45's arm twice and poked the resident with her index finger over and over just beneath his/her shoulder. 2. Resident #39 was involved in a resident to resident altercation on 04/27/2023 at 6:30 PM. Resident #39 was assessed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-12-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and facility policy review it was determined, the facility failed to ensure violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents, Resident #39 and Resident #45. 1. An incident involving Resident #45 occurred on 11/23/2023 at 3:50 PM, when CNA #4 was observed by CNA #1 and CNA #5 to push Resident #45's chair up to the table during which the resident sustained a skin tear. CNA #4 was also observed to hit Resident #45's arm twice and to poke the resident with her index finger in just beneath the shoulder over and over, without the CNAs intervening or reporting the abuse to Administration immediately. Resident #45 told CNA #1 that CNA #4 hurt my hand, and showed his/her hand to the CNA where a skin tear was located. The CNAs reported the skin tear to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of facility's policy it was determined, the facility failed to follow the care plan for one (1) of fifteen (15) residents, Resident #45. On 11/23/2023 at 3:50 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #4 abused Resident #45. The incident was investigated by the facility and CNA #4 was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. On the day of the incident Resident #45 had behaviors and was trying to get up into other people's space. CNA #4 pushed Resident #45's chair under the table with the resident sustaining a skin tear on his/her hand. It was also reported CNA #4 hit Resident #45's arm twice and poked her index finger over and over just beneath the resident's shoulder. Resident #45 was care planned with interventions which included redirecting him/her, and providing diversional activities; however, facility staff failed to implement the resident's interventions. (Cross Reference F600) The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, MDS 3.0 Assessment:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety, which had the potential to affect 68 of the facility's 68 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.The findings include: 1). Review of the facility policy titled, Refrigerated Storage, effective 07/11/2024, revealed all foods were to be properly wrapped and/or stored in sealed containers and dated and labeled. Observation on 08/20/2025 at 11:25 AM, revealed signage posted on the freezer door which stated, Label and date all food that has been opened with 2 dates. The 1st date is the day it was opened. The 2nd is 7 days after. Continued observation at 11:30 AM, of Freezer 1 revealed a bag of chicken nuggets, a bag of fish sticks, a bag of soup, and (2) pound cakes, all stored out of their original containers that were not labeled or dated. Further observation at 11:30 AM, revealed a box of dinner rolls in the original box with the flaps partially closed; however, with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$62,189 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $16,071 — penalty dated 2024-07-10
• $46,118 — penalty dated 2023-12-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in KY