No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mountain View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

39 Ferndale Apartments Road, Pineville, KY 40977 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 115 certified beds · (606) 337-7071 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Sep 20193 immediate-jeopardy citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
12904 Robert L. Madon Bypass, Ste 2 · (606) 598-4508 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
308 S Pine St · (606) 337-8300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
134 N Pine St · (606) 337-3411 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
315 S Cherry St · (606) 337-8194

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.3%13.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%6.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%17.7%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.2%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication39.7%29.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.6%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.0%19.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.6%16.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.7%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%83.5%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.131.941.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.232.141.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.70U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.36hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.33hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.70 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 8.2–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay9.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.441.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.86
RN hours/ resident / day
0.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.57
RN hoursweekends
54.3%
Total nursing turnover
61.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 56.8 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-14)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2019-09-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy it was determined the facility failed to immediately notify the physician of omitted medications and/or medication errors for twelve (12) of twenty-two (22) sampled residents (Resident #3, #9, #13, #19, #28, #41, #42, #47, #63, #66, #72, and #86). Seven residents (Residents #3, #13, #19, #41, #42, #72, and #86), who were alert and oriented, all alleged they did not receive medications as ordered on the evening of 08/19/19. RN #1 was responsible for administering medications for these residents on 08/19/19. Although the residents' complaints were reported to administrative staff (DON and Administrator), the facility failed to report the medication errors to the residents' physicians. Resident #66 also reported that he/she did not receive his/her medications on the evening of 08/26/19. In addtion, RN #1 failed to administer three (3) residents (Residents #63, #47, and #9) their 10:00 PM medications on 08/26/19. Again, the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2019-09-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY *The facility alleged the following was implemented to remove the Immediate Jeopardy as of 09/19/19: 1. On 09/13/19, a Quality Improvement meeting was conducted after the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was communicated to the facility. The purpose was to develop an improvement plan to address the IJ deficiencies, and monitor guidelines to ensure compliance was maintained. This meeting was attended by the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Staff Development Coordinator (SDC), and an RN Nurse Consultant. 2. On 09/14/19, the facility's Medical Director was made aware of the Immediate Jeopardy and advised of the improvement plan, by the DON. He had no concerns or additions to the plan. 3. On 09/16/19, a follow-up QI meeting was conducted to review the progress on the 09/13/19 plan. A review of all items completed and the monitoring plan was completed. There were no additional recommendations at this time. Those in attendance were the Administrator, DON, ADON, RN Consultant,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2019-09-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. a. Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 06/25/19 with diagnoses that included Seizure, Debility, Acute Renal Failure, and Hypertension. Review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a BIMS score of eight (8), which indicated the resident was cognitively impaired but interviewable. Further review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed Physician's Orders for Phenobarbital 64.8 milligrams (mg), one tablet by mouth twice daily for seizures. The medication was scheduled to be administered at 10:00 AM and 10:00 PM; and Depakote 500 mg, one tablet by mouth three (3) times per day, used to treat seizures, was scheduled for 10:00 AM, 2:00 PM, and 10:00 PM. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 08/26/19, revealed the medications had not been initialed as being administered for the 10:00 PM dose. Review of the schedule and time card documentation revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #1 was responsible for administering the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy the facility failed to implement changes to the Care Plan for 1 of 14 Sampled residents, (R46).The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan not dated, revealed it was the policy to the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Further review of the policy revealed the interdisciplinary team (IDT) would develop resident specific interventions, and the comprehensive care plan would be reviewed and revised by the IDT after each comprehensive and quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Furthermore, the qualified staff responsible for carrying out interventions specified in the care plan would be notified of their roles and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-19 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's local health department inspection, and review of the local health department's website, the facility failed to provide education to food handlers related to safe food handling practice to enable the food handlers to effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service department. This deficient practice affected 53 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The findings include: Review of the local health department's, Food Service Establishment Inspection Report, dated 08/17/2023, revealed the facility had been cited for areas of the kitchen floors needing cleaning; equipment needing cleaning; and three (3) overhead lights needing repair. Review of the local county health department's website, Environmental - Bell County Health Department (bellcohealthky.org), revealed an annual Food Handler Training Course for all employees who worked in the food service industry was required. Continued review revealed newly hired food service workers were to complete the food handlers online training course before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to provide a safe sanitary environment for food production and appropriate trash storage and disposal, which affected 54 residents receiving their meals from the kitchen. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning Procedures-Garbage Cans, Buckets, and Disposals, dated 08/2013, revealed kitchen garbage cans were to have plastic liners and those liners were to be changed as needed and disposed of frequently in the outside dumpster. Review of the facility's policy titled, Preparation of Food, dated 08/2013 and revised on 02/09/2026, revealed the preparation of foods served to residents and personnel were the responsibility of the Food Service Manager. Further review revealed food was to be produced using sanitary guidelines and served according to established rules and regulations. Review of the facility's Cleaning Assignment Sheet for July of 2024, revealed it noted all garbage can were to be emptied twice daily and the bathroom garbage can was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled with residents' names. Observation of the four (4) medication carts and two (2) medication refrigerators on 07/16/2024 at 2:08 PM and 2:13 PM and on 07/18/2024 at 4:36 PM, revealed three (3) of the four (4) carts contained unlabeled medications. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, Version 09/2020, revealed medications were to be stored in the containers in which they were dispensed. Further policy review revealed under no circumstances should any person, other than the Pharmacist, be allowed to transfer medications from one container to another, except for immediate use. Observation on 07/16/2024 at 2:08 PM, revealed Medication Cart #2 contained a medication cup with one white pill in it. Per observation, the white pill was out of its package and the cup was labeled only with a resident's name, Resident (R) 32. Additional observation on 07/16/2024 at 2:13 PM, revealed Medication Cart #4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for one of 29 sampled residents. The facility failed to document Resident (R) 25's skin lesion identified on 10/07/2022 until the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/24/2024. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Process, dated 10/2019, revealed the facility will use the most current version of the RAI Manual and follow guidelines therein as set forth by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services (CMS) for all RAI processes and completion of the MDS unless otherwise outlined in the manual. Further review revealed the facility will complete the RAI process according to state guidelines as applicable. Review of the MDS 3.0 RAI User's Manual Section M with an effective date of 10/2023 revealed the following steps for assessment: review the medical record, including skin care flow sheets or other skin tracking forms, nurses' notes, and pressure ulcer/injury risk assessments; speak with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours for each resident that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident (R) to meet professional standards of quality care for one of 29 residents sampled for care plans, R49. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Care Plan, dated 11/13/2017, revealed the facility was to initiate a baseline care plan immediately upon admission by the admitting Registered Nurse (RN). Continued review revealed the baseline care plan was to include instructions needed to provide effective and resident-centered care for residents that met professional standards of care. Further review revealed the baseline care plan was to include the initial goals for the resident, physician orders, and other services to be administered for the resident in the first 48 hours. Review of the admission Record, located in the facility's clinical record for R49, revealed the facility admitted the resident on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, to include measurable objectives and timeframes as identified in the comprehensive assessment for two of 29 residents sampled for care planning, R10 and R39. 1. The facility failed to implement R10's care plan related to respiratory care, to include ensuring the resident's supplemental oxygen was running at the prescribed liters per minute. Observation on 07/17/2024, revealed R10's oxygen running at 2.5 liters per minute (LPM); however, the Physician's order was for the resident to receive her oxygen at 4 LPM. 2. In addition, the facility failed to add resident-centered interventions regarding R39's repeated refusals of his dressing changes for his wound. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Care Plan dated 11/13/2017, revealed the facility was to develop and implement a multidisciplinary care plan based on the resident's comprehensive assessment. 1. Review of R10's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 1 of 3 residents (R) sampled for respiratory care (R10), out of the total sample of 29 residents. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Therapy, dated 04/2013, revealed the facility's procedure for administering oxygen included adjusting the oxygen flow meter to the prescribed rate. Review of R10's admission Record, revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/10/2020, with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity with hypovolemia (low fluid/blood volume), and cerebral palsy. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/08/2024 for R10, revealed the facility assessed the resident to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 out of 15. indicating the resident was cognitively intact. In addition, review revealed the facility assessed R10 to have received oxygen therapy while a resident. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a system of records to ensure the accurate reconciliation of controlled drugs. Nursing staff failed to document that narcotic counts were completed by two (2) nurses at shift change, 46 times between 08/21/19 and 09/10/19. The controlled medication count on 9/18/19 was inaccurate for one resident's (Resident #33) medication. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled Controlled Substances, dated 10/11/15, revealed all controlled substances shall be counted at each shift change and reconciled to the declining inventory sheets by at least two (2) staff members who are authorized to administer medications, preferably the staff member taking charge and the staff member relinquishing charge of these controlled substances. Further review revealed a separate record shall be maintained on each controlled substance in the form of a declining inventory record. The inventory record shall be accurately maintained and shall include the quantity of the controlled substance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice in two (2) of two (2) medication storage rooms and during observation of the medication pass on 09/09/19. Observation of the facility's East and [NAME] medication rooms revealed expired medications available for resident use. Observation of the medication pass on 09/09/19 revealed a bottle of prescription nasal spray sitting on top of the medication cart and not under the direct physical supervision of a licensed nurse or medication aide. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage, with a revision date of 11/01/17, revealed the medication cart shall be locked at all times, when not under the direct physical supervision of a licensed nurse or medication aide. The policy did not address expired medication. 1. Observation of the [NAME] Wing Medication Storage room on 09/09/19 at 8:40 AM revealed Flu vaccine (11 individual injections) with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 7 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to store, serve, and prepare food under sanitary conditions. During the initial tour of the kitchen, slices of pie were observed stored on a cart in the walk-in cooler, uncovered and not dated. During the lunch tray line observation, wrapped silverware was observed to be contaminated with food that could not be identified. In addition, staff was observed to transport an uncovered food tray to the [NAME] Wing at the supper meal on 09/08/19. The findings include: Interview with the Dietary Manager on 09/11/19 at 11:00 AM revealed the facility did not have a written policy for the storage of food in the coolers. However, it was the facility's procedure to store food items covered and dated, use clean silverware at meals, and to cover all trays that were being transported away from the dining room to resident rooms. 1. Observation of the walk-in cooler during the initial tour of the kitchen on 09/08/19 at 10:05 AM revealed slices of cream pie on saucers on a cart in the cooler. The pie was not covered or dated.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-25 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy it was determined the facility failed to have an effective performance improvement program which measured the success and tracked the performance of implemented plans to ensure improvements are sustained in the facility. The State Agency received an acceptable Plan of Correction (POC) on 11/14/19 for previously cited deficiencies, with an exit date of 09/25/19. Per the POC, the facility conducted weekly audits to ensure the Shift Change Controlled Substance Count Check sheets included two (2) staff members' signatures (on-coming and off-going nurse and/or medication aide). During the revisit conducted on 11/20/19, review of the Shift-Change Controlled Substance Count Check sheets revealed nursing staff failed to document that narcotic counts were completed by two (2) staff members at shift change on six (6) occasions between 10/23/19 and 11/15/19. Interviews with staff revealed concerns had been identified with the audits; however, no actions had been taken to correct the identified concerns. The findings include:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide a sanitary homelike environment for residents. Observations of the lunch meal service in the dining room on 09/08/19 revealed the facility had two (2) separate dining services at different times for the lunch meal (A dining and B dining). Staff failed to clean the dining room tables between the A and B dining services. Observations revealed residents who ate at the B dining service were observed to sit and eat at tables contaminated with food spillage from the previous A dining service. The findings include: Interview with the Housekeeping Supervisor on 09/11/19 at 1:40 PM revealed the facility did not have a policy or procedure regarding cleaning the dining room between meals. According to the Housekeeping Supervisor, the dining room was cleaned three (3) times daily, after each meal service was completed. Observation of the B dining service on 09/08/19 at 12:04 PM at the lunch meal, revealed residents' lunch trays were placed on tables soiled with food spillage from the previous A dining service.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests. Flies were observed in the kitchen on initial tour, during the lunch meal, and during the supper meal on 09/08/19. An air curtain over the facility kitchen door to the outside was observed, but it was not functioning. There was no other means to prevent or control flies in the kitchen. The findings include: A review of the facility's pest control policy titled Pest Control, dated August 2013, revealed the contracted pest control company would treat the dietary department monthly. Observation of the kitchen on 09/08/19 at 10:05 AM revealed three (3) flies in the kitchen in contact with plates, plate covers, food surfaces, and counters. Observation during the lunch meal on 09/08/19 at 11:10 AM revealed three (3) flies in the kitchen in contact with plate covers, counters, trays, and drinking glasses. Observation of the kitchen during the tray line service on 09/08/19 at 4:55 PM revealed four (4) flies in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse for one (1) of twenty-two (22 ) sampled residents (Resident #10) to the appropriate entities including the State Survey Agency within two (2) hours of becoming aware of the allegation. The facility received a report of verbal abuse on 07/07/19 at 1:00 AM from Resident #10 that he/she had been verbally abused by Registered Nurse (RN) #1. However, the facility failed to report the alleged abuse to the State Survey Agency until 9:17 AM on 07/08/19 (over 20 hours after the allegation was initially reported by the resident). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Abuse, Neglect, or Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy, dated 03/10/17, revealed all complaints of abuse, neglect, including injuries of unknown origin, or misappropriation of resident property will be reported in no longer than two (2) hours. Review of the medical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #10 on 03/27/15. The resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to protect and prevent further abuse for one (1) of twenty-two (22) sampled residents (Resident #10). On 07/07/19, Resident #10 alleged verbal abuse from Registered Nurse (RN) #1 when she told the resident to shut up and go to his/her room. RN #1 was not removed from direct resident care and was permitted to continue to work until her shift was completed. Resident #10 slept on another unit, away from the RN. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Abuse, Neglect, or Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy, dated 03/10/17, revealed employees accused of being directly involved in allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of property will be suspended immediately from duty pending the outcome of the investigation. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of Coronary Artery Disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-09-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure seven (7) unsampled residents received or were offered appealing options (substitutes or alternates) of similar nutritive value when the residents chose not to eat food that was initially served, or who had requested a different meal choice. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy for alternate menus and substitutes titled, Use and Storage of Leftovers, dated August 2013, revealed leftover foods were kept for residents who did not like items on the menu and according to the policy the leftover foods were cooled and stored for a period of seven days to offer as alternate food items. Observations on 09/08/19, of the lunch meal at 11:10 AM revealed chicken soup and cold cut and pimento cheese sandwiches were served for the alternate. Additional observation of the supper meal at 4:55 PM revealed cold cut sandwiches and vegetable soup were served as an alternate. Review of the facility's menu for 09/08/19 revealed the entree for lunch was maple glazed pork, cornbread…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense24% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 8%Other / private 11%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$310per resident / day
operating cost
$9,428per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$309per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kentucky Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kentucky
$9,718/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,528/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 185243. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next