Telford Terrace

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 26 beds and averages 21.4 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.10 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.06 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.15 to 0.96 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 89% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (2) of eighteen (18) sampled residents (Residents #217 and #218). Observation, on 01/12/2022 at 10:45 AM, revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 walked out of room [ROOM NUMBER], where Resident #218 had been moved, after testing positive for COVID, and walked up the hallway. CNA #1 was observed to be wearing the contaminated full personal protective equipment (PPE) of gown, mask, eye protection, and shoe covers that had been worn while in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Continued observation revealed CNA #1 walked up the hallway and touched the community linen cart with a contaminated gloved hand. Additionally, CNA #1 was observed to wear the contaminated shoe covers from room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-02-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of facility recipes, and review of facility Policy, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance for pureed foods. Observation during lunch tray line, on 02/22/2023, during preparation of the lunch puree meal revealed the CDM used hot water to puree the macaroni and cheese and hot water to blend the barbecue chicken. However, review of the facility Puree Mac [Macaroni]-Cheese recipe, revealed directions to blend with milk and some of the juice from the Mac-Cheese. Additionally, review of the facility Puree BBQ [Barbecue] Chicken recipe, revealed directions to blend with BBQ sauce or chicken broth. The findings include: Review of the facility Policy titled, Food: Quality and Palatability, revised 09/2017, revealed, Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance. Food will be palatable, attractive and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Food and liquids are prepared and served in a manner, form, and texture to meet resident's needs.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to serve food in a safe manner. Observations, on 01/11/2022, of the resident tray line revealed [NAME] #1 picked up an alcohol wipe from the floor with a gloved hand. [NAME] #1 proceeded to wash off the thermometer in the hand sink while wearing the contaminated glove. Continued observation revealed [NAME] #1 then used an alcohol wipe to sanitize the thermometer and continued to use the same wipe on the thermometer after each food on the tray line. In addition, [NAME] #1 was observed, on 01/11/2022, walking toward the facility from the parking lot wearing his apron and hairnet. Observation, on 01/12/2022 at 8:45 AM, in the resident nourishment room revealed food items were not labeled or dated in the freezer, cabinets, and on the countertop. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Preparation, dated 09/2017, revealed for all staff to practice proper hand washing techniques and glove use. All food contact equipment would be cleaned and sanitized after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-01-15 · tag F0638 — pattern
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, dated 10/2019, it was determined the facility failed to complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments at least quarterly for four (4) of eighteen (18) sampled residents (Residents #3, #12, #16, and #167). The findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, dated 10/2019, under the section 5.2: Timeliness Criteria revealed the completion date for all non-admission OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) and Prospective Payment System (PPS) assessments, the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments must be completed not less frequently than every three (3) months. 1. Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the facility admitted the resident, on 03/04/2021, with diagnoses which included Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), Hemiplegia, Hemiparesis, Anxiety, and Hypertension. Additional review of Resident #3's EMR revealed Resident #3's latest…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted standards of practice. Observation revealed the medication storage room contained expired and discontinued medications, as well as medications of residents who had expired. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medication, undated, revealed the facility would store all drugs and biologicals in a secure and orderly manner without crowding. Further review revealed the facility would not keep drugs on hand after the expiration date which appeared on the label. Additional review of the policy revealed external medications should be stored separately from internal medications. Observation of the Medication Storage Room, on [DATE] at 10:05 AM, revealed three (3) 1.0 liter (L) bags of Normal Saline (NS) that expired on [DATE]. Further observation revealed multiple medications stored loosely, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-01-15 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, dated 10/01/2019, it was determined the facility failed to complete the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments in a timely manner as determined by the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Guidelines for one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents (Resident #2). The findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1 dated 10/01/2019 under the Section 5.2: Timeliness Criteria revealed the completion date for all non-admission OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) and Prospective Payment System (PPS) assessments, the MDS assessment completion date must be no later than fourteen (14) days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident, on 12/03/2019, with Alzheimer's Disease, Major Depression, Dysphagia, and Hypertension. Review of Resident #2's Annual MDS Assessment, in the electronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-01-15 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 Manual, Version 1.17.1, dated 10/2019, it was determined the facility failed to complete a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment in a timely fashion for one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents (Resident #1). The findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility RAI 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.17.1, dated 10/2019, Section 5-2: Timeliness Criteria revealed that for other comprehensive MDS assessments, Significant Change in Status Assessment and Significant Correction to Prior Comprehensive Assessment, the CAA (Care Area Assessment) completion date must be no later than fourteen (14) days from the determination date of the significant change in status or the significant error, respectively. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident, on 05/11/2021, with diagnoses of Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery without Angina Pectoris; Acute Diastolic Heart Failure; Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY