Maison du Monde Living Center
4000 Rodeo Road, Abbeville, LA 70510 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 128 certified beds · (337) 892-2332 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $5,600 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.3% | 17.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 5.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 1.2% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.6% | 2.1% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.0% | 3.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 27.0% | 17.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 35.8% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.3% | 94.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.0% | 5.6% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.9% | 15.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 30.7% | 22.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 3.1% | 1.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 64.0% | 76.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.2% | 28.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.8% | 14.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.51 | 2.56 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.85 | 2.74 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.4%CMS range 34.8–58.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 6.9–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 4.1–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.32 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 118.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.10 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.11 to 0.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents belongings were secured, by failing to inventory, document, and label clothing upon admission for 1(Resident #1) of 4 sampled residents.Findings: On 05/12/2026, a review of the facility's policy titled, Personal Property with a revised date of 08/2025, read in part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation.2. Resident belongings are treated with respect by facility staff, regardless of perceived value.10. The resident's belongings and clothing are inventoried and documented upon admission and updated as necessary. Review of Resident #1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm of colon; secondary malignant neoplasm of retro peritoneum and peritoneum; bipolar disorder and pain, unspecified. On 05/11/2026 at 10:16 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #1's responsible party (RP).The RP stated she dropped Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance, received assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 sampled residents.Findings:On 05/12/2026, a review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting with a revised date of 03/2025, read in part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care).c. elimination.Review of Resident #1's electronic health record (EHR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm of colon; secondary malignant neoplasm of retro peritoneum and peritoneum; bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post daily nursing staffing that included the facility name, date, census, and the total number and actual hours worked by staff responsible for resident care in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. The facility census was 119.Findings: On 01/27/2026 at 8:39 a.m., an observation was made throughout the entire facility, and there was no evidence that the daily nursing staffing was posted.On 01/27/2026 at 10:30 a.m., a second observation was made throughout the entire facility, and there was no evidence that the daily nursing staffing was posted.On 01/27/2026 at 12:21 p.m., a third observation was made throughout the entire facility, and there was no evidence that the daily nursing staffing was posted.On 01/27/2026 at 12:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7BenCoor (Benefits Coordinator). S7BenCoor confirmed she is responsible for the calculation and posting of the nurse staffing hours. She confirmed it had not been done and should be done daily.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0685 — patternAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received the proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities by failing to follow up with community resources for 1 (Resident #6) out of 44 sampled residents.Findings:Review of the facility's policy titled Social Services, with a last reviewed date of 04/09/2025, read in part: 4. The social worker/social services staff are responsible for: g. making referrals and obtaining needed services from outside entities.Review of Resident #6's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease and type 2 diabetes.Review of Resident #6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Further review revealed the resident was coded as moderate difficulty for hearing, indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, by failing to ensure:Staff utilized Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) by wearing a gown when providing wound care to Resident #1;Proper infection control techniques were practiced during perineal care (cleaning of the genitals and anal areas) for Resident #75; andFailing to properly store clean bed pads.The facility census was 119.Findings: 1. On 01/28/2026, a review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a last revised date of 08/2025 read in part: Policy Statement: Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation.2. EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply 3. Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring the use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #81) of 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #81) residents investigated for resident to resident abuse. The facility failed to protect:1. Resident #81 from physical abuse by Resident #2; and2. Resident #2 from physical abuse by Resident #81. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program with a last review date of 04/09/2025, read in part. Policy Statement: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: As part of the resident abuse prevention, the administration will: 1. Protect our residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #81) of 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #81) residents investigated for resident to resident abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting with a last reviewed date of 04/09/2025, revealed the following in part. Reporting 1. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the Facility Administrator, or his/her designee, to the following persons or agencies: a. The State licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing of facility.2. An alleged violations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment (including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for 1 (Resident #123) of 3 closed records reviewed.Findings:A review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge Summary and Plan, with a last reviewed date of 04/09/2025, read in part, When the facility anticipates a resident's discharge to private residence, another nursing care facility, a discharge summary and post discharge plan will be developed which will assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment. The discharge summary will include a recapitulation of the resident's stay at this facility and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of discharge. A copy of the following will be provided to the resident and receiving facility and a copy will be filed in the resident's medical records: c. discharge summary.A review of Resident #123's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 11/07/2025. Further review of the record revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (#9) of 2 (#9, #124) residents investigated for ADLs.Findings:On 01/28/2026, a review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily living (ADLs), Supporting, with a last reviewed date of 04/09/2025, read in part: Policy Statement: Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .4. If residents with cognitive impairment or dementia resist care, staff will attempt to identify the underlying cause of the problem and not just assume the resident is refusing or declining care. Approaching the resident in a different way or at a different time, or having another staff member speak with the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the provider failed to document, investigate, and maintain documentation of complaints voiced during the facility's resident council meetings that were conducted on 07/09/2024 and 10/08/2024. This had the potential to effect a census of 112 residents in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievance/ Complaint Filing, with a last review date of 10/09/2024 revealed in part . 8. Upon receipt of a grievance or complaint, the designee will review and investigate the allegations and submit a written report of the findings to the administrator within 5 working days of receiving the complaint or grievance. 12. The person filing the complaint on behalf of the resident, will be informed of the findings of the investigation and the actions that will be taken to correct any identified problems. a. The administrator or his designee will make a report within 5 working days of the filing of the grievance with the facility. b. A written summary will be provided to the resident upon request regarding any corrective action taken by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered careplan for 2 (#17 and #53) residents in a final sample of 35 residents as evidenced by failing to: 1. notify the physician of Resident #17's abnormal CBG (Capillary Blood Glucose) levels as ordered; and 2. develop a focus area and interventions related to a choking incident for Resident #53. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose Level last reviewed on 10/09/2024, revealed in part, Report abnormal results promptly to the supervisor or Attending Physician. Review of Resident #17's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, end stage heart failure, unspecified dementia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A review of Resident #17's Order Summary Report, for the month of 08/2024, revealed an order, dated 08/01/2024, Novolin R Injection Solution (Insulin Regular (Human)) Inject as per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure recipes for pureed diets were followed. This failure had the potential to contribute to an unpleasant dining experience, decreased intake, altered nutritional needs, and weight loss for the 12 residents who received pureed meals. Findings: Review of a facility document titled Puree Recipe Liquid Addition - Quick Guide that read in part Item - vegetables, breads, desserts, pasta, sandwiches, fish, potato dishes, eggs, port, ham, chicken, steak/beef. Liquid - whole milk and margarine/butter for all listed items except steak/beef use gravy. On 12/16/2024 at 10:55 a.m., S4Cook was observed preparing pureed rice with a pan filled with water, pouring a white powdery substance from a white bag that contained instant puree rice into the water, and continuously stirring with a whisk. S4Cook was asked how much water the pan held, and she stated she did not know. S4Cook stated she just poured the pureed rice into the water and stirred until she achieved the smooth blended consistency she wanted. She stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards for 2(#17 and #21) of 2 (#17 and #21) residents investigated for hospice services, by failing to: 1. Collaborate with the hospice agency to ensure the hospice nurse's visit notes and certification were up-to-date in Resident #21's hospice binder; and 2. Communicate with the hospice agency of Resident #17's high blood sugars. Findings: 1. A review of a document titled Nursing Facility Agreement indicated This Agreement is made and entered into this 23rd day of April 2018 by and between the facility and hospice .4.1 Compilation of Records. Nursing facility and hospice shall each prepare and maintain complete and detailed clinical records concerning each residential hospice patient receiving nursing facility services and hospice services under this agreement in accordance with prudent record keeping procedures and as required by applicable Federal and state law and regulations and applicable Medicare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#49) of 35 sampled residents was safe to perform self-administration of medication. Findings: On 12/18/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Self- Administration of Medications which was last reviewed on 10/09/2024, read in part, Policy Statement: Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so; Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. As part of their overall evaluation, the staff and/or practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical, abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the resident. 2. In addition to general evaluation of decision-making capacity, the staff and/or practitioner will perform a more specific skill assessment, 3. If the team determines that a resident cannot safely self-administer, the nursing staff will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an alleged injury of unknown source was reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency for 2 (#84, #113) out of 3 (#7, #84, #113) sampled residents investigated for falls. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 112 residents. Findings: On 12/17/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting with a last reviewed date of 10/09/2024 revealed the following in part .Reporting 1. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the Facility Administrator, or his/her designee, to the following persons or agencies: a. The State licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing of facility .2. All alleged violations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment (including injuries of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the State Long Term care Ombudsman of facility-initiated transfer for 2 (#84, #113) out of 2 (#84, #113) residents in a final sample size of 35. The deficient practice has the potential to affect a census of 112. Findings: Review of Resident #84's electronic health record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of Resident #84's nurse's notes revealed on 10/15/2024 at 6:00 a.m., the resident was transferred to the hospital. Further review of the nurse's notes revealed that on 10/15/2024 at 10:46 a.m., the resident returned from the hospital back to the facility. Further review of the facility's document titled Census List revealed Resident #84 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], 11/08/2024 and 11/17/2024. Review of the Emergency Transfer Log for October 2024 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the enteral feeding infused at the ordered rate for one (Resident #63) out of 2 Residents (Resident #63 and Resident #66) investigated for tube feeding. This had the potential to effect 3 residents in the facility who had tube feedings. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enteral Feedings-Safety Precautions last reviewed on 10/09/2024 revealed in part, the following Preventing errors in administration, 1. Check the enteral nutrition label against the order before administration. Check the following information: g. Rate of administration (ml (milliliters)/hr (hour)). Review of Resident #63's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia, dysphagia, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, and encounter for attention to gastrostomy. Review of Resident #63's physician orders revealed an order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices by failing to ensure the comprehensive care plan was accurately documented for 1 (#53) resident. The deficient practice has the potential to affect a census of 112. On 12/19/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Charting and Documentation with a last review date of 10/09/2024, read in part, All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any change in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The policy also indicated that the following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: Progress toward or changes in the care plan goals and objectives. Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate. Resident #53 Review of Resident #53's record revealed he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program by failing to ensure staff used personal protective equipment according to accepted standards of practice during biohazard trash removal. Findings: Review of a facility policy and procedure titled Personal Protective Equipment - Using Gloves, with revised date of 10/09/2024, read in part, .purpose to guide the use of gloves. Objectives - 1. To prevent the spread of infection. 3. To protect hand from potentially infectious material. When to use gloves: 4. When cleaning potentially contaminated items; and 5. Whenever in doubt. On 12/17/2024 at 10:58 a.m., an observation of Hall A revealed a treatment cart positioned against the wall. The treatment cart had a trash can attached with the lid of the trash can opened. A red biohazard trash bag was observed lining the trash can. A partially discarded blue glove was observed hanging half way outside of the red trash bag along with other discarded materials. On 12/17/2024 at 10:59 a.m., an observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party (RP), the nurse practitioner, and physician of a deteriorating right foot wound for 1 (#2) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents by failing to contact the responsible party (RP), nurse practitioner, and physician in a timely manner. Findings: On 05/07/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Prevention with a last revised date of 06/14/2023 revealed in part the following: Policy: The purpose of this policy is to provide information regarding identification of wound/pressure ulcer/injury risk factors and interventions for specific risk factors for prevention of pressure ulcers/wounds. Monitoring: 1. Evaluate, report and document potential changes in the skin including new wounds/pressure ulcers. No mention of which professional discipline could perform the assessments or to who to report changes noted in the policy. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program by: 1. Failing to ensure staff sanitized reusable resident care equipment after each resident use. 2. Failing to perform proper hand hygiene after removing gloves This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 108 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of a policy titled Cleaning/Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment read in part Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 3. Reusable resident care equipment will be sterilized between residents according to manufacturer's instructions. Review of a policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene read in part. Policy Statement. This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections .6. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap .and water for the following situations .m. after removing gloves. 1.On 11/28/2023 at 8:55 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-29 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — patternProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide colostomy care as required by the facility's policy for 1 (Resident #79) of 1 (Resident #79) residnet's reviewed for colostomy care. Findings: Review of facility's policy titled, Colostomy/Ileostomy care read in part . Documentation: the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. the date and time the colostomy/ileostomy care was provided. 2. The name and initial of the individual who provided the colostomy/ileostomy care. 3. Any breaks in resident's skin, signs of infection. 4. How the resident tolerated the procedure. 5. If the resident refused the procedure, the reason why and the intervention taken. 6. The signature and title of the person recording the data. Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included Diverticulitis of Large Intestine with perforation and abscess without bleeding, Encounter for attention to Colostomy. A review of Resident #79's physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess and document the location and intensity of pain for 1 (Resident #34) of 1 residents reviewed for pain. Findings: Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Polyneuropathy, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Spinal Stenosis, Pain, Neuropathy, Osteoarthritis, Parkinson's Disease with Dyskinesia, and Abnormal Posture. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Sets (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 10, indicating that the resident is moderately impaired. Review of Resident #34's care plan revealed, in part, alteration in comfort related to pain, neuropathy, OA (Osteoarthritis). Interventions read in part .if pain noted, assess location and intensity of pain. Review of Resident #34's November 2023 Physician orders revealed, in part, Naproxen Tablet (medication used for pain) 500mg (milligrams) give 1 tablet orally every 12 hours as needed for pain. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff demonstrated specific competencies and skill sets necessary to provide care to meet the residents' needs safely to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 1 (#34) of 43 sampled residents. This was evidenced by S4LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) leaving Resident #34's medication at the bedside. Findings: Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Polyneuropathy, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Spinal Stenosis, Parkinson's Disease with Dyskinesia, and Abnormal Posture. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Sets (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 10, indicating that the resident is moderately impaired. Review of the resident's physician's orders dated 11/2023 revealed the following orders: - Sinemet 10-100mg (miligrams) give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day. - Duloxetine 30mg give 1 capsule orally one time a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and observation the facility failed to ensure all medications were properly stored and labeled as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure Novolog Multidose Insulin Pen was labeled with resident identification; and, 2. Failing to ensure controlled drugs awaiting disposal were stored and separately locked. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census was 108. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications revealed; 17. Insulin pens are clearly labeled with the resident's name or other identifying information. On 11/28/2023 at 10:15 a.m., an observation was made in Med Room A medication refrigerator accompanied by S4LPN. Upon inspection, a Novolog Multidose Insulin Pen was discovered. It was noted with no resident label/information. S4LPN could not confirm to which this medication belonged to and confirmed the medication should have been labeled with resident identification and was not. 2. A review of the facility's policy titled Discarding and Destroying Medications revealed; 1. All unused controlled substances…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN), form Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-10055, and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage form CMS-10123 was completed prior to the discontinuation of Medicare Part A services (short term skilled nursing care and/or rehabilitation) for 1 (Resident #65) of 3 residents reviewed for termination of Medicare Part A services. Findings: Review of the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice, form CMS-10055, completed by the facility revealed, in part, Resident #65's last day of Medicare Part A Services was on 10/04/2023. There was no documented evidence and the facility was unable to present any documented evidence Resident #65 had a signed CMS-10055, and CMS 10123 form prior to Medicare Part A services being terminated by the facility on 10/04/2023. On 11/29/2023 at 11:47 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2MDSA. S2MDSA stated the MDS (Minimum Data Set) coordinators are in charge of the Resident's NOMNC (Notice of Medicare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean environment as evidenced by unclean floor and medical equipment at the bedside of 1 (#23) out of a final of 43 final sampled residents. Findings: Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Encounter for Attention to Gastrostomy and Dysphagia. The resident had an indwelling feeding tube. On 11/27/2023 at 09:48 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #23's room. The resident was lying in her bed with enteral nutrition formula hanging from an IV (intravenous) pole. A wet area was noted underneath the pole. On 11/28/2023 at 09:29 a.m., a second observation was conducted of Resident #23's room. The resident was sleeping in her bed. She was receiving infusions of enteral nutrition formula and water hanging from an IV pole. A closer observation revealed a brown moist buildup of enteral nutrition formula on the bottom of the IV pole, and a moist area with debris underneath the right upper wheel of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed within the required time frame for 2 (Resident #14, Resident #90) out of 43 sampled residents. Findings: A review of Resident #14's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed the residents last quarterly MDS assessment reference date (ARD) was 07/19/2023. Further review of the EMR revealed an assessment was overdue by 27 days. A review of Resident #90's EMR revealed the resident's last quarterly MDS assessment reference date (ARD) was 07/19/2023. Further review of the EMR revealed an assessment was overdue by 27 days. On 11/29/2023 at 11:21 a.m., an interview was conducted with S19MDS. She viewed both resident's EMR and confirmed assessments for both were not completed within the required time frame making them 27 days overdue.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status by failing to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for medications for 1 (Resident #8) out of a finalized sample of 43. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total of 108 residents on the census. Findings: Review of Resident #8's electronic health record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Fusion of Spine, Neuralgia, Acquired Absence of Left Leg Above Knee, Polyneuropathy. A review of the Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/29/2023 for Resident #8 revealed, Section N: Medications, was coded 7 (days) for anticoagulant use. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for September 2023 revealed the residents anticoagulant was stopped on 09/21/2023. On 11/29/2023 at 10:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with S19MDS. She confirmed that the resident was taking an anticoagulant in the month of September 2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a newly diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for 1 (Resident #8) resident investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 43 residents. Findings: A review of Resident #8's record revealed an admission date of 03/20/2017. Further review revealed he was diagnosed with Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type on 12/10/2021. Further review of Resident #8's record revealed a Level 1 PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) dated 06/20/2019. There was no evidence that a rescreening had been submitted after the resident received a newly qualifying diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type on 12/10/2021 and there was no PASARR Level II noted in Resident #8's record. On 11/28/2023 at 2:57 p.m., an interview was conducted with S11SSD. She stated she was not aware that a reevaluation for a Level II PASARR determination should be resubmitted when a resident receives a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure physician orders were implemented as ordered for checking oxygen saturations every shift, monitoring blood pressure before and after dialysis, and monitoring for symptoms before and after dialysis for 1 (#10) of 43 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #10's health record revealed an admission date of 07/14/2021 with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, End Stage Renal Disease, Shortness of Breath, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Edema, and Hypertension. Review of Resident #10's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating his cognition was intact. Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs checked for dialysis. Review of Resident #10's physician's orders revealed an order dated 09/08/2023 that read, check oxygen saturations every shift, monitor blood pressure pre and post dialysis every shift every Tuesday,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident and their representative received assistance in gaining access for hearing services for 1 (#44) out of 2 (#12, #44) residents investigated for hearing impairment out of a total sample of 43 residents. Findings: Resident #44. On 11/27/23 at 10:40 a.m., the resident was observed sitting in her chair in her room. During this observation, the surveyor spoke to the resident and the resident was observed having difficulty understanding. The resident stated that she has trouble with her hearing. Review of the resident's electronic clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, and Anxiety. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set Assessment) dated 9/27/2023 revealed the resident was coded having moderate difficulty for hearing. Review of the resident's care plan revealed the resident was care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who had a urinary catheter received services to prevent urinary tract infection for 1 (#65) of 43 sampled residents. Findings: Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Urinary Retention. The resident had an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident # 65's plan of care revealed she had a history of Urinary Tract Infections, with the last one on 10/09/2023 and a goal to have no urinary Tract Infections this quarter. The resident was also care planned for having a Foley Catheter (indwelling urine drainage tube) and at risk for infections. Goal was for the catheter to remain patent, and interventions include ensuring tube is patent and free from twists and kinks. Review of Physician's Orders revealed an order written on 08/15/2023 to change indwelling catheter leg strap weekly and PRN (as needed). On 11/28/2023 at 09:05 a.m., an observation was conducted of S14CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask stored properly for 1 (Resident #63) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings: Review of facility's policy, titled, Respiratory Therapy, read in part . Infection Control Considerations Related to Oxygen Administration . 5. Keep the oxygen cannula and tubing used PRN (as needed) in a plastic bag when not in use. Review of Resident #63's record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). Review of Resident #63's care plan read in part . Diagnosis- sleep apnea: at risk for altered sleep pattern, interventions: change tubing/mask as ordered. Review of Resident #63's Physician Orders for November 2023 revealed, in part, Resident #63's Auto-PAP 9-15 (CPAP) worn for every sleep. On 11/27/2023 at 09:23 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #63's room. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility through dialysis communication forms for 1 (#10) out of 1 (#10) residents sampled for dialysis services. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with revealed, in part, the following: Policy Statement: Residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 3. Agreements between the facility and the contracted ESRD facility include all aspects of how the resident's care will be manages, including: a. How information will be exchanged between facilities. Review of Resident #10's health record revealed an admission date of 07/14/2021 with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, End Stage Renal Disease, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Edema, and Hypertension. Review of Resident #10's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor and accommodate food preferences for 1(#7) out of 2 (#7, #55) residents reviewed for food. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 107 residents who consumed meals from the kitchen. Findings: Review of Resident #7's record revealed an admission date of 08/24/2023 with diagnoses that included Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease, Diarrhea, Nausea, Constipation, Abnormality of Albumin, Dysphagia, Hyperlipidemia, Vitamin B Deficiency. Review of Resident #7's care plan revealed a focus area for food preferences that stated no peanuts. Review of admission progress note dated 08/24/2023 revealed no peanuts. On 11/27/2023 at 10:35 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #7. She stated she was allergic to peanuts and still received it on her food tray. On 11/27/2023 at 11:15 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #7's lunch time meal tray. She was served peanut butter frosting on her dessert. The meal ticket indicated no peanuts. On 11/27/2023 at 11:17 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards in the kitchen by failing to ensure compromised cans in the dry storage room were disposed and not readily available for use. Findings: On 11/27/2023 at 8:40 a.m., an observation of the dry storage room with S2DM (Dietary Manager) revealed 4 cans of vegetable soup, 1 can of condensed cream of mushroom soup, and 3 cans of mandarin oranges that were dented near the lip of the cans. An interview with S2DM confirmed the cans on the shelf were compromised, available for use, and should have been discarded.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$5,600 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $5,600 — penalty dated 2024-05-09
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAY, BRIAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 03/07/2005 |
| STOTT, MARTIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 03/07/2005 |
| CASSIDY, WILLIAM | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/01/2018 |
| DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/07/2005 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $740K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in LA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195567. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.