Willow Ridge Nursing And Rehabilitation Center,llc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 29.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-09-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to inform and provide written information to formulate an advance directive for 5 (#2, #8, #23, #71, #116) out of 5 residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings:Review of Resident #2's medical records revealed an admit date of 02/17/2025. Further review of Resident #2's Resident Rights/Advanced Directive form dated 02/17/2025 failed to provide written information to formulate an advance directive. Review of Resident #8's medical records revealed an admit date of 04/08/2025. Further review of Resident #8's undated Resident Rights/Advanced Directive form signed by representative failed to provide written information to formulate an advance directive. Review of Resident #23's medical records revealed an admit date of 10/30/2024. Further review of Resident #23's Resident Rights/Advanced Directive form dated 04/29/2024 failed to provide written information to formulate an advance directive. Review of Resident #71's medical records revealed an admit date of 03/24/2022. Further review of Resident #71's Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 (#8) of 2 (#8, #80) residents reviewed for infections. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's Tobramycin ophthalmic medication was stopped after indication for use was resolved. Findings:Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/08/2025 with diagnoses that included, in part, hordeolum externum left eyelid, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, and end stage renal disease. Review of Resident #8's physician orders revealed a 05/13/2025 order for Tobramycin opthalmic ointment 0.3% - Instill 0.5 drop in left eye every 8 hours for hordeolum externum left upper eyelid. Review of Resident #8's May, June, July, August, and September 2025 Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed Resident #8 continued to receive Tobramycin ophthalmic ointment from the order dated 05/13/2025 until 09/17/2025. Review of Resident #8's 05/13/2025 progress note by S3Nurse Practitioner (NP) revealed, in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and menu review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for 10 (#9, #12, #13, #23, #37, #52, #54, #62, #86, #90) of 10 (#9, #12, #13, #23, #37, #52, #54, #62, #86, #90) residents that had an order for a pureed diet. Findings:Review of the 09/15/2025 lunch menu, approved by the Registered Dietician, revealed the residents who require a pureed diet would receive pureed Southwestern chicken over pureed rice and gravy, pureed black eyed peas, and pureed strawberry cookie bar. On 09/15/2025 at 11:55 a.m., an observation of the lunch meal service revealed the facility had 10 residents that received a pureed diet. Dining room observations revealed that the residents present who required a pureed diet did not receive a pureed strawberry cookie bar for dessert. On 09/15/2025 at 12:15 p.m., an interview with S7Dietary worker confirmed that he was responsible for preparing the pureed menu. He further confirmed that he did not puree the cookie bar for dessert as specified on the lunch menu. On 09/15/2025 at 12:20 p.m., an interview with S6Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was developed for 1(#3) resident of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. The facility failed develop a plan of care for Resident #3's hospice care. Findings: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admit date of 04/01/2022 with diagnoses of but not limited to unspecified dementia, psychotic disturbance, anxiety and senile degeneration of the brain. Review of Resident #3's May 2025 Physician's Orders revealed an order to admit Resident #3 to ____Hospice dated 01/23/2025. Review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Plan of Care failed to reveal a problem and approaches addressing Resident #3's hospice care. During an interview on 05/21/2025 at 12:05 p.m. S2 LPN (licensed practical nurse) confirmed, a hospice plan of care should have been initiated when Resident #3 was placed on hospice on 01/23/2025. During an interview 05/21/2025 at 12:15 p.m. S1 DON (director of nurses) confirmed a hospice plan of care of should have been initiated when Resident #3 was placed on hospice.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to inform the resident's responsible party (RP) of a resident's change in condition for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's RP of the initiation of oxygen. Findings: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/19/2025 with diagnoses of but not limited to senile degeneration of brain, not elsewhere classified, unspecified dementia, moderate with agitation, anxiety disorder, essential (primary) hypertension, primary osteoarthritis, and unspecified pain. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed a progress note dated 04/25/2025 at 5:04 a.m. indicating Resident #1 was started on 3.5 liters of oxygen per nasal cannula. Further review failed to reveal Resident #1's RP was notified of the initiation of oxygen on 04/25/2025. During a telephone interview on 05/21/2025 at 9:56 a.m. Resident #3's RP reported he had not been notified that Resident #1 was placed on oxygen on 04/25/2025. During a telephone interview on 05/20/2025 at 2:16 p.m. S3 LPN (licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 (#92) of 2 (#68, #92) residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure 1). a thorough investigation was conducted after each incident involving a resident's laptray and 2). a laptray was not applied to a resident's gerichair after multiple incidents occurred that involved a laptray. Findings: Resident #92 Review of the facility policy Accident and Incident Documentation and Investigation Resident Incident revised July 2018 revealed the following in part: Policy: Accidents and/or incidents involving resident care will be investigated and documented on the Resident Incident Report entry form in the Long Term Care system. An incident is defined as an occurrence which is not consistent with the routine operation of the facility or the routine care of a particular resident. Accidents and incidents will be analyzed for trends or patterns to enable the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to have a completed Physical Restraint Informed Consent for 1 (#71) of 2 (#71, #92) sampled residents reviewed for restraints. Findings: Observations on 08/19/2024 at 11:20 a.m. and 08/21/2024 at 08:10 a.m. revealed resident #71 was lying in a geri chair located in the front day room near the nurse's station. The head of geri chair was elevated about 45 degrees and his lower extremities were elevated. Record review revealed resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include essential hypertension, seizures, chronic systolic heart congestive heart failure, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy status, hemiplegia following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, and unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 which indicated resident #71 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to treat and care for each resident in a manner which promoted dignity by failing to ensure resident's medical conditions were not discussed in a community environment for 1 (#3) of 4 (#1, #3, #5, and #6) residents reviewed for Resident's Rights. Findings: Review of resident #3's electronic health record revealed an admit date of 11/13/2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, cardiovascular accident, pure hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, essential hypertension, chronic systolic heart failure, and coronary artery disease. Review of resident #3's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. Review of the facility's grievances revealed on 06/18/2024 resident #3 reported S4 Driver/CNA (certified nursing assistant) talked about the size of his penis in front of the facility with other female staff members present. S4 Driver/CNA reported telling resident #3 how to stop urinating in the bed. S4 Driver/CNA reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive services with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 6 (#80, #1, #2, #76, #92, #93) of 6 residents (#80, #1, #2, #76, #92, #93) residents by failing to provide residents with proper utensils to consume meals. Findings: Resident #80 Observation of the morning meal on 08/14/2023 at 8:59 a.m. revealed resident #80 was provided only a spoon for the meal. Interview on 08/14/2023 at 10:30 a.m. with Resident #80's family member revealed he had complained regarding utensils provided to residents on the memory unit. He reported that he comes frequently to assist resident #80 with meals and dietary only provided a plastic spoon with meals. He further reported it was impossible to cut up meat and other items without a knife and fork. Interview on 08/14/2023 at 1:15 p.m. with S5LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed that residents are only given a spoon to eat meals. S5LPN reported that was problematic at time not having the correct utensils. S5LPN revealed staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1(#78) of 1 (#78) resident reviewed for limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion by failing to apply hand splint daily as ordered. Findings: Review of the medical record for resident #78 revealed an admission date of 11/05/21 with diagnosis of major depressive disorder, cannabis abuse, hypertension, urinary tract infection, other bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, Schizophrenia, seizures, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and nutritional deficiency. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the Resident has a BIMS score of 6 which indicates cognitive impairment. Further review revealed the Resident had a range of motion limitation impairment to the right upper extremities. Review of the Nurses notes dated 5/14/23 at 1:00 p.m., resident has old CVA (cerebral vascular accident) with right sided weakness. Wears hand…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA