Maison D'Acadiens Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 62.8 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the discharge summary included a recapitulation of the resident's stay for 1 (Resident #66) of 3 closed records reviewed. Findings:Review of the facility's policy titled Discharge Summary and Plan with a revised date of 03/2025 read in part, When a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary is created and the discharge plan is finalized to assist the resident with plans for care after discharge. Discharge Summary: 1. a. discharge summary includes: a recapitulation of the resident's stay at the facility (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility). Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/31/2026 and a discharged date of 04/10/2026.Review of Resident #66's Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed in part, Resident #66 was discharged to another facility. Further review of discharge summary revealed no recapitulation of Resident #66's stay in the current facility.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary services to maintain good grooming. The facility failed to provide proper hair grooming for 1 (#54) of 17 sampled resident. The current census was 65.Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living, Supporting with a revised date of 03/2018 read in part.Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living. Appropriate care and services will be provided for resident, including support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing dressing grooming, and oral care) Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed an admit date of 05/06/2025 with the following diagnoses in part .Major Depressive Disorder, Anemia, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Mild Intellectual Disability. Review of Review #54's Annual MDS with an ARD date of 05/13/2026 revealed Client #54 has a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #54 required supervision/touch…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that received meals prepared by the kitchen. The facility census was 65. Findings: Review of the facility's policy on 06/09/2026 at 12:52 p.m. titled: Sanitization with a revised date of 11/2022 read in part . The food service area is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. Service area wiping cloths are cleaned and dried or placed in a chemical sanitizing solution of appropriate concentration.Observation of the facility's kitchen on 06/07/2026 at 8:44 a.m. accompanied by S5 [NAME] revealed: The kitchen's floor was heavily soiled with unknown brown substances and food items. Underneath the sink, was an uncovered crate that held multiple dirty and soiled towels. Observation of the facility's kitchen on 06/07/2026 at 10:45 a.m., accompanied by S4 Dietary Manager revealed: The kitchen's floor was heavily soiled with unknown brown substances and food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections by failing to ensure staff changed gloves and performed hand hygiene after touching contaminated areas during wound care for 1 (#10) of 2 (#4 and #10) residents observed for wound care. Findings: Review of the Facility's policy titled Wound Care with a revision date of 04/2026 read in part.Purpose: The Purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. Steps in the Procedure:8. Put on exam glove. 9. Loosen tape and remove old dressing.10. Pull glove over dressing and discard into appropriate receptacle. Remove the second glove.11. Perform hand hygiene.12. Put on clean gloves. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission to the facility on 7/22/2024 with a readmission date of 12/30/2025 with the following diagnoses in part Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program by failing to ensure the facility was free from insects. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 62 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy on 06/18/2025 at 4:00 p.m. titled Pest Control with revision date of 05/2008 read in part . Our facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is free of insects and rodents. Observation of the facility's kitchen on 06/16/2025 at 8:48 a.m. accompanied by S11 Dietary Manager revealed: There were multiple flies observed throughout the kitchen area with flies landing on the kitchen stove and food prep area. The dry food pantry contained 3 large storage bins and within the (1) flour bin there were 3 small black insects. Interview with S11 Dietary Manager on 06/16/2025 at 8:48 a.m. confirmed the above findings. S11 Dietary Manager stated the kitchen should be free of insects, but was not. Observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Resident's right to formulate an advanced directive was properly reflected in the Resident's medical record for 1 (Resident #47) of 24 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure all medical records regarding code status consistently reflected Resident #47's wishes to be a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). Findings: Review of Resident #47's electronic medical record revealed an admit date of [DATE] with admitting diagnoses of Cellulitis of Right Lower Limb, Unspecified Neuralgia and Neuritis, Severe Sepsis with Septic Shock, Adult Failure to Thrive, Anemia, Moderate Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Hyperlipidemia, Depression, and Essential Primary Nutrition. Review of Resident #47's admission MDS with an ARD date of [DATE] revealed in part . Resident #47 had a BIMS score of 9, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. On [DATE] at 11:02 a.m. review of Resident #47's [DATE] physician orders revealed an order dated [DATE], listing the code…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the NOMNC Form CMS-10123 (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) was provided to the resident and/or the resident's representative prior to discharge from Medicare Part A services for 2 (Resident #115 and Resident #116) of 2 sampled residents for Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN). Findings: Review of the SNF Beneficiary Notification Review forms completed by the facility revealed the following: Resident #115- Medicare Part A Skilled Services Episode start date 12/20/2024; last covered day 01/06/2025. The facility/provider initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A Services when benefit days were not exhausted. No evidence of NOMNC Form CMS 10123 being issued. Resident #116- Medicare Part A Skilled Services Episode start date 01/17/2025; last covered day 02/03/2025. The facility/provider initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A Services when benefit days were not exhausted. No evidence of NOMNC Form CMS 10123 being issued. Interview on 06/18/2025 at 12:30 p.m. with S12 HR/BOM stated that Resident #115 and Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document discharge planning for a resident who had expressed a desire to discharge. The facility failed to document a referral to an outside entity, and the responses received from the outside entity, for Resident #45. The total sample included 20 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy entitled Discharge Summary and Plan, revised 03/2025, revealed, in part .when a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary is created. The discharge summary includes information necessary for the care of the resident while residing in the facility, and after his/her discharge. The medical record contains a copy of the discharge summary. Referrals made for the purpose of discharge are documented in the medical record. Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/18/2023 with diagnoses including, in part .Encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, MDD, Arthritis, Overactive Bladder, Acute Hepatitis C, Epilepsy, and Metabolic Encephalopathy. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene by failing to provide ADL care for 1 (Resident #54) of 24 sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL) with a revision date of 03/2018 read in part . 2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care); b. mobility (transfer and ambulation, including walking); c. elimination (toileting); d. dining (meals and snacks); and e. communication (speech, language, and any functional communication systems). Review of Resident # 54's Clinical Record revealed an admit date of 04/19/2024 with diagnoses which included: Alcohol Dependence with Alcohol-Induced Persisting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that received meals prepared by the kitchen. The facility census was 62. Findings: Review of the facility's policy on 06/18/2025 at 4:00 p.m. titled: Sanitization with a revised date of 11/2022 read in part . The food service area is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. All kitchens, kitchen areas and dining areas are kept clean, free from garbage and debris, and protected from rodents and insects. All equipment, food contact surfaces and utensils are cleaned and sanitized using heat or chemical sanitizing solutions. Observation of the facility's kitchen on 06/16/2025 at 8:48 a.m. accompanied by S11 Dietary Manager revealed: The kitchen's floor was heavily soiled with mud and food items. The kitchen's microwave was unsanitary with dried food splattered on the top and bottom. Interview with S11 Dietary Manager on 06/16/2025 at 8:48 a.m. confirmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $100K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA