Cherry Ridge

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 78.6 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-06-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for 2 (#73 and #23) of 3 (#73, #23, and #13) residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. Findings: Resident #23 Record review revealed Resident # 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction due to embolism of unspecified cerebellar artery, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and reduced mobility. Review of most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) data revealed as Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of June 2025 active orders revealed an order for a hand roll to right hand for contracture management and remove every shift to wash and dry thoroughly inside hand and replace. Every shift- day shift, evening shift, night shift. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations of the medication administration, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it was free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater. The facility had a 5.26% medication error rate with 2 medication errors out of 37 opportunities. Findings: Resident #40 Observation of the medication pass for Resident #40 on 06/03/2025 at 7:15 a.m. revealed S3Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered one eye medication, Dorzolamide 2%, 1 drop in each eye. Review of the physician orders for Resident #40 revealed an order for the glaucoma eye medication Brimonidine 0.2, 1 drop in both eyes three times daily at 8:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. This medication was not administered. Review of the Medication Administration Record for Resident #40 revealed that S3 LPN documented that she administered Brimonidine eye medication at 7:15 a.m., at the same time as she administered Dorzolamide eye medication. Resident #67 Observation of the medication pass for Resident #67 on 06/03/2025 at 7:57 a.m. revealed S4LPN administered 8 medications. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections by failing to implement its policy for enhanced barrier precautions for 2 (#50 , #57) of 3 (#50, #57, #77) residents reviewed for transmission based precautions. Findings: Review of the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) policy dated August 2022 revealed in-part: Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. 2. EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. a. Gloves and gown are applied prior to performing the high contact resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically transmit encoded, accurate and complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) data to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) in a timely manner for 2 (#30,#79) of 2 (#30, #79) residents reviewed for the completion of a 14 day discharge assessment. Findings: Record review revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 01/25/2025. The discharge assessment for 01/25/2025 was noted as being in process and had not been transmitted. Record review revealed Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 01/03/2025. A discharge assessment for 01/03/2025 had not been completed therefore a discharge assessment had not been transmitted within 14 days. On 06/04/25 at 12:33 p.m., an interview with S7MDS coordinator confirmed Resident #30 was discharged on 01/25/2025 and Resident #79 was discharged on 01/03/2025. The discharge assessments had not been transmitted within 14 days of discharge for Resident #30 or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice by not having signage on the outside of the residents' room door to indicate oxygen was in use for 2 (#13, #60) of 2 (#13, #60) residents reviewed for oxygen. Findings: Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy and procedure, revised January 2025, revealed the following, in part: Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Steps in the Procedure 2. Place an Oxygen in Use sign in a designated place outside resident room. Resident #13 Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 05/09/2025 with diagnoses that included the following: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, fracture of unspecified part of left clavicle, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, displaced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident was treated with dignity and respect for 1 (#2) of 1 (#2) sampled residents who complained of a long call light response. The facility failed to ensure resident #2's call light was answered in a timely manner, after the resident had requested assistance from staff on 08/11/2024. Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a colostomy. Further review revealed that resident #2 had a documented brief interview for mental status score of 14. A score of 13-15 indicated that resident #2 was cognitively intact with daily decision making skills. On 08/12/2024 at 10:23 a.m., an interview with resident #2 revealed he had used his call light three times on 08/11/2024 and requested staff assistance with the emptying of his colostomy bag. Review of the [NAME]-Care Report (a reporting system by which the facility obtained all nurse call activity)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and to prevent infection for 1(#3) of 2 (#1 and #3) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed as evidence by resident #3 not having a dressing covering her sacral wound, in accordance with the physician's orders. Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3's documented diagnoses included obesity, cerebral infarction, and an unstageable pressure ulcer of the sacrum. Review of the medical record revealed a physician's order dated 07/11/2024. Review of the order revealed that staff were to cleanse resident #3's sacral wound with wound cleanser, pat the wound dry, and apply Calcium Alginate to the wound bed. Further review of the order revealed to cover the wound with a silicone dressing, to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record reviews, the facility failed to honor and accommodate food preferences for 5 (#4, #17, #22, #39, #47) of 6 (#4, #6, #17, #22, #39, #47) residents investigated for dining concerns. The failed practice was evidenced by residents not being provided condiments with their meals. Findings: Resident #39 Record review revealed resident #39 had a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 05/03/2024. Section C (cognitive patterns) of the MDS revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was completed with a score of 13 which indicated she was cognitively intact. Further review of active physician orders for May 2024 revealed an order for resident #39 to receive a regular diet. On 05/28/2024 at 09:18 a.m., observation revealed resident #39 was served pancakes with no syrup. During an interview at this time with resident # 39, she reported she was agitated and she stated enough was enough. Resident # 39 complained about the kitchen staff rarely providing the necessary condiments to go with the food served. Resident # 39 reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to prepare and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure 1) that all staff operating the three compartment sink and dishwasher could test for the proper amount of sanitizer, and 2) contamniated serving utensils did not come in contact with the food on the steam table. According to interview with S4Dietary Manager (S4DM), there were 72 residents who received meals served from the kitchen. Findings: During a tour of the kitchen with S4DM on 05/28/2024 at 8:35 a.m., an observation revealed S5Dietary Worker in the dishwashing room. She was observed placing dishes in the three compartment sink. Further observation revealed water in all three individual compartments of the sink. S5Dietary Worker removed a test strip from the Auto-Chlor (Test strips used to test for chemical sanitizer levels) bottle. S5Dietary Worker dipped the test strip into the water of each of the compartments. S5Dietary Worker revealed that she was checking the water with the test strip and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical equipment in a safe operating condition by having a large buildup of grease in the deep fryer. Findings: On 05/28/2024 at approximately 12:30 p.m., an observation of the kitchen revealed one large gas deep fryer. Further observation revealed the deep fryer had a lower compartment that housed the fryer's internal components. Observation of the lower compartment revealed a large, thick buildup of grease and grease splatters throughout the compartment and in direct contact with the fryer's internal components. S4Dietary Manager was present during the observation and confirmed the deep fryer was not in safe working condition and needed to be cleaned. On 05/30/2024 at 3:02 p.m., S1Administrator and S9Administrator-In-Training were notified of the observation of the deep fryer.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA