No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ollie Steele Burden Manor

4250 Essen Lane, Baton Rouge, LA 70809 · Non profit - Church related · 174 certified beds · (225) 926-0091 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (225) 926-0091 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 20 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • about 100% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7968 Essen Park Avenue
Pharmacy
4950 Essen Ln Ste 540 · (225) 374-0260 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7515 Perkins Rd · (225) 769-6084 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4560 Essen Ln · (225) 763-3990 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.9%17.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%5.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.2%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.8%2.1%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.1%2.3%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened30.6%17.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.9%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.4%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%5.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.2%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table42.2%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%3.1%1.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.1%76.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.6%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.5%14.8%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 91 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
20.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 20.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.3%CMS range 42.1–57.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 6.8–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge20.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge12.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge24.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.4–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.74
RN hours/ resident / day
1.38
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.56
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.69
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.56
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 174 beds and averages 61.3 residents a day — about 35% occupied, or roughly 113 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.56 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-17)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure:1. Food was properly labeled in the walk-in refrigerator;2. Food was properly labeled in the dry storage room;3. Food was properly sealed and labeled in the walk-in freezer;4. Dietary staff maintained documentation of dishwasher temperatures;5. Dietary staff maintained documentation of 3 compartment sink temperatures and chemical sanitation levels; and 6. Dietary staff maintained documentation of Breakfast and Lunch meal temperatures. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 29 residents who were served food from the facility's kitchen.Findings:Review of the facility's revised policy dated 11/2022 and titled, Food Receiving and Storage, revealed the following, in part:Policy: Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices.Policy Interpretation and Implementation:Refrigeration/Frozen Storage1. All foods stored in the refrigerator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program was maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure:1. Nursing staff providing care to a resident who required Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) did not exit a resident's room wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) or store a mask worn during resident care in their pocket for 1 (#62) of 2 (#2 and #62) residents reviewed on TBP; 2. Nursing staff sanitized insulin pen stoppers prior to attaching an insulin pen needle for 2 of 2 (#2 and #66) residents reviewed for insulin administration; and 3. Documentation was maintained of the annual review of the Infection Prevention Policies and Procedures.Findings: 1.Resident #62Review of Resident #62's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis, which included COVID-19.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing of Medicare services which may not be covered, and of the resident's/beneficiary's potential liability for payment for non-covered services. The facility failed to ensure liability notices were accurate and completed as required for 2 (#53 and #54) of 3 (#53, #54, and #61) residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Advance Beneficiary Notices revealed the following, in part:Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:4. The facility shall inform Medicare beneficiaries of his or her potential liability for payment. A liability notice shall be issued to Medicare beneficiaries upon admission or during a resident's stay, before the facility provides:a. An item or service that is usually paid for by Medicare, but may not be paid for in a particular instance because it is not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan which met the needs of 1 of 1 (#50) residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #50 was care planned for fall risk upon admission.Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, and dated 2025 revealed the following, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measureable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and all services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meets professional standards of quality. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 3. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following:a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each residents' care plan was reviewed and revised for 1 of 1 (#21) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The facility failed to update Resident #21's care plan after 11/05/2024, when she required a mechanical lift for transfers. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, and dated 2025 revealed the following, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measureable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and all services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meets professional standards of quality. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 5. The comprehensive, care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the services provided as outlined in the comprehensive care plan met professional standards of quality by failing to ensure nursing staff primed insulin pen needles prior to administering insulin for 2 of 2 (#2 and #66) residents reviewed for insulin administration.Findings: Review of the Humalog (Insulin Lispro) Kwik pen Manufacturer's Insert revealed the following, in part:Step 4: Push the capped Needle straight onto the Pen and twist the Needle on until it is tight.Prime before each injection. Priming your Pen means removing the air from the Needle and Cartridge that may collect during normal use and ensures that the Pen is working correctly. If you do not prime before each injection, you may get too much or too little insulin.Step 6: To prime your Pen, turn the Dose Knob to select 2 units.Step 7: Hold your Pen with the Needle pointing up. Tap the Cartridge Holder gently to collect air bubbles at the top.Step 8: Continue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to properly label respiratory care equipment for 1 of 1 (#2) resident investigated for respiratory care.Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Departmental (Respiratory Infection)-Prevention of Infection revealed, in part:Steps in the Procedure:Infection Control Considerations Related to Oxygen Administration:7. Change the oxygen cannula and tubing every seven (7) days, or as needed. Review of Resident #2's Clinical record revealed an admission date of 06/26/2025 and diagnoses, which included Pulmonary Hypertension and Congestive Heart Failure. Review of Resident #2's current Physician Orders revealed an order for Oxygen at 2 Liters per minute per nasal cannula as needed. Review of Resident #2's current care plan revealed the following, in part:Problem: The resident has shortness of breath.Goal: The resident will maintain normal breathing pattern as evidenced by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled properly in accordance with current accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Insulin pens were labeled with an open date in 1 (Cart C) of 3 (Cart A, Cart B and Cart C) medication carts reviewed, and2. An expired medication was not available for use in 1 (Med Room A) of 2 (Med Room A and Med Room B) medication rooms reviewed.Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication Storage revealed the following, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation. 1. Review of the Humalog (Insulin Lispro) Kwik pen Manufacturer's Insert revealed the following, in part:Do not use your Pen past the expiration date printed on the Label or for more than 28 days after you…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure garbage and waste were properly contained in the outdoor trash dumpsters.Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, revealed the following, in part:Policy: The facility shall properly dispose of kitchen garbage and refuse.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:7. Containers and dumpsters shall be kept covered when not being loaded. On 09/15/2025 at 10:15 a.m., an observation was made of the facility's two outdoor trash dumpsters with S4DM. One of the dumpsters was observed with one of the two lids open and half full of trash. The second dumpster was observed with both lids open and half full of trash. On 09/15/2025 at 10:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4DM. He confirmed the above observation. He confirmed the dumpster lids should be kept closed when not in use. On 09/15/2025 at 4:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. She was made aware of the above observation of the dumpster lids being open. She confirmed the dumpster lids…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to meet the following Hospice requirements by failing to: 1. Designate a member of the facility's interdisciplinary team (IDT) to be responsible for working with Hospice representatives to coordinate care of the resident provided by facility and Hospice staff for 1 of 1 (#4) residents reviewed for Hospice care; and2. Maintain a system to ensure a Hospice resident's Hospice Binder contained most current Hospice plan of care for 1 of 1 (#4) residents reviewed for Hospice care. A review of Resident #4's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #4 was admitted to a local hospice agency on 06/07/2025 with a current Certification Period of 09/04/2025 thru 12/02/2025. A review of Resident #4's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/10/2025 revealed the following, in part, Section O- K1. Hospice Care - Yes. On 09/17/2025 at 11:30 a.m., a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 10 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and an interview, the facility failed to issue a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) prior to the discontinuation of Medicare Part A services for 3 (#25, #228, and #229) of 3 (#25, #228, and #229) residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. Findings: On 10/30/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Advance Beneficiary Notice with a Copyright date of 2024, revealed the following: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage. c. A Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), Form CMS-10123, shall be issued to the resident/representative when Medicare covered service(s) are ending, no matter if resident is leaving the facility ore remaining in the facility. i. This notice is used when all covered services end for coverage reasons. Resident #25 Review of Resident #25's Beneficiary Notification Review form revealed his Medicare Part A skilled services last covered day was 08/11/2024. Further review revealed a NOMNC, Form CMS-10123 was not provided to Resident #25 prior to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Each residents' discharge was encoded in an MDS assessment for 3 (#7, #12, and #22) of 11 (#1, #5, #6, #7, #8, #12, #14, #15, #19, #20, and #22) residents reviewed for Resident Assessment; and 2. A resident's discharge assessment was completed and transmitted for 1 (#6) of 11 (#1, #5, #6, #7, #8, #12, #14, #15, #19, #20, and #22) residents reviewed for Resident Assessment. Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes with a revision date of July 2017 revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 2. Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual. Review of the facility's policy titled, Electronic Transmission of the MDS with a revision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident was assessed using the quarterly review instrument not less frequently than once every three months for 3 (#1, #19, and #20) of 11 (#1, #5, #6, #7, #8, #12, #14, #15, #19, #20, and #22) residents reviewed for Resident Assessment. Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes with a revision date of July 2017 revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 2. Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual. Resident #1 On 10/30/2024, a review of Resident #1's MDS assessments revealed a quarterly MDS with an ARD of 06/20/2024. Further review revealed no other MDS assessment had been opened or completed after 06/20/2024. Resident #19 On 10/30/2024, a review of Resident #19's MDS assessments on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed for 1 of 1 (#21) resident reviewed for PASARR. Findings: On 10/30/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program with a Copyright date of 2024, revealed the following: Policy: This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening. b. PASARR Level II - a comprehensive evaluation by the appropriate state-designated authority (cannot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-11 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the individual designated as the Infection Preventionist, completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings: Review of the facility's Infection Control Binder revealed no documentation of S2DON and S11RN having completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. On 10/11/2023 12:26 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON confirmed that neither she nor S11RN had completed the specialized infection prevention and control training. S2DON stated S15CRNC had the specialized infection prevention and control training and was overseeing them. On 10/11/2023 at 2:41 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON, S11RN, and S15CRNC. S15CRNC confirmed she completed specialized infection prevention and control training but was unable to produce documentation of the training. S2DON confirmed she had been over infection control since 04/21/2021 and had not completed specialized infection prevention and control training. S11RN confirmed she was the RN Quality Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by failing to: 1. Ensure opened foods were sealed properly; and 2. Ensured expired food items were disposed. Findings: Review of the policy titled Sanitation and Infection Control: Food Storage, revealed the following, in part: Policy: Sufficient storage facilities are provided to keep foods safe, wholesome, and appetizing. Food is stored, prepared, and transported at appropriate temperatures and by methods designed to prevent contamination. 15. Refrigeration: e. All foods should be covered, labeled and dated 16. Frozen Foods: c. Foods should be covered, labels and dated. On 10/09/2023 at 10:52 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted with S13SFS. The following observations were made and confirmed by S13SFS. Dry Storage -4 unopened and 1 opened bag of marshmallows with an expiration date of 09/25/2023 Walk-in Cooler -1 opened and unsealed bag of romaine lettuce -1 large white plastic tub of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all medical records regarding the residents code status consistently reflected the resident's wishes for 1(#136) of 16 residents reviewed for advanced directives in the initial pool process. Findings: Review of Resident #136's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #136's MDS with an ARD of [DATE], revealed, in part, the resident was assessed by the facility to have a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #136's current Physician's Orders revealed the following: [DATE] - Code Status: DNR Review of Resident #136's Physical Hard Chart revealed a Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Form signed on [DATE] by Resident #136 representative, which indicated Resident #136 wished to receive CPR if found with no pulse or respirations. Review of Resident #136's face sheet revealed a Code Status of DNR. On [DATE] at 1:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #136.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0851 — isolated
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit accurate payroll information for direct care staffing as required. Findings: Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report for FY Quarter 3 2023 (April 1-June 30) revealed the following: Metric One Star Staffing Rating: This metric is suppressed for this facility and quarter Excessively Low Weekend Staffing: This metric is suppressed for this facility and quarter. Possible reasons for suppressed metrics: Invalid Data Review of the facility's CMS Submission Report PBJ Submitter Final File Validation Reports for 04/2023 revealed the following in part: Total Employee Link Records: Not Submitted Review of the facility's CMS Submission Report PBJ Submitter Final File Validation Reports for 05/2023 revealed the following in part: Total Employee Link Records: Not Submitted Review of the facility's CMS Submission Report PBJ Submitter Final File Validation Reports for 06/2023 revealed the following in part: Total Employee Link Records: Not Submitted On 10/11/2023 at 1:38 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-10-30 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing data on a daily basis which included the total resident census for 1 of 1 area reviewed for nurse staffing data. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 20 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, revised on 08/2022, revealed the following: Policy Interpretation and Implementation 2. Shift staffing information is recorded on a form for each shift. The information recorded on the form shall include the following: c. The resident census at the beginning of the shift for which the information is posted. An observation was made on 10/29/2024 at 11:15 a.m. of the daily staffing sheet, dated 10/29/2024, posted on the wall outside of the Director of Nursing's office. There was no resident census included on the sheet. An interview was conducted on 10/29/2024 at 11:25 a.m. with S3DON. S3DON stated she was responsible for posting the daily staffing sheet. She confirmed the resident census number was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-10-11 · tag F0640 — widespread
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete and transmit MDS assessments in the required timeframe for 4 of 4 (#8, #17, #22, and #24) residents reviewed for resident assessment. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Electronic Transmission of the MDS revealed the following, in part: All MDS assessments (e.g. admission, annual, significant change, quarterly, review, etc.) and discharge and reentry records are completed and electronically encoded into our facility's MDS information system and transmitted to CMS QIES Assessment Submission and Processing System in accordance with current OBRA regulations governing the transmission of MDS data. Review of the MDS assessments was conducted with S12LPN on 10/11/2023 at 9:25 a.m. revealed the following: Resident #8 was discharged from the facility on 09/11/2023. A discharge assessment was completed but not transmitted. The discharge assessment should have been transmitted by 09/26/2023. Resident #17 was discharged from the facility on 06/29/2023. A discharge assessment was completed but not transmitted.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OUR LADY OF THE LAKE HOSPITAL INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/15/2003
CURRY, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2013
LANDRY, ARTHURIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/10/2013
TAUZIN, MARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2013
CLOWERS, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
CURTIS, ELIZABETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/10/2022
SCHEXNAYDER, CONSTANCEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/23/2020
FRANCISCAN MISSIONARIES OF OUR LADY HEALTH SYSTEM INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-101.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$11.2M
Related-party expense100% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 8%Other / private 92%

This home reported $11.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 100% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$526per resident / day
operating cost
$15,988per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$262per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195566. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next