St Clare Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 19.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 184 beds and averages 134.7 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.14 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.16 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles by failing to ensure:Resident rooms were free of loose and unlabeled pills for 1 (Resident #145's room) of 6 resident rooms observed during medication administration; andMedication carts were free of loose and unlabeled pills for 2 (Med Cart 1 and Med Cart 2) of 3 medication carts reviewed.Findings: Review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy, dated November 2020, revealed the following, in part:Policy:The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner.2. Drugs and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers. 1.On 05/04/2026 at 10:12 a.m., an observation was made with S4LPN during medication administration of an unlabeled and oblong shaped white pill broken in half on the floor of Resident #145's room. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered a therapeutic diet when the health care provider ordered a nutritional supplement for 1 (#95) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings: Resident #95Review of Resident #95's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Malignant Neoplasm of Brain and Colostomy Status. Review of Resident #95's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/11/2026, revealed a BIMS of 9, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #95's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part:Start date 09/12/2025 -Mighty Shakes - with meals House supplement or equivalent with each meal Problem: I have the potential for weight loss/gain and altered nutrition related to my facility ordered diet.Interventions: Mighty Shakes with meals, house supplement or equivalent with each meal-date initiated-09/12/2025. On 05/05/2026 at 8:10 a.m., an observation was made of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to provide food that accommodated the resident's food preference for 1 (#9) of 9 of residents reviewed for food accommodations/preference. Findings: Review of Resident #9's Clinical Record revealed he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #9's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/25/2026 revealed a BIMS of 14, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of the May 2026 Menu revealed the following:Entree- Red BeansStarch- RiceWith a substitute alternative available. Review of the dietary system with RD (Registered Dietician) the following:Resident #9 disliked red beans and rice Review of the lunch dietary ticket dated 05/04/2026 for Lunch revealed the following:Entree- Entree substituteStarch- starch substitute On 05/04/2026 at 12:30 p.m., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #9. Red beans and rice noted on Resident #9's food tray. Resident #9 stated he did not like red beans and rice. On 05/05/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to communicate with hospice staff pertaining to residents current oxygen orders for 1 (#144) of 1 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. Findings: Review of the Facility's Policy, Hospice Program, dated July 2017, revealed the following, in part:10. In general, it is the responsibility of the facility to meet the Resident's personal care and nursing needs in coordination with the hospice representative, and ensure that the level of care provided is appropriately based on the individual resident's needs. These include:d. Communicating with the hospice provider (and documenting such communication) to ensure that the needs of the resident are addressed and met 24 hours per day; and Review of Resident #144's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and admitted to hospice services on 04/29/2026. Review of the hospice binder for Resident #144 revealed standing orders for oxygen 2-5 liters via nasal cannula as needed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (#95) of 24 sampled residents by failing to ensure resident was coded correctly for Active Diagnosis. Review of Resident #95's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included in part: Dementia, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety. Review of Resident #95's Quarterly MDS, with ARD of 04/30/2025, revealed no BIMS due to severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed Section I Active Diagnosis, Section I2500 Wound Infection other than foot - checked Yes. On 05/29/2025 at 9:05 a.m., an interview was conducted with S10CNA. S10CNA confirmed she provided ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care to Resident #95. She stated Resident #95 did not have a wound. On 05/29/2025 AT 9:07 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8LPN. S8LPN stated Resident #95 did not have a wound. On 05/29/2025 at 9:10 a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an identified mental health diagnosis was referred for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II evaluation as required for 2 (#7 and #72) of 5 (#7, #31, #41, #67, and #72) sampled residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings: Resident #7 Review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses upon admit, which included Schizophrenia. Review of Resident #7's Level 1 PASRR dated 02/05/2025 revealed Section III: Mental Illness did not have Schizophrenia selected as a diagnosis. Resident #72 Review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses upon admit, which included Delusional Disorder. Review of Resident #72's Level 1 PASRR dated 02/17/2023 revealed Section III: Mental Illness did not have Delusional Disorder selected as a diagnosis. On 05/28/2025 at 11:55 a.m., an interview was conducted with S6SS. She stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care-plan to meet the psychosocial needs for 1 (#67) of 2 (#18 and #67) residents reviewed for mood/behavior. Findings: Review of Resident #67's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of PTSD. Review of Resident #67's Significant Change MDS with an ARD of 04/04/2025 revealed a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #67's most recent Care Plan revealed he was not care planned for triggers, behaviors, and interventions specific to his PTSD diagnosis. On 05/27/2025 at 10:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #67. He confirmed his diagnosis of PTSD, and stated he was triggered by acts of aggression due to the physical abuse he experienced during his childhood. On 05/29/2025 at 8:17 a.m., an interview was conducted with S11LPN. She stated she was aware of Resident #67's diagnosis of PTSD, but was unaware of his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure a multi dose vial of insulin was dated upon opening. This deficient practice had the ability to affect any of the 129 residents who received medications in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage with a revised date of February 2023, revealed the following, in part: Medication Labeling: 5. Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed are dated. An observation and interview was conducted on 05/27/2025 at 10:34 a.m., of refrigerator in Med Room A with S9LPN. Observed was an opened and undated multi-dose vial of Lispro Insulin for subcutaneous injection. S9LPN confirmed the insulin multi-dose vial was opened and undated, and stated it should have been dated upon opening. An interview was conducted on 05/28/2025 at 1:45 p.m., with S2DON and S1AA. S2DON and S1AA confirmed multi-dose insulin vials should be dated as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to: 1. Properly document temperatures daily for Refrigeration units and; 2. Properly maintain and document chemical sanitation checks for the dishwasher at least once per shift. This deficient practice had the ability to affect 131 residents who consumed food from the facility. Findings: Review of Facility policy titled Food Receiving and Storage with a revised date of November 2022, revealed the following, in part: Refrigerated/ Frozen Storage: 5. Functioning of the refrigeration and food temperatures are monitored daily and at designated intervals throughout the day by the food and nutrition services manager or designee and documented according to state specific requirements. 1. Review of the walk in Refrigerator Temperature Logs for May 2025 revealed no temperature checks documented for 5/24/2025 and 5/25/2025. 2. Review of the Dish Machine Log revealed no documented evidence the chemical solution was assessed and maintained at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to meet Hospice requirements by failing to maintain a system to ensure a hospice resident's Clinical Binder contained documentation of Hospice Nurse Visit Notes for 1 (#63) of 1 resident reviewed for hospice care. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the residents receiving hospice services in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident #63's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #63 was a patient of a local hospice agency with Certification Period of 01/24/2025 through 04/23/2025; and recertification on 04/14/2025 for current plan of care. A review of Resident #63's Hospice Nurse Visit Notes, performed on 05/28/2025 revealed, in part, the most recent Hospice Nurse Visit Note present in the Hospice Binder was created on 03/12/2025. On 05/28/2025 at 8:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9LPN. S9LPN reviewed the hospice binder and confirmed the last Hospice Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA