The Woodleigh of Baton Rouge

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 100.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-05-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each nurse aide was competent when transferring a resident with the slide board for 1 (#29) of 3 (#29, #61, and #69 ) residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #29, beginning on 04/02/2024 at 4:30 p.m. when S16CNA inappropriately used the slide board during a transfer, which resulted in Resident #29 falling to the floor. On the morning of 04/03/2024, Resident #29 refused care due to severe pain when she moved. On 04/03/2024 at 12:12 p.m., Resident #29 had X-rays in the facility that revealed a Left Femur Fracture. Resident #29 was transferred to the emergency room and found to have a Left Distal Femur Fracture and a Right Displaced fracture that required surgical interventions. Review of the Facility's November 2023 Training Materials revealed the following, in part: Sliding Board Transfer 7. The caregiver should position themselves in front of the patient when performing the transfer, using…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency, within two hours for 1 (#R1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #R1) residents investigated for abuse.Findings: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting with a revision date of 06/2024 revealed the following, in part:All reports of resident abuse . shall be promptly reported to the local, state and federal agencies .Reporting: 1. All alleged violations involving abuse .will be reported by the facility Administrator, or his/her designee, to the following persons or agencies:a. The State licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility; A request was made to review reports submitted to the State Agency since 05/01/2025. On 09/25/2025 at 10:35 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON confirmed there had been no reports submitted to the State Agency from 05/01/2025 to present. On 09/24/2025 at 10:05 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3LPN. S3LPN stated S4CNA was reported by a resident's anonymous,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 (#34) of 34 residents reviewed during the initial pool. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Call System, Residents, with a revision date of September 2022, revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: Residents are provided with a means to call staff for assistance through a communication system which notifies a staff member or a centralized work station. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Each resident is provided with a means to call staff to notify them for assistance from his/her bed, floor, and from toileting/bathing facilities. Review of Resident #34's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Left Hand Contracture, and Left Elbow Contracture. Review of Resident #34's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all medical records regarding the resident's code status reflected the resident's wishes for 2 (#67 and #78) of 34 residents reviewed in the initial screening for advance directives. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 103 that resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #67 Review of Resident #67's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #67's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] revealed, the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating he was cognitively moderately impaired. Review of Resident #67's physical chart revealed the following documents, in part: LaPost dated [DATE] and signed by Resident's Power of Attorney and Physician which, indicated Resident #67 was a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). Review of Resident #67's [DATE] Physician Orders revealed: [DATE] Full Code Status. Review of Resident #67's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure services were provided by the facility to meet quality professional standards. The facility failed to ensure medications were stored safely and were kept locked by leaving medication at the bedside for 1 (#341) of 33 residents observed during the initial screening of residents upon facility entrance. Findings: Review of the facility's policy Medication Labeling and Storage, with a revised date of 02/2024, revealed, in part, the following: Policy Heading The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperatures, humidity, and light controls. Only authorized personnel have access to keys. Policy Interpretation and Implementation Medication Storage 2. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. 4. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was properly labeled for 1 (#342) of 5 (#65, #77, #84, #341, and #342) residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. Findings: Review of Resident #342's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Diastolic Heart Failure, Ischemic Cardiomyopathy, and Asthma. Review of Resident #342's Physician's Orders revealed the following, in part: Start date: 05/29/2025: Oxygen at 2 Liters per nasal cannula, as needed for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. On 06/02/2025 at 11:45 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #342's oxygen tubing, which was not labeled with the date. On 06/03/2025 at 9:47 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #342's oxygen tubing, which was not labeled with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled properly in accordance with current accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure: 1. An expired medication was not available for use for Resident #54 in 1 (Cart B) of 2 carts (Cart A and Cart B) reviewed; and 2. An opened medication was labeled with an open date and not available for use in 1 (Cart B) of 2 carts (Cart A and Cart B) reviewed. Findings: On 06/02/2025 at 11:15 a.m., an observation was made of Cart B with S6LPN. The following was observed: One medication card containing 21 tablets of Hyoscyamine Sulfate Sublingual 0.125 mg tablets with a discard after date of 02/28/2025 for Resident #54; and One bottle of Vitamin D 10 mcg tablets was opened and not labelled with the open date. On 06/02/2025 at 11:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with S6LPN. She observed the above findings and confirmed the Hyoscyamine Sulfate Sublingual 0.125 mg tablets for Resident #54 were expired and available for use. She also confirmed the bottle of Vitamin D…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure garbage and waste were properly contained in the outdoor trash dumpster. Findings: On 06/02/2025 at 9:04 a.m., an observation was made of the facility's two outdoor trash dumpsters with S3DM. One of the dumpsters was observed with the door open and a clear plastic bag containing soiled briefs and gloves hanging out of the lid. Scattered trash was observed on the ground around the dumpster including the following: plastic bag, plastic cups, plastic utensils, gloves, one green cloth, empty juice containers, and other unidentifiable paper items. On 06/02/2025 at 9:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3DM. She observed and confirmed the above mentioned observations of the dumpster area. She stated the dumpster door should be kept closed and the surrounding area kept free of trash. She stated maintenance was responsible for keeping the dumpster area clean. On 06/02/2025 at 10:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4MA. He stated he and S5MS were responsible for keeping the dumpster area clean. He stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection. The facility failed to ensure S12LPN wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing urinary catheter care for 1 (#67) of 2 (#13 and #67) residents with indwelling medical devices. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, dated 08/2024, titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revealed, in part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 2. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities . 3. Examples of high contact resident care activities requiring the use of gown and gloves for EBP include: g) device care or use (urinary catheter .) Review of Resident #67's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status. The facility failed to ensure staff accurately coded the assistance required for eating for 1(#1) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 03/02/2025, revealed the resident required setup or cleanup assistance for meals. On 03/26/2025 at 12:45 p.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #1 in the dining room. Resident #1 is noted with a bib on with S3CNA was feeding the resident. S9CNA held the cup for Resident #1 and placed the straw next to his lips. On 03/26/2025 at 11:19 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9CNA. She stated Resident #1 returned from the hospital on [DATE] with a sling for his left upper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident that was frequently incontinent was provided services to restore as much normal bowel function as possible for 1 (#1) of 4 (#1, #2, #3 and #4) residents reviewed for Bladder and Bowel Incontinence. Findings: Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Septic Arthritis Of Left Shoulder, History Of Falling, Need For Assistance With Personal Care, and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction, Affecting Right Side. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 03/02/2025 revealed the resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Further review revealed Resident #1 was assessed by the facility to have a BIMS of 11, indicating he was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,748 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,748 — penalty dated 2024-05-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA