White Oak Post Acute Care
2828 Westfork, Baton Rouge, LA 70816 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 176 certified beds · (225) 291-7049 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2023
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (88) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $608,723 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-06)
- nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-03, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2026-03 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.8% | 17.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.3% | 5.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 1.2% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 2.3% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 31.2% | 17.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.7% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.6% | 94.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.9% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.2% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.1% | 22.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.1% | 3.1% | 1.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 25.6% | 76.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.4% | 28.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.2% | 14.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.70 | 2.56 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.43 | 2.74 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 38.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.2%CMS range 5.7–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 38.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 30.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.06 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 103.3 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 73 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
88 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 68 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective system was in place for staff to identify unsafe smokers and implement interventions including supervision to prevent accident hazards for 2 (#1, #5) of 3 residents reviewed for unsafe smoking. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident #1 on 04/15/2026 when he was observed smoking in another resident's room while oxygen was in use. Resident #1 was a moderately cognitively impaired resident who was deemed an unsafe smoker upon admission to the facility on [DATE]. After 04/15/2026, not all staff were educated. On 05/03/2026, Resident #1 was noted smoking cigarettes in his room with smoking paraphernalia in his possession. Interviews revealed multiple staff members were unaware Resident #1 was assessed as an unsafe smoker. An observation of Resident #5, an assessed unsafe smoker, on 05/04/2026 revealed the resident had smoking paraphernalia in her possession. The facility failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 (#5) of 3 (#5, #6, and #7) residents reviewed for wandering. The facility failed to ensure staff appropriately supervised Resident #5 who was assessed to be a wanderer, unsafe smoker, and a high fall risk. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation on the weekend of 02/15/2025 through 02/16/2025, when Resident #5, a severely cognitively impaired resident identified as a wanderer, unsafe smoker and high fall risk, entered the smoking patio while no staff were present to provide supervision. Resident #5 self-propel himself in his wheelchair through the gate of the smokers' patio onto the sidewalk along the resident patio exterior doors. When Resident #5 attempted to enter back through the gate into the smoking patio, he was unable to maneuver his wheelchair over the uneven concrete. He stood up from his wheelchair and fell onto the concrete walkway. Random Resident #R3 observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of accident hazards and received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. The facility failed to ensure: 1. An effective system was in place for nursing staff to identify and implement a resident's assessed transfer needs for 1 (#54) of 4 (#32, #38, #54, and #66) residents reviewed requiring a Hoyer lift for transfers; and 2. An effective system was in place for staff to implement safe smoking interventions for 3 (#49, #75, #87) of 4 (#49, #58, #75, and #87) residents reviewed for smoking. 1. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation for Resident #54, a resident who required a Hoyer lift and 2 staff members' assistance for transfers, on 08/28/2024 at 3:45 p.m. when S4CNA transferred Resident #54 independently without a Hoyer lift. Resident #54 fell to the floor and sustained a laceration above her left eyebrow. Resident #54 was transferred to a local hospital,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-09-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. The facility failed to ensure: 1. An effective system was in place to ensure licensed nurses and nurse aids were competent to identify and implement a resident's assessed transfer needs for 1 (#54) of 4 (#32, #38, #54, and #66) residents reviewed requiring a Hoyer lift for transfers; and 2. An effective system was in place to ensure licensed nurses and nurse aids were competent to identify and implement safe smoking interventions for residents who smoked for 3 (#49, #75, #87) of 4 (#49, #58, #75, and #87) residents reviewed for smoking; and 3. An effective system was in place to ensure licensed nurses and nurse aids were competent in the skill sets required to meet resident needs for 10 of 10 (S4CNA, S9WCN, S11CNA, S24CNA, S27CNA,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled its resources to be used effectively and efficiently to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for each resident residing in the facility. The facility failed to have an effective system in place to: 1. Ensure licensed nurses and nurse aids were trained and competent to update, implement, and identify a resident's assessed transfer needs for 1 (#54) of 4 (#32, #38, #54, and #66) residents reviewed requiring a Hoyer lift for transfers; 2. Ensure licensed nurses and nurse aids were trained and competent to implement and identify safe smoking interventions for residents who smoked for 3 (#49, #75, #87) of 4 (#49, #58, #75, and #87) residents reviewed for smoking; and 3. Ensure licensed nurses and nurse aids were competent in the skills sets required to meet resident needs for 10 of 10 (S4CNA, S9RN, S11CNA, S24SA, S27CNA, S38CNA, S40CNA, S43LPN, S47CNA, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure device site care orders were obtained and clarified for 2 (#1 and #3) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #5, and #6) residents reviewed for indwelling devices. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 05/02/2024 when Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube and a nephrostomy tube. Upon Resident #1's admission, the facility failed to ensure orders were obtained and entered for site monitoring and dressing changes. This resulted in Resident #1 receiving no dressing changes or site monitoring for the PEG and nephrostomy sites from admission through 05/12/2024. On 05/12/2024, Resident #1 was transferred to the local emergency room for an elevated temperature and altered mental status. Resident #1's hospital diagnoses included Sepsis, Nephrostomy associated Urinary Tract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident, who exhibited exit-seeking behaviors, was adequately supervised to prevent unsafe wandering and elopement for 1 (#7) of 2 (#7 and #8) residents reviewed with wander guards. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation for Resident #7, a severely cognitively impaired resident with exit seeking behaviors, on the morning of 05/20/2024. At approximately 9:05 a.m., a Good Samaritan alerted the facility that Resident #7 was in a parking lot. After being alerted to Resident #7's elopement from the facility, staff located the resident in a parking lot, 1.1 miles away from the facility, across a high trafficked four-lane divided highway next to the interstate. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed by 05/28/2024, prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the clinical record for Resident #7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently by failing to ensure all admission orders were obtained, clarified, and entered into the resident's electronic medical record. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had physician orders for PEG and nephrostomy site care. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 05/02/2024 when Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube and a nephrostomy tube. Upon Resident #1's admission, the facility failed to ensure orders were obtained and entered for site monitoring and dressing changes. This resulted in Resident #1 receiving no dressing changes or site monitoring for the PEG and nephrostomy sites from admission through 05/12/2023. On 05/12/2024, Resident #1 was transferred to the local emergency room for an elevated temperature and altered mental status. Resident #1's hospital diagnoses included Sepsis, Nephrostomy associated Urinary Tract Infection (UTI),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician was immediately notified when there was a significant change in the resident's skin condition for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents with pressure ulcers. This deficient practice resulted in an actual physical harm for Resident #3 when S3CNA observed and reported to S4LPN three dime size blisters on the resident's sacrum on 02/14/2026, and S4LPN failed to notify the physician. The physician was notified on 02/18/2026 when the wound was noted as a stage 3 pressure ulcer by S6TxNurse. On 02/18/2026, Resident # 3 was diagnosed with a stage 3 pressure ulcer measuring length 8.1 centimeters (cm) x width 9.2 cm x depth 0.1 cm. The facility implemented corrective actions, which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation.Review of the facility's policy titled Skin Program, Pressure Ulcers & Other Wounds revealed the following in part: Risk Assessment & Routine Care for All Residents: Nursing Assistants will check all residents' skin during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards, to promote healing and prevent the development of new pressure ulcers by failing to ensure a resident's heels were floated as ordered for 1(#2) of 3 (#2, #R1 and #R4) residents reviewed for facility acquired pressure ulcers. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #2, a paraplegic with no sensation to the lower extremities, on 07/16/2024 at 8:58 a.m. when the resident was observed lying in bed with his feet resting directly on the foot board and heels not floated off the surface of the mattress. Further observations were made at 10:39 a.m., 11:51 a.m., and 1:00 p.m. when S6TN confirmed there were new areas of discoloration on both the resident's right and left heel. On 07/17/2023 at 7:25 a.m., Resident #2 was assessed by S7NP and was found to have a Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) to the left heel measuring 3.5 cm x 6.0 cm x 0 cm.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 2 (#57 and #58) of 34 residents reviewed during the initial pool. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response revealed the following, in part:Policy:The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each resident's bedside. to allow residents to call for assistance.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:4. Staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident. Resident #57Review of Resident #57's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Greenstick Fracture of Shaft of Humerus Right Arm with Routine Healing, and Other Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. Review of Resident #57's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive plan of care was implemented for 1 (#57) of 25 residents reviewed in the final sample. The facility failed to ensure Resident #57's urinary catheter securement device was in place at all times.Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Physician Services/Physician Orders revealed the following, in part:Policy Interpretation and Implementation:3. Staff will follow and implement all physician orders in accordance with plan of care. Resident #57Review of Resident #57's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder and Other Disorders of Urinary System. Review of Resident #57's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/23/2026, revealed the resident had an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #57's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part:Start date: 01/06/2026-Urinary Catheter: Change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided, as outlined in the comprehensive care plan, met professional standards of quality by nursing staff failing to observe and ensure a resident consumed medications for 2 (#34 and #59) of 32 residents reviewed in the initial pool. Findings: Resident #34 Review of Resident #34's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 11/28/2025 and diagnoses, which included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Venous Hypertension, Hypertensive Heart Disease, Heart Failure, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Constipation, Polyosteoarthritis, Chronic Back Pain, and Morbid Obesity. Review of Resident #34's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/06/2026 revealed he had a BIMS of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Review of Resident #34's current Physician Orders revealed the following: Lasix 40mg by mouth daily, Losartan Potassium 50mg by mouth daily, Metoprolol Succinate Extended Release 25mg by mouth daily, Multivitamin tablet by mouth daily, Pantoprazole Sodium Delayed Release…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a Pressure Ulcer received care based on the comprehensive assessment and professional standards of practice to promote healing by failing to ensure the air mattress was properly functioning for 1 (#21) of 2 residents reviewed with pressure ulcers.Findings: Review of Resident #21's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Stage 4 Sacral Pressure Ulcer and Spastic Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy. Review of Resident #21's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/08/2026 revealed she had a BIMS of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed Resident #21 was dependent on staff for turning and repositioning. Review of Resident #21's current Physician Orders revealed pressure reducing mattress to bed. Review of Resident #21's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part:Problem: Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer to Sacrum.Interventions: Pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health by failing to maintain proper toenail length for 1 (#34) of 3 residents observed for foot care.Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Nail Care revealed the following, in part:Policy: The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the provision of care to a resident's nails for good grooming and health.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:1. Routine cleaning and inspection of nails will be provided during ADL care on an ongoing basis.3. Principles of nail care:c. if a resident has a toe infection, Diabetes Mellitus or Peripheral Vascular Disease, toenail trimming should be performed by a physician or practitioner. Review of Resident #34's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 11/28/2025 and diagnoses, which included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Venous Hypertension with Ulcer and Inflammation of Left Lower Extremity, Chronic Venous Insufficiency, and Morbid Obesity. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding by failing to ensure tube feeding formula was administered as prescribed for 1 (#77) of 3 residents reviewed for tube feedings.Review of the Clinical Record for Resident #77 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Gastrostomy Status.Review of the current Physician Orders for Resident #77 revealed, in part, the following:Enteral: continuous feed: Isosource 1.5 at 70 milliliters an hour.An observation was made on 06/01/2026 at 8:55 a.m. of Resident #77. Observed Resident #77's feeding tube attached to a feeding pump which read an error of Notice pump inactive.An observation was made on 06/01/2026 at 10:46 a.m. of Resident #77. Observed Resident #77's feeding tube attached to a feeding pump which read an error of Notice pump inactive.An observation was made on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to properly label respiratory care equipment for 1 (#74) of 2 residents investigated for respiratory care.Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Oxygen Administration revealed the following in part:Oxygen Administration Safety & Guidelines18. Tubing, cannulas, and masks should be dated and replaced weekly unless otherwise ordered. Review of Resident #74's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hypertensive Heart Disease without Heart Failure, and Cough. Review of the Resident #74's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 03/24/2026 revealed a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #74's Physician's Orders revealed the following in part: Start: 06/02/2025 - Check Oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure temperatures were documented for the medication refrigerator in 1 of 1 (Med Room A) medication storage rooms observed. Findings: On 06/01/2026 at 9:15 a.m., an observation was made of Med Room A with S3ADON. Review of the form titled Nursing Refrigerator Checklist dated May 2026, for the refrigerator located in Med Room A revealed no documentation of temperatures for 05/23/2026, 05/24/2026, and 05/29/2026 - 05/31/2026. On 06/01/2026 at 9:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3ADON. She reviewed the form titled Nursing Refrigerator Checklist dated May 2026 and confirmed there were no temperatures documented for 05/23/2026, 05/24/2026, and 05/29/2026 - 05/31/2026. She stated night shift nurses were responsible for documenting the medication refrigerator temperatures each night. On 06/03/2026 at 11:48 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection. The facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene, proper glove usage, and utilized proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care for 2 (#57 and #77) of 7 sampled residents who were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).Findings: Review of the facility's policy dated 03/2024, titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions revealed the following, in part:Enhanced barrier precautions refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities.2. An order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the following: Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices such as urinary catheters, feeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled its resources to be used effectively and efficiently to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for each resident residing in the facility. The facility failed to have an effective system in place for staff to identify unsafe smokers and implement safety interventions for 2 (#1 and #5) of 3 residents assessed as unsafe smokers. Findings: Cross Reference F689Review of facility's undated policy titled, Smoking Policy revealed the following, in part:The facility provides a safe and healthy environment for residents, including safety as related to smoking. Safety protections apply to smoking and non-smoking residents.2. Residents who are assessed as not being able to smoke safely will not be allowed to smoke without supervision.3. If a resident exhibits dangerous behaviors with smoking paraphernalia such as smoking in non-designated areas, smoking in room.the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 68 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide drinks consistent with resident preferences for 1 (#R7) of 1 resident observed for drinking preferences. The facility failed to provide Resident #R7 coffee when he requested it. Findings: Review of Resident #R7's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #R7's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/20/2026 revealed a BIMS of 8, which indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired. On 05/05/2026 at 12:25 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #R7 self-propelling himself out of his room in his wheelchair, holding a drinking tumbler. He waved his drinking tumbler in the air. When asked if he wanted coffee, he shook his head yes. At that time, S4LPN was observed down the hall. S4LPN was notified Resident #R7 wanted coffee. S4LPN shook her head and stated no. On 05/05/2026 at 12:28 p.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S15OT walking toward Resident #R7. S15OT told Resident #R7 he could not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure staff properly utilized Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during direct care for 2 (#5 & R1) of 4 residents reviewed for infection control.Review of the facility's titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated January 2025 revealed the following, in part: It is the policy of the facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). Enhanced barrier precautions refer to the use of gown and gloves for use during high-contact resident care activities. Nursing staff will place residents with any applicable conditions or devices on EBP. An order may be obtained. Applicable conditions and devices: (i.e. Wounds and / or indwelling medical devices (e.g.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's MDS Assessment accurately reflected their status for 5 (#4, #7, #13, #21, and #43) of 19 residents in the sample. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #7 was coded correctly for antipsychotics; 2. Resident #43 was coded correctly for insulin; 3. Resident #13 was coded correctly for their Level II PASRR status; and 4. Resident #4 and #21 were coded correctly for restraint status. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a current census of 92 residents. 1. Review of Resident #7's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 02/20/2024 with diagnoses which included Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Schizophrenia, Delusional Disorders, and Unspecified Dementia. Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/02/2025 revealed, in part, the following: Section N. Medications N0415. High-Risk Drug Classes: Use and Indication A. Antipsychotic: Yes Review of Resident #7's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure food was properly labeled, dated, and sealed. This had the potential to affect 92 residents who were served from the kitchen.Findings:On 12/01/2025 at 8:28 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with S5DM. The observations were made of the following items available for consumption:Main kitchen area:1 clear bag of Grits (1/2 bag) opened, undated, and not sealed.2 clear bags of cornbread mix opened and undated.5 clear bags of seasoning mixes opened and undated.1 box of powdered sugar opened, undated, and not sealed.Walk-In Cooler: 1 Large, plastic bag of cheddar cheese opened and undated.1 Large, plastic bag of parmesan cheese opened and undated.1 tray of liquid-filled drinking cups (10 cups) undated and unlabeled.8 bowls of fruit cocktail undated, and unlabeled. On 12/01/2025 at 8:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5DM. He confirmed the above items were not dated and should have been.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 3 (#10, #79, and #95) of 19 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure:1. Medication administration was accurately documented on the MAR for Residents #10 and #95; and2. Colostomy changes were documented for Resident #79.1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication-Documentation of Administration revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: The facility shall maintain a medication administration record to document all medications administered. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. A nurse shall document all medications administered to each resident on the resident's medication administration record (MAR). Resident #10 Review of Resident #10's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 02/05/2025 and diagnoses, which included Hypertensive Heart Disease and Peripheral Vascular Disease. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the resident's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II by failing to incorporate PASRR Level II determinations and recommendations into a resident's transitions of care for 1 (#98) of 4 (#3, #13, #66, and #98) residents reviewed for PASRR.Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASRR Program revealed the following, in part: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:7. Recommendations, such as any specialized services, from a PASRR Level II Determination and/or PASRR evaluation report will be incorporated into the resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care. Review of Resident #98's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Bipolar Disorder and Unspecified Psychosis. Review of Resident #98's Form 142 revealed he was approved for admission by Level II authority for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided, as outlined in the comprehensive care plan, met professional standards of quality by nursing staff failing to observe and ensure a resident consumed medication for 1 (#10) of 7 residents reviewed for medication administration.Findings: Review of Resident #10's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 02/05/2025 and diagnoses, which included Hypertensive Heart Disease and Peripheral Vascular Disease. Review of Resident #10's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 11/12/2025 revealed a BIMS of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Review of Resident #10's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Lasix oral tablet 40 mg by mouth twice daily at 5:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. Review of Resident #10's MAR dated 12/01/2025 revealed the following, in part:Lasix 40 mg by mouth at 12:00 p.m. with a check mark and initials indicating S7LPN administered Resident #10's Lasix at 12:00 p.m. An observation was made of Resident #10 on 12/01/2025 at 3:55 p.m. She had a white tablet in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent prior to the installation of bed rails/grab bars for 1 (#13) of 19 residents in the sample. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a current census of 92 residents. Findings: Review of Resident #13's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe morbid obesity. Review of Resident #13's quarterly MDS Assessment with an ARD of 09/18/2025, revealed she was assessed to have a BIMs score of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #13's Physician Orders, dated 10/01/2024 through 12/01/2025, revealed, in part, the following: 04/01/2025 - Grab bars x2 to assist with bed mobility.Review of Resident #13's current Care Plan, revealed, in part, the following: Problem: Resident uses bed rails/grab bars x2 for bed mobility and repositioning. Intervention: Ensure valid consent on chart prior to initiating.Review of Resident #13's Physical Restraint /…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure Insulin pens were labeled with an opened date on 2 (MCa and MCb) of 2 medication carts reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received insulin in the facility.Findings:On 12/01/2025 at 2:55 p.m., an observation was made of MCa with S6LPN, which revealed Resident #92's Lantus Subcutaneous Solution Pen-Injector was opened and was not labeled with an opened date. On 12/01/2025 at 2:58 p.m., an interview was conducted with S6LPN. S6LPN confirmed Resident #92's Lantus Subcutaneous Solution Pen-Injector was not labeled with an opened date. She stated she did not know when the pen was opened.On 12/01/2025 at 3:25 p.m., an observation was made of MCb with S7LPN, which revealed Resident #80's Lantus Subcutaneous Solution Pen-Injector was opened and was not labeled with an opened date.On 12/01/2025 at 3:27 p.m., an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff accurately documented Resident #2's pressure ulcer interventions. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Documentation revealed the following, in part: The purpose of charting and documentation is to provide: 1. A complete account of the resident's care, treatment . for continuity of care, treatment decisions . Procedure: 3. Be concise, accurate, and complete . 12. Personnel will be expected to document timely, accurately, and completely. Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer Of Sacral Region, Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer Of Left Heel, and Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer Of Other Site. Review of Resident #2's admission Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services provided by the facility met professional standards of quality. The facility failed to ensure medications were administered safely and timely by leaving medications at bed side for 1 (#3) of 3(#1, #2, and #3) residents observed during the survey. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medications- Administration, revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: Residents may self-administer medications only if attending physician, in conjunction with Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, has determined that they have the decision making capacity to do so safely. Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #3's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 01/10/2025 revealed she had a BIMS of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #3's Current Physician's Orders included, in part:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff notified the NP of a residents fall outside, which required a care plan update, for 1 (#5) of 3(#3, #4 and #5) residents reviewed for falls. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Policy Titled, Falls- Resident, revealed the following, in part: Actual Falls 1. When a resident falls, the charge nurse will access . and notify the physician for the appropriate orders. Review of the facility's undated Policy Titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revealed the following: 1. The nurse supervisor/charge nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or on call physician when there has been: a. An accident or incident involving the resident. Review of Resident #5's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included History of Falling. Review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 12/06/2024 revealed Resident #5 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed in a timely manner for 1 (R1) of 8 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7 and R1) resident records reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility failed to ensure that the resident admission assessment was completed within the 14-day requirement. Findings: R1 Review of R1's admission MDS assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/12/2025, revealed an admit date of 01/31/2025. Further review of the Admit MDS revealed the MDS had a status of in progress. On 02/25/2025 at 1:34 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2MDS. She reviewed R1's admission MDS and confirmed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She further confirmed R1's admission MDS was still in progress, and was not completed in the required timeframe. On 02/25/2025 at 1:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON. He reviewed R1's admission MDS and confirmed R1 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions for falls were implemented as identified on the care plan for 1 (#3) of 3 (#3, #5, and #7) residents reviewed for falls. Findings: Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed the resident had diagnoses which included Paraplegia and Unspecified Injury at T7-T10 Level of Thoracic Spinal Cord. Review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 11/20/2024 revealed a BIMS of 14, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #3's current Care Plan revealed the following: Problem: The resident is at risk for falls. Intervention: 11/16/2024-Fall mat. On 02/24/2025 at 9:00 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #3 in his room. No fall mat was observed at bedside. On 02/25/2025 at 8:42 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #3 in his room. No fall mat was observed at bedside. On 02/24/2025 at 2:58 p.m., an interview was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive plan of care was developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment for 1 (#1) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7) residents reviewed for care plans. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Care Plans-Comprehensive, revealed the following, in part: Policy It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objective and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 7. The comprehensive care plan will be developed within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive MDS assessment. Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure census checks were accurately documented for 2 (#5 and #6) of 3 (#5, #6, and #7) residents reviewed for elopement and wandering. Findings: Resident #5 Review of Resident #5's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses: Cerebral Infarction, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis. Review of Resident #5's MDS with an ARD of 12/06/2024 revealed a BIMS of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #5's physician's orders revealed the following, in part: 02/13/2025-Q 30 minute checks due to falls and census checks related to elopement risk. Review of Resident #5's Task log, dated 02/13/2025 to 02/15/2025, revealed no documentation of census checks every 30 minutes. On 02/26/2025 at 12:28 p.m., an interview was conducted with S8ADON. She stated if a resident had orders for census checks, it would appear in the CNA Task log and prompt documentation. On 02/25/2025 at 1:50…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have sufficient certified nursing assistant staff to provide nursing and related services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident based on the facility assessment. The deficiency had the potential to affect the facility's total census of 76 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Sufficient Staff, undated, revealed the following: 37. The facility will supply services by sufficient number of each of the following personnel types on a 24 hour basis to provide nursing care to all resident in accordance with resident care plans; CNAs and LPNs. On 01/16/2025 at 3:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He stated the facility required the following staffing ratio; 8 CNAs on the day shift, 8 CNAs on the evening shift and 4 CNAs on the night shift. Review of the facility's Staffing Pattern revealed on 12/22/2024, 12/29/2024, 01/11/2025, and 01/12/2025, the night shift had 3 CNAs providing direct care. On 01/15/2024 at 10:30 a.m., an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-27 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of facility-initiated resident transfers for 2 (#5 and #6) of 3 (#4, #5, and #6) residents reviewed for emergency transfers. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a current census of 76 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Transfer and Discharge, revealed, in part, the following: Definitions: Transfer refers to the movement of a resident from a bed in one certified facility to a bed in another certified facility when the resident expects to return to the original facility. 12. Emergency Transfers/Discharges - initiated by the facility for medical reasons to an acute care setting such as a hospital, for the immediate safety and welfare of a resident. h. The Social Services Director, or designee, will provide copies of notices for emergency transfers to the Ombudsman, but they may be sent when practicable, such as in a list of residents on a monthly basis, as long as the list meets all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observation, and interviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan which met the needs of 3 (#3, #4 and #5) of 5 (#3, #4, #5, #6 and #8) residents reviewed. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident #3's PT evaluation was completed as ordered; and 2. Ensure Resident #4's care plan was comprehensive and individualized for wandering behaviors; and 3. Ensure Resident # 5's every 30 minute checks were completed as ordered. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a current census of 76 residents. Findings: 1. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebrovascular Disease and Unspecific Dementia. Review of Resident #3's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/29/2024, indicated resident was assessed by the facility to have a Brief Interview of Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 (RR1) of 4 (#1, #8, #9 and RR1) residents reviewed for ADL care. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), undated revealed the following: 3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain . personal and oral hygiene. Review of the clinical record for Random Resident 1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses that included Morbid Obesity and Functional Quadriplegia. Review of Random Resident 1's most recent MDS with an ARD of 10/23/2024 revealed the resident was assessed to have a BIMS of 15. Further review revealed she was always incontinent and required extensive assistance for ADL care. Review of the care plan for Random Resident 1 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care was accurately documented for 2 (#8 and #9) of 3 (#1, #8 and #9) Residents reviewed for ADL care. Findings Review of the facility policy titled, Documentation, revealed the following, in part: The purpose of charting and documentation is to provide: 1. A complete account of the resident's care, treatment, response to the care, signs, symptoms, etc., for continuity of care, treatment decision and to support services provided for payment. 2. A legal record that protects the resident, physician, nurse and the facility that may be traditional paper record, electronic record or combination of both. Review of Resident #8's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses: Unspecified Injury At unspecified level of Thoracic Spinal Cord and Acute Pain due to Trauma. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #4) sampled residents reviewed for behavioral health services. The facility failed to ensure S2RN administered Resident #1's Ativan per the Physician's Order. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Medications-Administering, revealed in part, the following: Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 3. Medication must be administered in accordance with the orders. Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Bipolar Disorder. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders revealed the following: A handwritten telephone order for Ativan 1 mg IM x 1 dose for agitation and aggression, written by S2RN ordered on 10/13/2024 at 4:29 p.m. Review of Resident #1's MAR for October 2024 revealed no documentation Ativan had been administered as ordered on 10/13/2024. On 11/13/2024 at 12:22 p.m., a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 9 of 9 (Room A, Room B, Room C, Room D, Hall E, Hall F, Room G, Room H, and Room I) areas observed for environmental concerns. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 88 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings: Room A An observation was conducted on 09/18/2024 at 12:12 p.m. of Room A. One fluorescent light fixture was observed with no cover in place. One fluorescent light fixture was observed to be broken with dead bugs inside and paint marks on the sides. Two fluorescent light fixtures were observed with dead bugs inside the covers. All four walls were observed with scuff marks, indentations and missing paint. The baseboards were observed to be scuffed, missing paint and had a blackish brown substance beneath them. The floor tiles had stains throughout. The blinds for the window were missing. A stainless steel serving cart had dust visible on all surfaces. The 4 air conditioner vents were covered in rust.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an identified mental health diagnosis was referred for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II evaluation as required for 4 (#13, #18, #26, and #46) of 6 (#13, #18, #26, #38, #46, and #48) sampled resident records reviewed for PASRR. Findings: Resident #13 Review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following mental health diagnoses: Anxiety Disorder and Schizophrenia (onset date of 11/12/2021). Further review revealed no Resident Review Form for a PASRR Level II determination. Resident #18 Review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following mental health diagnoses: Depression and Schizophrenia (onset date of 03/31/2023). Further review revealed no Resident Review Form for a PASRR Level II determination. Resident #26 Review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status by failing to provide the ordered therapeutic diet for 1 (#21) of 4 (#21, #22, #42, and #66) residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Nutrition Services, revealed the following, in part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation 2. Nursing personnel will ensure that residents are served the correct food tray. Review of Resident #21's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included End Stage Renal Disease. Review of Resident #21's MDS with an ARD of 07/02/2024, revealed a BIMS of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Review of Resident #21's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Start date 04/25/2024- Diet: liberal renal; 1000 ml fluid restriction Start date 06/25/2024-No soups/broth Review of Resident #21's Nutrition Assessment Notes, dated 06/24/2024, revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Medication carts were free of loose pills for 2 (Med Cart A and Med Cart B) of 2 (Med Cart A and Med Cart B) medication carts reviewed. 2. Medication carts were free of expired drugs or biologicals for 1 (Med Cart B) of 2 (Med Cart A and Med Cart B) medication carts reviewed. 3. Medications were stored at proper temperatures in 1 (Med Frig D) of 1 (Med Frig D) medication refrigerators reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medications Storage, revealed, the following, in part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation 2. The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. 4. The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. 1. On 09/18/2024 at 8:30 a.m., an observation was made of Med Cart A with S10LPN, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 5 out of 5 dietary staff hired were trained on how to test the chemical dishwasher for chlorine. Findings: On 09/18/2024 at 1:41p.m., an observation was made of S14CHD placing the following items through a low temperature dishwasher: 1. 1 full rack of black serving trays 2. 1 full rack of cups 3. 1 full rack of bowls No testing of chlorine was observed. On 09/18/2024 at 1:43 p.m., an interview was conducted with S14CHD. He stated he washes dishes on the day shift. He confirmed he did not test the low temperature dishwasher for chlorine. He was not able to demonstrate how to test the low temperature dishwasher for chlorine. He confirmed he was not trained on how to test the low temperature dishwasher for chlorine. On 09/18/2024 at 1:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7DEM. He confirmed all kitchen staff should be using the chemical rinse method to sanitize dishes. He further stated there were 5 dietary staff hired to operate the low temperature dishwasher. He was unable to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect 81 residents who were served from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, titled Food Safety Guidelines for Dry Storage to Know, dated 05/05/2024, revealed, in part: Label and Date- Labeling and dating aren't just for food you keep in cold storage. Always label any food not in its original container. An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 09/17/2024 at 8:34 a.m. with S7DEM. Observations were made of the following items: 11oz. container of opened parsley flakes without a label indicating an open date or expiration date. 6 lb. container of opened onion powder without a label indicating an open date or expiration date. 6 lb container of opened garlic powder without a label indicating an open date or expiration date. 11 oz. container of opened ground garlic and ginger mix without a label indicating an open date or expiration date. On 09/17/24 at 8:58 a.m., a tour of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents understood the binding arbitration signed on admission for 2 (#143 and #192) of 3 (#44, #143, and #192) residents reviewed for arbitration. Findings: Review of the facility's Optional Binding Arbitration, page 2 of 3, dated 09/16/2019, revealed, in part: Section G. Other Provisions: Opportunity to Read: the resident or legal representative acknowledges that he/she has received a copy of this agreement and has had ample opportunity to read it before accepting it. Resident #143 Review of Resident #143's clinical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #143's clinical record revealed a form titled, Optional Binding Arbitration. The arbitration form was dated and signed on 09/05/2024 by Resident #143 and S6CAC. On 09/17/2024 at 3:58 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #143. He stated he was admitted to the facility from the hospital. He stated he did not know what an arbitration agreement was. He stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct and ensure ongoing compliance with identified quality deficiencies. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 88 residents currently residing in the facility. Cross Reference: F558, F609, F656, F677, F689, F802, F812, F835, and F880, Findings: Review of the facility's most recent Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Team Meeting Notes, held 08/28/2024 at 10:00 a.m., revealed in part, the following: 1. Dietary Management Review: Review of ServSafe Protocols, Diets, Customer Service and Quality of Meals and Beverages continues in daily QAPI; and 2. Monitoring and audits for all Complaint Surveys dated 06/10/2024 through 08/23/2024 showing continued compliance in all areas previously cited including, in part: therapeutic diets, food storage, abuse reporting and enhanced barrier precautions. Monitoring and audits of these areas through the end of September 2024. Review of the facility's Areas of Deficiency cited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn by staff for 2 (#5 and #49) of 2 residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP); and 2. Urine soiled laundry was removed from a resident's room for 1 (#87) of 27 (#4, #8, #13, #16, #18, #21, #22, #25, #26, #27, #32, #38, #42, #43, #46, #48, #49, #53, #54, #56, #58, #64, #65, #66, #85, #87, #192) residents observed during initial pool. Findings: 1. Resident #5 A review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 05/2023 revealed, in part: Definitions: Enhanced barrier precautions refer to the use of gown and gloves for use during high-contact resident care activities. 48. High-contact care activities include: c. transferring, g. device care or use: feeding tubes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences by failing to respond to call lights in an appropriate time frame for 1(#192) of 5 (#27, #53, #54, #66 and #192) residents reviewed for call light response. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response, undated revealed the following: 20. Ensure the call light system alerts staff members directly or goes to a centralized staff work area. 21. All staff members who see or hear an activated call light are responsible for responding. If the staff cannot provide what the resident desires, the appropriate personnel should be notified. Review of Resident #192's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 09/17/2024 at 8:59 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #192. Resident #192 stated she was wet and needed to be changed. Resident #192…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of physical abuse and misappropriation of resident property were reported to the facility administrator and the state survey agency timely for 1 (#54) of 27 residents reviewed for abuse in the initial pool. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revealed the following, in part: Definitions: Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting with a revision date of October 2019 revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: All reports of resident abuse, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) . Reporting: 1. All alleged violations involving abuse, exploitation, or mistreatment, including misappropriation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's assessment accurately reflected the resident's status. The facility failed to ensure: 1. A resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded in regards to PASRR Level II for 1 (#48) of 6 (#13, #18, #26, #38, #46, and #48) residents reviewed for PASRR; and 2. A resident's quarterly MDS assessment was accurately coded in regards to hospice status for 1 (#4) of 28 residents reviewed in the final sample. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled MDS - Conducting an Accurate Resident Assessment, with no effective date, revealed, in part, the following: Policy: The purpose of this policy is to assure that all residents receive an accurate assessment of relevant care areas. 1. Accurate assessments addressing each resident's status, needs, strengths, and areas of decline must be conducted by qualified staff that are knowledgeable about the resident and correctly documented in the medical record. 1. Review of Resident #48's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 06/22/2020…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 5 (#4, #14 #32, #54 and #75) of 28 residents reviewed in the sample. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #4's hospice status was reflected in the care plan; 2. Resident #14's ostomy care was provided per physician's orders; 3. Resident #32 attended her scheduled physician's appointment as per physician's orders; 4. Resident #54's transfer status was reflected in the care plan; and 5. Resident #75's smoking status was reflected in the care plan. Findings: 1. Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 01/25/2024 with diagnoses, which included Chronic Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure and the Presence of Cardiac Pacemaker. Further review revealed resident was admitted to a local hospice agency on 07/09/2024. Review of Resident #4's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/17/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) without assistance received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (#32) of 3 (#16, #87, and #32) reviewed for ADL's. Findings: A review of the Bath, Bed Policy and Procedure with no effective date revealed: Policy: Residents will be assisted with bathing as needed. Resident baths will be scheduled per resident preference as possible or at least 3 times weekly. It is the practice of this facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene and help prevent skin issues A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an ARD of 08/08/2024 revealed Resident #32 had an admit date of 09/09/2017 and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #32 had the following diagnoses: Type 2 DM with foot ulcer. Review of September 2024 Progress notes revealed the following in part:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received enteral feedings as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 (#43) residents reviewed for tube feeding. Findings: Review of Resident #43's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Cerebral Vascular Infarction, Aphasia, and Dysphagia. Review of Resident #43's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/09/2024 revealed the provider assessed the resident as having a BIMS of 0, indicating the resident was rarely/never understood. Further review revealed, Resident #43 had a feeding tube. Review of Resident #43's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: 10/12/2023 - Enteral feeding; Glucerna 1.2 at 70ml/hour continuous for 22 hours daily, feeding held for up to 2 hours to provide daily routine care 11/23/2021 - Diet Type: NPO (Enteral Feedings Only) An observation was made of Resident #43 on 09/17/2024 at 8:45 a.m. Resident #43's feeding tube was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection 2 (#2 and #R1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #R1, and #R4) residents reviewed for repositioning. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment while providing care to Resident #2 and #R1, residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions; 2. Staff did not hang a urinary drainage bag above the level of Resident #2's bladder during a transfer; and 3. Staff performed proper hand hygiene during the care of Resident #R1. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions with no date, revealed the following, in part: Enhanced barrier precautions refer to the use of gowns and gloves for use during high contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized and infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk of MDRO…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of needs for 1 (#3) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's request to get out of bed was honored in a timely fashion. Findings: Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction and Primary Disorders of Muscles. Review of Resident #3's admission MDS with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/12/2024 revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Further review revealed Resident #3 was dependent on transfers. Review of Resident #3's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: ADLs: Requires assistance with ADL's related to Impaired Mobility Interventions: Transfers: Requires a mechanical lift On 07/17/2024 at 9:36 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good hygiene for 1 (#3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 received incontinence care timely. Findings: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Incontinence Programs revealed the following, in part: (3) Check and Change Staff Involvement: Monitor for incontinent episodes and provide incontinence care Suggested Interventions: 1. Provide Incontinence care on a predetermined schedule and as needed. Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction and Primary Disorders of Muscles. Review of Resident #3's admission MDS with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/12/2024 revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#R3) of 3 (#3, #R2, and #R3) residents reviewed for diabetes. Findings: Review of Resident #R3's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Diabetes. Review of Resident #R3's Yearly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/01/2024 revealed he had a BIMS of 10, which indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #R3's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Humalog 100 Unit/Ml Kwikpen Blood Glucose AC and HS If FSBS 0-199=0Units, 200-250=2Units SQ, 251-300= 4Units SQ, 301-350= 6Units SQ, 351-400= 8Units SQ, greater than 400, administer 12 units and notify MD. Start date 05/04/2024. Review of Resident #R3's July 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following, in part: July 5th-7:00 a.m.-BG 150, box checked that insulin was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-10 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the administrator reported to and was accountable to the governing body. S1ADM failed to ensure the facility's QAPI program was maintained. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 87 residents. Findings: A review of the facility's undated policy, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), as of 06/10/2024, revealed, in part, the following: 11. Governance and leadership: a. The governing body and/or executive leadership is responsible and accountable for the QAPI program. b. Governing oversight responsibilities include, but are not limited to the following: ii. Ensuring the program is ongoing, defined, implemented, maintained, and addresses identified priorities. iii. Ensuring the program is sustained during transitions in leadership and staffing. c. The QA Committee shall communicate its activities and the progress of its subcommittee PIPs to the governing body at least quarterly. A review of the facility's QAPI Committee Members revealed, in part, the following: Medical Director;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 87 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's CMS 672, dated 06/10/2024, revealed, in part, the following: Total Residents (F78): 87 A. Bladder Status Indwelling or external catheter: 10 Occasionally or frequently incontinent of bladder: 45 Occasionally or frequently incontinent of bowel: 39 B. Mobility Ambulation with assistance or assistive device: 4 C. Mental Status Documented signs and symptoms of depression: 6 Documented psychiatric diagnosis: 26 Dementia or Alzheimer's disease: 5 Behavioral healthcare needs: 15 D. Skin Integrity Pressure ulcers: 14 Receiving preventative skin care: 83 E. Special Care Hospice Care: 4 Chemotherapy: 1 Dialysis: 7 IV therapy: 5 Respiratory treatment: 4 Ostomy care: 7 Injections: 21 Tube feedings: 3 Mechanically altered diets: 17 Rehabilitative services: 62…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-10 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop, implement and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) program focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 84 residents. Findings: A review of the facility's undated policy, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), as of 06/10/2024, revealed, in part, the following: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop, implement and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 2. The QA Committee shall be interdisciplinary and shall: b. Meet at least quarterly and as needed . 4. The facility will maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of its ongoing QAPI program. 5. The plan and supporting documentation will be presented to the State Survey Agency . upon request. A review of the facility's QAPI Committee Members…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free of significant medication errors for 1 (#1) of 8 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8) residents reviewed for medications. The deficient practice had the potential to effect the 84 residents residing in the facility receiving medications. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Medications-Administering revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Unspecified Convulsions and Traumatic Brain Injury. Review of Resident #1's Discharge MDS with an ARD of 05/12/2024 revealed the resident was unable to complete the BIMS interview. Review of Resident #1's Physician Orders dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on an observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines by failing to: 1) Follow the approved menu in regard to meals served; 2) Record and archive deviations/substitutions of menu. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 77 Residents who receive meals prepared by the facility kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's undated titled, Menu Substitution, revealed in part, the following: Policy: To provide a substitute when an uncontrolled situation has temporarily made an item unavailable, decisions on menu substitutions will be made after discussion with the dietary professional whenever possible. 2. All changes to the menu will be recorded on the Menu Extension Sheets and the Substitution Sheet. The date, menu item, substitution and reason for the substitution will be recorded on the Menu Substitution Sheet. 3. Menu changes should be evaluated monthly by the dietary professional and an appropriate plan of action made to prevent further changes. 4.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to effect 77 residents who were served meals from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Storage: Dry Food revealed in part, the following: Dry food storage pertains to those foods not likely to support bacterial growth in their normal state. These foods include: d. Dried beans Procedure: 1. Store dry foods in a cool dry place . 2. Dry foods can be contaminated, even if they don't need refrigeration. On 06/06/2024 at 9:30 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was made with S22DM. During the tour, an observation was made of sprouted red beans with a large amount of mold in a 5 gallon clear plastic container. Through interview, S22DM stated the red beans must have gotten wet. S22DM confirmed the above observation and stated the red beans should have been discarded.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-10 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure effective communication was performed as mandatory training for all direct care staff for 3 (S7CNA, S8CNA, S9CNA) of 5 (S5LPN, S6LPN, S7CNA, S8CNA, S9CNA) personnel files reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool, as of 06/06/2024, revealed, in part, the following: Date of Assessment or Update: 05/14/2024 3.4 Staff Training, Education and Competencies: Describe the staff training/education and competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed for your resident population. Communication - All staff members are expected to be effective at communicating with each other, with residents, with family members and with other visitors to the facility. Review of the facility's policy titled In-service Training, undated, revealed, in part, the following: Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. All personnel will receive ongoing education as required by federal and state laws. 6. The director of nursing will maintain a planned annual schedule of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident elopement was reported to the State Survey Agency as required within the specified timeframes for 1 (#7) of 2 (#7 and #8) residents reviewed for elopement. Findings: A review of the clinical record for Resident #7 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Other Neurological Conditions, Aphasia, Cerebral Vascular Accident, Encephalopathy, Alcohol Use, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy to the Left Lower Leg, Lack of Coordination, Unsteadiness on Feet, and Muscle Weakness. A review of the admission MDS with an ARD of 02/27/2024 revealed Resident #7 had a BIMS of 4, which indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. A review of the Nurse's Notes for Resident #7 revealed the following: 05/20/2024 at 9:45 a.m.- Visitor came into the facility and spoke with S17UC. He asked if the facility had a resident by the name of Resident #7. Visitor stated there was a man at a fast food chain who identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive plan of care was implemented for 1(#4) of 8( #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7 and #8) residents reviewed in the sample. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 received the correct diet as ordered by the physician. Findings: Review of the Clinical Record for Resident #4 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Dementia, Unspecified Severity, with Behavioral Disturbances and Age-Related Cognitive Decline. Review of the Physician Orders for Resident #4 revealed the following: 05/19/2024- Honey Thick liquid; No straw. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #4 revealed the following, in part: 05/15/2024- Resident is on Honey Thick liquids. Goal: Ensure resident is on Honey Thick liquid. Intervention: Resident should not use straw, No water pitcher at bedside; provide resident with Honey Thick liquids. On 06/10/2024 at 9:30 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days and indicated the duration for 2 (#2 and #5) of 8 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8) residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings: Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #2's June 2024 Physician's Orders revealed an order written on 05/17/2024 for Risperdal 2 mg tablet , one tablet by mouth every twelve hours as needed (PRN) for agitation. Further review revealed the PRN medication had no stop or duration date. Review of Resident #2's June 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Risperdal 2 mg tablet by mouth every twelve hours as needed was started on 05/17/2024. Further review revealed the PRN medication had no stop or duration date. Resident #5 Review of Resident #5's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 2 (#1 and #3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for wound care. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Charting and Documentation, dated 07/2017, revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: All services provided to the resident shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. 2. The following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: c. Treatments or services performed. 3. Documentation in the medical record will be objective, complete, and accurate. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Cellulitis to the Right Lower Limb, Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive plan of care was implemented for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents reviewed in final sample. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan reflected his frequent bath refusals. Findings: Review of the 12/2016 dated facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered reviewed on 04/16/2024, revealed the following, in part: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measureable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 8. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: g. Incorporate identified problem areas Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included End Stage Renal Disease, Cellulitis to Right Lower Limb, and Pressure Ulcer Stage 3 Sacral Area.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection. The facility failed to ensure staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment while providing care for 1 (#2) of 2 (#2 and #3) sampled residents who were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, reviewed on 04/16/2024, dated 04/2024, revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. 2a. Applicable conditions and devices: i. Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (hemodialysis catheters) even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized. 3a. Gowns and gloves. 4. High-contact resident care activities include: d. Providing hygiene. f. Changing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by Resident #2 for 1 (#1) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse and Neglect revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: Our facility will not condone any form of resident abuse. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Abuse is defined as willful infliction of injury, intimidation resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Anoxic Brain Damage, Traumatic Brain Injury, Cognitive Communication Deficit and Functional Quadriplegia. Review of Resident #1's Nurse's Notes dated December 2023 revealed the following, in part: 12/01/2023 at 8:02 p.m., S5LPN noted other residents reported Resident #1 was burned on his arm with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed provide, at minimum, abuse, neglect and exploitation training for 1 (S6CNA) of 6 (S2CNA, S3CNA, S4LPN, S5CNA, S6CNA and S7CNA) personnel records reviewed for the completion of abuse, neglect, and exploitation training. Findings: Review of the facility policy Staffing Training stated in part: Policy Statement: All staff will receive the appropriate training through HR Orientation, Facility Orientation. Orientation will occur within seven days of hire and include the following: Procedures and requirements for reporting Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. Review of S6CNA personnel record revealed a rehire date of 10/02/2023. Further review of the personnel record revealed no documented evidence S6CNA completed abuse, neglect, and exploitation training after rehire. On 11/29/2023 at 2:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1HR. She confirmed S6CNA was rehired on 10/02/2023. She confirmed there was no documented evidence S6CNA completed the required abuse, neglect, and exploitation training and should have.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to have sufficient licensed nursing staff and certified nursing assistant staff to provide nursing and related services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The deficiency had the potential to affect the facility's total census of 78 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Nursing/Ancillary Personnel Staffing Pattern Reporting Form, dated 07/09/2023 through 07/22/2023, revealed, in part, the following: 07/09/2023 NF Residents: 73 Hours Provided: 146.5 Hours Required: 171.5 Hours +/-: -25.05 Review of the facility's Nursing/Ancillary Personnel Staffing Pattern Reporting Form, dated 07/23/2023 through 08/05/2023, revealed, in part, the following: 07/23/2023 NF Residents: 76 Hours Provided: 179.75 Hours Required: 201.6 Hours +/-: -21.85 07/29/2023 NF Residents: 75 Hours Provided: 154.25 Hours Required: 176.25 Hours +/-: -22 07/30/2023 NF Residents: 75 Hours Provided: 164.75 Hours Required: 176.25 Hours +/-: -11.5 Review of the PBJ Staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration as ordered by the physician for 4 (#3, #4, #10, and #32) of 6 (#3, #4, #10, #20, #32 and #48) residents reviewed for medication administration in the final sample. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Pharmacy Services Overview revealed, in part, the following: Policy Statement: The facility shall accurately and safely provide or obtain pharmaceutical services, including the provision of routine and emergency medications and biologicals, and the services of a licensed consultant pharmacist. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Pharmaceutical services consists of: a. The processes of receiving and interpreting prescriber's orders; acquiring, receiving, storing, controlling, reconciling, compounding (e.g., intravenous antibiotics), dispensing, packaging, labeling, distributing, administering, monitoring responses to, using and/or disposing of all medications,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for each resident residing in the facility. The facility failed to have an effective system in place to: 1. Ensure adequate numbers of direct care staff were present to provide quality care for resident direct care needs; 2. Ensure facility policies and procedures were developed and/or implemented for effective medication availability, storage, and administration; 3. Ensure facility policies and procedures were implemented for an effective Hospice Program; 4. Ensure facility policies and procedures were implemented for an effective Water Management Program; 5. Ensure facility policies and procedures were implemented for an effective Antibiotic Stewardship Program; 6. Ensure facility policies and procedures were implemented for an effective Kitchen and Dietary Services Program; 7. Ensure facility policies and procedures were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet quality professional standards. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Residents received scheduled medications as ordered by the physician for 2 (#4 and #10) of 29 residents reviewed in the final sample; 2. Resident #4's medications were documented in the MAR at the time of administration for 1 (#4) of 29 residents reviewed in the final sample; 3. Resident #44's Urinary Catheter was assessed daily and changed according to the hospice care plan for 1 (#44) of 5 (#19, #27, #44, #58, and #70) residents reviewed for urinary catheters; and 4. Resident #48's central venous catheter dressing was assessed and changed every 7 days for 1 (#48) of 1 (#48) residents reviewed for central venous catheter dressing. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% by having a medication error rate of 13.04% during the medication administration observation. A total of 46 opportunities were observed, which included 6 medication errors for 3 (#4, #10 and #32) of 5 (#4, #10, #20, #32, and #48) resident's observed during medication pass. This failed practice had the potential to affect any of the 78 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, revealed, in part, the following: Policy Statement Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 3. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 5. Medications errors are documented, reported, and reviewed by the QAPI committee to inform process changes and or the need for additional staff training. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure storage of medications in accordance with current accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Schedule II-V medications, in the emergency kit box, were stored in a permanently affixed compartment; 2. Schedule II-V medications, in the emergency kit box, were stored in a single unit package drug distribution system; 3. Medication refrigerator temperature logs were maintained and documented appropriately for one refrigerator located in Med a room; and 4. Expired medications were not available for administration to residents for 1 (Cart C) of 3 carts (Cart A, Cart B, and Cart C) reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 5. Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct and document an accurate facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 78 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's CMS 672, dated 08/13/2023, revealed, in part, the following: Total Residents (F78): 75 E. Special Care Respiratory Treatment (F124): 7 Tracheostomy Care (F125): 1 Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool revealed, in part, the following: Facility Name (Typed): Facility Name (Typed) Persons Involved in completing the assessment: Administrator (Typed): S1ADM (Handwritten) Director of Nursing (Typed): S2DON (Handwritten) Governing Body (Typed): Facility Owners (Typed) Medical Director (Typed): Medical Director (Typed) Date of Assessment or Update (Typed): July (Typed) 2023 (Handwritten) Date Assessment Reviewed with QA/QAPI Committee (Typed): July (Typed) 2023 (Handwritten) Part 1: Our Resident Profile Numbers Indicate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies for 1 (Resident #10) of 5 (#13, #10, #19, #70 and #77) residents reviewed for pain medication. Findings: Review of the facility's Notice of Disciplinary Action for S23LPN, dated 07/05/2023, revealed, in part, the following: Final Warning - narcotic logs have 'void' with no details and no witness to a waste if one was done. Narcotic signed out. Resident stated she didn't receive medication. Review of the facility's Notice of Disciplinary Action for S23LPN, dated 07/12/2023, revealed, in part, the following: S23LPN suspended on 07/12/2023 pending investigation. S23LPN shall submit to appropriate testing, if requested, based on a reasonable belief they are under the influence. Upon positive urine drug screen and no availability of corresponding prescription, S23LPN terminated effective 07/20/2023. Review of facility's Plan of Action/Continuous Quality Improvement, dated 07/12/2023, revealed, in part, the following: Problem Area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from misappropriation of property for 1 (#10) of 6 (#10, #43, #53, #54, #65, and #68) resident's reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Reporting Abuse to Facility Management revealed the following, in part: Misappropriation of resident property is defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. Review of the Facility's Policy, titled, Controlled Substances revealed the following, in part: The Facility will comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of Schedule II and other controlled substances. Review of Resident #10's Medical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Chronic Pain Syndrome. Review of Resident #10's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 06/19/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (#21) of 4 (#9,#21, #24, #53) reviewed for ADL care. Findings: Review of Facility's Policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) read in part: 2.) Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a.) hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). Review of Resident #21's medical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included Morbid obesity, abnormalities of gait and balance, and muscle weakness. Review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD 7/11/2023 revealed Resident#21 had BIMs of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure the oxygen tubing and humidification bottles were dated for 1 (#21) of 3 (#21, #44, #53) residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings: Review of the Facility's Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) Prevention of Infection revealed in part: Infection Control Considerations Related to Oxygen Administration 6.) Change the oxygen cannula and tubing every seven (7) days, or as needed. Findings: Review of Resident #21's medical records revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included COPD. Review of Resident #21's Physicians Orders: Oxygen at 2L/min continuous flow per nasal cannula. Change the Oxygen sterile water, and tubing every seven days and PRN. Record Review revealed no orders on Resident #21's MAR to change oxygen tubing. An observation was made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-09-20 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted daily in a prominent location readily accessible to residents and visitors. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 88 residents residing in the facility. Findings: An observation was made on 09/19/2024 at 9:45 a.m. of the facility. No staffing data sheets observed. An interview was conducted on 09/19/2024 at 9:50 a.m. with S3ADN. She stated she was responsible for posting staffing data sheets. She stated the last daily staffing data sheet completed was 09/18/2024. An interview was conducted on 09/19/2024 at 9:55 a.m. with S1ADM. He confirmed the last daily staffing data sheet completed was 09/18/2024.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$608,723 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 3 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $47,791 — penalty dated 2026-05-06
- $14,288 — penalty dated 2026-03-18
- $119,307 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
- $208,128 — penalty dated 2024-09-20
- $219,209 — penalty dated 2024-06-10
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-27 for 8 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-22 for 27 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-06 for 31 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DANE MGMT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 24% | since 01/01/2021 |
| RHC10 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 24% | since 01/01/2021 |
| TOLEDO PROP MGMT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 51% | since 01/01/2021 |
| JUGE, KEIRA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| BRIDGES, ROY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| JUSTINIANO, KIMBERLY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| ARK POST ACUTE NETWORK LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2021 |
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $666K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in LA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195488. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.