No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Adira Medical Resort

4405 Airline Drive, Bossier City, LA 71111 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 77 certified beds · (318) 747-5440 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$8,281 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,281 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-23)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (87%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1000 Chinaberry Dr Ste 1200 · (318) 965-6020 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4160 Airline Dr · (318) 584-7433 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4860 Airline Dr · (318) 467-4001 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Old Brownlee Rd · (318) 741-8450 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4601 Airline Dr · (318) 349-4235

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased30.0%17.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.2%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.3%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.1%23.2%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.7%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.1%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.0%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.2%3.1%1.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.3%76.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.6%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.2%14.8%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
33.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.81U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.38hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.34hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 33.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.81 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.2%CMS range 45.1–71.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.3–17.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge33.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge27.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge89.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
1.55
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.45
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.41
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
86.7%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 77 beds and averages 29.7 residents a day — about 39% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.45 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 87% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-21)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to assess a resident upon readmission for the risk of elopement and failed to identify the need for supervision related to wandering tendencies displayed by a resident for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #1 on 06/10/2025 when Resident #1 walked out of the facility's locked front door with S1Medical Director and was left unattended on the facility's front porch. Resident #1 walked along a busy 4 lane road without supervision and entered a dental office business approximately 37 feet from the facility's parking lot. Resident #1 was last observed in the facility at approximately 9:00 a.m. when Resident #1 was observed sitting in the day area on the couch. The facility was notified by dental office staff of Resident #1 being in their office at approximately 9:10 a.m. Resident #1 was retrieved from the dental office business by S11Physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled its resources to be used effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. S3Director of Nursing (DON) failed to ensure the nursing staff conducted a risk for elopement assessment for Resident #1 at the time of readmission to the facility and failed to implement elopement precautions. The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #1 on 06/10/2025 when Resident #1 walked out of the facility's locked front door with S1Medical Director and was left unattended on the facility's front porch. Resident #1 walked along a busy 4 lane road without supervision and entered a dental office business approximately 37 feet from the facility's parking lot. Resident #1 was last observed in the facility at approximately 9:00 a.m. when Resident #1 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 3 (#1, #2, and #5) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) sampled residents reviewed for wounds. The facility failed to ensure evidence that wound care was conducted as ordered. Findings:Review of undated policy titled Wound Treatment Management revealed, in part:Policy:To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of this facility to provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:1. Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change.7. Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record or in the electronic health record. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/16/2026 with diagnoses that included, in part, burns involving 80-89% of body surface with 80-89% third degree burns, pressure ulcer of left heel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure CNA's were able to demonstrate competency in skills necessary to care for residents' needs as identified through resident assessments and described in residents' plans of care for 2 (S5, S6) of 5 CNA personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of S5CNA's personnel record revealed a hire date of 01/14/2025. Further review of S5CNA's personnel record failed to reveal a skills competency had been conducted. Review of S6CNA's personnel record revealed a hire date of 10/22/2025. Further review of S6CNA's personnel record failed to reveal a skills competency had been conducted. During an interview on 01/21/2026 at 1:34 p.m., S1Administrator reviewed S5CNA and S6CNA's personnel files and confirmed the facility did not have documented evidence of skills competencies for S5CNA or S6CNA.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to obtain a CNA registry verification prior to hire for 2 (S4CNA, S7CNA) of 5 CNA personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of S4CNA's personnel record revealed a hire date of 09/20/2025. Further review of S4CNA's personnel record failed to reveal a CNA registry verification had been obtained. Review of S7CNA's personnel record revealed a hire date of 09/04/2025. Further review of S7CNA's personnel record failed to reveal a CNA registry verification had been obtained. During an interview on 01/21/2026 at 2:28 p.m., S1Administrator reviewed S4CNA and S7CNA's personnel files and confirmed the facility did not have documented evidence of CNA registry verification prior to hire for S4CNA or S7CNA.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to honor and accommodate resident food allergies, intolerances, and preferences by failing to ensure a resident received meals that did not include food allergies for 1 (#20) of 1 (#20) resident reviewed for food. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 20 residents who consumed meals from the kitchen. Findings:Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admit date of 11/21/2025 with diagnoses that included in part type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, and urinary tract infection. Further review revealed Resident #20's allergies included tomatoes and potatoes. Review of Resident #20's meal ticket dated 01/19/2026 revealed in part: allergies: tomatoes, potatoes.Review of Resident #20's record revealed a Diet Requisition Form dated 11/21/2025 indicating New Admission, Allergies: potatoes, tomatoes. Signed by DON. Observation on 01/19/2026 at 12:30 p.m. revealed Resident #20's lunch food tray meal ticket: allergy-allergic to tomatoes. Further observation revealed tomatoes on lunch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-23 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to assess a resident for the risk of elopement and failed to ensure an assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for elopement, impaired cognition and/or a diagnosis which may increase the risk of elopement by failing to: 1. Ensure a nursing assessment and elopement risk assessment were completed for Resident #1 at the time of readmission on [DATE]. 2. Ensure Resident #1's behavioral section on Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/31/2025 was completed accurately. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Elopement/Missing Resident policy revealed in part: Purpose: - Ensure a safe and secure environment for all residents. - In the event a resident is missing from the facility, the resident is located in a timely manner. - Ensure staff awareness of the importance of the resident safety and security. Procedure: 3. All residents will be assessed for risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to implement the plan of care to meet the needs of 1 (#1) out of a total of 3, (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents by failing to complete an x-ray as ordered by the physician. Findings: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 04/16/2025 with diagnoses of but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, pneumonia, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, spinal stenosis cervical region, cognitive communication deficit, spinal stenosis lumbar region without neurogenic claudication, essential (primary) hypertension and dysphagia. Review of Resident #1's physician's orders revealed an order for a STAT (immediately or right now) Chest x-ray on 04/18/2025. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed a chest x-ray report with a completion date of 04/19/2025. Review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed an entry on 04/19/2025 at 4:05 p.m. stating, Resident #1's chest x-ray was completed at 1:15 p.m. and results were sent to the provider. During an interview on 05/13/2025 at 8:30 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care for 1( #3) resident out of 3 (#1,#2, #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure a resident request for toileting assistance was answered in a timely manner. Findings: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/14/2025 and a readmission date of 05/09/2025 with diagnoses of but not limited to unspecified fracture of left femur, hyperlipidemia, essential hypertension, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, irritable bowel syndrome, parkinsonism, major depressive disorder, esophageal obstruction, gastronomy and dysphagia. Review of Resident #3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed Resident #3 was assessed to require assistance with using the toilet. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan revealed a problem of: ADL (activities of daily living)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the faciity failed to implement the care plan for 2 (#2, #3) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents reviewed. The facility failed to administer antibiotic for Resident #2 and provide wound care for Resident #3 as ordered. Findings: Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's medical records revealed an admit date of 03/26/2025 with the following diagnoses, including in part: dependence on renal dialysis, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Review of Resident #2's Physician's orders revealed an order dated 03/27/2025 for Levofloxacin oral tablet 250 mg (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for UTI (urinary tract infection) for 10 Days. Review of Resident #2's March and April 2025 Medication Administration Records (MAR) failed to reveal Levofloxacin tablet 250 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for 10 days was administered on 03/28/2025, 03/31/2025, 04/02/2025 and 04/04/2025. During an interview on 04/16/2025 at 1:30 p.m. S2 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) acknowledged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing data was posted on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift. Findings: Observation on 04/16/2025 at 8:30 a.m. revealed staffing posted was dated 04/12/2025. During an interview on 04/16/2025 at 9:05 a.m. with S2 Interim DON (Director of Nursing)/Director of Clinical Operations acknowledged the staffing posted was dated 04/12/2025 and should have been posted daily.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents reviewed. The facility failed to ensure a controlled drug was available and administered to Resident #1. Findings: Policy: Pharmacy Services: (no revision date) Purpose: Ensure accurate and safe provision or obtaining of pharmaceutical services, including the provision lot routine and emergency medications and biologicals as well as the services of a licensed pharmacist to meet the needs of the resident. Procedure: The facility must: 2. Provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident. 3. Employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist who b. Establishes a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation. c.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's representative after an incident with an injury for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's Condition Change of the Resident policy (no revision date) revealed: Procedure: After all resident falls, possible injuries or changes in physical or mental function: 6. Notify Resident's Responsible Party. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/26/2025 with diagnoses which included, in part: Type 2 diabetes mellitus, unspecified dementia, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #2's admission MDS (Minimum Data Sets) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 11 indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of the facility's incident log revealed Resident #2 had an incident which involved an injury on 03/16/2025. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed for Resident #2. Findings: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/26/2025 with diagnoses which included, in part: Type 2 diabetes mellitus, unspecified dementia, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #2's admission MDS (Minimum Data Sets) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 11 indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #2's medical record failed to reveal a baseline care plan had been completed. During an interview on 04/01/2025 at 1:30 p.m. S3 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed Resident #2 did not have a baseline care plan and should have. During an interview on 04/01/2025 at 2:15 p.m. S1 Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an RN (Registered Nurse) was on duty for 8 consecutive hours per day 7 days per week. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 24 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of the Nursing/Ancillary Personnel Staffing Pattern Reporting Form for the week days of 03/09/2025 to 03/22/2025 completed by S4 Human Resource Director revealed there were no staffing hours for an RN on 03/21/2025. Review of the facility's Employee Hours Per Day record, provided by S4 Human Resource Director, dated 03/21/2025 revealed no RN hours were clocked on 03/21/2025. During an interview on 04/01/2025 at 2:15 p.m. S1 Administrator reviewed the Personnel Staffing Pattern report from 03/02/2025 to 03/22/2025 and confirmed the facility did not have RN coverage on 03/21/2025.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective system was in place for advanced directives. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident's medical records accurately reflected the residents' wishes for emergency basic life support for 8 (#1, #15, #9, #76, #77, #126, #127, #175 ) residents; 2. Failed to document residents and/or resident's representative were given information on Advanced Directives on admission for 12 (#9, #76, #77, #126, #127, #175, #4, #11, #12, #20, #75, #125) residents, of 19 (#9, #77, #11, #75, #12, #76, #125, #126, #1, #127, #4, #20, #15, #175, #2, #8, #22, #24, and #18) residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. Total facility census was 23. Findings: Review of the Facility's Advance Directive Policy dated 07/2024 revealed in part: It is the policy of the Facility to respect the resident's right of self-directed care including the right to issue Advance Directives on health care, to refuse or accept treatment, to make informed decisions, and/or appoint a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for the risk of entrapment from bed rails and received a written order from the physician for bed rails prior to installation for 7 (#4, #20, #125, #22, #75, #9, #126) of 7 (#4, #20, #125, #22, #75, #9, #126) residents reviewed for accident hazards. Findings: Review of the Facility's Restraint Evaluation & Restraint Reduction Policy dated 07/2024 revealed in part: -Definition: Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. -Responsibility: All members of the interdisciplinary team (as appropriate to individual resident needs) and monitored by the Director of Nursing. -Procedure: 1. The following devices are considered physical restraints and require evaluation (Category I is considered most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary medications for 4 (#9, #11, #76, #175) of 5 (#9, #11, #76, #127 and #175) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of: Resident #9 for edema related to the use of diuretic Bumex. Resident #11 for edema related to the use of the diuretic Furosemide (Lasix). Resident #11 for bleeding related to the use of an anticoagulant Apixaban (Eliquis). Resident #76 for edema related to the use of the diuretic Furosemide. Resident #175 for bleeding related to the use of the anticoagulant Dabigatran Etexillate Mesylate. Findings: #9 Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, Parkinson's disease, systolic (congestive) heart failure, essential (primary) hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #9's 5-day MDS (minimum data set) with ARD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary medications for 2 (#9, #175) out of 5 (#9, #11, #76, #127, #175) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure monitoring of side effects and behaviors had been conducted for Resident #9 and Resident #175 who were each receiving a psychotropic. Findings: #9 Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included, in part, Parkinson's disease, systolic (congestive) heart failure, essential (primary) hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #9's 5-day MDS (minimum data set) with ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/08/2024 revealed Resident #9 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicated Resident #9 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #9's physician orders revealed the following orders: 10/04/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0836 — pattern
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to comply with Federal, State, and Local Laws, and Professional Standards by: 1. Failing to ensure CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) staff had undergone and passed criminal background checks prior to working in the facility for 2 CNAs (S12, S14) of 5 CNA personnel records reviewed. 2. Failing to ensure the nurse aide registry/adverse action list was searched monthly for 3 CNAs (S12, S13, S14) of 5 CNA personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of S12 CNA's personnel record revealed S12 CNA was hired on 05/17/2024 with a criminal background check performed on 09/06/2024. Further review of S12 CNA's personnel record failed to reveal monthly nurse aid registry/adverse action list searches. Review of S13 CNA's personnel record revealed S13 CNA was hired on 01/05/2018. Further review of S13 CNA's personnel record failed to reveal monthly nurse aid registry/adverse action list searches. Review of S14 CNA's personnel record revealed S14 CNA was hired on 07/23/2023 with a criminal background check performed on 09/06/2024. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission for 2 (#75, #76) of 20 sampled residents. Findings: #75 Review of Resident #75's medical records revealed an admit date of 10/09/2024 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic polyneuropathy, and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #75's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an assessment reference date 10/09/2024 in progress (not completed). Review of resident #75's medical record failed to reveal a Baseline Care Plan was completed. During an interview on 10/17/2024 at 1:50 p.m. S4 DOCO (Director of Clinical Operations) reported it is the nurse's responsibility to complete the Baseline Care Plan for the resident on admit. S4 DOCO reported if the Baseline Care Plan is not in the paper chart, it has not been completed and it should have been. #76…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was provided according to the facility's Policy and Procedure for Oxygen therapy for 3 (#12, #15, and #175) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure: Resident #12 had a physician order for oxygen therapy when Resident #12 had been receiving oxygen for several days. Resident #15's CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) mask and tubing was stored properly when not in use. Resident #175 had a physician order for CPAP and was care planned for the use of CPAP. Resident #175's CPAP mask and tubing was stored properly when not in use. Findings: Review of the facility's Oxygen Therapy Policy and Procedure presented by S4 Director of Clinical Operation (DOCO) (07/2024) revealed, in part: Subject: Oxygen Therapy Policy: Oxygen (O2) is administered to promote adequate oxygenation and provide relief of symptoms of respiratory distress. Responsibility: All licensed Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and an interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who required dialysis received services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (#18) of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis by failing to obtain weekly weights according to the plan of care and communicate and collaborate with the dialysis facility by completing the hemodialysis communication record form. Findings: Review of Dialysis Communication Record (dated 07/2024) policy revealed, in part: Policy: A Dialysis Communication Record Form is completed each time a resident receives outpatient dialysis. This ensures communication between the two facilities. Procedure: 1. The top section of the Dialysis Communication Record Form is completed by the nurse responsible for sending the resident to the dialysis unit/facility. 2. The middle section of the form is completed by personnel responsible for the resident at the dialysis facility and returned to the nursing home with the resident. 3. The bottom of the form is completed by personnel responsible for the resident upon return to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure the use of services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week during FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 3 2024 (April 1- June 30). Findings: Review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Report for FY Quarter 3 2024 (April 1- June 30) revealed the facility triggered for: Failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day on 05/04/24, 05/05/2024, 05/18/2024, 05/26/2024, 06/02/2024, 06/16/2024, 06/22/2024, 06/23/2024, 06/29/2024, and 06/30/2024. During review of the Facility's Nursing/Ancillary Personnel Staffing Pattern Reporting Form dated 10/17/2024 provided for the triggered dates on the PBJ Staffing Report FY Quarter 3 2024 (April 1- June 30) failed to reveal RN services were used on 05/05/2024 and 05/18/2024. During an interview on 10/17/2024 at 2:00 p.m. S1 Administrator reviewed the Facility's Nursing/Ancillary Personnel Staffing Pattern Reporting Form dated 10/17/2024 for the triggered dates on the FY Quarter 3 2024 (April 1- June 30) PBJ Staffing Report and acknowledged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure annual performance evaluations were conducted on 2 CNAs [Certified Nursing Assistants (S13 CNA, S14 CNA)] out of 5 CNA personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of S13 CNA's personnel record revealed S13 CNA was hired on 01/05/2018. Further review of S13 CNA's personnel record failed to reveal documentation of an annual performance evaluation since 01/12/2023. Review of S14 CNA's personnel record revealed S14 CNA was hired on 07/23/2023. Further review of S14 CNA's personnel record failed to reveal documentation of an annual performance evaluation since hire. During an interview on 10/17/2024 at 12:36 p.m. S15 Human Resources reviewed S13 CNA and S14 CNA's records and confirmed there was no documentation of annual performance evaluations.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0851 — isolated
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to accurately submit mandatory direct care staffing information to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 3 2024 (April 1- June 30). Findings: Review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Report for FY Quarter 3 2024 (April 1- June30) revealed the facility triggered for Failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day on 05/04/24, 05/05/2024, 05/18/2024, 05/26/2024, 06/02/2024, 06/16/2024, 06/22/2024, 06/23/2024, 06/29/2024, and 06/30/2024. Review of the Facility's Nursing/Ancillary Personnel Staffing Pattern Reporting Form dated 10/17/2024 for the triggered dates on the FY Quarter 3 2024 (April 1- June 30) PBJ Staffing Report revealed licensed nursing coverage. During an interview on 10/17/2024 at 2:00 p.m. S1 Administrator reported the facility's corporate office submits the PBJ to CMS from the facility's time clock management system. S1 Administrator indicated agency staffing hours were likely left off of the submission to CMS.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meeting at least quarterly with required staff present since last annual survey dated 10/04/2023. Findings: Review of QAA binder with S1 Administrator failed to reveal a QAA meeting for the 1st quarter and the Director of Nursing (DON) was not present for the QAA meeting in the 2nd quarter. During an interview on 10/17/2024 at 4:45 p.m. S1 Administrator confirmed the facility did not meet during the 1st quarter and confirmed the DON was not present for the 2nd quarter meeting.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure immunizations were administered to residents who consented to receive the influenza, pneumococcal and/or COVID-19 immunizations during the admission process for 2 (#11, #77) of 2 (#11, #77) residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings: Review of the facility's Influenza, Pneumococcal and COVID-19 Vaccination policy dated 07/2024 revealed in part, the following: Responsibility: The Director of Nursing in conjunction with the Infection Preventionist or RN (Registered Nurse) designee. Procedure: 1. On admission, residents will be offered the influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID-19 vaccines. 3. For those residents accepting, record all influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID-19 vaccines administered on the resident immunization record. 5. Obtain a physician's order for all residents to receive the Influenza, Pneumococcal, and COVID-19 vaccines. Review of Resident #11's Immunization Informed Consent signed on admission on [DATE] revealed Resident #11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) received the required training for 1 CNA (S12) out of 5 CNA personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of S12 CNA's personnel record revealed S12 CNA was hired on 05/17/2024. Further review of S12 CNA's personnel record failed to reveal S12 received required dementia training. During an interview on 10/17/2024 at 12:36 p.m. S15 Human Resources reviewed S12 CNA's personnel record and confirmed there was no documentation of dementia training.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 2 (#2, #3) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled resident's received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan. The facility failed to: 1. Identify Resident #2 and Resident #3 as high risk falls, and 2. Ensure Resident #3 was wearing proper foot wear to prevent falls. Findings: Review of Facility's Falling Star Program (revision date 07/27/2018) revealed: Policy: To decrease the number of resident falls in the facility, the Falling Star program is designed to facilitate recognition of residents who are at high risk for falls. Procedure: .Residents identified for the program will have a star placed outside their room by their nameplate and on the outside of their chart near the name label. A star will be attached to the resident's w/c (wheelchair), gerichair, and all mobility aids (walkers, canes, etc.). A star will be placed above the resident's bed. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's Medical Records revealed an admit date of 02/08/2024 with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, the facility failed to notify resident representative of changes in condition for 1 (#2) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents reviewed. The facility failed to notify Resident #2's resident representative of a fall requiring treatment at a hospital. Findings: Review of Resident #2's Medical Record revealed an admit date of 02/08/2024 with the following diagnoses, in part: acute cerebrovascular insufficiency, muscle weakness (generalized), other lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit and other abnormal glucose. Review of Resident #2's Baseline Care Plan revealed: Falls - resident has had an actual fall - 03/02/2024 resident states he got up on his own and fell - laceration to back of head - sent to emergency room (ER), area closed with Dermabond. Review of Facility's Incident Log revealed an incident for Resident #2 dated 03/02/2024 - resident room - fall - laceration - 911 EMS (emergency medical services) dispatched .has quarter sized laceration to back of head . During an interview on 03/12/2024 at 9:45 a.m. Resident #2's wife reported she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan for 1 (#1) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents reviewed. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Medical Record revealed an admit date [DATE] with the following diagnoses, in part: end stage renal disease, major depressive disorder, chronic systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, muscle weakness (generalized), other lack of coordination, difficulty in walking/not elsewhere classified, polyneuropathy/unspecified, long term use of anticoagulants, diabetes mellitus and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan with revision date of 02/29/2024 failed to reveal problems and approaches for: risk for falls, congestive heart failure, anticoagulant therapy, major depressive disorder, impaired mobility, self-care deficit, and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders revealed the following orders dated 02/28/2024: Eliquis oral tablet 2.5mg (milligrams) give 1 tablet by mouth two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services had been provided for 1 (#177) of 1 (#177) resident reviewed for Dialysis. The facility failed to ensure Resident #177's dialysis shunt was accurately assessed and monitored. Findings: Review of the EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed the following, in part, Resident #177 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of sepsis. Review of Resident #177's Progress Note dated 10/02/2023 revealed Resident #177 had a dialysis shunt site to the left upper arm. Review of Resident #177's September and October 2023 eMAR (Electronic Medication and Administration Record) failed to reveal documentation the dialysis shunt site had been assessed and monitored. Review of the Dialysis Communication Records for Resident #177 failed to reveal an assessment of Resident #177's dialysis shunt site upon returning to the facility on [DATE] and 10/02/2023. During an interview on 10/02/2023 at 4:00 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0729 — pattern
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure State Registry verifications were completed prior to hire for 1 [S6 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)] of 5 CNA personnel files reviewed. Findings: Review of S6 CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 01/16/2023 and first day of work 01/16/2023. Further review of S6 CNA's personnel file revealed the Criminal Background and Sex Offender Registry checks were completed on 01/23/2023. During an interview on 10/04/2023 at 3:00 p.m. S3 Human Resources confirmed the State Registry verifications had not been completed prior to hire for S6 CNA and should have been.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months for 4 [S4 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) S5 CNA, S7 CNA, and S8 CNA)] of 5 CNA personnel files reviewed. Findings: Review of the personnel records revealed the following: 1. S4 CNA-date of hire was on 03/19/2015. Further review failed to reveal the annual performance review had been completed in March 2023. 3. S5 CNA-date of hire 05/10/2022. Further review failed to reveal the annual performance review had been completed in May 2023. 2. S7 CNA-date of hire 05/26/2021. Further review failed to reveal the annual performance review had been completed in May 2023. 4. S8 CNA-date of hire 05/07/2020. Further review failed to reveal the annual performance review had been completed in May 2023. During an interview on 10/04/2023 at 3:00 p.m. S3 Human Resources confirmed the annual performance evaluations had not been completed every 12 months for S4 CNA, S5 CNA, S7 CNA, and S8 CNA and should have been.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain orders on admission for Oxygen, Foley catheter and Trilogy Machine use, care and treatment for 1 (#24) of 2 (#24, #25) closed records reviewed. Findings: Review of resident #24's closed record revealed an admit date of 08/04/2023 with discharge/transfer on 08/12/2023 and diagnoses that include in part acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, chronic atrial fibrillation, urinary tract infection, dependence on supplemental oxygen, essential hypertension, and asthma. Review of resident #24's progress notes from 08/04/2023 to 08/12/2023 revealed in part resident #24 was admitted to the facility with Oxygen in use at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula, Foley catherer in place and a Trilogy machine for use at bedtime. Review of resident #24's physician orders failed to reveal orders for Oxygen, Foley catheter and Trilogy machine use, care and treatment. Review of resident #24's current care plan failed to reveal interventions related to Oxygen, Foley catheter and Trilogy machine use, care and treatment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-06-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AIRLINE DRIVE BOSSIER LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2024
DOODLE LA HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2024
RMG ENTERPRISES SOLUTIONS, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2024
FRANKEL, RAIZYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2024
MUSHELL, SHLOMOIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2024
BASS, PATIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
MIZE, GARYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
PELICAN CARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/04/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-62.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$137K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 19%Other / private 81%

This home reported $137K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$565per resident / day
operating cost
$17,165per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$347per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195247. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next