St. Agnes Healthcare and Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 95.8 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.14 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.17 to 0.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to identify and correct situations that could possibly result in actual or suspected abuse by failing to immediately report a complaint made by a resident to the Administrator or designee for 1 (#92) resident out of 30 sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Grievance, with a last revised date of 11/24/2025, read in part: Grievance or complaint is filed, if staff has received the complaint, he/she is to notify administrator or his designed as soon as possible.Prevention- identify and correct situations that could possibly result in abuse. Encourage staff to report actual or suspected abuse without fear of retribution.Identification- C) any staff person receiving a complaint of abuse, neglect, or an injury of unknown origin whether it is from the resident, a family member of staff, should listen to the complaint, writing down the date, and time complaint is being received time, and any details given. Review of Resident #92's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0685 — pattern
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received an assistive device to maintain and/or improve hearing for 1 (Resident #6) out of 1 resident investigated for communication-sensory.Findings:Review of Resident #6's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, and anxiety disorder.Review of Resident #6's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD of 02/26/2026, under Section C, revealed she had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated her cognition was intact. Further review of the MDS revealed, under Section B, that Resident #6 had minimal difficulty hearing and no hearing aid or other appliance was used.Review of Resident #6's Progress notes revealed a note dated 02/26/2026 written by S5SSD which stated the following: No hearing aids noted for assist device. Is slightly HOH however was able to hear when spoken to in a louder tone. Is on wait list for free…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service and failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen by failing to:Appropriately store, label and date frozen food items, and Ensure kitchen staff used good hygienic practices while preparing and serving food to residents.This had the potential to affect 93 residents who consumed foods from the facility's kitchen.Findings:1.On 05/05/2026, a review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage with a last reviewed date of 11/24/2025, read in part . 14. Frozen Foods .c. All foods should be covered, labeled and dated .All foods will be checked to assure that foods will be consumed by their use by dates or discarded . On 05/04/2026 at 8:53 a.m., an observation of the facility's freezer with S2DMT revealed the following:- 1/2 a plastic bag of frozen meat patties which was tied at the opening. The bag had a small hole in the plastic bag, was not labeled with the contents, and did not have a used by dated.- 4 mid-sized plastic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's plan of care was implemented as ordered for 2 (Resident #3, Resident #7) out of a total sample of 30 residents by failing to:follow physician's order for assessing Resident #3's dialysis site; andfollow physician's order for monitoring of right hand splint; administering enteral feed; and administering enteral flush for Resident #7.Findings:1.Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, and diabetes mellitus.Review of Resident #3's February 2026 physician's order and Hall TAR (Treatment Administration Record) revealed the following order dated 09/27/2022: Dialysis Access Site-observe daily for bleeding or signs of infection. Notify dialysis center/MD (medical doctor) if noted every shift. The resident's Hall TAR failed to include nurses' initials or evidence that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was accurately updated to reflect the resident's current code status for 1 (Resident #3) out of 30 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 95 residents.Findings: Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, and diabetes mellitus.Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record revealed she was a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate).Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record revealed a Louisiana Physician Orders For Scope of Treatment (LaPOST) that read in part:.A. Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR).F. Summary of Goals: Discussed with: Personal Health Care Representative. The basis for these orders is: Patient's Personal Health Care Representative (Qualified Patient without capacity), signed by physician and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure: 1. food was dated after opening; and 2. food was properly sealed and stored. The facility had a census of 95 residents. Findings: On 03/24/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Correct Food Storage with a revised date of 12/30/2024, read in part, all foods shall be stored in a manner to ensure First-in - ''First- Out use and all items shall be labeled, dated and sealed. On 03/24/2025 at 9:01 AM, an observation was made of the dry storage area with S1DM (Dietary Manager). S1DM confirmed the following observations: -1 partially used bottle of imitation vanilla with no opened date; -1 partially used bottle of imitation banana with no opened date; -1 opened unsealed bag of corn flakes with no opened date; -1 opened and unsealed box of quick oats opened with no opened date; -1 opened and unsealed bag of grits with no opened date. On 03/24/2025 at 9:07 AM, an interview was conducted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and infection policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by failing to: 1. Appropriately handle and transfer soiled laundry; 2. perform proper hand hygiene; 3. appropriately remove PPE (Personal protective equipment); and 4. sanitize dirty scissors before re-using. Findings: 1. On 03/24/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled Laundry, with a last reviewed date of 12/30/2024, read in part: Policy: The facility launders linens and clothing in accordance with current CDC (Centers for Disease Control) guidelines to prevent transmission of pathogens .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Aligning with principles of standard precautions, staff shall consider all previously worn clothing and used linen as potentially contaminated .4. Soiled laundry shall be handled as little as possible, with minimum agitation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to assess 1(#12) out of 1 sampled residents for self-administration of medication in a final sample of 35 residents. Findings: On 03/24/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Self-Administration of Medications with a las review date of 12/30/2024 revealed in part, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's right to self-administer medication. A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team had determined which medications may be self-administer safely. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .4. The results of the interdisciplinary team assessment are recorded on the Medication Self-Administration Assessment Form, which is placed in the resident's medical record . Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included essential hypertension and dermatitis. Review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to report to the administrator of the facility a resident report of sexual abuse for 1(#85) of 1 resident sampled for abuse. This had the potential to affect the 95 residents that reside in the facility. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect with a last reviewed date of 12/30/2024 read in part, Identification- A) Any staff member receiving a complaint of abuse, neglect, or an injury of unknown origin whether it is from the resident, a family member or staff, should listen to the complaint, writing down the date, and time complaint is being received, and any details given D) Administrator or his designee should be notified as soon as possible. Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses which included, but were not limited to cerebral infarction, unspecified psychosis, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the care plan for Resident #80 as evidenced by failing to offer the resident a visit with the in house dental consultant for 1 (#80) out of 35 sampled residents. Findings: Resident #80. On 03/24/2025 at 10:11 AM, an interview was conducted with the resident. The resident stated that he had some broken and missing teeth and he wanted to see a dentist. The resident stated that no one discussed dental services with him. Review of the resident's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was coded to have obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth and inflamed or bleeding gums or loose natural teeth. Review of the resident's care plan revealed that it addressed the resident having carious teeth and gum inflammation. An intervention included to offer the resident a visit with the in house dental consultant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $856K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA