Acadia St. Landry Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
830 S. Broadway St., Church Point, LA 70525 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 134 certified beds · (337) 684-6316 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $268,528 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-12)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.7% | 17.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.3% | 5.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.4% | 1.2% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 3.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.5% | 17.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.1% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.2% | 94.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.9% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.0% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 28.2% | 22.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.6% | 3.1% | 1.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.5% | 76.3% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.0% | 28.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.6% | 14.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.99 | 2.56 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.19 | 2.74 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.0%CMS range 41.2–57.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 7.6–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 65.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 9.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 4.7–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.27 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 126.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.12 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.15 to 0.06 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 (#105) of 39 sampled residents. S8CNA failed to obtain the appropriate number of persons required to utilize a mechanical lift to transfer Resident #105. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for Resident #105 on 09/13/2024 at approximately 6:35 AM when S8CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) moved the resident from a lying position to sitting position in preparation to transfer him into a chair without the assistance of a second person or a mechanical lifter as required by his plan of care. When S8CNA turned away from the resident to get his chair, he fell on the floor and hit his head resulting in a laceration to his right eyebrow and right cheek that required stitches. Findings: Review of Resident #105's clinical records revealed an admit date of 04/08/2024 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to unspecified dementia, psychotic disturbance and anxiety, and repeated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for foot care and treatment for a diabetic resident for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 (Resident #1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, and #R3) sampled residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #3, a cognitively impaired diabetic with neuropathy to the lower extremities. Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] without preventative food care ordered. On 11/19/2024 the resident's skin evaluation assessment by S2LPN/TN (Licensed Practical Nurse/Treatment Nurse) revealed left & right 2nd (second) & 5th (fifth) toes are black . Resident #3 was assessed by S3NP (Nurse Practitioner) on 11/22/2024, who evaluated the second digit of the right foot and noted Resident #3 had a fungus skin/nail over the nail bed. S3NP removed the fungus skin/nail and observed a foul smell from the second digit of the right foot, and bone of the second digit knuckle; dry hard skin to the right lateral heel SDTI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review,and observation the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality by failing to ensure nursing staff identified skin changes timely for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, and #R3) sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #3, a diabetic with neuropathy to the lower extremities. Review of the resident's weekly skin evaluations 9/1/2024 through 11/18/2024 revealed the resident did not have any skin issues. On 11/19/2024 the resident's skin evaluation assessment by S2LPN/TN (Licensed Practical Nurse/Treatment Nurse) revealed left & right 2nd (second) & 5th (fifth) toes are black . Resident #3 was assessed by S3NP (Nurse Practitioner) on 11/22/2024, who evaluated the second digit of the right foot and noted Resident #3 had a fungus skin/nail over the nail bed. S3NP removed the fungus skin/nail and observed a foul smell from the second digit of the right foot, and bone of the second digit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-12-09 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received preventative foot care to avoid complications from the resident's medical condition such as diabetes and circulatory disorders. The facility failed to provide appropriate preventative foot care for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 (#Resident #1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, and #R3) sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #3, a cognitively impaired diabetic with neuropathy to the lower extremities. Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] without preventative food care ordered. On 11/19/2024 the resident's skin evaluation assessment by S2LPN/TN (Licensed Practical Nurse/Treatment Nurse) revealed left & right 2nd (second) & 5th (fifth) toes are black . Resident #3 was assessed by S3NP (Nurse Practitioner) on 11/22/2024, who evaluated the second digit of the right foot and noted Resident #3 had a fungus skin/nail over the nail bed. S3NP removed the fungus skin/nail and observed a foul smell from the second…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's physician of a major injury for 1 resident (#1) of 3 sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, with a last revised date of May 2017, read in part: Policy Statement: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's physical/mental condition and/or status.1. The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician call when there has been a (an): d. significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition.2. A significant change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that: c. Requires interdisciplinary review and/or revision to the care plan.Review of Resident #1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including, but not limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements to 3 (#83, #88, #89) residents of 4 (#64, #83, #88, #89) residents investigated for personal funds. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Trust Fund Policy and Procedure, with a review date of 11/3/2025, read in part; 4. Resident Rights Regarding Personal Funds, Resident have the right to: Receive quarterly statements of their account. Review of Resident #83's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed an admission date of 12/02/2024 and diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure peripheral vascular disease, and chronic kidney disease. A review of the Resident #83's comprehensive MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 11, which indicated her cognition was moderately intact. On 03/09/2026 at 10:18 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #83. Resident #83 stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure call systems in resident bathrooms were functional and accessible to residents at all times for 7 residents (#4, #23, #75, #112, #130, #132, and #133) out of a final sample of 48 residents. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Call Bell Policy with a last reviewed date of 11/03/2025 read in part, Policy Statement: The facility will maintain an effective call-light system that allows residents to summon staff assistance at any time. Resident #4Review of Resident #4's electronic health record revealed an admission date of 07/13/2023 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, acute kidney failure, and diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic neuropathy. Review of Resident #4's 5 day MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a BIMS (Basic Interview for Mental Status) score of 11,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0920 — patternProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient space in the dining room to accommodate residents who required assistance with feeding. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 14 residents who required assistance with feeding. Findings: On 03/09/2026 at 11:25 a.m., Resident #3 and Resident #35 were observed sitting in the adjoining T.V. (television) activity section of the dining room. Other residents were eating lunch in the dining room at this time. S10TN told a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) that Residents #3 and #35 were waiting to eat at the table for residents who were required to be fed. On 03/09/2026 at 11:45 a.m., Resident #3 and Resident #35 were placed at the table for residents who were required to be fed when space became available. On 03/10/2026 at 11:25 a.m., another observation was conducted in the dining room during lunch. Resident #35 was waiting in the adjoining TV activity section of the dining room to eat. On 03/10/2026 at 11:31 a.m., an interview was conducted with S10TN who was the nurse responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care/physician orders were implemented for 1 (Residents #2) out of 48 sampled residents. The facility failed to apply topical cream to a suprapubic site, irrigate a suprapubic catheter, and document suprapubic catheter output for Resident #2.Findings:Review of Resident #2's electronic health record revealed an admission date of 08/27/2024 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, calculus in bladder and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. Review of Resident #2's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a BIMS (Basic Interview for Mental Status) score of 11, indicating his cognition was moderately impaired. Review of Resident #2's current plan of care revealed in part: Focus- urinary catheter (suprapubic); Interventions- Document suprapubic cath (catheter) output q (every) shift, Irrigate suprapubic cath with 60cc (cubic centimeter) NS (normal saline) bid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that services were provided to meet professional standards of quality for 2 (#7 and #54) out of 48 sampled residents as evidenced by:1. Failing to ensure Resident #7 swallowed all medications before the nurse exited the room, and2. Failing to ensure Resident #54's tube feeding bottle was labeled with the date and time it was hung and the nurse's initials.Findings: Resident #7 Review of a facility policy titled Administration of Drugs from Medication Carts, with a last reviewed date of 11/03/2025, revealed in part, 12. Never leave the drugs at the bedside or in the patient's hand or mouth. The patient must take the medicine while the nurse is present. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admit date of 08/06/2008 with diagnoses that included, in part, artherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, chronic pain syndrome, and hypokalemia. Review of Resident #7's MDS (Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received the necessary care and treatment for a pressure ulcer consistent with professional standards of practice evidenced by the nurse failing to conduct accurate weekly skin/ body audit assessment, and complete comprehensive weekly wound assessments for 1 (Resident #9) out of 3 (#9, #10, #109) residents investigated for pressure ulcers out of a total sample of 48 residents. Findings:Review of Resident #9's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to spina bifida, unspecified, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, unspecified and paraplegia, unspecified. Review of the facility's policy with a review date of 11/03/2025, titled Pressure Ulcer/Skin Breakdown Risk Assessment read in part, Steps in the Procedure, 4. a. Conduct a comprehensive weekly skin assessment/body audit. b. Once inspection of skin is completed document the findings on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of records and policies and procedures, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to ensure the resident's environment remained free of hazards for 1(#66) out of 9 residents investigated for accidents.Findings:Review of the facility's policy titled Smoking Policy - Residents with a last reviewed date of 11/03/2025, read in part: Policy Statement: This facility shall establish and maintain safe resident smoking practices. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .7. Any smoking-related privileges, restrictions, and concerns (for example, need for close monitoring) shall be noted on the care plan.Review of Resident #66's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; cerebral infarction; muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, right hand; and muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified left hand.Review of Resident #66's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs as evidenced by failing to adequately monitor for anticoagulant side effects for 1 (#5) out of 5 residents investigated for unnecessary medications.Findings:Review of the facility's policy titled, Anticoagulation-Clinical Protocol, with a last reviewed date of 11/03/2025, revealed in part, 5. The staff.will monitor for possible complications in individuals who are being anticoagulated, and will manage related problems. a. If an individual on anticoagulation therapy shows signs of excessive bruising, hematuria, hemoptysis, or other evidence of bleeding, the nurse will discuss the situation with the physician before giving the next scheduled dose of anticoagulant.Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses including, but not limited to: atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and review of the facility's policy and procedures, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen by failing to ensure all staff wore a hair covering when entering the kitchen.127 residents consumed foods from the kitchen.Findings:On 03/09/2026, a review of the facility's policy titled, Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices with a reviewed date of 11/03/2025, read in part: Policy Statement: Food and nutrition services employees will follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .12. Hair nets or caps and/or bead restraints must be worn to keep hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils and linens.On 03/09/2026 at 10:43 a.m., an observation was made of S6MD entering the kitchen and walking to the stove where there was an uncovered pot with bite-sized meat simmering. S6MD stood at the stove near the pot. S6MD had a full head of hair. He was not wearing any hair covering. S6MD was asked if he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-12 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents received mail on Saturdays. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 121 residents residing in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident #55's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 11/27/2024 revealed she had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 12, indicating she had moderately impaired cognition. A review of Resident #63's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS of 13, indicating her cognition was intact. A review of Resident #99's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS of 15, indicating her cognition was intact. On 02/10/2025 at 02:46 PM, during the resident council meeting, Resident #55, Resident #63, and Resident #99 stated they did not receive or were unsure if they received mail on Saturdays. On 02/11/2025 at 12:50 PM, an interview was conducted with S10T/SSA (Transportation/Social Services Assistant). S10T/SSA confirmed she is responsible for delivering mail to residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles by: 1. having loose pills in 2 (Cart A and Cart B) of 2 medication carts checked for safe and secure storage; 2. failing to ensure expired medications were not available for administration to residents in 2 (Cart A and Cart B) of 2 medication carts checked for safe and secure storage; and 3. failing to ensure medications were stored at the proper temperatures to preserve their integrity. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 121 residents residing in the facility. Findings: On 02/12/2025, a review of the facility's undated policy entitled, Storage of Medications, revealed, in part, drugs are stored at the proper temperature. Drugs are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage areas in a safe manner. Outdated drugs are returned to the pharmacy or destroyed. Medications requiring refrigeration are stored in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent the likelihood of foodborne illnesses and store and serve meals in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The deficient practice had the potential to effect the 118 residents who consumed meals prepared from the facility's kitchen. On 02/10/2025 at 8:35 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with S17DM (Dietary Manager) and revealed the following: 1. Food storage: A. Refrigerated items: 1. One bottle of lemon juice with an expiration date of 12/14/2024 2. One bottle of barbecue sauce with an expiration date of 09/11/2024 3. One bottle of whipped topping with an expiration date of 06/27/2024 4. One container of sour cream with an expiration date of 01/27/2025 5. One container of sour cream with an expiration date of 01/27/2025 6. One bag of cabbage with an expiration date of 01/19/2025 7. A freezer burned box of pies 8. Opened and undated beef B. Dry storage: 1. Ten individually packed soft baked cookies with an expiration date of 09/25/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-12 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure the well-being of residents by failing to provide oversight of the kitchen's cleanliness, sanitation, and practices for safe food service. The deficient practice had the potential to effect the 118 residents who consumed meals prepared from the facility's kitchen. Findings: Cross Reference F812 On 02/10/2025 at 8:35 AM, an tour of the facility's kitchen revealed surfaces with an accumulation dust, dirt, food residue and other debris and expired food items. In addition, a meal was served at temperatures that were not within an appropriate range during distribution of hall trays. Review of the facility's State of Louisiana Department of Health, Office of Public Health, Retail Food Notice of Violations dated 05/13/2024 at 12:30 PM, read in part: Non-Critical Items: Description of Violations: Non-food contact surfaces of equipment have an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue and other debris. Food carts are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections by failing to ensure contact precautions were followed for 1 (#74) of 4 (#21, #27, #74 and #273) residents on contact precautions. Findings: On 02/13/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled Application of Transmission-Based Precautions with a revised date of 11/05/2024, read in part .Contact Precautions: Intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents that are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident or the resident's environment. Staff caring for residents on Contact Precautions should wear gown and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with the resident or potentially contaminated areas in the resident's environment. Resident # 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's change in condition was immediately reported for 2 (#43, #82) of 2 (#43, #82) residents as evidenced by: 1. Staff failing to report bilateral lower extremity edema for Resident #43 and; 2. S10T (Transportation) failing to notify the physician of failed attempts to complete a consult for Resident #82's left shoulder pain. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Change in Resident's Condition or Status, with a last reviewed date of 05/2017, read in part . Policy Statement: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. 1. The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician, or physician on call when there has been a(n): d. significant change in the resident's physical, emotional, mental condition. 2. A significant change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-12 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer residents with newly diagnosed mental disorders or had a significant change in their mental condition to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) for evaluation and determination for 2 (#22, #74) of 3 (#22, #74 and #89) residents investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 39 residents. Findings: Resident #22 Review of Resident #22's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following pertinent diagnoses: Insomnia and Anxiety Disorder. Review of Resident #22's EHR revealed a Level I PASARR screening was completed on 02/07/2023 by the hospital case manager that the resident was admitted from. Further review of Resident #22's EHR revealed the resident was later diagnosed with Unspecified Psychosis on 12/08/2023. Review of Resident #22's February 2025 physician's orders revealed an order dated 02/15/2024 for an antipsychotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care was implemented for 1 (#107) out of 1 (#107) resident out of 39 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #107's weekly weights were completed as ordered. Findings: A review of Resident #107's admission Record, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, gastrostomy status and acute kidney failure. A review of Resident #107's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 8, which indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. A review of Resident #107's Order Summary Report revealed a physician's order, dated 09/20/2024 that read, weekly weight Q (every) Friday every evening shift every Friday. A review of Resident #107's weights in the EHR (Electronic Health Record) failed to reveal weekly weights on 10/04/2024, 10/11/2024, 10/18/2024, 11/01/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide form CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) 10123- Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) as required for 1 Resident (#97) out of 3 (#13, #97 and #107) residents reviewed for SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) Beneficiary Notification. The facility had a census of 121 residents. A review of Resident #97's SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form revealed that the facility initiated the resident's discharge from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted. Resident #97 was discharged from Medicare Part A services on 1/31/2025. Further review of Resident #97's EHR failed to reveal that a Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) form was provided to the resident. On 02/12/2025 at 3:19 PM, an interview was conducted with S19MDS/LPN (Minimum Data Set/Licensed Practical Nurse). S19MDS/LPN stated Resident #97's discharge was facility initiated, and the resident also had skilled benefit days remaining at the time of the discharge. S19MDS/LPN confirmed she did not provide Resident #97 a NOMNC form,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to provide a communication aid for 1 (#88) out of 3 (#65, #88, and #115) residents reviewed for communication. Findings: A review of Resident #88's admission record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, heart failure, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. A review of Resident #88's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #88's care plan initiated on 06/03/2024, revealed the resident had the potential for communication difficulties or declines due to speaks Spanish. Interventions included that read in part, use communication board or chart when needed/ordered for resident with difficulty in communication (initiated on 06/03/2024). On 02/10/2025 at 10:03 AM, an observation was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility through use of dialysis communication forms for 1 (#8) out of 2 (#8 and #223) residents sampled for dialysis services. Findings: On 02/12/2025, a review of the facility's agreement with the Contracted Dialysis Agency with an effective date of 01/01/2011 read in part, Collaboration of Care - Both parties shall ensure that there is documented evidence of collaboration of care and communication between the Nursing Facility and ESRD (End-Stage Renal Disease) Dialysis Unit. A review of Resident #8's admission record revealed an admission date of 11/27/2023 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, dependence on renal dialysis and chronic kidney disease. A review of Resident #8's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating his cognition was moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were capable of using call bells were able to reach the call bell for 1 (#60) of 39 sampled residents. Findings: Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited, to major depressive disorder and repeated falls. A review of Resident #60's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/30/2024, revealed in Section GG that she had no upper extremity impairments. On 02/10/2025 at 9:46 AM, an observation was made of Resident #60 in her room. The resident was lying in her bed and her call bell was on the night stand at the foot of her bed. The call bell was outside of the resident's reach. When asked, Resident #60 stated that she did not know where her call bell was. During an observation and interview with S18LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) on 02/10/2025 at 9:50 AM, she confirmed the resident's call bell was out of Resident #60's reach. S18LPN stated Resident #60 was capable of using…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's Responsible Party (RP) of a change in skin condition for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 (Resident #1,#2, #3, #R1, #R2, and #R3) sampled residents. Findings: A review of the facility's policy Diabetic Skin and Foot Care, with a last review date of 12/05/2024, revealed in part . 2. Notify MD (Medical Doctor) and responsible party on any changes in skin integrity. Review of nurse's progress note dated 11/19/2024 at 12:34 p.m. written by S2LPN/TN (Licensed Practical Nurse/Treatment Nurse) read in part . Resident has current skin issues. Skin note: left & right 2nd & 5th toes are black not sure why will have NP (Nurse Practitioner) look at them. Further review of Resident #3's nurse's progress notes failed to show evidence the RP was notified of the skin changes to the residents left and right toes. Review of the facility's grievances dated 11/25/2024, revealed in part: Resident #3's RP stated he was upset for not being called in a timely manner about a wound on Resident #3's toe, and discoloration to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and menu review, the facility's kitchen staff failed to follow the menu to ensure residents were served the appropriate portion/serving size of food during meals in order to meet the nutritional needs of the residents as evidenced by kitchen staff failing to use the correct serving utensils for pureed, mechanically soft, and non-mechanically altered foods. This deficient practice had the potential to contribute to an unpleasant dining experience, decreased intake, altered nutritional needs and weight loss for the 111 residents who consumed meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings: On 05/29/2024, a review of the facility's policy, Policy on Dietary Serving Sizes, revealed: Policy Purpose: To serve the appropriate portion/size of foods for meals. Procedure: 1. Use dietary menus provided by food supply company to provide the portion spread as recommended for each diet/texture using portion control information which is provided in dietary. Review of the lunch menu for 05/28/2024 revealed the following recommended serving portions: Carrot Souffle- ½…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure physician orders/plan of care were implemented as ordered for monitoring a bed alarm for proper functioning Q (every) shift for 1 (#2) of 4 (#1-#4)sampled residents. Findings: Review of Facility Policy titled, Policy for Fall Alarm, received and reviewed on 05/29/2024 read in part: 3. Alarms will be monitored every shift for proper functioning. Review of Resident #2's health record revealed an admission date of 10/18/2021 with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, Depression, Schizoaffective Disorder, and Insomnia. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 indicating the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Review of Resident #2's physician's orders revealed an order dated 01/16/2023 that read: Bed alarm while in bed monitor for proper functioning Q shift. Review of Resident #2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically transmit a completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) to the CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) system within 14 days after completion for 10 (#11, #21, #32, #37, #45, #54, #110, #113, #114 and #115) out of 11 (#11, #21, #32, #37, #45, #54, #110, #113, #114, #115 and #276) resident's investigated for resident assessment submission activities as evidenced by: Failing to submit a Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #45 and submit Discharge MDS assessments for Residents #11, #21, #32, #37, #45, #54, #110, #113, #114, and #115. Findings: Resident #54: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Major Depressive Disorder and Schizophrenia. A review of Resident #54's Discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 12/15/2023, revealed a status of opened, indicating the resident's assessment had not been completed. On 01/10/2024 at 2:39 p.m., an interview and review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement the residents' plan of care by not following physician orders and the care plan for 3 (#15, #53, #72) out of a finalized sample of 55 residents as evidenced by: 1.Failing to monitor and document for adverse reactions to an anticoagulant for Resident #15 and Resident #53. 2.Failing to apply hand splint as ordered for Resident #72. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 118 residents. Findings: Resident #53 Review of the facility's policy titled Anticoagulation-Clinical Protocol revealed; #5 The staff and physician will monitor for possible complications in individuals who are being anticoagulated. Review of Resident #53's records revealed an admission date of 07/21/2023 with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of the Native Coronary Artery. Review of Resident #53's EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) revealed Resident #53 was receiving an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure recipes for pureed meals were available for staff. This failure had the potential to contribute to an unpleasant dining experience, decreased intake, altered nutritional needs, and weight loss for 3 (#28, #35, and #81) out of 3 (#28, #35, and #81) residents who received pureed meals. Findings: Review of the manufacturer's instructions for the pureed rice in the facility's kitchen read in part: 6 servings = 3 cups water and 1/2 cup of rice 12 servings = 6 cups water and 1 cup of rice 24 servings =12 cups of water and 2 cups of rice Review of the manufacturer's instructions for the pureed meatloaf in the facility's kitchen read in part: Prepare on Stove top or conventional oven. On 01/08/2024 at 9:50 a.m., S16C (Cook) was observed preparing pureed rice. S16C boiled 8 cups (64 fluid ounces) of water then added two 8 ounce scoops (equal to 2 cups) of pureed rice. S16C should have used 3 cups of water and ½ cup of puree rice. On 01/09/2024 at 3:30 p.m., an observation was conducted in the kitchen with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary manner as evidenced by: 1. staff failing to wear gloves while handling raw meat; and 2. staff failing to discard contaminated meat. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 109 residents who consumed meals from the kitchen. The facility's census was 118. Findings: Review of a facility document titled, Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, read in part: 6. Employees must wash their hands: e. After handling raw meat and when switching between working with raw food and working with ready to eat food. 8. Contact between food and bare (ungloved) hands is prohibited. Review of a facility document titled Food Safety Requirements read in part: 2. Any suspicious or obviously contaminated food will be checked and discarded immediately. On 01/08/2024 at 8:35 a.m., an observation was made of the kitchen. Upon further observation it was revealed that S16C (Cook) was handling sausage without wearing gloves. S16C was observed rinsing her hands. She did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system of accounting of each resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf by failing to provide quarterly statements for 1 (# 54) of 3 (#48, #54, and #109) residents investigated for personal funds. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Accounting and Records of Resident Funds, read in part. Policy Statement. Our facility maintains accounting records of resident funds on deposit with the facility. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .5. Individual accounting records are made available to the resident through quarterly statements and upon request . Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Major Depressive Disorder and Schizophrenia. A review of the resident's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/28/2023 revealed that she had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 14, indicating that her cognition was intact. On 01/08/24 at 09:49 a.m., an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain privacy and confidentiality of residents' medical records for 2 out of 6 residents observed during medication pass. The facility had a total census of 118 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled, Security of Medication Cart, read in part: When EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) is not being used, computer screen must be turned into privacy screen or laptop must be closed. On 01/08/2024 at 12:15 p.m., an observation of medication pass was conducted on Hall 1 with S15LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). S15LPN was observed entering Resident #35's room to administer her medication. Further observation revealed that Resident #35's private medical information was visible on the laptop mounted on top of the medication cart. On 01/08/2024 at 12:17 p.m., an interview was conducted with S15LPN, who confirmed that she should have initiated the privacy screen before she left the medication cart to administer Resident #35's medication. On 01/09/2024 at 8:37 a.m., an observation of medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide residents with a safe, clean and homelike environment for 2 (#13 and # 34) out of 2 (#13 and #34) residents investigated for environment out of a total sample of 55 residents. Findings: Review of Policy titled Routine Resident Checks read in part, 1. To ensure the safety and well-being of our residents, designated staff shall make a routine resident and room check on each unit at least once per week. Review of the Supervisor Rounds log with each resident's room dated 01/03/2024 at 4:00 a.m. revealed a checklist that included in part checks for toilets and refrigerators. Resident #13 and Resident #34 were included in this log and marked that these items had been checked with no issues identified. Review of Resident #13's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus without complication, Unspecified Macular degeneration, Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension and Glaucoma. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0642 — isolatedEnsure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have an RN (Registered Nurse) conduct/coordinate each assessment with other health care professionals; certify that assessments are complete; sign and certify the accuracy of the assessment for 3 (#45, #54 and #276) residents of 55 total sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS (Minimum Data Set) Completion and Submission Timeframes, read in part .Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. 1. The assessment coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring that resident assessment are submitted to CMS's (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) assessment submission and processing (ASAP) system in accordance with current federal and state guidelines. Resident #45 Review of Resident #45's MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/08/2023 revealed a status of opened, indicating the Resident's assessment was not completed. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who need respiratory care were provided care consistent with professional standards for 1 (#29) of 2 (#29 and #56) residents investigated for respiratory care out of a total of 55 sampled residents, by failing to ensure that the resident's oxygen tubing was stored in a sanitary manner when not in use. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Departmental (Respiratory therapy)-Prevention of Infection read in part, Purpose. The purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment .Steps in the Procedure Infection Control Considerations Related to Oxygen Administration .8. Keep the oxygen cannula and tubing used PRN (as needed) in a plastic bag when not in use . Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease. A review of the physician's orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater, as evidenced by a calculated medication error rate of 33.33 percent. Findings: Review of a facility document titled, Administering Medications, read in part: Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed . 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame . 7. Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders). Resident #19 Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses in part: Stage 3 Chronic kidney disease, Polyneuropathy, Psychoactive substance abuse, Peripheral vascular disease, Dry eye syndrome, and Chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #19's January 2024 physician's orders revealed: Hydrocodone 7.5 mg (Milligrams) -acetaminophen 325 mg table, take 1 every 8 hours every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly and not left unattended on top of the medication cart while administering medications. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications revealed, in part: No medications are kept on top of the cart. The cart must be inaccessible to residents or others passing by. On 01/09/2024 at 8:05 a.m., an observation of medication pass on Hall 1 was conducted with S14LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), who was preparing to administer Resident #176's medication. After preparing the resident's medications, S14LPN entered Resident #176's room and left three medications on top of the medication cart unattended. Further review revealed that the medications were Pantoprazole 40 mg (Milligrams), Potassium chloride 10 meq (Milequivalant), and Amiodarone 200 mg. On 01/09/2024 at 8:07 a.m., an interview was conducted with S14LPN who confirmed that she left Pantoprazole, Potassium, and Amiodarone on top of the medication cart unattended and should not have. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility-wide assessment included any ethnic, cultural, or religious factors that may potentially affect the care provided by the facility. This deficient practice affected 1 resident (#105) with a potential to affect a census of 118 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Facility Assessment, revealed in part, the following: Policy Statement: A facility assessment is conducted annually to determine and update our capacity to meet the needs of and competently care for our resident during day-to-day operations. Determining our capacity to meet the needs of and care for our residents during emergencies is included in this assessment. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: . d. Religious, ethnic or cultural factors that affect the delivery of care and services, such as: . (4) Language translation requirements. Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] - 12/01/2023 included a profile…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to make efforts to demonstrate diligence and a genuine attempt to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to ensure residents were free from verbal and physical abuse in a timely manner after S6CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) abused 1 (#3) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. Findings: Cross Reference F600 Review of Resident #3's progress notes dated 10/13/2023 at 10:54 a.m. revealed a late entry on 10/11/2023 per S4ALPN (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse): S7CNA summoned me concerning resident. S7CNA reported S6CNA physically pushed Resident #3. S5CNA intervened and removed Resident #3 from the environment. Also, they both (S7CNA and S5CNA) stated S6CNA verbally stated (to the resident), I will put your head through the wall. As I was standing at my cart, I witnessed S6CNA telling her fellow aides, (Resident #3) tried to stand up on me, I pushed that bch out my way and I bet that bch will not try me again. I told (Resident #3) that I am not in the mood today because my mind not stable. S6CNA stated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#3) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents were free from abuse as evidenced by the facility failing to protect Resident #3 from physical and verbal abuse by S6CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). The deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 117. Findings: Review of Resident #3's electronic health records revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident), Convulsions, Dementia, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension. Review of Resident #3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #3's Functional Status as requiring supervision with bed mobility and limited assistance with transfer and locomotion. Review of Resident #3's progress notes dated 10/13/2023 at 10:54 a.m. revealed a Late Entry 10/11/2023 per S4ALPN (Agency Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility's nursing staff failed to implement the residents' plan of care for obtaining intake and output (I&Os) daily every shift for 3 (#1, #4, #5) of 3 residents care planned for dehydration in a sample of 5 (#1-#5) residents. Findings: Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Major Depressive Disorder, Unspecified Mood Disorder, Dementia, Congestive Heart Failure, Multiple Myeloma, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, and Acute Pulmonary Edema. Review of Resident #1's physician orders dated 05/16/2023 revealed, in part, an order for Torsemide (Diuretic) 20 mg (milligrams) tablet oral once daily every day. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan revealed, in part, a problem for Potential for dehydration related to diuretic use due to edema. One of the interventions for this problem included I & O (Intake and Output) recorded every shift. Review of Resident #1's electronic health record and paper chart did not reveal any records of I & O from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility's nursing staff failed to revise the resident's care plan upon return from the hospital and after a medication change for 1 (#5) of 5 (#1-#5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #5's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, Dementia, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Review of the resident's progress notes revealed he was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] where he was diagnosed with dehydration. The resident was discharged from the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the resident's physician orders revealed in part: Order dated 07/05/2023 Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg (milligram) capsule give 1 capsule oral once daily every day. Discontinued 08/21/2023; Order dated 07/05/2023 Furosemide (Lasix) 20 mg tablet give 1 tablet oral once daily every other day. Monitor for signs and symptoms of dehydration. Discontinued 07/27/2023. Review of MAR (Medication Administration Record) July 2023 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-08-29 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the posted nurse staffing information was current with the actual hours worked and posted on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift. The facility's census was 121. Findings: On 08/28/2023 at 8:00 a.m., an observation of the nurse staffing information posted on a cork board near the facility's main entrance revealed nurse staffing information for Tuesday 08/22/2023, Wednesday 08/23/2023, and Thursday 08/24/2023. There was no staffing data posted for 08/25/2023 through 08/28/2023. On 08/28/2023 at 3:52 p.m., another observation of the nurse staffing information posted at front entrance again revealed nurse staffing data for 08/22/2023 through 08/24/2023. There was no current nurse staffing data posted. On 08/28/2023 at 3:57 p.m., an interview and review of the nurse staffing information posted at the facility's main entrance was conducted with S1DON (Director of Nursing). S1DON stated that S8RFAM (Resident Funds Accounts Manager) was responsible for posting nurse staffing information. S1DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$268,528 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $164,824 — penalty dated 2025-02-12
- $103,704 — penalty dated 2024-12-09
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1926 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 30% | since 07/15/2022 |
| ALL THERAPY MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 30% | since 07/15/2022 |
| CARE POINT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 15% | since 07/15/2022 |
| JCOM LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 07/15/2022 |
| LEBLEU, DALTON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 15% | since 07/15/2022 |
| CASTILLE, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 07/15/2022 |
| COON, STEVEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 07/15/2022 |
| HENRY, JOHN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 07/15/2022 |
| HENSGENS, BRIAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 15% | since 07/15/2022 |
| HENSGENS, CRAIG | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 15% | since 07/15/2022 |
| LEMOINE, SHANNON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 07/15/2022 |
| VANHOOK, STEPHEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 07/15/2022 |
| PRICE, TEDDY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/15/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in LA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195564. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.