Haven Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 79.6 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.81 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 98% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of chemical restraints by failing to ensure a resident had an appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication for 1 (#13) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Findings: Review of Resident #13's record revealed an admission date of 04/17/2023 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral, psychotic, or mood disturbances, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder recurrent.Review of Resident #13's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed resident received antipsychotic medication and diuretic medication. Review of Resident #13's June 2026 Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 02/06/2026 for Abilify (antipsychotic medication) 5 mg oral tablet give 2.5 mg (1/2 tab) by mouth one time a day. Interview on 06/10/2026 at 9:58 a.m. with S3ADON revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that a resident receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to identify a wound for 1 (#33) of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions.Findings: Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed diagnoses which included chronic systolic congestive heart failure, unilateral primary osteoarthritis (right hip), atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, old myocardial infarction, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and major depressive disorder.Review of the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #33 revealed a BIMS score of 7 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed she required substantial-maximal assistance with most ADLs. Resident #33 was assessed to be at moderate risk for pressure ulcers and had no current pressure ulcers and no other skin problems identified.An interview with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies, and skill sets necessary to care for resident needs by not 1) having documentation of a change of condition regarding a resident's low blood pressure and/or low pulse for 1 (#84) of 3 closed records reviewed, and 2) notifying a resident's physician for a high blood sugar reading for 1 (#10) of 1 residents reviewed for insulin.Findings: Resident #84Review of the facility's Charting and Documentation policy and procedure (undated) revealed the following in part:Policy StatementAll services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care.Policy Interpretation and ImplementationDocumentation in the medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the Pharmacist failed to identify and report irregularities to the attending Physician, the facility's Medical Director and DON for 1 (#13) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of Resident #13's record revealed an admission date of 04/17/2023 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral, psychotic, or mood disturbances, generalized anxiety disorder, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #13's June 2026 physician's orders revealed an order dated 02/06/2026 for Abilify (antipsychotic medication) 5 mg oral tablet give 2.5 mg (1/2 tab) by mouth one time a day and an order dated 09/26/2025 for Lasix (diuretic medication) oral tablet 20 mg one tablet by mouth one time a day (monitor for edema).Review of the record revealed Resident #13 did not have an appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication (Abilify).Review of Resident #13's May and June 2026 MARs revealed the resident was administered a Lasix (diuretic) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 (#13) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to monitor for edema for Resident #13 while on receiving Lasix (diuretic medication).Findings: Review of Resident #13's record revealed an admission date of 04/17/2023 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral, psychotic, or mood disturbances, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder recurrent.Review of Resident #13's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed resident received a diuretic medication. Review of Resident #13's June 2026 Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 09/26/2025 for Lasix oral tablet 20 mg one tablet by mouth one time a day (monitor for edema).Review of Resident #13's May and June 2026 MARs revealed no documented evidence of monitoring for edema…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food under sanitary conditions. The facility failed to 1) ensure food item packages were sealed and not left open to air, 2) document refrigerator and freezer temperatures, and 3) document steam table food temperatures. Findings:On 06/08/2026 at 7:50 a.m. observation of the kitchen revealed one package of garlic bread and french toast were stored in the freezer open to air and not sealed properly. One package of hamburger buns was open to air and not sealed properly. Review of the temperature logs revealed no documented evidence of steam table food temperatures from 06/03/2026 - 06/07/2026. Further review of the logs revealed no documented evidence of refrigerator or freezer temperatures from 06/03/2026 - 06/07/2026. On 06/08/2026 at 8:00 a.m. S4DM confirmed the food item packages were open to air and not sealed properly, and no documentation of the steam table food temperatures, or refrigerator and freezer temperatures from 06/03/2026 - 06/07/2026.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment by failing to ensure biohazardous waste was not accessible to unauthorized personnel. Findings:Observations of the biohazardous waste storage closet on 06/08/2026 at 11:24 a.m. and 06/09/2026 at 11:38 a.m. revealed it was unlocked and the contents were accessible to residents and the public, including several filled sharps containers.On 06/10/2026 at 10:05 a.m., interview with S1Administrator confirmed the biohazard door should remain locked and should not be accessible to residents or the public.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assess residents for self-administration of medications for 1 (#35) of 1 sampled residents observed for medications available at the bedside. Findings: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 04/10/2025. Resident #35 had diagnoses that included rheumatoid arthritis, hypothyroidism, anxiety, edema, hypertension and depression.Review of the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition for daily decision making.Review of the June 2026 physician orders revealed Resident #35 had a skin tear to the left shin, and an order dated 05/02/2026 to clean with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Mupirocin ointment, apply non adherent dressing wrap daily and as needed until healed.On 06/08/2026 at 8:35 a.m., and 11:23 a.m. observations of Resident #35's room revealed a tube of Mupirocin ointment on the over bed table.On 06/08/2026 at 11:25 a.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent the development of new pressure ulcers for 2 (#7, #30) of 5 (#7, #30, #61, #66, #136) residents investigated for pressure ulcers. The deficient practice was evidenced by the facility failing to provide pressure reducing devices for a resident with a stage 3 pressure ulcer (#7) and for a resident who was at a moderate risk for developing pressure ulcers (#30). Findings: Review of the facility Pressure Injury Prevention and Management Policy revised 06/21/2024 revealed the following, in part: Policy: This facility is committed to the prevention of avoidable pressure injuries, unless clinically unavoidable, and to provide treatment and services to heal the pressure ulcer/injury, and prevent the development of additional pressure ulcers/injuries. 4. Interventions for Prevention and to Promote…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status by failing to follow up with the physician in a timely manner to implement the registered dietician's (RD) recommendation for 1 (#14) of 4 (#6, #14, #51, #63) residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings: Review of the medical record for resident #14 revealed an admission date of 07/06/2024 with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, and vitamin deficiency. Review of the record revealed that resident #14 had a weight of 179.0 pounds on 01/07/2025 and a weight of 162.5 pounds on 03/06/2025 showing a weight loss of 16.5 pounds. Review of active May 2025 physician orders revealed that resident #14 was not currently taking an appetite stimulant. Review of the medical records revealed on 04/01/2025 the RD sent a note to the physician with the recommendation for resident #14 to receive an appetite stimulant. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA