Deerfield Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 39.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 62.1 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible by not locking the door to the kitchen giving residents direct and full access to the kitchen and the ability to elope from the facility through an exterior door at the back of the kitchen for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for elopement.This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for Resident #1 on 08/29/2025 at 11:35 p.m. when Resident #1 exited out of the facility. Resident #1 was able to access the kitchen through an unlocked kitchen door, walk through the kitchen and leave through an exterior door at the back of the kitchen. Resident #1 was located by the police two blocks away from the facility on a two-lane road. Resident #1 was returned to the facility on [DATE] at 12:20 a.m. without injury. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation entry on 09/09/2025.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop comprehensive person centered care plans for each resident that met each residents' nursing needs for activities of daily living (ADLs) for 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) of 6 sampled residents.Findings:Resident #1Review of the medical record of Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 10/15/2001 and diagnoses which included dementia, psychosis, hypertensive heart disease and anxiety.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was dependent for toileting, personal hygiene and transfers from bed to chair. Review of the Resident #1's plan of care revealed impaired cardiac output - may use 2 person assist with ADL tasks as needed. Further review failed to identify the required assistance of 1 or more staff for each ADL.Resident #2Review of the medical record of Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 10/11/2003 and diagnoses which included dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 1 (#7) of 3 (#7, #8, #9) residents reviewed for falls. The facility failed to implement Resident #7's fall care plan intervention. Findings: Record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility 10/18/2022 with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, dementia with agitation, osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, edema, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, other schizoaffective disorder, protein- calorie malnutrition, osteoarthritis, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment 07/07/2025 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1 which indicated Resident #7 had severe cognitive impairment for daily decision making. Resident #7 had no range of motion impairment to upper or lower extremities. Resident #7 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff had appropriate competencies and skill set to provide care for 1 (#7) of 3 (#7, #8, #9) residents reviewed for falls. A nurse failed to send Resident #7 to the hospital after an unwitnessed fall.Review of the facility's policy and procedure related to Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting policy with a revised date of 06/9/2025 revealed in-part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation1. The nurse supervisor/charge nurse and/or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of the accident or incident.2. The following data, as applicable, shall be included on the Report of Incident/Accident form:a. The date and time the accident or incident took place;b. The nature of the injury/illness (e.g., bruise, fall, nausea, etc.);c. The circumstances surrounding the accident or incident;d. Where the accident or incident took place;e. The name(s) of witnesses and their accounts of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to develop a plan of care for 1 (#28) of 1 (#28) residents for discharge planning and failed to implement the plan of care for 1 (#46) of 1 (#46) residents by failing to place a fall mat on the floor at the bedside. Findings: Resident #28 On 05/12/2025 at 1:18 p.m., an interview with resident #28 revealed she spoke with S7Business Office Manager (BOM), whom was previously the social service director, over 6 months ago about getting her own apartment but she had not heard anything else about it. Review of the record for resident #28 revealed diagnoses including cerebral infarction, non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage with dysarthria and dysphagia, type 2 diabetes, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident #28 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated the resident was cognitively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medications by failing to administer insulin as ordered for 1 (#32) of 5 (#3, #4, #8, #32, and #36) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure for Administering Medications Policy revised April 2019 revealed the following, in part: Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including required time frame. Review of the medical record for resident #32 revealed diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, edema, hypokalemia, dementia, muscle wasting, altered mental status, hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #32's Brief Interview for Mental Status indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment for daily decision…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure: 1) freezer temperatures were maintained at a level to keep frozen food solid; 2) frozen foods and noodles were properly sealed and not left open to air; 3) storage containers for flour, corn meal, and sugar were free from spills and splatters; 4) frozen chopped meat was thawed appropriately, and 5) hygienic practices were followed during food service. S4Dietary Manager (DM) reported that 53 residents were served meals from the kitchen. Findings: Observation of the kitchen on 05/12/2025 at 8:18 a.m. revealed the following: -the freezer had multiple thawed items including: 2 packs of onion rings, 1 box of waffles, 1 box of egg patties open to air, 1 box of waffles, 1 box of oatmeal raisin cookies, and 1 box of omelets open to air; -the dry storage area had an opened bag of noodles stored in an opened plastic zip bag; -storage containers for flour, corn meal, and sugar were visibly soiled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0868 — pattern
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have quarterly quality assessment and assurance (QAA) meetings with required members of the QAA committee present. The failed practice was evidenced by the facility`s lack of documentation of 4th quarter of 2024 and 1st quarter of 2025 QAA meetings. Findings: Review of the QAA meetings revealed that the facility held meetings in the second and third quarters of 2024. Further review of the QAA meetings binder revealed that the facility did not have QAA meetings in the 4th quarter of 2024 and 1st quarter of 2025 with required participants. Interview with S1Administrator and S2DON on 05/14/2025 at 4:00 p.m. confirmed that the facility was not able to provide documentation of QAA meetings with required participants during the 4th quarter of 2024 and the 1st quarter of 2025.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections by failing to: 1) implement policies and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) by not wearing the appropriate personal protective equipment during care for 4 (#7, #8, #11, and #46) of 4 residents, 2) have signage or an indicator outside of rooms to determine residents that should be on EBPs for 6 (#2, #7, #8, #11, #46, and #50) of 6 residents that required EBPs, and 3) ensure infection control practices were maintained during catheter care for 1 (#16) of 1 residents observed for catheter care. Findings: Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, not dated, revealed in-part: Policy Statement: Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are utilized to prevent spread of multi-drug resistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment remained free from accident hazards by not conducting a bed rail/mattress safety assessment prior to implementing the use of side rails for 1 (#36) of 4 (#3, #36, #40, #50) residents reviewed for the use of side rails. Findings: On 05/12/2025 at 3:20 p.m., observation of resident #36 revealed she was up in the wheelchair. Observation of resident #36's bed at that time revealed both the top quarter rail and the bottom quarter rail on the right side of the bed were in the upright position and the left side of the bed was against the wall. On 05/13/2025 at 8:20 a.m., observation of resident #36 revealed she was sitting up in a wheelchair asleep. Observation of resident #36's bed at that time revealed both the top quarter rail and the bottom quarter rail on the right side of the bed were in the upright position and the left side of the bed was against the wall. On 05/14/2025 at 9:45 a.m., observation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interview, the facility failed to 1.) review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation and 2.) assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation for 1 (#36) of 4 (#3, #36, #40, #50) residents reviewed for bed rails. Findings: Review of the Bed Safety and Bed Rails policy and procedure revised August 2022: Policy Statement Resident beds meet the safety specifications established by the Hospital Bed Safety Workgroup. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The resident's sleeping environment is evaluated by the interdisciplinary team. 2. Consideration is given to the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort, and freedom of movement. 3. Bed frames, mattresses and bed rails are checked for compatibility and size prior to use. 4. Bed dimensions are appropriate for the resident's size. 5. Regardless of mattress type, width, length, and/or depth, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-09-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $914K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA