Oak Lane Wellness & Rehabilitative Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 74.7 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility staff failed to recognize and properly respond to a resident who was demonstrating exit seeking behaviors or recognize the Wanderguard alarm to prevent elopement for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents investigated for elopement (Resident #1, #4, #5, #6 and #7). This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 03/22/2025 at 10:40 a.m. when Resident #1, a moderately cognitively impaired resident, eloped from the facility located in a residential area. On the morning of 03/22/2025, prior to his elopement, Resident #1 asked staff members for the code to the facility's door alarm and expressed that he wanted to go home before exiting the facility undetected by staff. Staff failed to recognize the residents exit seeking behavior and the sound of the wanderguard as he went out of the door. On 03/22/2025 at 10:50 a.m., the facility received a phone call from Resident #1's responsible party that Resident #1 was at his home. Resident #1 walked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-05-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement its antibiotic stewardship policy to timely evaluate culture and sensitivity results in order to determine appropriate antibiotic usage by failing to: 1. Obtain culture report and sensitivity data in a timely manner in order to initiate possible treatment for Residents #43 and #77 and; 2. Notify the physician of culture report and sensitivity data in order to ensure Resident #380 was prescribed the appropriate antibiotic, out of 6 (Residents #34, #43, #54, #65, #70, #77, and #380) residents reviewed for infection control tracking and trending during the Infection Control facility task. The facility's census was 77. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm when Resident #43's final urine culture and sensitivity final report dated 04/26/24 showed that the bacteria, Klebsiella pneumoniae, was present in the resident's urine. The facility failed to have the final culture and sensitivity report resulted on 4/26/2024 in the resident's record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's plan of care was implemented as ordered through five consecutive months by failing to follow physician orders for completing wound care and monitor swelling for 1 (Resident #2) out of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents.Findings:Review of Resident #2's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease and dementia.Review of Resident #2's November 2025 physician's order and TAR (Treatment Administration Order) revealed the following order dated 11/07/2025: Skin tear to R (right) forearm. Clean with NS (normal saline), apply TAO (triple antibiotic ointment), cover with a dry dressing daily until healed. The TAR failed to reveal evidence that treatment for the skin tear to the right forearm was administered for the resident for November 2025.Review of Resident #2's December 2025 physician's order and TAR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care and/or physician's orders for 1 (Resident #38) out of 29 sampled residents. This deficient practice was evidenced when the facility failed to implement standing orders for constipation for Resident #38. Findings: Review of Resident #38's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Alzheimer's disease, Diabetes Mellitus and Cerebral Infarction. Review of Resident #38's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Section C, revealed Resident #38's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 12, indicating her cognition was moderately impaired. Further review of the assessment, under Section H revealed Resident #38's bowel continence was always incontinent. Review of Resident #38's Care Plan revealed in part, risk for inadequate bowel pattern. Interventions included in part, administer medication as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain professional standards for food service safety by failing to: 1. Discard food items that were past the used by date, 2. Label and date opened food items stored in the walk in cooler, 3. Label and date an opened food item in the area where food is prepared 4. Label and date an opened food item in the pantry, 5. Remove a dented can from the dry storage area, 6. Ensure kitchen staff wear proper hair restraints. The facility's census was 69. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Food Receiving and Storage with a last review date of 08/07/2024 read in part, Policy Statement: Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. 8. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use bydate). A review of the facility's policy titled Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices with a last review date of 08/07/2024 read in part, Policy Statement: Food and nutrition services employees will follow appropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to promote and facilitate residents' self- determination through support of the residents' choice about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident for 1 (#59) out of 29 sampled residents. The facility failed to provide a diet according to Resident #59's food preferences. Findings: A review of Resident #59's electronic health record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Cerebral Infarction, Dementia, and Vitamin Deficiency. A review of the Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 06, indicating the resident's cognition was severely impaired. On 06/23/2025 at 11:18 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #59 consuming lunch. He did not eat the mixed vegetables or beans that were on his lunch tray. An interview was conducted with Resident #59 at this time,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #66) out of 29 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #66's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to unspecified combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure. Further review revealed Resident #66 was discharged on 04/25/2025. Review of Resident #66's Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a code of 2 in section A0310 - Type of Assessment, which indicated unplanned discharge. Review of Resident #66's care plan revealed a focus area initiated on 01/28/2025 for D/C (discharge) planning - active plans to return to the community. A review of progress notes revealed on 04/24/2025 at 10:59 a.m. S12LPN (Licensed practical Nurse) wrote: New order per (by) Dr. (doctor) .for patient to be discharged home with home…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receives services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 (#16) of 1 (#16) residents investigated for ADL care. The sample size was 29. Findings: Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity and encounter for palliative care. Review of Resident #16's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a code of 1 in section GG0115 A. Upper extremity, indicating the resident had impairment on one side. Further review revealed a code of 03 in section GG0130. Self-Care I. Personal hygiene indicating the following .Helper lifts, holds, or supports trunk or limbs, but provides less than half the effort. Review of Resident #16's care plan revealed a focus area initiated on 01/24/2025 for mobility and self-care needs with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to properly store respiratory equipment for 2 (Resident #16 and Resident #22) out of 3 residents (Resident #16, Resident #22 and Resident # 63) investigated for respiratory care. Findings: Resident #22: Review of Resident #22's electronic medical record revealed that she was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Review of the resident's June 2025 physician orders revealed an order to change replacement cushion (mask) on CPAP machine every month on the 22nd. On 06/23/2025 at 09:15 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #22's CPAP mask in a plastic storage bag dated 05/13/2025. On 06/23/2025 at 2:35 p.m., an interview and observation was conducted with S2DON (Director of Nursing). S2DON stated the plastic storage bags for the CPAP mask should be changed once a month when they change the CPAP mask. She confirmed the plastic bag with the resident's CPAP mask was dated 05/13/2025. She stated that the plastic storage bag should have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #50 Review of Resident #50's electronic medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on 09/12//2022 with the following diagnoses in part, but not limited to, Type 2 Diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On 06/23/2025 at 10:20 a.m., a medication administration observation was conducted with S15LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). After S15LPN drew up Resident #50's insulin injection, she proceeded to the resident's room and administered his injection without donning gloves prior to giving the injection. On 06/23/2025 at 10:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with S15LPN. S15LPN confirmed she did not wear gloves when she administered Resident #50's injection. She stated that she should have worn gloves to give the injection. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 resident (#2) out of 7 (#1,#2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Prevention of Pressure Ulcer/Injuries, with a last reviewed date of August 2024, read in part: 1. Evaluate, report, and document potential changes in the skin with weekly skin assessments. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including; type 2 diabetes, pressure ulcer of sacral region, and unstageable pressure induced deep tissue damage of other site. Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed section M in part: Resident has a pressure ulcer/injury, at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #2's care plan initiated on 12/12/2024 revealed an intervention to conduct body audit per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on in record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility by failing to ensure dialysis communication forms were filled out completely for 1 (#66) resident sampled for dialysis. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 1 dialysis resident that resided in the facility. Findings: On 05/22/2024 at 2:27 p.m., a request was made for a facility policy for dialysis communication. No policy was provided by the time of survey completion and exit. A review of Resident #66's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed an admission date of 01/11/2023 with diagnoses that included End Stage Renal Disease, Essential Hypertension, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A review of Resident #66's Physician's Orders from May 2024 revealed an order with a start date of 01/26/2024 that read; Hemodialysis at dialysis center on Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday. Send communication form on all visits. A review of Resident #66's dialysis communication forms revealed a total of 39 sheets with date ranges from 02/01/2024 through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$96,785 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $65,458 — penalty dated 2025-04-02
• $31,327 — penalty dated 2024-05-14
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-21 for 7 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA