Bayside Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 151 beds and averages 94.0 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.16 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.14 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to:1. implement enhanced barrier precautions for a resident who received medications through a midline catheter (Resident #96); 2. clean glucometers used for multiple residents as per the manufacturer's recommendations for 2 (glucometer a, glucometer b); and, 3. ensure a staff member performed proper hand hygiene during wound care (Resident #18).This deficient practice was identified for 2 (Resident #18, Resident #96) of 7 (Resident #4, Resident #18, Resident #45, Resident #48, Resident #51, Resident #60, Resident #96) sampled residents reviewed for infection control and for 2 (glucometer a, glucometer b) of 2 (glucometer a, glucometer b) glucometers reviewed for cleaning. Findings:1.Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy and procedure revised on 01/22/2025 revealed, in part, it was the policy of the facility to implement EBP for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Further review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was free from flies for 12 ( Resident #18, Resident #21, Resident #27, Resident #34, Resident #37, Resident #45, Resident #50, Resident #60, Resident #61, Resident #64, Resident #67, Resident #96) of 13 (Resident #18, Resident #21, Resident #27, Resident #34, Resident #37, Resident #45, Resident #50, Resident #60, Resident #61, Resident #64, Resident #67, Resident #90, Resident #96) sampled residents reviewed for environment. Findings:Review of the facility's Pest Control Program policy and procedure, revised on 01/22/2025 revealed, in part, the policy was to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common house hold pests and rodents. Further review revealed the facility was to utilize a variety of methods in controlling certain seasonal pests and/or flies and this would involve indoor and outdoor methods that are deemed appropriate by the outside pest service company. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure an enteral feeding bag (bag which contains an enteral formula for purpose of supplying nutrients directly into the stomach), free water flush bag (bag of water used to supply hydration needs into the stomach), and a syringe (used to flush and check placement of gastrostomy tube in the stomach) were properly labeled according to professional standards of practice. This practice was identified for 1 (Resident #4) of 1 (Resident #4) sampled resident investigated for enteral feeding. Findings:Review of Resident #4's electronic health record revealed, in part, Resident #4 had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction (blood flow to the brain is interrupted causing brain damage) and an encounter for attention to gastrostomy (tube inserted into the stomach for enteral nutrition). Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/10/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #4 had an enteral feeding tube and received fluid and calories…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident's smoking status to determine if a resident needed supervision or assistance for smoking for 1 (Resident #38) of 1 (Resident #38) sampled resident investigated for accident hazards. Findings:Review of facility's Acknowledgment of Facility's Smoking and Tobacco Use Policy dated, January/2024, revealed, in part, for the safety and well-being of all individuals it was paramount, and the policy of the facility, that all smoking residents were evaluated using the Safe Smoking/Tobacco Use Assessment upon admission, quarterly, and when there was a significant change in the residents ability to handle their smoking products.Review of the Facility's Smoking Program List, dated 09/02/2025 revealed, in part, a list of the facility's residents who were identified as safe and unsafe smokers. Further review of the facility's smoker's list revealed Resident #38 was not identified on the list as being a safe or unsafe smoker. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided for 1 (Resident #32) of 1 (Resident #32) residents observed during catheter (a medical device that drains urine from the bladder) care. Findings: Review of Resident #32's medical records revealed, in part, an admit date of 09/15/2021. Review of Resident #32's October 2024 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order to change the suprapubic catheter dressing daily and as needed. Observation on 10/15/2024 at 1:50 p.m. revealed S5Wound Care Nurse (WCN) entered Resident #32's room to perform catheter care. Further observation revealed Resident #32's door and bedside curtain remained opened, exposing Resident #32 to the hallway while Resident #32 received catheter care from S5WCN. In an interview on 10/15/2024 at 1:58 p.m., S5WCN indicated she did not pull the curtain or close the door prior to providing catheter care to Resident #32. S5WCN further indicated due to Resident #32's door and privacy curtain remaining open during catheter care Resident #32 was exposed to anyone that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an alleged incident of resident to resident verbal and/or physical abuse was reported to the State Survey Agency for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #440) of 3 (Resident #2, Resident #61, and Resident #440) sampled residents investigated for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Reporting of Resident Abuse or Neglect - Statewide Incident Management System Reporting dated 01/10/2024 revealed, in part, the facility's policy is to provide an environment free from abuse. Further review revealed the definition of verbal abuse was any use of oral language that included disparaging (an opinion of little worth) and derogatory terms to the resident. Further review revealed the definition of physical abuse included hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking an individual. Further review revealed all incidents of alleged abuse must be reported immediately to the Administrator, the Director of Nursing and the respective Department Head. Further review revealed reports of abuse will be reported to Health Standard…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an alleged incident of resident to resident verbal and/or physical abuse was thoroughly investigated for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #440) of 3 (Resident #2, Resident #61, and Resident #440) sampled residents investigated for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Reporting of Resident Abuse or Neglect - Statewide Incident Management System Reporting policy dated 01/10/2024 revealed, in part, the facility's policy was to provide an environment free from abuse. Further review revealed the definition of verbal abuse was any use of oral language that included disparaging (an opinion of little worth) and derogatory terms to the resident. Further review revealed the definition of physical abuse included hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking an individual. Further review also revealed all incidents of alleged abuse must be reported immediately to the Administrator, the Director of Nursing and the respective Department Head. Review revealed the facility's policy was to provide timely and thorough investigations of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program in order to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections as evidence by failing to ensure: 1. a resident's infection causing organism was included as part of the facility's infection control surveillance; 2. a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not use gloves stored in her pockets for catheter (a medical device that drains the bladder) care for 1 (Resident #32) of 1 (Resident #32) residents observed for catheter care; and, 3. staff provided wound care in a sanitary manner for 1 (Resident #12) of 1(Resident #12) residents observed for wound care. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's June 2024 infection tracking and trending documentation revealed no documented evidence that the infection causing organism was included in the facility's infection surveillance. Review of the facility's July 2024 infection tracking and trending documentation revealed no documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system for the provision of feedback reports on antibiotic usage, antibiotic resistance patterns based on laboratory data, and antibiotic prescribing practices for practitioners. Findings: Review of the facility's Infection Control documentation revealed no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence that the facility had a system for the provision of feedback reports on the facility's antibiotic usage and antibiotic resistance patterns based on laboratory data. In an interview on 10/15/2024 at 2:48 p.m., S2Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist confirmed she had no documented evidence regarding the usage of antibiotics or antibiotic resistance patterns in the facility.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a new identified mental health diagnoses was referred for a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II evaluation as required for 1 (Resident #60) of 2 (Resident #9 and Resident #60) sampled residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings: Review of Resident #60's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Level I PASARR. Further review revealed Resident #60 was diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) on 11/15/2021 and Delusional Disorder on 02/10/2023. Review of Resident #60's EMR revealed there was no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence, of a Level II PASARR being completed for Resident #60. In an interview on 10/15/2024 at 1:26 p.m., S4Social Worker indicated she had never completed an evaluation for a Level II PASARR. S4Social Worker further confirmed she had not completed an evaluation for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA