No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Presbyterian Village Of Homer

3700 Hwy. 79 South, Homer, LA 71040 · Non profit - Corporation · 79 certified beds · (318) 927-6133 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (318) 927-6133 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2023
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
620 E College St · (318) 927-2024 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
815 W Main St · (318) 927-3537 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
402 N Second St
Park
168 Morris Cir · (318) 927-2976 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
772 Moreland Rd

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.8%17.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%5.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder10.3%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.2%2.3%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.2%17.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication35.6%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.2%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%5.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.7%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.1%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication6.1%3.1%1.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.6%76.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission33.0%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%14.8%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.542.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.822.741.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

35.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.94U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.59hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.94 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 55% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF35.5%CMS range 24.3–49.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.8%CMS range 8.8–18.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified2.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.2%CMS range 5.2–15.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.561.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.18
RN hours/ resident / day
1.34
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.52
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
34.1%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 47.6 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-29)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-04)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure an RN (Registered Nurse) was on duty for 8 consecutive hours per day, 7 days a week, for 4 days within FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 1 2025 (October 1- December 31). Findings: Review of the facility's PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report for FY Quarter 1 2025 (October 1- December 31) revealed there were no RN hours for four or more days within the quarter. Further review revealed no RN hours for the dates of 10/27/2024, 11/30/2024, 12/01/2024, and 12/28/2024. During an interview on 05/28/2025 at 1:00 p.m. S1 Administrator reported he was responsible for completing the PBJ staffing report. S1 Administrator reviewed the PBJ for FY Quarter 1 2025 (October 1-December 31) and reported during that time period the facility only had one full time RN and 4 part time RNs. S1 Administrator confirmed there was not RN coverage for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 10/27/2024, 11/30/2024, 12/01/2024, and 12/28/2024 and there should have been.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #47 Review of Resident #47's record revealed an admission date of 12/16/2024 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, muscle wasting, lack of coordination, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, aphasia, hyperlipidemia, reflux, depression, polyosteoarthritis, heart disease, and pseudobulbar affect. Review of Resident #47's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 3 which indicated severe cognitive impairment for daily decision making. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #47 was provided substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility and dependent on staff for toileting. Resident #47 had limitation in range of motion on one side of upper and lower extremities. Review of Resident #47's May 2025 Physician's Orders revealed no documented evidence of an order for the use of bedrails/positioning bars/turn bars. Review of Resident #47's care plan dated 05/08/2025 revealed Resident 47's bed was equipped with turning bars for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Resident #39 Observations on 05/27/2025 at 9:45 a.m., 05/28/2025 at 10:10 a.m. and at 1:45 p.m. of Resident #39's room revealed the air conditioner unit contained a black substance on the vents and needed to be cleaned. On 05/28/2025 at 3:45 p.m., an observation of Resident #39's room with S2 DON present revealed Resident #39's air conditioner had a black substance on the vents. S2 DON confirmed the air conditioner vents needed to be cleaned. Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 2 (#3 and #39) of 2 residents rooms observed. The failed practice was evidenced by 1) Resident #3 and #39's air conditioner vents needed cleaning, and 2) Resident #3's bed control needed cleaning, and 3) Resident #3's room had a bedrail stored under his bed. Findings: Resident # 3 Observations on 05/27/2025 at 10:05 a.m. and 05/28/2025 at 12:10 p.m. of Resident #3's room revealed the air conditioner vent was dirty with a buildup of dust, the bed control was noted on the Resident's night stand and was dirty and had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure each resident/RP (Responsible Party) was notified in advance of care planning conferences to enable resident/RP participation for 1 (#27) of 28 sampled residents. Findings: Review of facility's undated Care Plan Policy revealed, in part: Application of Policy . 4. Care plan conferences (meetings) are scheduled for each resident at admission and continuing at least quarterly by the MDS Coordinator. The resident and his/her legal guardian/family member is given at least a seven (7) day notice of invitation to attend and participate in the resident's care planning conferences. The conference may be scheduled at an alternate date and time if more convenient for the resident and/or family member. 5. The MDS Coordinator or designee will invite family members and maintain records of the invitation and whether the resident and/or family member participated in the care plan conference. 6. Participation by the resident and/or family member is not limited to attending the scheduled conference but may be done by conversations in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician documented a rationale for denying a gradual dose reduction for 1 (#36) of 5 (#17, #24, #35, #36 and #47) Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #36 had diagnoses including restlessness and agitation, pseudobulbar affect, depression, muscle wasting, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #36's May 2025 physician orders revealed an order dated 02/26/2025 for Abilify 5 mg (milligrams) every morning and evening. Review of the consultant Pharmacist report revealed a dose reduction letter dated 03/18/2025 recommended a gradual dose reduction for Abilify 5 mg bid (two times a day) for Resident #36. Further review of the report revealed the physician chose not to attempt a gradual dose reduction, and failed to give a written clinical rationale. On 05/28/2025 at 3:50 p.m. interview with S2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition in the kitchen as evidenced by the deep fryer's internal compartment having a heavy grease buildup. Findings: Initial observation of the kitchen on 05/27/2025 at 8:50 a.m. revealed the deep fryer internal compartment had a heavy grease buildup and needed to be cleaned. On 05/27/2025 at 2:27 p.m. S5 DM (Dietary Manager) confirmed the deep fryer's internal compartment had a grease buildup and needed to be cleaned.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement written policies and procedures to protect residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of their property. The facility failed to obtain documentation of Agency/Contract Staff's criminal background checks, Adverse Actions checks, and/or CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) Registry checks prior to allowing 17 of 17 unlicensed Agency/Contract Staff reviewed (S6 CNA, S7 CNA, S8 CNA, S9 CNA, S10 CNA, S11 CNA, S12 CNA, S13 CNA, S14 CNA, S15 CNA, S16 CNA, S17 CNA, S18 CNA, S19 CNA, S20 CNA, S21 CNA, and S22 CNA) to work with residents in the facility. This practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, & Exploitation policy revealed in part: The facility must not employ or otherwise engage individuals who: a. Have been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law. b. Have had a finding entered into the State nurse aide registry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-04 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment which included the resident's safe smoking assessment for 1 (#27) of 1 (#27) resident reviewed for smoking. Findings: Review of the Facility Smoking Policy (no date noted) revealed in part: Smoking Procedure: 4. Residents who smoke will be assessed upon admission, quarterly, and whenever there is a significant change in their ability to safely handle their smoking products. Review of resident #27's medical record revealed she had the following diagnoses in part: cerebral infarction with hemiplegia, unspecified affecting right dominant side, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, and memory deficit following cerebral infarction. Review of resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 which indicated resident was unable to be tested. Further review revealed resident #27 required extensive to total assistance for most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions during transfers for 2 (#44, #46) of 2 (#44, #46) residents reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Findings: On 06/04/2024 at 4:16 p.m. review of the undated Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) Policy and Procedures (no date noted) in part revealed: Enhanced Barrier Precautions are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. Enhanced barrier precautions include gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for resident known to be colonized or infected with MDROs as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisitions (e.g. residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices). Enhanced Barrier Precautions are an approach of targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities, designed to reduce transmission of Staph Aureus and MDROs. Overview: 1. MDRO…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal abuse by staff. The facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse by staff for 4 (#1 #2, #3, #4) of 4 (#1 #2, #3, #4) sampled residents. Findings: Review of facility policy and procedure Reporting of Abuse or Suspected Abuse (no policy date) revealed in part: Residents have the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse .Definition of Abuse .Verbal Abuse is the use of oral, written and gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents . Review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident Report initiated 09/08/2023 revealed in part: Victim: Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4 Accused: S2 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) Allegation: Verbal Abuse-substantiated S5 Social Service Director spoke with Resident #1 on 09/08/2023 and Resident #1 stated she could not remember what S2 CNA said, but S2 CNA was really, really ugly and Resident #1 reported S2 CNA told her, I hate you. Resident #1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation of verbal abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours to the State Survey Agency for 4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) residents reviewed for an abuse allegation. Findings: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed an admit date of 11/17/2022 and diagnoses including, but not limited to: Lymphedema, Atrial Fibrillation, and Status Post Bowel Resection. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 08/31/2023 revealed the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15 out of 15, indicating the Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed an admit date of 08/15/2022 and diagnoses including, but not limited to: Congestive heart failure, Delusional Behaviors, Anxiety Disorder, and Bipolar Disorder. Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/13/2023 revealed the resident had a BIMS score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision and assistance with devices to prevent accidents by failing to use proper assistance with transfers for 1 Resident (#10) of 2 Residents (#10 and #32) reviewed for accident hazards. Findings: Review of Resident #10's clinical record revealed a diagnosis of morbid obesity and rheumatoid arthritis. Review of Resident #10's clinical record revealed on 07/05/2023 resident's height was 61 inches and weight was 252 pounds. Review of Resident #10's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed resident requires total assistance with two persons for transfers. Review of Resident #10's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 04/11/2023 revealed resident had upper and lower extremity impairement on both sides and requied total dependence and two person physical assistance with transfers. Review of Resident #10's clincial record revealed a nurse's note dated 04/11/2023 indicating resident required two person lift assistance with transfers to and from bed to wheelchair. An observation on 07/10/2023 at 9:20 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-06-04 · tag F0851 — pattern
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit (PBJ) Payroll Based Journal staffing data as required. The facility census was 46 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's PBJ Staffing Data Report - [NAME] Report 1705D Fiscal Year Quarter 1 (10/2023 - 12/2023) revealed, in part, the facility triggered regarding they failed to electronically submit PBJ staffing data as required. During an interview on 06/04/2024 at 4:00 p.m., S1Administrator reported he failed to submit PBJ staffing data for the above Quarter 1 of 2024 (10/2023 - 12/2023).

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ABERCROMBIE, TONIIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/27/2009
WILLIAMS, JIMMYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/24/2018
ABSHIRE, BENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/11/2018
BAYS, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/11/2018
BRAY, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/11/2018
DOWIES, MARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/11/2018
HILLIDGE, PATSYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2011
HOOD, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/11/2018
JILES, RAYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/11/2018
LEWIS, JOELLYNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/11/2018
WARE, RUSHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/11/2018
WATSON, CHLOEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/11/2018

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 58%Medicare 19%Other / private 23%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$305per resident / day
operating cost
$9,273per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$307per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195579. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next