No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Maison Teche Nursing Center

7307 Old Spanish Trail, Jeanerette, LA 70544 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 121 certified beds · (337) 276-4514 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (337) 276-4514 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0568)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2312 E Main St · (337) 560-1711 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1801 Main St · (337) 276-4101 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1720 Martin Luther King Jr Dr · (337) 579-2258 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6017 E Old Spanish Trl · (337) 364-1777

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.7%17.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%5.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder4.7%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.6%2.3%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.9%17.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.6%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.7%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.5%15.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.6%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%3.1%1.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.0%76.3%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission35.3%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.4%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.862.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.832.741.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
59.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery

Met the expected recovery: 59.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.7%CMS range 30.3–55.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 8.0–18.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge59.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge71.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay5.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.2–14.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.271.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-13)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-13 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the most recent survey results of the facility were posted in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents. The facility's census was 87.Findings:Review of the facility's survey history in the state agency's database revealed the following: Revisit Complaint Survey dated 10/30/2024;Complaint Survey dated 11/06/2024;Revisit Complaint Survey dated 11/26/2024;Recertification, Re-Licensure, State Licensure Survey dated 12/04/2024;Revisit Re-Licensure, State Licensure Survey dated 01/13/2025;Complaint Survey dated 01/28/2025;Complaint Survey dated 01/28/2025;Complaint Survey dated 02/25/2025; andComplaint Survey dated 08/26/2025.On 01/11/2026 at 1:30 p.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S1ADM (Administrator). S1ADM stated the survey results were in a binder attached to the bulletin board near the dining room. S1ADM reviewed the binder and confirmed the last survey results in the binder were dated 10/15/2024. S1ADM confirmed the most recent survey results…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for 2 (#41 and #76) of 34 sampled residents by:not monitoring behaviors and side effects of medications for Resident #41, andnot completing skin checks for Resident #76 per the physician's order and care plan.Findings:Resident #41Review of Resident #41's electronic health record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder, other specified depressive episodes, and generalized anxiety disorder.A review of Resident #41's physician orders for January 2026 revealed the following orders:-order dated 08/01/2024 for Trazodone (an antidepressant) 50 mg (milligram), give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime.-order dated 08/02/2024 for Zoloft (an antidepressant) 25 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day.-order dated 09/04/2025 for Clorazepate Dipotassium (an antianxiety) 3.75 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the provider failed to revise a resident's care plan for 1 (Resident #42) out of 34 sampled residents as evidenced by the care plan failing to reflect the resident's plans for discharge out of the facility.Findings Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident #42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was able to participate in the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact.On 01/11/2026 at 9:34 a.m., an initial interview was conducted with Resident #42. Resident #42 stated he really wanted to get out of the nursing facility and move into his own place. Review of Resident #42's care plan meeting dated 03/19/2025 revealed: Resident hopeful waiver will find housing soon with S3MDS/LPN (MDS Licensed Practical Nurse) and S5SSD (Social Services Director) were present.Review of Resident #42's care plan meeting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program by failing to ensure staff utilized appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) while administering a water flush via feeding tube for 1(Resident #5) sampled resident was reviewed for tube feeding. Findings:A review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, with a last reviewed date of 04/01/2024, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Enhanced barrier precautions refer to an infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities. High-contact resident care activities include: . g. device care or use central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received mail on Saturdays. This had the potential to affect 90 residents residing in the facility. Findings: On 12/03/2024 at 2:49 p.m., during the resident council meeting, Resident #51 stated residents did not receive mail on Saturdays. On 12/04/2024 at 9:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S12CNASUP (Certified Nursing Assistant Supervisor) and S11HR (Human Resources). S12CNASUP stated the mail was delivered to the residents on Monday through Friday, but not on Saturdays. She stated the office was closed on weekends, and staff were not available to distribute mail on Saturdays. S11HR confirmed the residents received mail Monday through Friday but the mail carrier holds the mail on the weekend until the following Monday. S11HR stated that the facility does not have staff in the office to deliver the mail to the residents on the weekends. S11HR stated that she was not aware that it was regulatory for the residents to receive mail on the weekend. S12CNASUP confirmed she was aware residents were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #39 Review of Resident #39's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction, Heart Failure, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Overactive Bladder. Review of Resident #39's Brief Interview Mental Status revealed a score of 12, indicating moderately intact cognition. Review of Physician Orders dated 08/01/2024, read in part .compression stocking on daily, remove at night. On 12/02/2024 at 10:12 a.m., an observation of Resident #39 was conducted. The resident was observed sitting in her wheelchair with Christmas socks on bilateral feet, no compression stockings were noted. On 12/02/2024 at 3:00 p.m., a follow up observation and interview was conducted with Resident #39 who stated that staff had not applied her compression stockings that morning. On 12/03/2024 at 1:00 p.m., another observation and interview was conducted with Resident #39 who was observed without compression stockings on. The resident stated that staff had not applied…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure a resident's rights to personal privacy for 2 (#2, #39) of 2 (#2, #39) residents out of a total sample of 36 residents investigated for Activities of Daily Living by failing to ensure: 1. Resident #2 had privacy while in the bathroom; and 2. Resident #39 had the room door and bathroom door closed prior to staff providing personal care. Findings: 1. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Paranoid Schizophrenia, and Anxiety. Review of Resident #2's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 15, which indicated normal cognition. On 12/02/2024 at 9:15 a.m., Resident #2 stated Resident #54, who resided in the next room, made comments to her when she was in the bathroom. She stated if she passed gas in the bathroom, Resident #54 would state he heard that and laugh at her. She added that Resident #54 also would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 1 (#35) out of 5 (#18, #35, #36, #46 and #60) residents investigated for environment, out of a total sample of 36 residents. Findings: Review of a facility policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment, reviewed 01/2024, indicated Policy: In accordance with the residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 3. Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Parkinsonism and End Stage Renal Disease. Review of Resident #35's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 09/17/2024 revealed he had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15, indicating his cognition was intact. During an observation and interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a newly diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for 1 (#31) of 3 (#3, #31, #54) residents investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 36 residents. Findings: A review of Resident #31's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed she was diagnosed with Schizoaffective Disorder on 12/14/2022. A review of the Resident #31's physician's orders for December 2024 revealed resident had been prescribed the antipsychotic medication Aripiprazole 2mg (milligrams) related to the diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder. Further review of Resident #31's record revealed a Level 1 PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) dated 07/21/2022. There was no evidence that a new review or a Level II PASARR had been submitted to the appropriate state-designated authority…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment/services to prevent further avoidable reduction of Range of Motion (ROM) and mobility as evidenced by a resident being unable to use his left leg prosthetic limiting his ability to walk for 1 (Resident #60) of 2 (#36 and #60) residents investigated for positioning and mobility in a final sample of 36 residents. Findings: Review of Resident #60's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 02/16/2023 with diagnoses that included acquired absence of left leg below the knee with an onset date of 07/23/2019, other specified Depressive episodes and Generalized Anxiety disorder. Review of the list of residents with current wounds in the facility provided by S3DON (Director of Nursing) on 12/02/2024 at approximately 10:00 a.m. indicated Resident #60 had a facility acquired non pressure ulcer to his left stump that was acquired on 05/14/2024. Review of Resident #60's current physician's orders as of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (#42) out of 2 (#8 and #42) residents investigated for respiratory care, by failing to label and properly store Oxygen tubing, and safely store Oxygen tanks. The total sample size was 36 residents. Findings: On 12/04/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration with a revision date of 06/01/2024, indicated Policy: Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice .5. e. Keep delivery devices covered in a black IFP (infection prevention) bag when not in use. On 12/04/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Safety with a revision date of 06/01/2024, indicated Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide a safe environment for residents, staff, and the public .Policy Explanation and Compliance guidelines: 4. Oxygen storage - a. Oxygen storage locations shall be in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was less than five percent. Findings: Observations of morning med pass were conducted on 12/03/2024. S6LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered Carafate Oral Tablet 1 GM (gram) and Ferrous Sulfate Oral Tablet 325 MG (milligram) to Resident #15 after the resident ate breakfast. Review of Resident #15's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed Physician Orders, for the month of December 2024, including the following orders dated 11/19/2024: 1. Carafate Oral Tablet 1 GM (gram) (Sucralfate). Give 1 tablet by mouth before meals . 2. Ferrous Sulfate Oral Tablet 325 (65 Fe) MG (milligram) (Ferrous Sulfate) Give 1 tablet by mouth before meals . During an interview on 12/03/2024 at 9:03 a.m., S6LPN stated that the resident had eaten breakfast in the dining room then came back to Hall W for medication administration. S6LPN checked the orders for Ferrous Sulfate and Sucralfate in the resident's EHR and confirmed that the orders were written to be given before meals and were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to initiate a grievance for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Resident and Family Grievances read in part .it is the policy of the facility to support each resident's family members right to voice grievances without discrimination reprisal or fear of discrimination or reprisal .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 3. A resident or family member may voice grievances with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and other residents, and other concern regarding their facility stay. Review of Resident #1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) record revealed an admit date of 08/14/2024 with diagnoses that included but not limited to Malignant neoplasm of colon, Hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy, Paraplegia, Moderate protein calorie malnutrition, Pressure Ulcer Stage 2, and Physical debility. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure as needed narcotic pain medication was documented as administered on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for pain management. Findings: Review of facility policy and procedure with no revision date for Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability read in part .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. General Protocols: g. In all cases, the dose noted on the usage form or entered into the automated dispensing system must match the dose recorded on the Medication Administration record (MAR). H. The controlled drug record (or other specified form) serves the dual purpose of recording both narcotic disposition and patient administration. I. The controlled drug record is a permanent medical record document and in conjunction with the MAR is the source for documenting any patient-specific narcotic dispensed from the pharmacy. Review of Resident #1's Electronic Medical Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (#1) of 3 ( #1, #2, #3) sampled residents as evidenced by staff failing to ensure a third person was available to observe a resident that was transferred back to the bed using a mechanical lift. The facility has a census of 92 residents. Findings: Resident #1: A review of Resident #1's record revealed an admission date of 07/23/2019 with diagnoses including but not limited to Metabolic encephalopathy, Muscle wasting, Peripheral vascular disease, Cognitive communication deficit, Dysphagia, Alzheimer's disease. and Aphasia. A review of her care plan revealed a problem: Self-care deficit, needs assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) r/t (related to), decreased mobility, lack of coordination, and muscle weakness. An intervention dated 09/3/2023 read .Transfer assistance: Resident is a 3 person assist using mechanical lift, (Third Person for Observation). A review of a facility incident report dated 10/10/2024 revealed Resident #3 was observed to have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that nursing aides possessed the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing services to meet the residents' needs safely and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being as evidenced by S3Transportation failing to demonstrate the correct procedure for securing a resident in the facility's transportation van. Findings: Review of facility training and in-service records revealed an attestation signed by S3Transportation on 03/17/2023, attesting that she had watched the training videos for the use of the Q-straint Restraint System and [NAME] Wheelchair Lifts. Further review of facility training and in-service records revealed a van wheelchair in-service was conducted with all transportation drivers on 04/10/2024. S3Transportation's signature was on the sign-in sheet. Review of the van wheelchair in-service read in part: When transporting resident via wheelchair/power chair in transport van, ensure all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system of accounting of each resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf by failing to provide quarterly statements for 1 (# 2) of 1 resident investigated for personal funds. The facility was entrusted with personal funds for 75 residents. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident's Account, read in part: Residents shall have the right to the following options regarding their personal financial affairs. 1. They shall be allowed to manage their personal financial affairs or to designate someone to assume this responsibility for them .3. The resident or his/her legal representative shall have access through quarterly statements . Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15, indicating that her cognition was intact. On 10/30/2023 at 09:38 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #2. The resident stated she had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment during a meal observation. This deficient practice was evident when the CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene while feeding residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 10 residents who eat in the dining room that required assistance with feeding. Findings: On 10/30/2023 at 11:27 a.m. to 11:40 a.m., a meal observation was conducted. A hand sanitizer dispenser was noted on the wall next to the feeder table. S7CNA was observed at a feeder table in the dining room feeding four residents. During the observation, she cleaned one of the resident's mouth with his bib after he coughed then picked up a different resident's serving utensil without applying hand sanitizer. She was observed wiping another resident's mouth with his bib after the resident stated he was finished with his meal. Then she placed the resident's face mask on his face. She unlocked his wheelchair, grabbed the wheelchair handle, and pulled the resident's wheelchair away…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the smoking policy included the use of e (electronic)-cigarettes for 1 (#44) out of a total of 11 smokers who resided in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Smoking Policy-Residents failed to include e-cigarettes. On 11/01/2023 at 3:05 p.m., Resident #44 was observed sitting in his wheelchair, outside in the designated smoking area, smoking his personal e-cigarette. On 11/01/2023 at 3:09 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON (Director of Nursing) who stated she was unsure if the facility had a policy on e-cigarettes. On 11/01/2023 at 5:00 p.m., S1ADM (Administrator) confirmed the facility failed to include the use of e-cigarettes in the smoking policy.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for 2 (#8 and #58) out of 4 (#8, #37, #43, and #58) residents investigated for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility. The facility's census was 83. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Safe and Homelike Environment revealed, in part, the following: Policy Statement: In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment .This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes the resident independence and does not pose a safety risk . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 3. Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment. Resident #58: Review of Resident #58's record revealed he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the provider failed to electronically transmit a completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge assessment and Modification MDS Entry assessment to the CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) system within 14 days after completion for 2 (#55 and #56) out of 2 (#55 and #56) resident's investigated for resident assessment submission activities. Findings: A review of Resident #55's electronic clinical record revealed an admission date of 05/11/2023. Further review of the record revealed an Entry MDS assessment dated [DATE], and in the assessment history revealed the assessment had been modified and was accepted on 10/27/2023. A review of Resident #56's electronic clinical record revealed an admission date of 06/05/2023. Further review of the record revealed a Discharge Return Not Anticipated MDS assessment dated [DATE] and accepted on 10/27/2023. On 11/01/2023 at 3:15 p.m. an interview and record review was conducted with S3MDS, who confirmed Resident #55's Entry MDS dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews the provider failed to ensure 2 (#49 and #50) out of 38 sampled residents received an accurate assessment as evidenced by failing to: 1. indicate Resident #49 required wander/elopement alarm and 2. indicate Resident #50 received hospice services Findings: Resident # 49 Review of Resident # 49's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and under section P, Restraints and Alarms, was coded as 0. Not used for wander/elopement alarm. Review of Resident #49's current orders revealed a start date of 04/03/2023 that resident is an elopement risk and must wear wander alert bracelet at all times. Review of Resident #49's current care plan revealed the resident was an elopement risk with interventions, in part, to check alert bracelet for proper function weekly and to place wander alert bracelet on person. On 11/01/2023 at 3:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3MDS. S3MDS confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were implemented as ordered for weighing resident weekly for 1 (#17) of 38 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #17's record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Vitamin D Deficiency, Muscle Weakness, Vascular Dementia, and Mild Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. Review of resident's comprehensive care plan revealed a focus of potential for fluid volume deficit, malnutrition or significant weight change with an intervention that included weight every month unless otherwise ordered, record weight. Review of the resident's October 2023 physician's orders revealed an order entry date 07/25/2023 for weekly weights until stable one time a day every 7 day(s) for weight loss. Review of the resident's weight summary revealed weights on the following dates: 08/20/2023, 09/19/2023, 10/25/2023 and 10/31/2023. On 11/01/2023 at 11:59 a.m., an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was accurately updated with the appropriate interventions to reflect the resident's current use of an anticoagulant, a blood thinner medication, for 1 (#32) out of 5 (#10, #31, #32, #47 and #49) sampled residents investigated for unnecessary medication review. Findings: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Schizoaffective Disorder. Review of Resident #32's October 2023 physician orders revealed an order for Eliquis (a blood thinner medication) oral tablet 2.5mg (milligram) take one tablet by mouth twice a day, for DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis). Order date and start date 05/04/2023. Review of Resident #32's MAR (Medication Administration Record) failed to reveal that the resident was being monitored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance with activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 (#8) out of 3 residents (#5, #8, and #50) investigated for activities of daily living care out of a total sampled of 38. Findings: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses in part: Functional Quadriplegia, Spastic Hemiplegia Affecting Right Dominant Side, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Hx (History of) of Traumatic Brain Injury, Lack of Coordination, and Stiffness of right knee A review of section GG of Resident #8's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 09/08/2023 revealed that he scored a 3 in transfer, toilet hygiene, and shower/bathe self, indicating that the resident required help to lift or hold his trunk or limbs. A review of Resident #8's plan of care revealed that he required direct care and two people to assist him…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accident hazards for 1 (#49), who was care planned for unsafe smoking, out of 1 (#49) residents investigated for safe smoking. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, 'Smoking Policy - Residents', revealed in part .This facility shall establish and maintain safe resident smoking practices .3. If the resident is a smoker it should be noted in the care plan. 4. The facility may impose smoking restrictions on residents at any time if it is determined that the resident cannot smoke safely with the available levels of support and supervision . The facility's policy and procedure titled, Smoking Policy - Residents, failed to include information on how the facility determined whether or not a resident that smokes was considered a safe or unsafe smoker, designated smoking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care, for 2 (#3 and #43) of 4 residents (#3, #32, #43, and #50) investigated for Urinary Catheter or UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) out of 38 sampled residents. Findings: Resident #3: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses in part: Urinary Tract Infection, Neuro Muscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Overactive Bladder, Complete Lesion of T2-T6 of Thoracic Spinal Cord, and Osteomyelitis of Vertebra. A review of Resident # 3's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 09/19/2023 revealed that she had an indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. A review of the resident's physician's orders revealed an order written on 04/20/2023 to ensure Foley catheter is secure with leg band, and/or tape every day and night shift, and another on 04/21/2023 for urinary catheter care every day and night shift. A review of Resident #3's October 2023 TAR (Treatment Administration Record) revealed that there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided care consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 (#57, #58, #60) out of 3 (#57, #58, #60) residents investigated for respiratory care as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure oxygen equipment was stored appropriately when not in use for Resident #57 and Resident #60; 2. Failing to ensure oxygen equipment was changed for Resident #57 and Resident #60 ; 3. Failing to change infection prevention pouch for Resident #60 and; 4. Failing to label oxygen equipment for Resident #58. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Maintenance and Cleaning of Oxygen and Nebulizer Equipment read in part: a. Change and label oxygen tubing and mask/cannula weekly and as needed if it becomes soiled or contaminated. Review of the facility's policy titled Nursing (Infection Control) read in part: 1. The facility will utilize an infection prevention product (e.g. IP-Pouch) that will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the licensed nurses and agency staff have specific competencies and skills sets necessary to care for residents' needs as evidenced by: 1. The nurse failing to demonstrate the correct method to administer the correct dosage of a topical cream medication and; 2. Failing to ensure that agency nurse aides had the required competencies to care for residents' needs. Findings: 1. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included in part, Atherosclerosis of left leg, Type 2 Diabetes mellitus, Pain left shoulder, Acquired absence of right and left great toe and Muscle wasting and atrophy of right/left shoulder, right/left upper arm and Right/left lower leg. On 10/31/23 at 12:00 p.m., a medication administration observation was conducted with S6LPN. A medication cup with a white substance was observed in S6LPN's hand. She stated that this was a topical cream for Resident #48 to apply to her feet. The order for Declofenac…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that services were provided as outlined in the comprehensive plan of care by failing to follow physician orders for the administration of IV (Intravenous) fluids for 1 (#1) out of 3 (#1, #2,and #3) sampled residents. Finding Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses include in part, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Dysphagia, Hypertension, Alzheimer's Disease, amd Aphasia. Review of the Resident #1's plan of care revealed the resident was care planned for dehydration or potential for fluid deficit related to poor intake. Further review revealed an intervention dated 09/08/2023 for IV (intravenous) fluids 1000 cc (cubic centimeter) to be given as ordered. Review of the blood test completed on 09/08/2023 revealed an elevated BUN (blood urea nitrogen) of 50.3 mg/dl (milligram per deciliter) and an elevated Creatinine of 1.78 mg/dl. The normal range for the BUN is 9.8-20.1 mg/dl and the normal range for the Creatinine is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HODGES, IRISIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 10/01/1990
HODGES, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 10/01/1990
BOUTTE, HAYLEYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/14/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 12%Other / private 13%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$254per resident / day
operating cost
$7,733per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$271per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195574. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next