Jena Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC
5877 Aimwell Road, Jena, LA 71342 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 108 certified beds · (318) 992-4175 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $53,231 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-11)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.4% | 17.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.8% | 5.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 1.2% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.0% | 2.1% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.6% | 2.3% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.0% | 17.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.1% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.1% | 94.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.5% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.4% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.7% | 22.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 3.1% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.9% | 76.3% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 34.9% | 28.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.6% | 14.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.94 | 2.56 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.70 | 2.74 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
35.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 35.0%CMS range 20.6–55.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.0–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 55.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 4.2–17.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.30 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 69.5 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.15 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.17 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in condition for 1 (#3) of 4 sampled residents when Resident #3 experienced severe pain but no pain medication was available to administer. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm on 04/02/2026 at 6:23 p.m. when Resident #3 was admitted with a diagnosis of ORIF to both Left Femur and Right Wrist on 03/25/2026. admission orders included Hydrocodone 10/325mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. At that time Resident #3 complained of leg pain at a level of 6 out of 10, indicating severe pain per facility parameters, and was unable to receive any pain medication because the facility had not acquired her pain medication from the pharmacy. The nurse caring for Resident #3 failed to notify the physician that pain medication was unavailable for Resident #3.Findings:Review of a facility policy titled Notification of a Change in A Resident's Status dated 11/07, revealed in part:Policy: The attending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, for 1 (Resident #3) of 4 residents reviewed for pain.This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #3 on 04/02/2026 at 6:23 p.m., when the resident was admitted with an order for Hydrocodone 10/325 MG every 6 hours as needed for pain, and did not receive any pain medication. Resident #3 had diagnoses of status post ORIF to Left Femur fracture on 03/25/2026 and, ORIF of Right Wrist fracture on 03/25/2026 and pain. Resident #3 who complained of leg pain that hurt so bad it caused her to cry, stated the facility had not acquired her pain medication from the pharmacy, and her pain level was 10 out of 10 on a pain scale, indicating very severe pain, during that time. Findings:Review of a facility policy titled Pain Management with a review date of 12/17/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from resident to resident physical abuse, for 1 (Resident #5) of 7 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3 Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7) sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in an Actual Harm for Resident #5 on 02/05/2024 at 2:20 p.m., when Resident #6 hit Resident #5 in the left eye two times with a closed fist. Resident #5 received first-aid treatment in the facility for multiple abrasions and bruising to the face. Resident #5 was sent to a local emergency department where he received treatment for a left periorbital/facial contusion. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention revealed in part . The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director participated in the Quality Assessment and Assurance Process Quarterly meetings. Total sample size 41. Findings:Review of the Monthly and Quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance Process revealed no documented evidence of the Medical Director attending any Quality Assessment and Assurance program meetings from 12/2025 through May 2026.During an interview on 06/03/2026 at 3:10 p.m., S1 Administrator confirmed the previous Medical Director had not attended any Quality Assessment and Assurance program meetings from 12/2025 through 05/2026, but should have.During a telephone interview on 06/03/2026 at 3:26 p.m., with previous Medical Director confirmed she had not attended any Quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance meetings for 12/2025 to 05/2026.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infection by failing to practice Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 5 (Resident #7, Resident #17, Resident #31, Resident #34, and Resident #73) of 41 sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a review date of 03/01/2026, revealed in part, Enhanced Barrier Precautions applies to all residents with any of the following: indwelling medical devices (e.g., central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator); When a resident is placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, gown and gloves will be used during high-contact resident care activities. Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring gown and glove use for Enhanced Barrier Precautions include: a. Dressing; b. Bathing/Showering; c. Transferring; d. Providing hygiene; e. Changing linens; f.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that each Resident was treated with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, by failing to honor 1(Resident #10) of 1 sampled resident's choices. Findings: Review of a Facility Policy titled Resident Rights-Exercise of Rights with a review date of 01/17/2024, revealed in part .Intent: All residents have rights guaranteed to them under Federal and State laws and Regulations. All activities and interactions with residents by any staff, temporary agency staff or volunteers must focus on assisting the resident in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth and incorporating the resident's goals, preferences, and choices. Procedure: The facility will treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality.The facility will protect and promote the rights of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that met professional standards of quality care for 1 (Resident #78) of 1 sampled residents.Findings: Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/29/2026 with diagnoses including, in part.Schizoaffective Disorder, Unspecified; Asymptomatic Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Bipolar Disorder, and Insomnia Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed Resident #78 did not have a baseline care plan. Interview on 06/01/2026 at 10:39 a.m., Resident #78 stated he was new to the facility and was recently admitted on [DATE]. Interview on 06/02/2026 at 12:52 p.m., S3 Unit Manager stated she was responsible for completing the baseline care plans and a floor nurse would complete it if a resident was admitted on the weekend or late at night. S3 Unit Manager stated she was responsible for following up on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Resident Centered Plan of Care was revised to include behaviors for 1 (Resident #31) of 41 sampled residents. Findings:Review of the facility's policy with a review date of 01/08/2026 titled Comprehensive Care Plans read in part.Policy Statement: To meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs, the facility will develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and target goals. Procedure: Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/20/2023 with diagnoses, which included Other Seizures; Essential Hypertension; Major Depressive Disorder; Insomnia; and Constipation. Review of Resident #31's Annual MDS with an ARD date of 05/05/2026 revealed a BIMS was unable to be performed. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #31 was short…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #26) sampled residents. The facility failed to: provide nail care for Resident #8; andprovide hair care for Resident #26. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled, Supporting Activities of Daily Living (ADL) with a reviewed date of 01/26/2026 revealed in part, Residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). 2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). 5. Functional decline or improvement will be evaluated in reference to the ARD and the following MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 1 (Resident #17) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care in a total sample of 41 residents. The facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly changed, labeled, and stored. Findings:Review of the facility policy with a review date of 03/06/2026 titled Care and Cleaning of Respiratory Equipment revealed in part .Purpose: To maintain equipment in proper working order and to reduce the risk of nosocomial infection. XII. Additional Equipment. Respiratory tubing, catheters, masks, and cleaning kits will be secured or placed in a container, original package or bag. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/20/2023 with diagnoses, which included Iron Deficiency Anemia; Morbid Obesity; Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury with loss of Consciousness; and Unspecified Convulsions. Observation on 06/01/2026 at 12:44 p.m. revealed an undated Aerosol mask attached to a Nebulizer machine on Resident #17's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that ensure accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administration of medications to meet the needs of each resident. The facility failed to provide medications and/or biologicals to meet the needs of residents for 1 (Resident #59) of 1 resident reviewed for pharmaceutical services in a total sample of 41 residents.Findings:Review of the facility's policy with a review date of 03/01/2026 titled, Medication Administration revealed in part .Intent: All medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. 24. If medication is ordered but not present check to see if it was misplaced and then call the pharmacy to obtain the medication.Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/27/2025 with diagnoses, which included ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease); Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with unspecified complications; Depression; Anxiety; Bipolar Disorder; and Parkinsonism. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to make a prompt effort to resolve grievances filed by a resident's representative, for 1 (Resident #3) of 4 sampled residents. Findings:Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances/Missing Property, with a review date of 08/2017, revealed in part.Policy: Residents and resident representatives have the right to voice concerns or grievances, which affect their lives at this facility, without fear or discrimination or reprisal.Purpose: To provide an opportunity for residents, resident representatives, and/or family to present concerns or grievances of the proper authorities at the facility and to receive responses to the issues raised.Responsibility: All staff, monitored by Department Heads, Executive Director and Grievance Official.Section 504 Grievance Procedure:1. A grievance is to be in writing on the Grievance Form, contain the name and address of the person filing it, and briefly describe the action alleged to be prohibited by the regulations.3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the written notice of discharge was sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for Resident 1 (#1) of 1 residents reviewed for facility-initiated discharge.Findings:Record review of the facility's undated policy regarding Subject: Discharge and Transfer Policy read in part.Procedure: 2. Documentation will be entered into the resident's medical records regarding the transfer/discharge reason(s) and the appropriate transfer/discharge information will be communicated to the receiving healthcare center, provider, resident and/or Resident Representative.a. Documentation includes: 14. Prior to resident being transferred or discharged , the facility must provide a written notice (B.3 (a) or State Required Form) to the resident, and if known, a family member or legal representative of the resident and the LTC ombudsman. This must be issued at least 30 days before the resident is transferred to discharge or as soon as practicable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services that met professional standards of quality by failing to ensure medications were accurately documented on the TAR (Treatment Administration Record) for 1 (Resident #4) of 7 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 73 residents according to the Resident List Report provided by the facility.Findings:Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Medication Administration with a review date of 03/01/2026 read in part.Guideline: 14. Document as each medication is prepared on the MAR (Medication Administration Record). 18. If medication is not given as ordered, document the reason on the MAR.Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/08/2024 with a re-entry date of 09/24/2024 with diagnoses that included in part, Depression, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage 4, Paraplegia, Presence of Urogenital Implants, and Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder.Review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/17/2026 revealed a BIMs summary score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the Nurse Practitioner (NP) of a resident's change in condition of an elevated heart rate for 1 (Resident #5) of 7 sampled residents. The facility census was 73.Findings: Review of the facility's policy on 03/18/2026 at 1:44 p.m. titled Notification of a Change in a Resident's Status with a history date of 11/2017, revealed in part.Policy: The attending physician extender (NP) and the resident representative will be notified of a change in a resident's condition, per standards of practice and Federal and/or State regulations. Procedure: 1. Guideline for notification of physician/responsible party: a. significant change in/or unstable vital signs (Pulse). Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/15/2025 with diagnoses that included in part, Acute Respiratory Failure, Depression, Urinary Tract Infection, Pressure Ulcer of Left Buttock, Stage 3, and Infection of the Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue. Review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/15/2026 revealed a BIMs summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0729 — isolatedVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) registry verification was obtained prior to re-hire for 1 (S9 CNA) of 2 (S9 CNA and S10 CNA) personnel records reviewed.Findings: Review of S9 CNA's personnel record revealed, in part, S9 CNA had an initial hire date of 10/22/2012, a termination date of 04/19/2018, and a re-hire date of 10/10/2018. Further review revealed a CNA registry verification with a date of 10/22/2012. There was no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence, a CNA registry verification was obtained prior to re-hire for S9 CNA. In an interview on 03/18/2026 at 11:50 a.m., S1Admin confirmed the facility did not have documented evidence a CNA registry verification was obtained prior to re-hire for S9 CNA as required.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Observation on 03/18/2026 at 8:45 a.m. revealed a form for Daily Nursing Staff Posting dated 03/18/2026 was posted on a bulletin board in the middle of the facility. The resident census at start of shift, daily staffing hours required, or the actual hours worked were not posted on the form.Observation on 03/18/2026 at 8:45 a.m. also revealed a form for Daily Nursing Staff Posting dated 03/17/2026 that did not have resident census at start of shift, daily staffing hours required, or the actual hours worked documented on the forms or updated from the previous day.In an interview on 03/18/2026 at 9:20 a.m. with S4 SDC RN to review 03/17/2026 and 03/18/2026 Daily Nursing Staff Posting forms, S4 SDC RN confirmed the facility did not post the resident census, daily nursing hours required, or the actual nursing hours provided.S4 SDC RN confirmed that she had always posted the forms without the required information but should not have.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a review date of 03/01/2026 revealed in part, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) is an approach of gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities.Examples of high contact resident care activities.wound care.Review of Resident #2's record revealed in part an admit date of 09/03/2025, a primary diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, an order dated 09/19/2025 for Enhanced Barrier Precautions, and a Care Plan item dated 09/15/2025 for enhanced barrier precautions.Observation on 03/16/20026 at 2:25 p.m. of Resident #2's wound care by S6 TXRN revealed that S6 TXRN failed to follow EBP protocol. S6 TXRN did not wear a gown and change her gloves between cleaning and applying ointments and powder to the wounds for Resident #2.Review of Resident #3's record revealed in part an admit date of 07/02/2024, a primary diagnosis of Restless Legs Syndrome, an order dated 11/19/2024 for Enhanced Barrier Precautions, and a Care Plan item dated 03/05/2025 for enhanced barrier precautions.Observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #3) of 3 sampled residents.Findings: Resident #2 Review of the facility's Incident Report revealed Resident #2 had Unwitnessed Fall Incidents on 11/14/2025 and 11/25/2025. Review of Resident #2's EMR revealed an admission date of 08/04/2025 with diagnoses including Seizures, Personal History of Traumatic Brain Injury, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, and Delirium. Review of Resident #2's Medicare 5 day MDS with ARD of 11/29/2025 revealed Resident #2 did not have a fall any time in the last month. Review of Resident #2's Discharge - Return Anticipated MDS with ARD of 11/18/2025 revealed the resident did not have any falls since the prior assessment. Resident #2 was not receiving antipsychotic medication. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 11/11/2025 revealed Resident #2 was not receiving antipsychotic medication. Review of Resident #2's Physician's Orders revealed the following, in part. Rexulti 2mg po Q…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #1's EMR revealed an admission date of 03/19/2024 with diagnoses including Anoxic Brain Damage, Cardiac Arrest due to Other Underlying Condition, and Personal History of Other Venous Thrombosis and Embolism. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 09/16/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders revealed the following, in part.Apixiban 5mg po BID for History of Deep Vein Thrombosis, dated 10/17/2025. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan revealed Resident #1 was not care planned for anticoagulant therapy. Interview with S7LPN on 12/10/2025 at 10:10 a.m. revealed a resident receiving anticoagulant therapy should have been care planned for anticoagulant therapy. Interview with S11MDS on 12/10/2025 at 1:26 p.m. confirmed Resident #1 should have been care planned for anticoagulant therapy, but was not.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each resident to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosical well-being. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff placed, connected, and ensured proper functioning of Resident #122's bed alarm, as ordered; 2. Develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #19; and Resident #30 There were 29 sampled residents. Findings: Resident #122 Review of Resident #122's medical record revealed an admit date of 05/22/2025 with diagnoses including Quadriplegia, Seizures, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Attention to Gastrostomy (PEG tube.) Observation and interview with Resident #122 on 06/02/2025 at 09:40 a.m. found resident's bed against the wall with the fall mat on the open side. Bed observed in low position. Detached bed alarm control box was noted hanging on bed frame. There were no wires observed connected to the bed alarm box. Geri chair noted at bedside reclined with bed alarm mat in seat of chair. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #172 Review of the Facility's policy dated 11/2017 titled Weekly Skin Audit read in part .Policy: A skin audit will be documented on resident weekly. Any identified skin conditions will be documented and treatment initiated. Procedure: 1.Every resident will have a head to toe skin evaluation performed and documented on a weekly basis. Review of Resident #172 medical record revealed an admit date of 02/11/2025 with diagnoses that included: COPD, Congestive Heart Failure, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Depression, and Essential HTN. Review of Resident #172 Care plan with a review date of 05/20/2025 read in part . Risk for impaired skin integrity related to impaired mobility with interventions for weekly skin audits. Review of Resident #172 skin assessment dated [DATE] by S10 TX Nurse revealed 3 scabs to forehead area. No bruises noted. Interview on 06/04/2025 at 9:15 a.m. with S1 Admin revealed she was notified by S21 Marketer that during a hospital visit he was notified by hospital staff that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse for 1 (#51) of 4 (#31, #50, #51, and #172) sampled residents investigated for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #51 from physical abuse by Resident #272. This failed practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #51 on 05/20/2025 at 4:09 p.m. when Resident #272 hit Resident #51 multiple times on the head, causing lacerations to Resident #51's left cheek, right cheek, forehead, and chin. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy entitled Abuse Prevention revealed, in part .the facility is committed to protection residents from abuse. Physical abuse includes hitting. Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/06/2024 with diagnoses including, in part .Depression, Anxiety, Mood Disorder, and Other Seizures. Review of Resident #51's Annual MDS with an ARD of 05/06/2025 revealed, in part .a BIMS Score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Resident #51 did not have a history of physical behaviors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions, unless clinically contraindicated, for 1 (#34) of 6 (#16, #21, #28, #34, #49, and #122) residents sampled for Unnecessary Medications. Findings: Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/06/2020 with diagnoses including, in part .Schizophrenia. Review of Resident #34's Annual MDS with an ARD of 05/20/2025 revealed, in part .a BIMS Score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #34 used antipsychotic medication, a gradual dose reduction had not been attempted, and the physician had not documented a gradual dose reduction was contraindicated. Review of Resident #34's current orders revealed, in part .Risperdal 1mg tablet by mouth two times a day related to Schizophrenia, ordered on 09/13/2024. Review of Resident #34's Consultant Pharmacist Communication to Physician dated 04/17/2025 revealed the provider had not documented a response to the pharmacist's recommendation of gradual dose reduction for Risperdal 1mg. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin and allegation of abuse was reported immediately to management staff for 2 (#50 and #172) of 30 sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's 01/2025 policy titled, Abuse Prevention, read in part The facility is committed to protecting the resident from abuse by anyone .Identification: 1. Identify events such as suspicious bruising of residents, occurrences, patterns, and trends that may constitute abuse; and to determine the direction of the investigation. 2. The Executive Director and Director of nursing services must be promptly notified of suspected abuse or incidents of abuse. Resident # 172 Review of Resident #172 medical record revealed an admit date of 02/11/2025 with diagnoses that included: COPD, Congestive Heart Failure, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Depression, and Essential HTN. Review of Resident #172's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/18/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 03, which indicated severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 (#34, #51, and #60) of 5 (#16, #34, #44, #51, and #60) residents sampled for review of resident vaccinations. Findings: Resident #34 Review of Resident #34's most recent MDS revealed, in part .COVID-19 vaccination was not up-to-date. Review of Resident #34's Resident Immunization Record revealed COVID-19 vaccinations were administered to Resident #34 on 09/22/2021, 10/22/2021, 04/29/2022, 01/31/2024, and 06/12/2024. Resident #51 Review of Resident #51's most recent MDS revealed, in part .COVID-19 vaccination was not up to date. Review of Resident #51's Resident Immunization Record revealed COVID-19 vaccinations were administered to Resident #51 on 04/08/2021, 06/12/2024, and 11/13/2024. Resident #60 Review of Resident #60's most recent MDS revealed, in part .COVID-19 vaccination was not up to date. Review of Resident #60's Resident Immunization Record revealed COVID-19 vaccinations were administered to Resident #60…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. The facility failed to: 1. Perform AM care including face/hair washing and shaving for Resident # 38; and 2. Provide daily bed baths for 2 (Resident #26 and Resident #34) residents. The total Sample Size is 29 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's 10/2009 policy titled A.M. Care read in part . A.M. Care will be given to residents daily. Procedure: 5. Residents to wash, rinse and dry face and hands if able. 11. Provide/assist with shaving (male and female) as needed. Resident #38 Review of Resident #38's Care plan with a review date of 06/11/2025 revealed impaired mobility due to Muscular Dystrophy. Resident #38 requires 2 person assist with bathing, dressing, and grooming. Review of Resident #38's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 03/11/2025 revealed the BIMS was not conducted because Resident #38 is rarely/never understood. Resident #38 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain optimal skin integrity for 1 (Resident # 26) of 29 sampled residents. Findings: Resident # 26 A review of facility policy titled, Turning and Positioning Program with revision date of 07/2018, revealed in part . Policy: All residents will be turned and positioned as per the plan of care in an organized system . A review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/17/2023 with diagnoses that included Spinal Stenosis of lumbar region without neurogenic claudication, Alzheimer's with late onset, Epilepsy unspecified with Status Epilepticus, Morbid (severe) Obesity due to excess calories, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Osteoarthritis, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of bladder, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Atrial Fibrillation, Candidiasis of skin and nail, and other lack of coordination. A review of Resident # 26's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/18/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 13, which indicated intact cognition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received enteral feedings as ordered by the physician for 1 (#25) of 3 (#25, #53, and #122) residents reviewed for tube feeding. Findings: Review of the Facility's 01/2025 policy titled Tube Feeding read in part Residents with a Gastrostomy or Jejunostomy tube will be provided nutrition and hydration via the feeding tube. Procedure: Administer feeding as ordered via continuous pump feeding per physicians orders. Review of Resident #25's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Acute Respiratory Failure, Hyperlipidemia, Hypothyroidism, and Insomnia. Review of Resident #25's admission MDS with an ARD of 05/14/2025 revealed a BIMS of 13, which indicated intact cognition. Review of Resident #25's Care Plan with a review date of 08/13/2025 read in part: Resident requires tube feeding related to nothing by mouth status. The resident is dependent on tube feeding and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of the annual performance reviews for 2 (S16 CNA and S17 CNA) of 3 (S13 CNA, S16 CNA, S17 CNA) certified nursing assistants reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse who required it. Findings: Review of S16 CNA's personnel records revealed a date of hire of 11/01/2023. Further review revealed no evidence of an annual performance being completed within the past 12 months. Record review revealed the last annual performance was completed on 06/19/2023. Review of S17 CNA's personnel records revealed a date of hire of 05/24/2024. Further review revealed no evidence of an annual performance review being completed in the past 12 months. In an interview on 06/04/2025 at 2:01 p.m., S1 Administrator acknowledged annual performance reviews had been requested multiple times for the sampled CNAs, but had not been provided. In an interview on 06/04/2025 at 2:15 p.m., S15 HR (Human Resources) stated she provided the requested annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program was maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Facility staff wore a gown while administering medications to a resident on EBP, Resident #122, through a Gastrostomy (PEG tube); 2. Standard Precautions were utilized during wound care, 3. Unused resident care items were not stored on the floor 4. Resident's used basins were not stored in a shower 5. Resident's used urinal was not stored in a shower, and 6. A Curtain in the shower area was not visibly soiled. Findings: Resident #122 On 6/04/2025 at 10:30 a.m. the facility provided a copy of their Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy with a History date of 4/24. Review of the policy revealed, Enhanced Barrier Precautions only require use of gown/ gloves when performing high contact resident activities: a. g. Device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet professional standards of practice for 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, & R1) of 13 (#1-#12 & #R1) sampled residents out of a total census of 74 residents. The facility failed to ensure controlled medications were administered as ordered and documented correctly. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's policy on 02/20/2025 titled, Controlled Medications Administrations which was last reviewed on 08/2016 read in part . When administering controlled medication, the authorized personnel records the administration on the MAR/eMAR and enters all of the following information on the Controlled Drug Record: a. Date and time of administration b. Amount administered c. Signature of the person preparing the dose d. Quantity reconciled Review of the facility's policy on 02/20/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents by failing to assess for pain medication effectiveness after administration for 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #R1) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for pain. Findings: Review of the facility's policy on 02/20/2025 titled, Medication Administration-General Guidelines reviewed or revised on 01/2015 read in part . When prn medications are administered, the following documentation is provided: a. Date and time of administration, dose, route of administration (if other than oral), and if applicable injection site. b. Complaints or symptoms for which the medication was given. c. Results observed from giving the dose and the time results were noted. d. Resident pain evaluation per facility policy, if applicable. e. Signature or initials of person recording administration and signature or initials of person recording effects, if different from person administering. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 09/27/2023 with diagnoses that included in part…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from resident to resident physical abuse, for 1 (Resident #11) of 2 ( Resident #11 and Resident #12) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 was not physically abused by Resident #12. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's Investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Abuse Prevention on 02/18/2025 read in part . The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, friends, visitors, or any other individual. Definitions: a. Abuse: Willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (#1) of 12 (#1-#12) sampled residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to transport Resident #1 to an orthopedic specialist appointment in a timely manner as ordered. Findings: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 09/27/2023 with diagnoses that included in part .Heart Failure, Type 2 DM, Pain, and Unspecified Dislocation of Left Hip. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/28/2025 revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 8, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #1 was dependent with rolling left and right and required substantial to maximal assistance with sitting to lying and toileting hygiene. Resident #1 required setup or clean up assistance with eating. In an interview on 02/17/2025 at 1:30 p.m., Resident #1 stated his left hip keeps coming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from resident to resident physical abuse, for 1 (Resident #4) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3 and Resident #4) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was not physically abused by Resident #3. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention, with a review date of 10/2022, revealed in part .The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, friends, visitors, or any other individual. Abuse defined: Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Abuse may be resident to resident, staff to resident, family to resident, or visitor to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a PEG tube maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment for 1 (#2) of 8 (#2, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4, #R5, #R6, and #R7) sampled residents who received nutrition and hydration via PEG tube. The total sample size was 12. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled: Tube Feeding dated 07/2018 read in part . Residents with a Nasogastric, Gastrostomy, or Jejunostomy tube will be provided nutrition and hydration via the feeding tube. 2. Check Physicians orders and/or treatment record for amount and type of feeding. 7. Label the feeding bag with the resident's name, formula ordered and date. For gravity (intermittent) and continuous pump feedings, each time a feeding is administered into the bag, the amount of formula hung and the time it was hung must be noted on the feeding bag. 8. Administer the feeding as ordered via continuous pump feeding. F. Set the rate as ordered and begin the infusion. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure: 1. The floor in Rooms a, b, and c were clean, sanitary and free of dust, trash and dead insects. 2. The ceiling tiles Rooms a and b were not loose with exposed insulation, and did not have brown stained and holes ceiling tiles were securely in place without exposed insulation and were clean without brown stains. 3. The over bed wall mounted lights were operational in Room b over both beds a and b; and 4. The window pane in Room a was cleaned and allowed resident to see the outside view. Findings: Rooms a Observations of Room a on 04/02/2024 at 12:20 p.m. and 04/03/2024 at 8:35 a.m., revealed a large amount of dust, trash, and dead insects in the corner of the room between the bed and the window. The window pane was noted to have a large amount of mildew, green and brown substance along with a film on the inside of the pane. The outside view was not clearly visible. The ceiling tiles in the room were loose with exposed insulation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided by the facility to meet quality professional standards for 1 (Resident #43) of 5 (Resident #10, Resident #43, Resident #45, Resident #56 and Resident #57) residents reviewed for unnecessary medication and 1 (Resident #268) of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure labs were obtained as ordered by the physician for Resident #43. 2. Notify the physician of a dietician's recommendation to meet the nutritional needs of Resident #268. Findings: Resident #43 Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admit date of 09/10/2021 with diagnoses that included: Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Essential Hypertension, Viral Hepatitis C, and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Review of Resident #43's 04/2024 Physician Order's read in part . Draw CMC, CMP, HGAIC, IRON, MAG Q3 months in December, March, June and September. (Start Date 12/07/2021) Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1 and Resident #4 were free from facial hair and failed to provide nail care to dependent residents for Residents #11, Resident #17, Resident #21, Resident #38, Resident #48 and Resident #62 in a total sample of 10 residents reviewed for ADL care. Findings: Resident #1 Review of Facility's policy titled Shaving- Male and Female read in part Resident will be free of facial hair- both male and female. If the resident is alert and oriented and requests not to be shaved, this will be noted in the care plan. Review of Resident #1 medical record revealed an admit date of 09/18/2023 with diagnoses that included: Cerebral Infarction, Hemiplegia following Cerebral infarction affecting left nondominant side, Unspecified Dementia, Bipolar Disorder, Post Traumatic Stress disorder, Schizophrenia, and Anoxic Brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain dignity for 1 (Resident #17) of 1 resident reviewed for dignity by failing to ensure a female resident was free of facial hair. Findings: Review of the Facility's policy titled Shaving- Male and Female read in part Resident will be free of facial hair- both male and female. If the resident is alert and oriented and requests not to be shaved, this will be noted in the care plan. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admit date of 01/16/2020 with diagnoses that included: Unspecified Dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Schizoaffective Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Dysphagia. Review of Resident #17's Care plan with review date of 05/28/2024 read in part . Resident requires total assistance with all activities of daily living. Allow for independence as tolerated by resident such as brushing hair and teeth, washing face and assistance with bed mobility. Observation on 04/02/2024 at 11:29 a.m. revealed Resident #17 had ¼ inch facial hair to her chin. Interview on 04/02/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to act promptly on grievances concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility reported by residents during a monthly Resident Council meeting for 1 (02/13/2024) of 3 (01/09/2024, 02/13/2024, and 03/14/2024) meetings reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Resident Council on 04/02/2024 at 3:05 p.m. read in part . The Social Services Director or designee will facilitate the organization and maintenance of a facility Resident Council. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Grievance/Missing Property on 04/02/2024 at 3:05 p.m. read in part .Purpose: To provide an opportunity for residents, resident representatives, and/or family to present concerns or grievances to the proper authorities at the facility and to receive responses to the issue(s) raised. Review of the facility's Resident Council Department Response Form read in part . Date of council meeting: 02/13/2024. Date this form was distributed to Department Head: 02/14/2024. Date response due back to Resident Council…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure services were provided according to the resident's Comprehensive Plan of Care for 1 (Resident #268) of 1 (Resident #268) residents sampled for tube feeding. The facility failed to ensure Resident #268's nutritional needs were met. Findings: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #268 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Acute Respiratory Failure, Anoxic Brain Damage, Rhabdomyolysis, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Tracheostomy status, and Hypertension. Review of Resident #268's Comprehensive Plan of Care with target date 06/22/2024 revealed in part .Requires PEG tube for adequate nutritional intake. Goals include .nutritional needs will be met thru enteral feedings. Approaches include .Dietician to evaluate current nutritional status. Observation on 04/02/24 at 11:03 a.m. revealed Resident #268 awake in bed, nonverbal. Tube feeding infusing per dual pump of Jevity 1.5 at 50ml per hour with 50ml H20 flushes every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the nurse staffing information was posted daily. Findings: Observation on 04/02/2024 at 9:30 a.m. revealed the daily nurse staffing information posted was dated 03/29/2024. Interview on 04/02/2024 at 11:56 a.m. with S2 DON confirmed the daily nurse staffing information posted was dated 03/29/2024. S2 DON confirmed the nurse staffing information posted should have been updated daily, and was not.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that pureed foods were prepared by methods which conserved nutritional value for 3 (#11, #17, and #48) of 3 Residents who were ordered and served pureed diets. Findings: Review of the facility's approved 2024 Lunch Menu revealed the facility was on Week: 4, Day: Tuesday: Roasted Turkey, Mashed Potatoes, Turnip Greens, Bread Roll, Dessert- Sugar cookie, and a Beverage. Review of the facility's approved recipe for Pureed Roast Turkey read in part . Ingredients: 3 oz. Roast Turkey, [NAME] Sliced Bread, Water, and Chicken Base. Instructions: Combine chicken base and water to make chicken broth. Place prepared turkey and bread in a washed and sanitized food processor. Gradually add liquid and blend until smooth. Note: Follow any facility policy/procedures, such as the puree volume method procedure, to ensure a correct portion is served. Review of the facility's approved recipe for Pureed Turnip Greens read in part . Ingredients: Turnip greens, Margarine, and [NAME] Sliced Bread. Instructions: Place prepared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement/maintain infection control practices to help prevent and control the spread of an infectious communicable disease. The facility failed to ensure all staff adhered to Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 1 (Resident #6) of 6 (Resident #6, Resident #56, Resident #59, Resident #218, Resident #268, and Resident #269) residents reviewed for infection control. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled: Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revealed in part .Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g. residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices). Enhanced Barrier Precautions only require use of gown/gloves when performing high contact resident activities: dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, AM/PM care, changing linens, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to make a prompt effort to resolve grievances filed by a resident, and the resident's representative, for 1 (#7) of 7 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6 and Resident #7) sampled Residents. Findings: The Facility's Policy Titled Grievance/Missing Property read in part . Procedure: 1. Respective Department Head, Executive Director and/or Grievance Official will follow-up on issues noted. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admit date of 07/26/2017, with diagnoses that included: Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Morbid severe Obesity with Alveolar Hypoventilation, Chronic Systolic Heart Failure, Sleep Apnea Unspecified, Cardiomegaly, and Unspecified Asthma Uncomplicated. Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS with an ARD 11/10/2023, revealed Resident #7 had a BIMS score of 1? (indicating intact cognition); required partial/moderate assistance for dressing and personal hygiene; independent with eating; and dependent for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 1 (Resident #7) of 7 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6 and Resident #7) sampled Residents. The facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly changed, labeled and contained. Findings: Review of the Facility's Policy Titled Oxygen Therapy read in part . Procedure: 9. Date tube when changed (weekly). Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admit date of 07/26/2017, with diagnoses that included: Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Morbid severe Obesity with Alveolar Hypoventilation, Chronic Systolic Heart Failure, Sleep Apnea Unspecified, Cardiomegaly, Unspecified Asthma Uncomplicated. Review of Resident #7's Physician orders dated 02/2024 revealed in part . oxygen per concentrator, and to keep oxygen saturation equal to or greater than 90%. Bi-pap wear at night and during the day while napping. Review of Resident #7's care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention revealed in part . Investigation: The Executive Director, or designee, shall report any allegations of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property as well as report any reasonable suspicion of crime in accordance with Section 1150B of the Social Security Act to the Department of Health as required. Protection: l. Any allegation of abuses, neglect, misappropriation or exploitation against any employee must result in his/her immediate suspension to protect the resident. 2. In addition, the facility will follow Section 1150B of the Social Security Act's time limits for reporting a reasonable suspicion or crime (immediately but no later than 2 hours if abuse or serious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 3 allegations of abuse involving 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention revealed in part . Protection: 2. Suspected or substantiated cases of resident abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment shall be thoroughly investigated, documented, and reported to the physician, families and/or representative, and as required by state guidelines. Resident #1 Review of the facility's Supervisor Investigation Summary Form for Resident #1 revealed in part . Date of event: 10/12/2023 Investigation: On the morning of 10/12/2023, S1 Administrator received 2 text messages from Resident #1's responsible party. S1 Administrator immediately went to Resident #1's room to assure she was safe. Resident #1 verbalized to S1 Administrator that last night S2 CNA spoke louder than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #5) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 had a bed alarm applied to prevent falls after sustaining a fall with major injury. Findings: Review of Resident #5's clinical record revealed an admit date of 07/11/2023 with diagnoses that included: Acute Respiratory Failure, Aphasia, Dysphagia, Unspecified Convulsions, Non-traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage, Other symptoms and signs with cognitive functions following Cerebral Infarctions, and Insomnia. Review of Resident #5's MDS with an ARD of 11/01/2023 revealed a BIMS was not conducted as Resident #5 was rarely/never understood and Resident #5 had severely impaired skills for daily decision making. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #5 was dependent with sit to lying, lying to sitting on the side of the bed, sit to stand, and chair/bed to chair transfer. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure each Resident had the right to be free from abuse by other Residents. The Facility failed to protect 1 Resident (#4) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7) sampled Residents from being physically abused by another Resident. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy read in part .The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff or other residents . Protection: (3) It is the responsibility of all staff to provide a safe environment for the residents. Resident care and treatments shall be monitored by all staff, on an ongoing basis, so that residents are free from abuse, neglect or mistreatment. Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admit date of 04/07/2023 with diagnoses which included: Hemiplegia Left Non-Dominant Side, Mental Disorder Not other specified, HIV, Acute Bronchitis, Chronic Viral Hepatitis C, Idiopathic Neuropathy and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Review of Resident #4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$53,231 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $14,380 — penalty dated 2026-05-11
- $38,851 — penalty dated 2024-01-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $886K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in LA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195399. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.