No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Jeff Davis Living Center, LLC

1338 North Cutting Avenue, Jennings, LA 70546 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (337) 824-3165 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (337) 824-3165 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 10 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1322 Elton Rd · (337) 824-3050 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
1326 N Cutting St · (337) 824-4442 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1103 N Cutting Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.7%17.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%1.2%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection12.2%2.1%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.6%2.3%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.3%0.2%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.2%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.5%17.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication39.4%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine20.0%94.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%5.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.4%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table33.0%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.3%3.1%1.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine50.0%76.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission33.9%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.8%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.922.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.272.741.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
54.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.8%CMS range 31.4–52.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.3–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened10.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.2%CMS range 5.3–15.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.591.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.20
RN hours/ resident / day
1.18
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.44
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.12
RN hoursweekends
41.2%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 70.8 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-29)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-12)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

10 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) provided services for 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week and ensure the DON (Director of Nursing) did not serve as a charge nurse when the facility had an average daily census over 60 residents. Findings: Review of RN staffing timesheets from 10/01/2024-04/27/2025 revealed the RN did not work 8 consecutive hours the following dates: 11/10/2024 7.75 hours worked 11/23/2024 7.75 hours worked 12/31/2024 7.75 hours worked 01/03/2025 7.32 hours worked 01/28/2025 no RN hours worked 02/05/2025 6.75 hours worked 02/28/2025 7.92 hours worked 03/28/2025 7.88 hours worked 04/15/2025 5.75 hours worked On 04/28/2025 at 10:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON and S3RN. S2DON stated that on Saturday and Sunday the weekend RN is scheduled to work an 8 hour shift each day. S2DON stated that Monday through Friday, S3RN is scheduled to work an 8 hour shift each day. S2DON and S3RN reported that when S3RN is not present in the facility for her scheduled weekday 8 hour shift, S2DON serves as the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status, for 1(#24) of 32 sampled residents Findings: A review of Resident #24's medical records revealed an admission date of 07/26/2017 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder. A review of Resident #24's Pre admission Screening and Assessment Resident Review (PASRR) revealed a Level II determination that read, The individual has a serious mental illness and is recommended nursing home admission. A review of Resident #24's annual MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 02/06/2025 revealed the following: Section A1500 -Is the resident currently considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition? The answer was coded 0 for no. On 04/29/2025 at 1:04 p.m., an interview and review of Resident #24's MDS was conducted with S2DON (Director of Nursing). She confirmed that the PASRR was incorrectly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care was implemented for 1 (#41) out of 1 (#41) residents investigated for positioning out of a total sample of 32 residents. Findings: A review of Resident #41's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, cerebral infarction, cerebrovascular disease, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis. A review of Resident #41's Care Plan revealed a care plan intervention initiated on 10/11/2022 that read, staff instructed to check on resident's body alignment when passing by room and or after care and turning and repositioning her. Further review of the resident's care plan dated 08/15/2022 read in part .provide pressure reduction/relief mattress on bed. Assist positioning for comfort. Monitor frequently, at least every two hours for pressure redistribution and assist with repositioning as indicated. Review of the air mattress manufactures manual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 (#11) of 2 (#11, #27) residents sampled for wound care, with a total sample of 32 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's EBP policy revised on 03/2024 revealed the following, in part: EBP are used as in infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 12/22/2025 with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the March 2025 Physician's orders revealed an order dated 07/15/2024 which read in part enhanced barrier precautions. Further review revealed an order dated 03/26/2025, which read in part .venous stasis ulcer anterior right lateral lower leg: clean with normal saline, apply hydrofer blue dressing then cover. On 04/28/2025 at 10:20 a.m., an observation of wound care was conducted with S2DON (Director of Nursing) and S4TX…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of policy and procedure and interviews, the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to follow appropriate food handling practices as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure staff present in the kitchen covered their facial hair. 2. Food storage: A. Refrigerated items: 1. A container of peaches not labeled with the date it had been prepared. 2. A bag of mozzarella cheese and cheddar cheese opened and not labeled with the date it had been opened or placed in a closed bag. 3. A container of ranch dressing with an expiration date of 11/2023. 4. A container of honey mustard with an expiration date of 09/2023. B. Dry Storage 1. One dented canned good in the dry storage room. C. Walk-in freezer: 1. One box of boneless chicken on the floor. 2. One box of hot dog buns on the floor. 3. No thermometer noted on the inside. 4. No record of daily temperatures. The total amount of residents that ate out of the kitchen was 74 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' assessment accurately reflected the status of 2 (# 53 and # 59) residents out of a total of 30 sampled residents by failing to ensure that: 1. Resident # 53 was coded correctly for anticoagulant use. 2. Resident # 59 was coded correctly for dialysis treatment. Findings 1. Review of Resident # 53's electronic health record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to Anemia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Cardiac Pacemaker and Aphasia. Review of Resident # 53's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/23/2023 revealed in Section N - High-Risk Drug Classes: Use and Indication Drug Class E. Anticoagulant (e.g., Warfarin, Heparin, or low-molecular weight Heparin) was checked for 1. Is taking. Review of Resident # 53's November 2023 physician's ordered revealed no orders for use of anticoagulants. On 03/11/2024 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure routine medications were disposed of when expired. The deficiency had the potential to affect a census of 77 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy on 03/12/2024, titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, with a policy revised date of February 2023, read in part: . 3. If the facility has discontinued, outdated or deteriorated medications or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items. On 03/12/2024 at 9:30 a.m., an observation of the facility's Hall A medication storage room was conducted with S9LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). On 03/12/2024 at 9:58 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9LPN, who confirmed the following expired medications were present/identified in the residents' storage bins Phenergan 25mg (milligrams) suppository (6 suppositories) with an expiration date of 03/2023 Losartan K+ 50mg (30 tablets) with an expiration date of 01/31/2024 Amantadine 100mg (30 tablets) with an expiration date of 08/31/2022 Citalopram 20mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus met the nutritional needs of the residents and were followed as evidenced by kitchen staff failing to have knowledge of recipes to be followed when preparing pureed foods. This deficient practice had the potential to contribute to an unpleasant dining experience, decreased intake, altered nutritional needs and weight loss for the 3 residents who consumed pureed diets. Findings: On 03/12/2024 at 9:25 a.m., an observation was made of S6DC (Dietary Cook) preparing pureed lunch meals. S6DC prepared an unmeasured amount of ham by blending the pieces of ham into the blender and added an unmeasured amount of water. Next, S6DC was observed transferring an unmeasured amount of green bean casserole from the container to the blender and then added and unmeasured amount of water and blended all the ingredients. There were no recipe(s) present during the observed pureed lunch meal preparation by S6DC. On 03/12/2024 at 9:35 a.m., an interview was conducted with S6DC who confirmed she was one of the cooks at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program to ensure antibiotic use was being monitored and trending was being performed for residents receiving antibiotics. Findings: Review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program Policy revealed in part: Tracking: Process measures: Collect, review and report types of antibiotics ordered. Who ordered the antibiotic (attending, on call physician or nurse practitioner), Review and track whether appropriate tests such as cultures were obtained prior to prescribing antibiotics, are cultures (C&S) results communicated as soon as possible and changes in antibiotic therapy during course of treatment. Review of the Antibiotic Stewardship binder on 02/07/2023 revealed the tracking and trending of infections and antibiotic use for the months November 2022, December 2022 and January 2023, were incomplete. The logs revealed the following: 1. November 2022 Infection Control Log revealed 11 reported infections. 3 did not have a date the physician was notified, and 5 did not have a stop date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the provider failed to ensure dinnerware sanitization was achieved when dishwasher temperatures failed to reach the minimally required temperature and chemical used to sanitize dishware during the process failed to be delivered into the system. This deficient practice had the potential to effect 71 residents that consumed meals and/or beverage prepared and served from the facility kitchen. Findings: On 02/05/2023 at 8:35 a.m. a tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted. During this time, S4DA (Dietary Aid) was asked to demonstrate use of the dishwasher, including confirmation of the sterilization process by litmus paper test. S4DA initiated three consecutive wash cycles, all of which failed to reach the minimally required temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Additionally, S4DA attempted three chemical sterilization tests using litmus paper; all failed to register any color change, indicating sterilization had not been achieved. S4DA examined the small, clear hose used to deliver liquid sterilizing agent into the system and discovered it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CRAMER INVESTMENTS, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF20%since 03/01/2000
JEFF DAVIS INVESTMENT GROUP, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF30%since 03/06/2000
PHIL SMITH, INCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2000
CRAMER, LAWRENCEIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2000
SMITH, PHILIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2000
TERREBONNE, TERRYIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2000
GRIFFITH, PATRICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2000
MONTOU, BRENTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2000
DOUCET, CHRISTELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2000

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+16.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$777K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 17%Other / private 16%

This home reported $777K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$241per resident / day
operating cost
$7,336per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$287per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195314. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next