Amelia Manor Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 151 beds and averages 82.5 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 68 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.56 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the State Ombudsman Office was notified of a resident discharge for 1 (#87) out of 1 discharge record reviewed. Findings: Review of Resident #87's electronic health record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for short term respite care. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, spastic hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, recurrent moderate, and anxiety disorder.Review of the facility's Notice of Transfer or Discharge form revealed Resident #87 was discharged from the facility on 02/23/2026. There was no evidence the State Ombudsman Office was notified of a resident's discharge.On 04/07/2026 at 3:55 p.m., an interview with S6SSD was conducted. She stated only residents who were emergency transfers are listed on the Emergency Transfer Log. She stated for the non-emergent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's enteral feeding was properly labeled for 1 (#2) out of 1 (#2) sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding.Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump, with a last review date of January 2026, revealed under the heading Initiate Feeding read, in part.5. On the formula label document initials, date and time the formula was hung/administered. Review of Resident #2's electronic health record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dysphagia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, and encounter for attention to gastrostomy. Review of Resident #2's April 2026 physician's orders revealed an order dated 02/26/2025 that read in part.Enteral Feed Order every night shift.Change feeding administration set daily, label the formula container, syringe and administration set with resident's name, date, time and nurse's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record and policy review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice, by failing to label a nebulizer tubing and mask with a date, and store the mask in a bag when not in use for 1(#5) of 1 residents investigated for respiratory care.Findings:On 04/08/2026, a review of the facility's policy titled, The Facility Oxygen Administration which was last reviewed on 01/2026, read in part: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration . Steps in the Procedure .19. When not in use oxygen tubing will be stored in a plastic bag with date. 20. Change oxygen tubing weekly and label with date. 21. When not in use, store nasal cannula or mask in bag.Review of Resident #5's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, primary lateral sclerosis, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nurse maintained infection control practices while administering wound care treatments for 1 resident (#40) out of 2 residents reviewed for wound care in a sample of 32 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, with a revision date of December 2025, read in part: Hand hygiene is indicated: d. before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same resident;.h. after glove removal. Review of Resident #40's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, cerebral infarction and pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4. Review of Resident #40's current physician's orders revealed the following orders: -Dakins (1/4 strength) External Solution 0.125 % (Sodium Hypochlorite) Apply to sacrococcygeal topically every day shift for pressure wound. Cleanse, apply collagen, calcium…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care was implemented for 1 (Resident #51) out of 32 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #51's splint was applied on her left hand. Findings: A review of Resident #51's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, cerebral infarction. A review of Resident #51's Order Summary Report revealed a physician's order, dated 02/06/2025 that read, left hand splint to be worn during the day, take off at night and for showers. A review of Resident #51's Care Plan Report revealed a care plan intervention initiated on 02/07/2025 that read, left hand splint to be worn during the day, take off at night and for showers. On 03/18/2025 at 9:27 AM, an observation was made of Resident #51 in her room. No splint was observed on her left hand. On 03/18/2025 at 10:07 AM, a second observation was made of Resident #51 in her room. No splint was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of injuries of unknown source with serious bodily injury was reported immediately, or within 2 hours of the allegation to the state survey agency for 1 (#1) of 4 (#1, #2, #3 and #R1) residents sampled with facility reported incidents. Findings: On 09/10/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating with a last reviewed date of 03/11/2024 read in part: Policy Statement: All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin) . are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) . 1. If resident . injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. 2. The administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the status of 1 (Resident #2) out of 3 (Resident #1, #2, and #3) sampled residents by failing to ensure that Resident #2 was coded correctly for the use of a wander guard. Findings: Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's health record revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Hypertension. Review of Resident #2's most recent Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 99, indicating the resident was unable to cooperate. Further Review of Resident #2's most recent MDS dated [DATE] Section P - Restraints and Alarms, P0200 Alarms, E. Wander/elopement Alarm, revealed it was coded as 0. Not used. Review of the Wandering Risk Scale dated 03/16/2024 revealed in Section E. History of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infections as evidence by S3CNA failing to: 1. utilize the proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) while providing care to Resident #2 who was on Contact Precautions. 2. perform hand hygiene before entering and exiting Resident #2's room. 3. disinfect the vital sign machine and blood pressure cuff after use. The facility had a census of 88. Findings: On 06/04/2024, a review of the facility's policy, Isolation - Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions, with a last reviewed date of 03/08/2024, revealed in part, the following, . Contact Precautions: . 2. Contact precautions are also used in situations when a resident is experiencing wound drainage, fecal incontinence or diarrhea, or other discharges from the body that cannot be contained and suggest an increased potential for extensive environmental contamination and risk of transmission of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of policy and procedure and interviews, the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to follow appropriate food handling practices as evidenced by: 1. One opened package of bread on the counter not labeled with the date. 2. Food residue noted on the deep fryer and layer of oil and debris noted on the floor underneath the deep fryer. 3. Food storage: A. Walk-in cooler: 1. A container of onion mix not labeled with the date it had been prepared. 2. Two bags of ham opened and placed in a zip log bag not labeled with the date. 3. One bag of lettuce opened and not labeled with the date. 4. Four cucumbers with texture changes indicated the items were spoiled. 4. Failure to distribute food under sanitary conditions for Resident #61. The total amount of residents that ate out of the kitchen was 89 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Sanitization, last reviewed on 03/2024, revealed in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive patient-centered care plan for 2 residents (Resident # 6 and Resident # 84) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings: On 03/13/2024, a review of the policy dated 03/2024 titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered read in part, Policy Statement, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measureable objectives and timetable to meet the residents physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Resident #6 Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Lobar Pneumonia. Review of Resident #6's physician's orders revealed an order dated 01/15/2024 that read: O2 (oxygen) at 2L/MIN (liters per minute) continuously/titrate as needed. Review of Resident #6's Comprehensive Care Plan failed to reveal a care plan had been developed for oxygen use.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $655K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA