Courtyard Manor Nurse Care Center & Assisted Liv

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 23.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 82.2 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service, and ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen as evidenced by: multiple spots of build up debris and a red sticky substance on the covering of the ice machine;uncovered and expired food items stored in the refrigerator; andexposed hair and facial hair.This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 75 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.Findings:On 01/05/2026, a review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, with a last reviewed date of 07/29/2025, revealed in part. Refrigerated/Frozen Storage 1. All food stored in the refrigerator or freezer are covered, labeled and dated ( use by date).On 01/05/2026, a review of the facility's policy titled, Refrigerator and Freezer, with a last reviewed date of 07/29/2025, revealed in part.Food Preparation Area.5.Hair nets and beard restraints are to be worn while in food preparation areas. On 01/05/2026 at 8:31 a.m., a tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's physician was immediately notified of a change in the resident's skin condition for 1 (#17) resident out 2 (#17, #77) residents investigated for pressure ulcers. Findings:Review of the facility's policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status with a review date of 07/29/2025, read as follows: 1. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a: i. specific instruction to notify the physician of changes in the resident's condition. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/08/2024 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, prediabetes, and vascular dementia. On 01/05/2026 at 9:59 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #17 with an uncovered, open abrasion on her left facial cheek. On 01/06/2026 at 3:20 p.m., a second observation was made of Resident #17 who remained to have the uncovered, open abrasion on her left facial cheek. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a newly diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for 1 (#33) of 3 residents investigated for PASARR. A review of Resident #33's record revealed an admission date of 08/15/2024 with diagnoses that included in part, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with agitation and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. Further review revealed she was diagnosed with major depressive disorder on 10/07/2024. A review of Resident #33's Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review dated 07/11/2024 was conducted. Review of Section III, 1. revealed in part, an empty box next to the diagnosis of major depressive disorder. A review of the Resident #33's document Medicaid Program, Notice of Medical Certification dated 07/30/2024 revealed that a Level II decision was not required. On 01/07/2026 at 2:36 p.m., an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident identified with a mental disorder had an accurately completed PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) on admission for 1 (Resident #57) of 3 residents investigated for PASARR.Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, unspecified dementia, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, depression, and generalized anxiety disorder. A review of Resident #57's PASARR dated 02/24/2025 was conducted. Review of Section III, 1., revealed in part, an empty box next to Other Psychotic Disorder. A review of Resident #57's document Medicaid Program, Notice of Medical Certification dated 02/28/2025 revealed in part that a Level II decision was not required. On 01/07/2026 at 2:30 p.m., an interview and review of Resident #57's record was conducted with S3ADM (Administrator). S3ADM stated that the PASARR dated on 02/24/25 was completed by another facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan and a physician order for a concave mattress for 1 (Resident #76) of 27 sampled residents.Review of Resident #76's record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include in part, anxiety disorder, unspecified dementia, psychotic disorder with delusions, Alzheimer's Disease, and bipolar disorder. A review of Resident #76's Order Summary Report revealed a physician order dated 10/14/2024 for Concave mattress every shift. A review of Resident #76''s Care Plan Report revealed in part: Focus: I am at risk for falls related to impaired mobility, generalized weakness and multiple medication use. Interventions: Maintain concave mattress to my bed.On 01/06/2026 at 2:12 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #76's empty bed. The mattress looked flat and not concave.On 01/07/2026 at 8:40 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #76's empty bed. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing services to meet the residents' needs safely, and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 1(#12) of 00 sampled residents as evidenced by nursing staff failing to properly maintain and record output from a Jackson Pratt (JP) drain for Resident #12. Findings: On 10/30/2024, a review of the facility's assessment with no revision date, read in part Before any new diagnoses is accepted into the facility the facility ensures the staff is competent of taking care of the resident. If a new diagnosis occurs then the facility would seek education and resources to ensure that the facility is able to care for the resident and new diagnoses, through this process. Further review revealed a review of clinical competencies within the clinical department is done on hire, annually and as needed based on need to ensure new protocols and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of resident's needs for 1 (#12) out of 29 sampled residents as evidenced by Resident #12's easy touch call light device outside of her reach. Findings: On 10/30/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Call System, Residents with no revision date, read in part residents are provided with a means to call staff for assistance through a communication system that directly calls a staff member or a centralized work station. Review of Resident #12's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Non-traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Affecting Left Non-dominant Side, Contracture Left and Right hand, and Right Mastectomy. Review of Resident #12's October 2024 physician's orders revealed an order dated 11/15/2023 which read in part .ensure flat soft touch call bell is within reach at all times, every…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative when a resident had a significant change in condition for 1 (#18) resident out of 29 sampled residents. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status with a last reviewed date of 03/15/2024, read in part, . Our facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status; 4. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when: b. there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status. Review of Resident #18's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Cerebral Infarction, Aphasia, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #18's progress notes revealed a note dated 10/11/2024 by S15LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) that read in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that services were provided as outlined in the comprehensive plan of care for 1 (#12) of 29 sampled residents as evidenced by staff failing to turn Resident #12 every two hours. Findings: Review of the resident's electronic health record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of Unspecified Site of Female Breast, Aphasia, Contracture of Muscle, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side, Contracture Left and Right Hand, and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of the resident's current physician's orders revealed an order dated 04/29/2023 which read, Turn every two hours every shift. Review of the resident's MAR (Medication Administration Record) for October 2024 read in part .turn every two hours every shift. Review of the resident's care plan dated 03/07/2024 read in part .at risk for impaired skin integrity related to incontinence, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (#57) of 3 (#12, #47 and #57) residents reviewed for ADLs. Findings: Review of Resident #57's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, in part, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following other non traumatic intracranial hemorrhage affecting left non-dominant side, Contracture to left and right hand, and Contracture to left and right leg. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] read in part .Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 9, which indicated he had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the resident's care plan dated 08/27/2024 read in part At risk for bowel and bladder incontinence related to immobility, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), Overactive bladder. I am incontinent of bowel and bladder,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,388 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $3,252 — penalty dated 2023-12-26
• $19,136 — penalty dated 2023-09-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $7K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA