No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Maison de Lafayette

2707 Kaliste Saloom Road, Lafayette, LA 70508 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 189 certified beds · (337) 981-2258 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (337) 981-2258 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2023Resident-funds citation (F0568)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$14,518 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $14,518 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-30)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (74%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4540 Ambassador Caffery Pkwy · (337) 984-1610 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid<0.1 mi
4510 Ambassador Caffery Pkwy · (337) 988-7290 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.1 mi
4518 Ambassador Caffery Pkwy · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
301 W Farrel Rd · (337) 981-1021

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased40.7%17.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%1.2%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms18.9%2.3%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.0%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened30.0%17.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.2%23.2%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%5.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.2%15.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.2%22.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.4%3.1%1.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine33.6%76.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.1%28.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.5%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.902.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.352.741.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 103 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
44.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 44.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.1%CMS range 37.6–53.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 7.2–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge44.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.9–9.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.251.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.20
RN hours/ resident / day
1.10
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.27
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.09
RN hoursweekends
74.2%
Total nursing turnover
70.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 189 beds and averages 166.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-13)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to initiate orders to conduct blood sugar levels on a newly admitted resident with a significant history of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and was receiving insulin, for 1 (#4) of 5 (#1-5) sampled residents, and 7 (R1-R7) randomly selected residents. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy for Resident #4 on 08/16/2023 when he was admitted to the facility until 08/18/2023 when he was transferred to the hospital via ambulance. On 08/16/2023, the resident was admitted with a significant history of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, including a Right Below the Knee Amputation, a recent diagnosis of Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Diabetic foot ulcers, and Gangrene. On 08/18/2023 Resident #4 became sluggish, lethargic, and short of breath. A glucometer level was obtained at that time, with the level too high to be read. Resident #4 was hospitalized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2023-08-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse for 2 (#1, #2) residents out of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) sampled residents. The facility failed to protect: 1. Resident #2 from verbal and psychosocial abuse by S2LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). 2. Resident #1 from verbal abuse made by S4HSK. This deficient practice resulted in psychosocial harm for Resident #2 on 06/08/2023 at 1:15 p.m. when S2LPN yelled expletives at her. Resident #2 was observed crying by staff after the incident. Resident #2 stated during an interview that she was deathly scared of S2LPN and hoped she didn't return to the facility. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: A review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect Policy statement read in part: Abuse: the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders to obtain daily weights for residents with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and fluid overload for 2 (Resident #2, Resident #3) of 2 residents in the facility ordered daily weights in a sample of 3 residents. This deficient practice was evidenced by 33 undocumented daily weights for Resident #2 and no documented daily weights on two consecutive weekends for Resident #3.Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Weighing and Measuring the Resident, with a revision date of March 2011, read in part: Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to determine the resident's weight and height, to provide a baseline and an ongoing record of the resident's body weight as an indicator of the nutritional status and medical condition of the resident.Reporting: 1. Report significant weight loss/weight gain to the nurse supervisor.4. Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement the plan of care and follow physician orders for 6 (#13, #52, #65, #69, and #120) of 56 sampled residents. This was evidenced by failing to:1. provide Resident #13 with Nepro (dialysis supplement) as ordered;2. apply a carrot stretcher (used for hand contractures) to Resident #52's right hand as ordered; 3. supervise Resident #65 for all meals4. administer medication for Resident #69; and5. provide Resident #120 with two person assistance for toileting.Findings:Resident #13 Review of Resident #13’s EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including end stage renal disease and diabetes type 2. Review of Resident #13’s quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set Assessment) dated 07/11/2025 revealed the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12, indicating her cognition was intact. Review of Resident #13’s August 2025 physician’s orders revealed an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for 7 (#1, #3, #71, #89, #121 #145, #148) residents who required mechanical soft diets out of a final sample of 56 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Menus, with a last revision date of October 2017, read in part: 1. Menus meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with the recommended dietary allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board. Review of the diet spread sheet for residents prescribed mechanical soft diets revealed the following meal was to be served on 08/11/2025: Beans [NAME] Northern f (featured)/Dry Ham buffet, [NAME] Steamed, Carrot Sliced Parslied, Cornbread, Crisp Pear. On 08/11/2025 at 11:30 a.m., an observation was made during lunch in Dining Hall B. Residents #1, #3, #71, #89, #121 #145, and #148 were all prescribed Mechanical Soft diets and had whole Brussel sprouts on their plates. Residents #1 and #145 had eaten all of the Brussel sprouts that were served on their plates. Resident #89 attempted to eat the Brussel sprouts but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to make choices about aspects of her life that were significant to the resident for 1 (#49) resident out of a final sample of 56 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, with a last revised date of February 2021, read in part: Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: e. self-determination.v. have the facility respond to his or her grievance. Review of Resident #49's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including spastic diplegic cerebral palsy, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder.Review of Resident #49's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating that her cognition was intact.On 08/11/2025 at 10:01 a.m., an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure individual financial records were provided to the resident through quarterly statements for 1 (Resident #35) out of 56 residents included in the sample.Findings:On 08/11/2025 at 3:54 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #35. Resident #35 stated she had not received quarterly statements for her personal funds account.On 08/12/2025, a review of Resident #35's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognition.On 08/12/2025, a review of Resident #35's admission Record revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included in part, unspecified dementia, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Further review under the Contacts section revealed Resident #35's Responsible Party (RP) was a family member.On 08/13/2025 at 10:39 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9OD (Office Director). She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to address and act upon grievances for 1 (#49) resident out of 56 sampled residents. Findings:Review of the facility's policy titled, Grievances/Complaints, Filing, with a last revised date of April 2017, read in part: 3. All grievances, complaints, or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning issues of resident care in the facility will be considered. Actions on such issues will be responded to in writing, including rationale for the response.7. Upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the grievance officer will review and investigate the allegations and report the findings to the administrator.13. The results of all grievances files, investigated and reported will be maintained on file for a minimum of three years from the issuance of the grievance decision.Review of Resident #49's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including spastic diplegic cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed timely for 1 (#111) out of 56 total sampled residents. Findings:Review of the CMS (Center for Medicare and/or Medicaid Services) RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Manual Version 3.0 provided by the facility as their policy titled, Chapter 5: Submission and Correction of MDS Assessments read in part .5.2 Timeliness Criteria: In accordance with the requirements at 42 CR 483.20(f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(3), long-term care facilities participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs must meet the following conditions: Completion Time: For all non-admission OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) and PPS (Prospective Payment System) assessments, the MDS completion date (Z0500B) must be no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD)(A2300). Review of Resident #111's electronic health record (EHR) revealed an initial admission date of 03/24/2025 and a discharge date of 06/13/2025. Further review of Resident #111's EHR failed to reveal that a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the minimum data set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the status of 2 (Resident #69 and #179) of 56 sampled residents. The facility failed to: 1.Accurately code medication on the MDS for Resident #69; and 2.Accurately code the discharge type on the MDS for Resident #179.Findings: Resident #69 Review of Resident #69’s (EHR) electronic health record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #69’s physician’s orders revealed an order dated 07/04/2025 that read in part, Aspirin 81mg (milligrams) 1 tablet by mouth daily related to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #69’s MAR (Medication Administration Record) for July 2025 revealed she had been administered Aspirin daily from 07/04/2025 to 07/31/2025. Review of Resident #69’s Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 07/09/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was stored appropriately when not in use for 3 (Resident #30, Resident #89, Resident #116) out of 5 (Resident #30, Resident #84, Resident #89, Resident #94, Resident #116) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings: On 08/13/2025, a review of the facility’s policy titled, “Oxygen Administration”, with a last revision date of October 2010, failed to address the procedure for oxygen equipment storage. On 08/13/2025, a review of the facility’s policy titled, “Administering Medications through a Small Volume (Handheld) Nebulizer”, with a last revision date of October 2010, failed to address the procedure for oxygen equipment storage. On 08/13/2025, a review of the facility’s policy titled, “CPAP(Continuous Positive Airway Pressure)/BiPap (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) Support” with a last revision date of March 2015, indicated “Masks, nasal pillows and tubing…Once dry place in zip lock bag until used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to make an appointment with a dentist in a timely manner for 1 (#3) of 1 (#3) residents investigated for dental care. Findings:Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with accumulative diagnoses including cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus, speech and language deficits following cerebral infarction, dysarthria following cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and depressive disorders.Record review of Resident #3's physician orders dated 08/06/2025 read in part: Consult dentist related to dental pain right upper gums has broken teeth with redness/tenderness.Record review of Resident #3's care plan read in part, I require dental care. I am experiencing dental pain and a potentially abscessed tooth. Interventions included refer resident and follow up with dentist as needed. Assess oral cavity and dentition. Monitor for any irritation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service, and ensure expired foods were removed from the kitchen.This had the potential to affect the 166 residents that consumed food from the kitchen.Findings:On 08/12/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, with a last revision date of 11/2022, revealed in part. Policy Statement: Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Dry Food Storage.4. Dry foods that are stored in bins are removed from original packaging, label and dated ( used by date). Such foods are rotated using a first in-first out system. On 08/11/2025 at 8:30 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with S7DD (Dietary Director). During the tour, S7DD confirmed: 15 cups of prune juice on the shelf in the dry storage room, had an expiration date of 07/03/2025; 4 loafs of bread had a best use by date of 07/24/2025; 22 loafs of bread had a best by date of 08/06/2025; and 10 loafs of bread with a best by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infection. This was evidenced by staff failing to perform appropriate hand hygiene during the provision of care and services, and failing to appropriately dispose of medical waste.Findings:A. Review of the facility’s Handwashing/Hand Hygiene Policy and Procedure, with a review date of October 2023, read in part: “…Indication for Hand Hygiene: 1. hand hygiene is indicated: e. after touching the resident's environment…” Review of a document titled “Medical Waste, Handling of”, with a revision date of 09/2010, which read in part: “Purpose – is to provide a definition of and guidelines for the safe and appropriate handling of medical waste…General Guidelines – 1. Medical waste includes human blood and blood soiled articles contaminated items (i.e., soiled dressings)… 4. Disposable items, which are contaminated with excretions or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident or RP (Responsible Party) with written notice which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for 1 resident (#2) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Preparing a resident for , with a last revised date of December 2016, read in part: The business office is responsible for .b. Informing the resident, or his or her representative (sponsor) of our facility's readmission appeal rights, bed- holding policies , etc; . Review of the facility's Emergency Transfer Log for March 2025 revealed Resident #2 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the Emergency Transfer Log revealed the written notification to resident portion of the log was blank. On 05/14/2025 at 9:04 a.m., a review of the Emergency Transfer Log was conducted with S12SSD (Social Services Director).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the minimum data set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the status of 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Residents #1 - #3) sampled residents. Findings: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, cerebral infarction, memory deficit following cerebral infarction, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following infarction affecting right dominant side. During an interview with Resident #3 on 05/13/2025 at 9:09 a.m., she stated that she experienced pain from her pressure ulcer but had been receiving pain medication which helps with the pain. Review of Resident #3 Physician Orders, revealed an order written on 06/20/2024 for Tylenol 8 hour oral tablet extended release 650 milligram (mg) (Acetaminophen) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/19/2025, revealed in Section J0100 that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care for dependent residents by failing to ensure rounding was conducted every two hours for 1 (#2) resident out of 3 (#1,#2,#3) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified dementia and urinary tract infection. Review of section GG- Functional Abilities of Resident #2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident could not walk ten feet and required substantial or maximal assistance for toileting. Review of section H- Bowel and Blader revealed the resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 05/12/2025 at 8:05 a.m., a phone interview was conducted with Resident #2's family member. She stated that the CNAs were not rounding on the resident every two hours, and her mom was left soiled for several hours before being changed. On 05/12/2025 at 3:50 p.m., a follow up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed timely for 1 (#1) out of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4) total sampled residents. Findings: A request was made on 04/03/2025 to S3RA (Regional Administrator) for a policy regarding MDS completion and submission time frames. A policy was not provided by the time of survey exit. Review of CMS's (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) RAI Version 3.0 Manual- RAI OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act)-required Assessment Summary revealed that Assessment Reference Date for an admission Comprehensive Assessment should be completed no later than the 14th calendar day of the resident's admission. Findings: Review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed he was hospitalized on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed he was hospitalized again on 02/27/2025 and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's electronic clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a plan of care after a fall for 1 (Resident #3) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #3's Discharge Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/02/2025 revealed, in part, section J had yes to falls. Review of Resident #3's Nursing Progress note dated 02/13/2025 8:11p.m., read in part .Summoned to resident's room by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), who was doing rounds. Upon entering resident's room he was noted lying in supine position on floor next to bed. When assisted to bed facial grimace noted, although he denied pain. Review of Resident #3's Nursing Progress note dated 02/18/2025 8:19 p.m., read in part . I the writer was in the middle of going to give resident his HS (Hours sleep) medications, when I noticed Resident #3 on floor laying down in supine position , head beneath bed. I called another Agency Nurse to assisted resident back into bed. Resident was cover in feces and he stated he was going to use bathroom Review of Resident #3's Plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect, dignity and care by: 1. the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with meals in a dignified manner as evidenced by staff standing over Residents #122, #138, and #563 while assisting them to eat, 2. the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a urinary catheter had a privacy bag or covering over their urine collection bag for dignity for Resident #128. Findings: On 06/12/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Assistance with meals with a revision date of 01/17/2024, read in part, Policy Statement: Residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident. Residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort, and dignity, for example: a. not standing over residents while assisting them with meals. Resident # 122 Review of the Resident #122's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure recipes for pureed, and chopped diets were followed. This failure had the potential to contribute to an unpleasant dining experience, decreased intake, altered nutritional needs, and weight loss for the 7 residents who received pureed or chopped meals. Findings: On 06/11/2024 at 11:09 a.m., an observation was made of S23DS (Dietary Supervisor) preparing the lunch meal pureed dessert of a chocolate peanut butter bar. S23DS was observed taking an unmeasured amount of chocolate peanut butter bars and placing them in the food processor and blended the bars. She then stopped blending the mixture and added an unmeasured amount of milk from 1- half pint of milk, then blended the mixture and shortly after stopped blending. S23DS was observed manually breaking the large pieces of bars that had not processed into smaller pieces and then blended the mixture. She then added an unmeasured amount of milk from a half pint of milk, blended mixture, stirred mixture and added unmeasured amount of milk from a second…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview the Facility failed to promote and facilitate residents' self- determination through support of the residents' choice about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident for 2 (#25, #35) out 5 (#2, #25, #35, #63, and #106) residents investigated for choices as evidence by: 1. failure to remove completed food trays from resident's room for Resident #25; 2. failure to support food choices for Resident #35 Findings: Resident #25 Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admit date of 11/14/2018 with diagnoses which included in part, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic features. Review of Resident #25's annual Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. On 06/10/2024 at 7:35 a.m., an observation was conducted in Resident #25's room, which revealed two food trays. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 2 (#1 and #123) out of 9 (#1, #15, #22, #35, #89, #102, #106, #123 and #142) residents investigated for environment, out of a total sample of 59 residents. Findings: On 06/11/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Homelike Environment with a revision date of 04/03/2024, read in part, Policy Statement: Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment . Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery without Angina and Recurrent Depressive Disorders. On 06/10/2024 at 7:30 a.m., an observation was conducted of resident #1's bathroom. The left wall of the bathroom was scratched up and peeling, and there were four holes observed in the sheetrock of the wall across from the shower. On 06/10/2024 at 7:34 a.m., an interview and observation of Resident #1's bathroom was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer residents with newly identified mental disorders to the appropriate state designated authority for review for 2 residents (#16, #125) out of 4 residents (#16, #65, #102, #125) investigated for PASARR (Pre admission Screening and Resident Review). Findings: Resident #16 Review of Resident #16's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Pyschotic Disorder with Hallucinations and Unspecified Psychosis. Further review of Resident #16's EHR revealed a Level I PASARR screening dated 06/30/2006 that was completed at another facility. A diagnosis of mental retardation or other related conditions was not documented on the screening. A Review of the Level II Evaluation summary and determination notice dated 07/28/2023 revealed in part: Type of Referral - Resident Review . Evaluation Placement Recommendations - The individual does not have a serious mental illness and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the care plan for Resident #72 as evidenced by failing to: 1. ensure the resident did not have cigarettes in her possession, 2. follow physician's orders to remove the resident's dialysis dressing for 1 (#72) out of 59 sampled residents. Findings: 1. Resident #72. Review of the resident's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Encephalopathy, End Stage Renal Disease, Anxiety Disorder, Altered Mental Status, and Tobacco Use. Review of Resident #72's medical record revealed in Section O of her MDS that she received dialysis. Further review revealed a physician's order written on 05/20/2024: remove dressings/bandaids over dialysis cannulation site every Mon (Monday), Wed (Wednesday), Fri (Friday) before dinner. On 06/10/2024 at 8:36 a.m., the resident was observed sitting up in wheelchair in the hallway of the hall she resided on. The resident was observed holding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident # 89 On 06/12/2024 at 2:32 p.m., a review of the facility's policy titled Advanced Directives with a last reviewed date of 04/03/2024 read in part: 4. The plan of care for each resident is consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/or advance directive. Review of Resident #89's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction due to Embolism of Left Posterior Cerebral Artery and Malignant Neoplasm of Cervix Uteri. Review of Resident #89's May 2024 physician's orders revealed an order dated 05/29/2024 that read DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). Review of the resident's Lapost (Louisiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment) signed and dated 05/29/2024 read in part: Cardiovascular Resuscitation - DNR/Do not attempt resuscitation (allow natural death). Review of Resident #89's plan of care revealed a focus that read: I am a Full Code; I have signed Advanced Directive, with an initiation dated 06/06/2023.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate and sufficient services, treatment and care according to standards of professional practice for 1 (#33) of 1 (#33) residents that were reviewed for urinary catheter or UTI (urinary tract infection) out of a total of 59 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33's urinary catheter bag was below the level of the resident's bladder. Findings: Resident # 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Bladder Disorder, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms A review of Resident #33's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 04/17/2024 revealed he had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, suggesting his cognition was intact. On 06/10/2024 at 8:32 a.m., an observation was conducted of the resident in his wheelchair with his urinary catheter bag hung on the right side on the arm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding by failing to ensure insertion site of the gastric tube was cleansed as ordered for 1 (#54) resident investigated for tube feeding, out of a total sample of 59 residents Findings: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Malignant Neoplasm of Overlapping Sites of Oropharynx and Carcinoma In Situ of Skin of Right Upper Limb. The resident had a PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy) tube for enteral feeding. A review of Resident #54's MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed in section K that he had weight loss and was receiving 26-50% tube feeding. A review of Resident #54's June 2024 physician's orders revealed an order written on 10/23/2023: Cleanse the PEG site with soap and water, pat dry, apply split gauze qd (every day). On 06/10/2024 at 6:58 a.m., an observation and interview were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly and not available for resident's use as evidenced by eye drops left at the beside for 1 (#2) out of 59 final sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 164. Findings: Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Preglaucoma, and Occipital neuralgia. Review of Resident #2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 05/28/2024 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. On 06/12/2024 at 12:34 p.m., review of the facilities Medication Administration policy and procedure with a review date of 04/03/2024 read in part Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 27. Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet to meet the nutritional needs of 2 (#51 and #92) of 26 (#s 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 17, 18, 28, 35, 49, 50, 51, 54, 62, 64, 83, 92, 104, 112, 122, 134, 138, 140, 142, 153, and 563) residents investigated for dining. Findings: On 06/12/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Frequency of Meals, with a revision date of 04/03/2024, read in part, Policy Statement: Each resident shall receive at least three (3) meals daily, at times comparable to typical mealtimes .Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The facility will serve at least three (3) meals or their equivalent daily at scheduled times .Breakfast 7:30 a.m. Resident #51: Review of Resident #51's electronic record revealed an admission date of 09/23/2019 with diagnoses that revealed in part, Acute Kidney Failure, Vitamin D Deficiency, Chronic Congestive Heart Failure, Hypomagnesemia, Celiac Disease, Hypokalemia, Anemia, Unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was enough dietary staff to provide residents' meals within 45 minutes of the facility's scheduled meal times for 57 residents who consumed meals from Kitchen 3. Findings: On 06/12/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Frequency of Meals, with a revision date of 04/03/2024, read in part, Policy Statement: Each resident shall receive at least three (3) meals daily, at times comparable to typical mealtimes .Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The facility will serve at least three (3) meals or their equivalent daily at scheduled times .Breakfast 7:30 a.m., Lunch 11:30 a.m . On 06/10/2024 at 8:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S23DS (Dietary Supervisor) stated the facility has one main kitchen (Kitchen 1) where all of food was prepared and two other kitchens (Kitchen 2 and Kitchen 3) used to distribute meals. On 06/10/2024 at 8:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with S11DM (Dietary Manager) stated S12Cook was responsible for Kitchen 3. On 06/10/2024 at 8:41 a.m., an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0839 — isolated
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure environmental staff possessed the necessary qualifications or competencies as evidenced by failing to notify nursing staff when Resident #93 was heard yelling for help. Findings: Review of S9Hsk's (Housekeeping) training revealed the following onboarding training was completed upon hire on 06/06/2024: Stop and Watch In service Form revealed, in part .Environmental and Dining Services Employees do not provide direct patient care, but may come in contact with patients or residents while performing their duties, for example, while cleaning a resident's room or serving a resident's meal .Employees may come in contact with residents, it is important for them to be aware of the types of behavior that could indicate a serious change in a resident's health .It is important that you immediately notify a member of the nursing staff. The facility may have a form for you to complete if you notice a change in a resident's behavior, but the important thing is that you report the change to nursing so they are aware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to protect confidential information for Resident #6 by failing to enable the computer's privacy screen during a treatment being administered to Resident #153. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 164. Findings: On 06/11/2024 a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure titled, Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy, with a revision date of October 2017 and review date of January 2024, read in part . Policy: Our facility will protect and safeguard resident confidentiality of all resident personal and medical records. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The facility will safeguard the personal privacy and confidentiality of all resident personal and medical records . 4. Access to resident personal and medical records will be limited to authorized staff . On 06/11/2024 at 10:12 a.m., an observation was made of an unattended treatment cart located outside of Resident #153's room with the computer opened and the screen was visible. Private medical information was visible on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary physical restraints for 1 (#3) resident out of 3 residents investigated. Findings: On 04/04/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Use of Restraints with a last reviewed date of 01/04/2024 read in part .Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom and never for discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of fall. Review of Resident #3's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Traumatic Subdural Hemorrhage, Major Depressive Disorder, and Dementia. Review of Resident #3's plan of care revealed the following problem and intervention: Resident is at risk for falls r/t (related to) muscle weakness, difficulty walking, SDH (Subdural Hemorrhage), seizure, dementia, TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack), falls, dizziness. Intervention implemented on 03/21/2024- Fall Intervention- I need my…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1. provide sufficient numbers of CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant) to perform services on a 24- hour basis per the facility's assessment, and 2. timely respond to call bells for Resident #1's and Resident 2's who required assistance with care and needs. This had the potential to effect 165 residents who reside in the facility. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool Staffing Plan revealed the following including: Staffing Plan 3.2 - Based on your resident population and their needs for care and support, describe your general approach to staffing to ensure that you have sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents at any given time. Nurse Aides - 46 (43 Floor, 2 [NAME] Clerks, 1 Activities). Review of the facility's 24 Hour CNA Staffing Sheet revealed the following days when there was not enough CNAs for the resident census as per the facility's assessment: 02/29/2024 - Facility Census: 164 - 41 CNAs worked in the 24 hour period. 03/01/2024 - Facility Census: 165 - 38 CNAs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a person centered care plan for 1 resident (#3) out of a final sample of 3 residents as evidenced by failing to ensure a resident had a comprehensive care plan that addressed her refusal for CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure). Findings: Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including in part, Asthma, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) with Chronic Bronchitis, SOB (Shortness of Breath) Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/24/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #3's Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) was a 15 which indicated Resident #15 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #3's Plan of Comprehensive Care Plan revealed, in part, Resident #3 I have episodes of dyspnea with potential for impaired oxygen exchange related to Asthma, COPD with Chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was provided incontinence care for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. Review of Resident #1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #1 had Hemiplegia (paralysis to one side of the body) and Hemiparalysis following a Cerebral Infarction (disruption in blood supply to a part of the brain causing tissue to die) affecting the left non-dominant side. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated she was cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assist from staff for toileting hygiene, partial/moderate assistance from staff for personal hygiene, and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #1's plan of care revealed, in part, an intervention that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nurse informed the physician and RP (Responsible Party) in a timely manner of a change in the resident's condition for 1 (#2) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. Findings: Resident #2. Review of the resident's electronic clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, Impulse Disorder, and Schizoaffective Disorder. Review of the resident's nursing note dated 5/30/2023 at 9:16 a.m. revealed, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was prompted to go to a resident room due to resident hollering to find (resident #2) walking around in her room only in a shirt . There was no evidence the physician or RP was notified of the resident's behavior. Review of the resident's nursing note dated 7/27/2023 at 17:40 (5:40 p.m.) revealed, Resident continuously wanders in and out of other resident's rooms. He bothers them in the dining room when others are trying to eat. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-17 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer residents with newly diagnosed mental disorders or had a significant change in their mental condition to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) for evaluation and determination for 2 (#18, #70) of 2 residents investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 44 residents. Findings: Review of Resident #18's diagnosis list revealed on 09/06/2021 he was diagnosed with Unspecified Psychosis, and Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations. Review of Resident #18's records revealed no evidence a Level II PASARR had been submitted to the appropriate state-designated authority. On 05/17/2023 at 1:07 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7SSD. She confirmed Resident #18 had a new diagnosis of Unspecified Psychosis, and Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations on 09/06/2021. S7SSD confirmed no Level 1 PASARR was completed after the new diagnosisResident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences as evidenced by failing to monitor for the presence of pain for 2 (96, 112) of 3 (96, 112, 130) residents sampled for pain, of a total sample of 44 residents. Findings: Review of Resident #96's Care Plan read in part .Pain: Potential for r/t (related to) Arthritis, Depression, Gout, GERD (Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease) Pain to right foot ankle, right great toe infection, Osteoporosis with old compression fracture, left side back pain. Review of Resident #96's May 2023 physician's revealed the following orders: - Bio freeze Gel 4% -apply to lower back topically at bedtime for pain. - Acetaminophen ER (Extra Strength) Tablet 650 milligrams - three times daily for pain. --Neurontin Capsule 300 mg - give one at bedtime for Diabetic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 1(#12) for resident's vision out of 44 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 162. Findings: Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part: Major Depressive Disorder, Bradycardia, and Legal Blindness. Resident #12's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] was reviewed. Review of Section B- Hearing, Speech, Vision Status, revealed the resident was coded as 0, indicating he had adequate vision. On 05/15/2023, at 10:30 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #12's room. There were two signs posted that read vision impaired. On 05/16/2023 at 3:41 p.m., an interview was conducted with S25MDS. She stated she was very familiar with Resident # 12, and he was blind. A review of section B of Resident #12's MDS was conducted with S25MDS. S25MDS confirmed that the resident's vision was coded as adequate and should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided based on comprehensive assessment , care plan, and preferences for 1 (#153) resident out of 1 resident investigated for activities out of a final sample of 44 residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 17 residents that resided on Hall A. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Group Programs and Activities Calendar read in part .1. Both large and small group activities are part of our activity programs. 2. The activities calendar states all activities available for the entire month .6. Smaller monthly activity calendars are placed in each resident room at a height and location that is accessible to the resident .8. Modifications, time changes, cancellations or substitutions are reflected on all large [NAME] calendars as soon as possible. Resident #153 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: Major Depressive Disorder and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-17 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to schedule a vision examination for 1 (#130) of 2 (#12, #130) residents reviewed for Communication and Sensory from 44 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #130's electronic record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Rheumatoid Arthritis, Dementia, Gout, Osteoarthritis, Myalgia, Major Depressive Disorder, Pain, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Anemia, and Essential Hypertension. Review of Resident #130's Social Services quarterly notes read in part, 12/02/2022 Resident has impaired vision without the use of corrective lenses at this time. 03/06/2023 Resident has impaired vision without the use of corrective lenses at this time. Review of Resident #130's MDS (Minimum Data Set) quarterly assessment read in part, 12/07/2022 Section B1000 Vision. 1. Impaired-sees large print but not regular print in newspapers/books. 03/08/2023 Section B1000 Vision. 1. Impaired-sees large print but not regular print in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for 1 (#3) resident diagnosed with a Urinary Tract Infection, of 2 (#3, #117) residents sampled for hydration, of a total sample of 44 residents. Findings: A review of Resident #3's annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score as 13, indicating that she was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #3's care plan revealed she was at risk for dehydration, bladder and bowel incontinence, and altered elimination related to dysuria (painful or difficult urination). Further review of the resident's care plan revealed she had a history of Urinary Tract Infections. A review of Resident #3's orders revealed an order with a start date of 05/09/2023 from S24NP (Nurse Practitioner) for the antibiotic Macrobid 100 mg (milligrams), one tablet twice daily for 7 days for a UTI (Urinary Tract Infection). The Macrobid was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (#121) of 2 (#121, #144) residents investigated for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by staff failing to clean Resident #121's CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) machine per the facility's policy. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled CPAP/BiPAP (Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure) Support revealed, in part, .General Guidelines for cleaning . 2. These guidelines are for single-resident use cleaning .5. Humidifier: a. Use clean, distilled water only in the humidifier chamber. b. clean humidifier weekly and air dry. c. To disinfect, place vinegar-water solution (1:3) in clean humidifier. Soak for 30 minutes and rinse thoroughly . A review of Resident #121's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of Unspecified Asthma, Sleep Apnea and Morbid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-17 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a process to ensure 100% of the facility's staff were fully vaccinated as evidenced by failing to provide documentation of COVID-19 vaccination status for 1 (S20CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) out of 1 staff listed as temporary delay/new hire. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 30 residents who resided on Hall B. Findings: Review of policy: Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Policy and Procedure read in part . New Hires: All new employees are required to comply with the vaccination requirements outlined in this policy as soon as practicable and as a condition of employment. The candidate shall have at a minimum the first dose in a vaccine series if applicable completed prior to working in the facility with 30 days to complete the series or have an approved exemption request. Review of the facility's COVID-19 Staff Vaccination Status for Providers form, provided by S22HR (Human Resources), revealed a list of 129 total staff. The form also listed 1 staff with temporary delay/new hire, 113 staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was evidence that CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants), which included agency or contracted CNAs, received in-service training regarding abuse/neglect/exploitation, resident rights, dementia care, infection control, communication, behavioral health, and specific resident needs for 4 (S26CNA, S27CNA, S28CNA, S29CNA) out of 5 (S26CNA, S27CNA, S28CNA, S29CNA, S30CNA) CNA personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of S26CNA's personnel record revealed that she was an agency CNA. There was no date of hire noted in the CNA's personnel record. Further review of the CNA's personnel record revealed that there was no evidence of training on abuse/neglect/exploitation, resident rights, dementia care, infection control, communication, behavioral health, and specific resident needs. Review of S27CNA's personnel record revealed that she was an agency CNA. There was no date of hire noted in the CNA's personnel record. Further review of the CNA's personnel record revealed that there was no evidence of training on resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$14,518 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $14,518 — penalty dated 2023-08-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MCPHERSON, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 10/01/2021
MOODY, CHARLESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL78%since 10/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$475K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 12%Other / private 16%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $475K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$265per resident / day
operating cost
$8,043per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$305per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195365. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next