Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 84 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 85.6 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff effectively notified the physician of a resident's injury for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy for Resident #1 on Friday, 10/13/2023 at 7:30 p.m., when S5LPN noted Resident #1's right arm tucked behind her back. She observed the resident's whimpering and her right arm was swollen and puffy. S5LPN notified S9MD's office via fax at approximately 10:30 p.m. that same evening when the physician's office was closed and would have remained closed and not staffed for the weekend. On Monday, 10/16/2023 at 7:11 a.m. S3LPN observed the injury, notified the doctor by phone and sent the resident to the hospital for evaluation and treatment where she was diagnosed with a fracture of the right arm. The facility implemented corrective actions and was in substantial compliance on 10/16/2023 prior to the State Agency's investigation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff: 1. effectively communicated a change in Resident #1's condition to a physician and 2. intervene by following up with the physician after the identified a change in condition for Resident #1 when she continued to display signs of injury and pain. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy for Resident #1 on Friday, 10/13/2023 at 7:30 p.m., when S5LPN noted Resident #1's right arm tucked behind her back. She observed the resident whimpering and her right arm was swollen and puffy. S5LPN notified S9MD's office via fax at approximately 10:30 p.m. that same evening when the physician's office was closed and would have remained closed and not staffed for the weekend. Nursing staff verbalized the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented for 1 (#R1) of 4 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 87.Findings: Review of the facility policy titled Medical Records, with a revision date of 09/2025 and an annual review date of 01/2026, revealed in part: This community maintains a separate electronic clinical record on each resident in accordance with regulations and accepted professional standards of practice that are complete, accurate, readily accessible, and systematically organized. The resident clinical medical record shall contain sufficient information to identify the resident, a record of the resident's assessments, the comprehensive plan of care and services provided, and the results of any preadmission screenings, progress notes, and any lab, radiology, and other diagnostic services. Review of Resident #R1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 03/29/2021 with diagnoses that included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented and maintained in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 (#1 and #9) residents out of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #6, #9) sampled residents investigated for wound care in a total sample of 9 residents. Findings: Resident #1Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-pressure chronic ulcer of left ankle with unspecified severity.Review of Resident #1's physician's orders revealed an order dated 10/16/2025 that read: clean diabetic ulcer to left lateral malleolus with normal saline; apply moist hydrofera blue; cover with border gauze dressing. Replace prevalon off-loading boot every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday until healed.Review of Resident #1's October and November 2025 TAR (Treatment Administration Record) revealed the following: clean diabetic ulcer to left lateral malleolus with normal saline; apply moist…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care and/or physician's orders for (#2) out of 11 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #R1-#R7) sampled resident as evidenced by failing to identify and implement interventions for refusal of care for Resident #2.Findings: Review of Resident #2's EHR revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, schizoaffective disorder, unspecified, unspecified dementia, moderate, with other behavioral[MC1] , anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder.Review of Resident #2's complex alert documentation report from 07/01/2025 to 09/08/2025 revealed resident refused hygiene care every day in July 2025, and on 08/13/2025, 08/15/2025, 08/25/2025, 09/01/2025 and 09/02/2025.Review of Resident #2's hospice records revealed aide visit notes from 07/14/2025 to 08/29/2025 unable to document: patient refused nail care, nurse notified. Review of Resident #2's care plan revealed no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive person-centered plan of care for 1 (#1) out of 11 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #R1-#R7) sampled resident as evidenced by failing to revise a care plan with changes in ADL (activities of daily living) care. Findings: Review of Resident #1's EHR (electronic health record) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, congestive heart failure, anxiety and depression.Review of Resident #1's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 13, indicating her cognition was intact. Further review of the MDS revealed resident was independent with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, dressing, transfers; and supervision or touch assistance for shower/bathe.Review of Resident #1's care plan date initiated: 06/23/2025 revision on: 08/19/2025 revealed resident needs partial/moderate assist with bathing/showering. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide services to meet professional standards in accordance with the resident's written plan of care by failing to administer daily medication on time as ordered for 3 (#1, #R1 and #R2) out of 11 (#1- #4 and #R1 - #R7) sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to effect a census of 87.Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administration of Medication with last revision date 03/2025, read in part, purpose: to administer medications in accordance with best practice.Procedure: 3. Drugs and biologicals are administered no more than one hour before or no more than one hour after the dosage time is ordered.Resident #1Review of Resident #1's EHR (electronic health record) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, congestive heart failure, anxiety and depression.Review of Resident #1's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was completed and submitted to CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) in a timely manner for 1 (#44) of 5 (#29, #41, #44, #46, #56) residents investigated for resident assessments in a final sample of 30 residents. Findings: Review of Resident #44's electronic medical record revealed a quarterly MDS assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/06/2025. Review of the MDS assessment signature page revealed the assessment had been completed and signed on 06/05/2025. On 06/11/2025 at 3:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7MDS who stated she was responsible for Resident #44's MDS assessments. S7MDS reviewed Resident #44's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 05/06/2025 and confirmed the assessment had not been completed in the CMS required timeframe of 14 days.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for use of antiplatelet medication for 1 (#56) out of 30 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #56's Quarterly MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 02/12/2025 revealed, in part: Section N- Medications High Risk Drug Classes E. Anticoagulant, Is taking- checked Yes .I. Antiplatelet, Is taking- checked No. Review of Resident #56's electronic medication administration record (EMAR) for February 2025 revealed he had taken Plavix, an antiplatelet medication. On 06/11/2025 at 12:45 p.m., an interview and record review was conducted with S7MDS. She verified that Resident #56 was administered Plavix, an antiplatelet medication during the lookback period for his Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/12/2025. S7MDS confirmed that Resident #56's Quarterly MDS was coded incorrectly as him taking an anticoagulant instead of an antiplatelet medication.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 (#9, #41) out of a final sample of 30 residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 84 residents. Findings: Resident #9 Review of Resident #9's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed an admission date of 03/24/2025 and diagnoses that include Hemiplegia following Cerebral Infarction affecting right dominant side, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Morbid Obesity. Review of Resident #9's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 03/28/2025 indicated Resident #9 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. On 06/09/2025 at 10:30 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #9 unshaven with long unkempt facial hair and fingernails that were long, curling under with brown debris under them. On 06/11/2025 at 8:37 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). S8LPN confirmed the resident had unkempt facial hair and fingernails. She stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that ensured accurate administration of medication to meet the needs of 1 (#72) of 6 residents observed during medication administration. The deficient practice had the potential to effect the facility census of 84 residents. Findings: On 06/11/2025 at 9:40 a.m., S10LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed during medication pass. During her preparation for medication administration for Resident #72, S10LPN stated that the prescribed Carbidopa-Levodopa ER Tablet 25-100 mg (milligrams) orders on her computer indicated Resident #72 was to take 1 tablet PO (by mouth) TID (three times per day) but that the instructions on the medication blister pack read to take 2 tablets PO TID. In that moment, S10LPN reviewed Resident #72's physician's orders on her computer and read from the prescribed Carbidopa-Levodopa order, take 1 tablet PO TID. S10LPN returned to the Carbidopa-Levodopa blister pack and read, take 2 tabs PO TID. S10LPN then removed a round, bright orange sticker from a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by failing to ensure: 1. dietary staff with facial hair utilized a hair restraint to prevent hair from contacting food; 2. dietary staff utilized gloves when handling and preparing food; and, 3. dietary staff utilized proper sanitary procedures when serving ice with a ice scoop. These deficiencies had the potential to affect the entire census of 80 residents who consumed food and beverages prepared in the kitchen. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Employee Work Practice, with a revised date of 05/2018 and annual policy review date of 01/30/2025, read in part: Policy: Food service employees shall follow sanitary practices to prevent the spread of food borne illness. Procedure: 2. Proper Work Attire a.maintain their hair and skin to prevent the transfer of pathogens to food and food equipment .c. ii. Wears a clean hat or other hair restraint (hair net, hat, surgical cap and/or beard restraint) in the food production area.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$29,042 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,521 — penalty dated 2023-11-08
• $14,521 — penalty dated 2023-11-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA