Rosewood Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 65.1 residents a day — about 43% occupied, or roughly 85 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from accidents hazards during a mechanical lift transfer for 1 (#1) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, R1, R2, R3, and R4) sampled residents who required two-person transfer with a mechanical lift. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #1 on 08/08/2024 at 2:15 p.m., when S3CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) attempted to transfer the resident from a shower bed to residents bed while utilizing the mechanical lift without assistance of another qualified staff person. Resident #1 fell from the lift sling during the transfer and landed on the floor resulting in a fractured right leg. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. X-ray report dated 08/08/2024 at 4:53 p.m. showed a suspected nondisplaced fracture of the distal fibula. A CT (comp tomography) scan done on 08/09/2024 at 7:43 a.m. revealed a comminuted, displaced distal femoral fracture with multiple ossific fragments and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from hazards for 1 (Resident #1) out of 8 sampled residents.This deficient practice resulted in actual harm on 03/12/2026 during the 10:00 a.m. group activity when Resident #1 spilled hot coffee on her lap. The dietary staff failed to follow the facility's hot beverage policy when S8DA distributed coffee for residents at an unsafe temperature. As a result, Resident #1 sustained a 2nd degree and a 3rd degree burn to her left thigh and received treatment at the facility.The facility implemented a corrective action plan on 03/15/2026 and was in substantial compliance at the time of the state agency's investigation on 03/31/2026; thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation.Findings:On 03/30/2026, a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Serving Hot Beverages and Soup with a revised date of 07/2007 read in part in part: Policy: The Food Service Department will monitor the temperature…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency no later than 2 hours later in accordance with State law for 1 (#1) of 8 (#1 ,#2, #3, #4, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4) sampled residents. The deficient practice had a potential to affect a total census of 66 residents. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Prevention and Prohibition Policy, with an approval date of 03/2025, revealed in part: All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property will be reported immediately to the administrator. The allegation will be reported no later than 2 hours, or per state regulations after the allegation is made. A review of the resident's medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, Schizoaffective Disorder, and History of Falling. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-10 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information in a prominent place, readily accessible to residents and visitors. The information should be posted on a daily basis and include the resident census and total number of actual hours worked by RNs (Registered Nurses), LPNs (Licensed Practical Nurses), and CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. The facility census was 63. Findings: On 12/10/2024 at 6:54 p.m., an interview with S1ADM (Administrator) and S9PM (Payroll Manager) verified that the facility did not post daily nurse staffing information that included the resident census and total number of actual hours worked by RNs, LPNs, and CNA staff directly responsible for resident care per shift anywhere in the facility. On 12/10/2024 at 7:30 p.m., an interview with S3RDO (Regional Director of Operations) was conducted. S3RDO was questioned regarding the posting of nurse staffing information that included resident census and total number of actual hours worked by RNs, LPNs, and CNA staff directly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services that is in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 (#11, #33, #37) out of 3 (#11, #33, #37) residents reviewed for respiratory care, with the potential to effect 7 residents receiving oxygen therapy. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration with an approval date of 12/2024, revealed in part: Steps in the procedure . 10. Check the mask, tank, humidifying jar, etc., to be sure they are in good working order and are securely fastened. Be sure there is water in the humidifying jar and that the water level is enough that the water bubbles as oxygen flows through. 12. Replenish water to humidifier jar as needed. Resident #11 Review of the physician's orders for Resident #11 revealed an order dated 12/09/2024 - Oxygen (O2) 3L/NC (liters per nasal cannula). On 12/08/2024 at 9:37 a.m., an observation of Resident #11's O2 concentrator was done. The humidifier jar, attached to concentrator tubing, was on floor without H2O (water) in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (#33) out of 35 sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 63. Findings: On 12/08/2024 at 10:19 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #33's room. The room had a silver pole on wheels that held the TF (Tube Feeding) machine, it had dry white substance(s) running down the pole and a tan , crusty substance covering almost the entire wheel base. Further observation revealed the oxygen concentrator had dried white and tan crusty splattered substance and drip spots on the front and top of the concentrator. On 12/08/2024 at 10:20 a.m., resident stated they should clean that machine and pole, it is dirty and they don't even attempt to clean it. On 12/08/2024 at 10:43 a.m., an observation of Resident #33's room and interview was conducted with S5RN (Registered Nurse). She confirmed the findings from above, and stated they should have been cleaned.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure RD (Registered Dietitian) recommendations in response to identified weight loss were relayed to the physician for review and implementation for 1 (#44) of 9 (#3, #5, #23, #33, #34, #35, #44, #46, #212) residents that receive nutrition from enteral feedings. Findings: A review of Resident #44's record revealed an admission date of 10/30/2024 with diagnoses that included Dysphagia, Aphasia, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Encounter for Attention to Gastrostomy (feeding/PEG tube). A review of Resident #44's care plan revealed a focus area for potential nutritional problem related to disease process, dysphagia, malnutrition, and has unplanned weight loss. Interventions included, provide and serve diet/provide peg (feeding) tube as per order and RD to evaluate and make diet change recommendations. A review of Resident #44's current physician's orders for November 2024 and December 2024 failed to reveal an order for tube feeding formula and rate. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' enteral feeding was properly labeled for 2 (#34 and #35) out of 2 (#34 and #35) sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total of 9 residents that received tube feedings. Findings: Resident #34 Review of Resident #34's electronic health record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction, Gastrostomy Status, Dysphagia Pharyngeal Phase, Moderate Protein Calorie Malnutrition, and Vascular Dementia. Review of Resident #34's physician's orders revealed an order dated 11/26/2024 that read: Enteral feed every night shift for supplement r/t (related to) Mod (moderate) PCM (Protein Calorie Malnutrition), and Dysphagia. Administer Isosource 1.5 via peg tube at 45 ml (milliliters)/hr. (per hour) continuous and flush of 60 ml/hr. Total volume to be infused 1080 ml in 24 hours. On 12/08/2024 at 10:46 a.m., an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that each residents' medication regimen was free from unnecessary medications by failing to monitor for side effects for antipsychotropic medications for 1 (#42) of 5 (#11, #24, #27, #42, #47) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 63. Findings: On 12/10/2024 at 1:07 p.m., a request was made for a policy regarding monitoring for antipsychotropic medications. No such policy was provided by the time of the survey conclusion. A review of Resident #42's record revealed an admission date of 10/21/2024 with diagnoses that included Vascular Dementia, Anxiety Disorder and Depression. A review of Resident #42's November 2024 and December 2024 EMAR's (Electronic Medication Administration Record) revealed Resident #42 was receiving the following medications: An antipsychotic, Quetiapine 200mg (milligram) twice daily with a start date of 11/14/2024, An antidepressant, Duloxetine 60mg 2 capsules daily with a start date of 11/15/2024, An antidepressant,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food products were properly refrigerated after being opened. This deficient practice has the potential to effect the 56 residents that eat meals from the from the facility's kitchen. Findings: On 12/08/2024 at 8:45 a.m., an initial observation of the kitchen's dry storage room was conducted. One 48 ounce container of Concord Grape Jelly, was opened with approximately one-third of the jelly missing. Upon further inspection of the container, it read Refrigerate after opening. On 12/08/2024 at 11:15 a.m., a second observation of the kitchen's dry storage room was conducted with S6DM (Dietary Manager). She confirmed the container of Concord Grape Jelly had been opened, and on further review of the label, that is should be been refrigerated after opening.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (#1) out of 2 (#1, #2) residents sampled for dialysis services as evidenced by: 1. Failing to conduct comprehensive post dialysis assessments; and 2. failing to ensure that communication received from the dialysis provider was addressed and communicated with staff. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dialysis Communication, read in part .6. The nurse will complete post dialysis information on the dialysis communication form. 7. Nurse will communicate any significant information (complications or concerns) to the medical practitioner and/or representative. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/12/2023 with diagnoses that included, in part but not limited to; End Stage Renal Disease and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed an intervention to review communication form or flow sheet after treatment, implement new orders or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a RN (Registered Nurse) was on duty for 8 consecutive hours per day for 7 days per week. Findings: Review of the facility's PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report for FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 4 2023 (July 1 - September 30), revealed a trigger for no RN hours and a One Star Staffing Rating. Review of Time Card Reports and RN clock in hours for the months of July 2023 to September 2023 revealed no RN hours for 4 days in the month of July. On 12/19/2023 at 2:50 p.m. a review of the Time Card Reports for July 2023 was conducted with S1ADM (Administrator). S1ADM confirmed that there was no RN coverage for 07/03/2023, 07/07/2023, 07/12/2023, and 07/13/2023.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$31,992 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $16,350 — penalty dated 2026-03-31
• $15,642 — penalty dated 2024-08-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $618K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA