No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Gardens And Guardian

1401 Country Club Road, Lake Charles, LA 70605 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (337) 480-1550 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (337) 480-1550 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
Worth asking about
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1601 Country Club Rd · (337) 480-4801 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1505 W McNeese St · (337) 477-7733 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4950 Lake St · (337) 747-7809 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4315 Nelson Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.0%17.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.1%5.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.7%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection10.5%2.1%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.8%2.3%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.7%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.4%23.2%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.7%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.8%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.2%15.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.0%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%3.1%1.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.8%76.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.1%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.0%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.662.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.142.741.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 233 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.67U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.38hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.28hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 126 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.67 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.1%CMS range 44.0–56.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 8.4–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge76.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.2%CMS range 7.4–14.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.441.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
1.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
62.5%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 42.5 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.42 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.13 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.76 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-07-10)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-21)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy and procedure reviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent cross contamination and the high likelihood of foodborne illnesses to the 40 residents who ate meals prepared from the facility's kitchen. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 3/3/2025 at 10:35 AM when the following was observed in the facility's kitchen during the initial tour: 1. Equipment and Food Prep Area a. The ice machine's air filter had an accumulation of lint build up. b. The ice machine's gutter located under the interior portion of the lift cover had an accumulation of lint build up. c. The countertop under a juice dispenser had a dried tan colored residue. d. The standup cooler's door handle was sticky and had food residue on the plastic framing and glass door. e. The backsplash on the wall located over the food processor was splattered with dried food debris. f. The table next to the small oven had dried food debris. g. The meat slicer and shelf on which it was located had splattered food debris. h.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow its policy regarding advance directives evidenced by failing to accurately document the resident's choice of code status in the medical record for 1 (#19) out of 2 (#19 and #26) residents reviewed for advance directive. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 41 residents. Findings: On [DATE], a review of the facility's policy titled, Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives with no date of implementation or revision, read in part: It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive. The policy explanation and compliance guidelines included in part: 7) Decisions regarding advance directives and treatment will be periodically reviewed as part of the comprehensive care planning process, the existing care instructions and whether the resident wishes to change or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment for 1 (#13) out of 1 (#13) residents sampled for resident assessment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the census of 41 residents. Findings: Review of Resident #13's electronic health record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Displaced Trimalleolar (ankle) Fracture of the Right Lower Leg. Review of Resident #13's progress note dated 03/15/2024 revealed she was discharged from the facility back to her assisted living center home. Further review of her electronic health record revealed no discharge MDS assessment completed for 03/15/2024. On 07/10/2024 at 11:38 a.m., an interview and record review was conducted with S1DON (Director of Nursing). She confirmed that Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to an assisted living center on 03/15/2024. She reviewed Resident #13's MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility's policy and procedure, record review and interview, the facility failed to effectively implement and monitor the facility's Performance Improvement Project (PIP) implemented on 11/07/2023 by failing to: 1. Conduct weekly meeting from 11/07/2023 to 12/14/2023, 2. Implement interventions in a timely manner, 3. Timely calibrated the facility's scale and, 4. Provide documented evidence of monitoring performance of the identified indicators. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 37 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Policy titled Weight Monitoring read in part, Compliance Guidelines: 5. A weight monitoring schedule will be developed upon admission for all residents: e. All others - monitor weight monthly unless otherwise indicated by physician. The facility's PIP (Performance Improvement Project) dated 11/07/2023 revealed an identified issue with the accuracy of weights-Root cause: due to staff not in-serviced and educated on proper ways to obtain weights and too many employees are obtaining weights without checking for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebrovascular Disease, Acute Kidney Failure, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, and Pain. A review of an incident report dated 12/17/2023 at 2:25 p.m., revealed a note written by S6LPN that she overheard the resident chair alarm beeping .saw resident on the floor with aid assessing her . A review of the resident's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed section P-Restraints and alarms, coded of 0 for use of bed alarm and chair alarm, indicating the resident did not use either. On 01/23/2024 at 10:17 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPNMDS coordinator. S5LPNMDS coordinator stated that bed and chair alarms were not coded on the MDS assessment unless used for a restraint. She further stated that they were included in the resident's risk assessment when used as an intervention for fall prevention. A review of the resident's fall assessment with S5LPNMDS revealed that the resident was not assessed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that services were provided as outlined in the physician's orders for 1 (#2) of 11 sampled residents, by failing to ensure that the resident's weight was measured weekly. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Weight Monitoring, read in part .Compliance Guidelines. Weight can be a useful indicator of nutritional status .Significant unintended changes in weight (loss or gain) .may indicate a nutritional problem .5. A weight monitoring schedule will be developed upon admission for all residents .e. All others - monitor weight monthly unless otherwise indicated by the physician. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Myopathy, Neoplasm of Uncertain Behavior of Right Kidney, Encounter for Attention to Ileostomy, and Limitation of Activities Due to Disability. A review of care plan revealed the resident was Care planned on 07/20/2023 for a potential nutritional problem related to vitamin deficiency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that pharmaceutical services provided to meet the needs of each resident were consistent with state and federal requirements and reflect current standards of practice for 1 (#R8) of 4 residents (#R8, #R9, #R10, and #R11) whose narcotic records were randomly checked, by failing to ensure that Resident #R8's narcotics record was reconciled. The facility had a census of 37. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Pharmacy Services, read in part: Policy. It is the policy of this facility to ensure that pharmaceutical services are provided to meet the needs of each resident, are consistent with state and federal requirements, and reflect current standards of practice . Pharmaceutical Services refers to the process (including documentation, as applicable) of .controlling, reconciling .5. The facility .will provide for: a. A system of medication records that enables .Accurate reconciliation and accounting for all controlled medications. Resident #R8 was admitted the facility on 04/27/2023 with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that pharmaceutical services provided to meet the needs of each resident were consistent with state and federal requirements and reflect current standards of practice for 1 (#R9) of 4 residents (#R8, #R9, #R10, and #R11) whose narcotic records were randomly checked, by failing to ensure that Resident #9's controlled drug was discarded after the blister pack was punctured. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Pharmacy Services, read in part: Policy. It is the policy of this facility to ensure that pharmaceutical services, whether employed by the facility or under an agreement, are provided to meet the needs of each resident, are consistent with state and federal requirements, and reflect current standards of practice . Pharmaceutical Services refers to the process (including documentation, as applicable) of .storing, controlling .packaging .using and/or disposing of all medications . Resident #R9 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Hospice Services for 1 (#13) of 2 (#13, #8) sampled residents whose records were reviewed for Hospice Services. The deficient practice has the potential to affect a facility census of 38 residents. Findings: A review of Resident #13's medical record revealed a Quarterly MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 04/12/2023, read in part . Section O. 00100 - K . had a blank for Hospice while a Resident. Further review of resident #13's electronic medical record revealed a physician's order dated 07/13/2022 admit to _______ Hospice and Palliative care for Idiopathic Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy. On 06/20/2023 at 12:45 p.m., during an interview with S1MDS nurse, she confirmed the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #13 was not receiving Hospice care. She verified that Resident #13 had an order for Hospice Service dated 07/13/2022 and the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the correct prescribed dosage of medication was administered to residents. The facility had a census of 37 residents. Findings: Resident #141 Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration read in part #11. Compare medication source with MAR (Medication Administration Record) to verify resident's name, medication name, form, dose, route, and time. Review of Resident #141's physician orders 06/14/2023 revealed an order for Lactobacillus Oral Tablet (Lactobacillus) Give 4 tablets by mouth three times a day related to Bacteremia for 2 weeks. Observation of medication administration on 06/20/2023 at 8:01 a.m. revealed S3LPN administered 1 tablet of Lactobacillus to Resident #141. On 06/20/2021 at 3:14 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3LPN and she confirmed that she administered the dosage of 1 tablet of Lactobacillus to Resident #141, and that 4 tablets of Lactobacillus should have been given. On 06/21/2023 at 11:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON and she confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program and implement accepted infection control practices to help to prevent and control the spread of infectious communicable disease, COVID-19, by failing to: (1) Ensure visitors were screened prior to entering the facility. (2) Post isolation signage and/or the correct isolation signage for 5 (Rooms A, B, C, D, and E) out of 5 isolation rooms (rooms A-E). This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 27. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy titled COVID 19 Infection Control Policy, read in part, F. Access to the Community. 1. General . B. All entry doors to the community should be secured to ensure all visitors must enter through one access point and/or main entrance . I. the main entrance door shall be locked, so that visitors must ring a bell or be let in by staff member to obtain access to the community. This protocol is to ensure each entrant has been properly screened. On 6/27/22 at 7:40 a.m., an observation was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that acceptable parameters of nutritional status was maintained for 1(#14) resident out of 1(#14) resident reviewed as evidenced by facility staff failing to follow the policy and procedure for weight assessment as well as failing to follow physician's orders. This deficient practice had the potential to effect the 24 residents that required monthly weights. FINDINGS: Review of the facility policy for Weight Assessment and Inteervention stated in part . Weight Assessment: 3. Any weight change of 5% or more since last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for confirmation. If weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietitian in writing. Verbal notification must be confirmed in writing. 4. The dietitian will respond within 24 hours of receipt of written notification. Resident #14 was admitted to facility on 01/28/22, with diagnoses of Cerebral Atherosclerosis, Conjunctivitis, Dementia Long-term use of anticoagulants, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the required in-service training for nurse aides failed to include documented evidence 3 (S7CNA, S8CNA, S9CNA) of 3 certified nursing assistants (CNAs) had dementia management training and 1 (S8CNA) of 3 (S7CNA, S8CNA, S9CNA) CNAs had resident abuse prevention training upon hire. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 27 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of the personnel file for S7CNA revealed she was hired on 03/30/2022. There was no documented evidence she had dementia upon hire to 06/29/2022. In an interview held on 06/29/22 at 11:23 a.m., S4ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) she confirmed there was no documentation of S7CNA's dementia training in her personnel file. Review of the personnel file for S8CNA revealed she was hired on 06/09/2022. There was no documentation she had dementia or abuse trainings upon hire to 06/29/2022 in her personnel file. In an interview held on 06/29/22 at 11:35 a.m., S4ADON confirmed there was no documented evidence of S8CNA's dementia or abuse trainings upon hire until…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2022-06-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were not labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, as evidenced by having opened medication bottles available for resident administration with no date(s) the bottles were opened for 2 residents (#17, #19) sampled resident's medication bottles located in 1 medication cart b out of 2 medication carts (a, b). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 27 residents residing in the facility. Findings: On 06/28/22 at 06:48 a.m., an observation of the bottom drawer of medication cart b was conducted with S3LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). There was an opened bottle of lactulose solution 10 mg (milligram) that was one quarter full for Resident #17 with no date that the medication was opened. Further observations revealed there were two opened bottles of Megestrol Suspension 40 mg full for Resident #19 with no date(s) that they were opened. During this observation of medication cart b, S3LPN verified resident #17's lactulose medication was opened and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-27 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
JOUBERT, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR50%since 09/01/2018
JOUBERT, KIMBERLYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 09/01/2018
WILCOXON, JUSTINIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.0M
Related-party expense27% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 49%Other / private 51%

This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$507per resident / day
operating cost
$15,416per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$522per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195636. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next