No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Luling Living Center

1125 Paul Maillard Rd, Luling, LA 70070 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 117 certified beds · (985) 240-0197 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$25,002 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $25,002 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-25)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
843 Milling Ave · (985) 785-5800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1313 Paul Maillard Rd · (985) 785-1753 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
13174 Highway 90 · (302) 596-4439 · Call to confirm hours
Park
13825 River Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
737 Paul Maillard Rd · (985) 703-2040

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased31.4%17.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.5%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.7%2.3%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.1%17.9%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.7%23.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%5.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control35.3%15.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.6%22.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication6.7%3.1%1.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.26
RN hours/ resident / day
1.29
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.65
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 50.6 residents a day — about 43% occupied, or roughly 66 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-25)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2026-03-25 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — widespread
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff provided basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation [(CPR) chest compressions and rescue breaths to maintain blood flow and oxygen to vital organs], in accordance with the resident's physician orders and American Heart Association for 1 (Resident #54) of 1 sampled residents reviewed who had expired in the facility in a total sample of 19 residents. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on [DATE] at 12:49PM when Resident #54 was found unresponsive, without a pulse and not breathing by S4Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and S5LPN The Immediate Jeopardy situation continued on [DATE] at 1:19PM when Resident #54 was pronounced deceased by his hospice nurse after no life-saving measures were being implemented upon Resident #54's hospice nurse's arrival, despite a physician order for full code status. The Immediate Jeopardy further continued on [DATE] at 1:20PM when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2026-03-25 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY I.Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being of each resident by failing to implement and maintain an adequate system to ensure administrative staff identified deficient practices, implemented corrective actions, and ensured licensed nursing staff were trained and competent in verifying residents' code status, initiating and continuing CPR until emergency medical services arrived.This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #54) of 1 sampled residents reviewed who had expired in the facility in a total sample of 19 residents.This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on [DATE] at 12:49PM when Resident #54 was found unresponsive, without a pulse, and not breathing, and licensed nursing staff failed to ensure CPR was initiated and continuously provided in accordance with the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician for 1 (Resident #47) of 2 sampled residents reviewed, in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice. Findings:In accordance with the Louisiana Nurse Practice Act (La. R.S. 37:913), nursing practice includes executing medical regimens prescribed by a licensed physician or authorized prescriber; therefore, medications must be administered as ordered. Review of the facility's policy titled Physician Orders Policy and Procedure, revised 09/12/2025, revealed Licensed Practical Nurses are required to follow physician orders as prescribed. Review of Resident #47's physician orders dated January 2026 through March 2026 revealed, in part, the following:An order dated 01/19/2026 for Simethicone 80 mg tablet (used to relieve symptoms caused by excess gas in the digestive tract), administer 1 tablet by mouth twice daily at 8:00AM and 5:00PM for 14 days;An order dated 02/10/2026 for Pataday ophthalmic solution 0.2% (used to treat allergic conjunctivitis),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatments as ordered by the physician for 3 (Resident #7, Resident #16, Resident #44) of 3 sampled residents investigated for pressure ulcers. Findings:Review of the facility's Wound Care Protocol, dated 2026, revealed, in part, residents with wounds will have wound care provided to them as ordered by the physician. Resident #7 Review of Resident #7's March 2026 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, cleanse sacral pressure ulcer with wound cleanser, pat dry, loosely fill cavity with gauze soaked in Dakin's solution (an antiseptic used to clean infected skin and tissues, treat wounds, and manage odors), apply Santyl ointment (a prescription medicine used to remove dead tissue from chronic skin ulcers to promote healing), followed by calcium alginate (a highly absorptive fiber commonly used in specialized wound dressings), cover with silicone foam border or equivalent dressing, change dressing daily and as needed. Review of Resident #7's Care Plan Report revised on 03/11/2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-25 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — pattern
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received dental services as required for 1 (Resident #47) of 1 sampled residents investigated for dental services. Findings:Review of the facility's Dental Services policy and procedure, last revised 08/2006, revealed, in part, social services personnel will be responsible for assisting the resident in making dental appointments and transportation arrangements as necessary. Review of Resident #47's physician's progress noted dated 01/29/2026 revealed, in part, Resident #47 was seen by the facility's contracted dental company with a chief complaint of a lower left broken tooth. Further review revealed the contracted dental company's plan to address Resident #47's broken tooth was a #18 Distolingual (DL) Silver Modified Atraumatic Restorative Technique (SMART) filling (a minimally invasive filling technique that was to be used to completed a filling to the back and tongue area of Resident #47's permanent lower left second molar). Review of Resident #47's medical records revealed Resident #47's dentist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 6 residents (Residents #2, #7, #16, #27, #44, #47) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for accurate documentation. Findings:Review of the facility's Medical Records policy and procedure, last revised 09/02/2025, revealed, in part, the facility should maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented. Review of the facility's Charting and Documentation policy and procedure revealed, in part, all observations, medications administered, and services performed must be documented in the resident's clinical record. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's March 2026 physician orders revealed, in part: Mirtazapine 15 milligrams (medication used to treat major depressive disorder); Seroquel 25 milligrams (medication used to treat insomnia); Artificial Tears ophthalmic solution (used to treat dry eyes); and, Systane ophthalmic solution (used to treat dry eyes) were ordered to be administered on 03/19/2026 at 9:00PM. Review Resident #2's March 2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the provider failed to ensure staff administered a resident's hydration through an enteral tube (a tube inserted directly into the stomach) per a Physician's Order for 1 (Resident #4) of 1 sampled residents investigated for enteral tube hydration. Findings:Review of Resident #4's 03/17/2026 Physician's Order revealed, in part, to administer Resident #4 Diabetisource ( a type of enteral feeding [a liquid nutritional supplement delivered directly into the stomach through an enteral tube]) at a rate of 45 milliliters an hour with a flush of 200 milliliters (ml) of water every hour. Observation on 03/23/2026 at 9:15AM revealed Resident #4's enteral feeding pump was set to administer Resident #4 Diabetisource at 45 ml an hour continuously with a water flush at 150 ml every 4 hours. Observation on 03/24/2026 at 10:24AM revealed Resident #4's enteral feeding pump was set to administer Resident #4 Diabetisource at 45 ml an hour continuously with a water flush at 150 ml every 4 hours. In an interview on 03/24/2026 at 5:35PM, S8Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to coordinate hospice care and obtain required information from the resident's hospice agency.This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #23) of 1 sampled residents investigated for hospice services. Findings:Review of Resident #23's electronic medical record revealed Resident #23 had an initial admission date of 08/18/2025, and was admitted for hospice services on 02/24/2026. Review of the facility's Hospice Program policy and procedure revised, August 2006 revealed, in part, when a resident participated in the hospice program, a coordinated plan of care between the facility, hospice agency, and resident/family will be developed and would include directives for managing pain and other uncomfortable symptoms. Further review revealed on the day of admission, the facility's nurse must obtain admission orders and a binder from the hospice nurse. On 03/23/2026 at 8:55AM this surveyor requested Resident #23's hospice binder from S1Director of Nurse. On 03/24/2026 at 9:00AM this surveyor requested Resident #23's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure:1. A resident's indwelling catheter tubing and bag were changed as needed (Resident #1); 2. Residents with an indwelling urinary catheter received catheter care as ordered (Resident #1, Resident #2); and,3. A resident's urinary catheter order was completed (Resident #2).This deficient practice was identified for 2 (Resident #1, Resident #2) of 2 (Resident #1, Resident #2) sampled residents investigated for urinary catheter care and Urinary Tract Infections (UTI). Findings: Review of the facility's Indwelling Catheter policy and procedure, revised on 09/23/2024, revealed, in part, catheter care shall be provided every shift for residents with an indwelling catheter. Review of the facility's undated Floor Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Job Description, revealed, in part, the LPN shall initiate the orders of physician's and carry out any treatment and procedures outlined in the patient's plan. Resident #1Review of Resident #1's August 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record was accurately documented for 2 (Resident #1, Resident #2) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for accurate medical record documentation. Findings:Review of the facility's undated Floor Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) job description revealed, in part, the LPN must accurately document the care they provide for a patient. Resident #1Review of Resident #1's August 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order for suprapubic catheter (a tube inserted directly into the bladder through an incision in the lower abdomen) care to be performed every shift. Review of Resident #1's August 2025 electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) revealed, in part, S7LPN documented on 08/25/2025 Resident #1's catheter care was completed. In an interview on 08/25/2025 at 1:52PM, S7LPN indicated she was the nurse assigned to Resident #1. S7LPN further indicated she did not perform Resident #1's catheter care during her shift as ordered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0941 — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff were provided effective communication training for 5 (S10Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA], S13CNA, S14CNA, S15CNA, S16CNA) of 5 (S10CNA, S13CNA, S14CNA, S15CNA, S16CNA) sampled direct care staff investigated for training requirements. Findings:Review of S10CNA's personnel record revealed, in part, S10CNA had a date of hire of 04/01/2025. Further review revealed S10CNA did not receive effective communication training as required. Review of S13CNA's personnel record revealed, in part, S13CNA had a date of hire of 02/25/2025. Further review revealed S13CNA did not receive effective communication training as required. Review of S14CNA's personnel record revealed, in part, S14CNA had a date of hire of 03/03/2025. Further review revealed S14CNA did not receive effective communication training as required. Review of S15CNA's personnel record revealed, in part, S15CNA had a date of hire of 07/15/2025. Further review revealed S15CNA did not receive effective communication training as required. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff were provided Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training for 5 (S10Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA], S13CNA, S14CNA, S15CNA, S16CNA) of 5 (S10CNA, S13CNA, S14CNA, S15CNA, S16CNA) sampled direct care staff investigated for training requirements. Findings:Review of S10CNA's personnel record revealed, in part, S10CNA had a date of hire of 04/01/2025. Further review revealed S10CNA did not receive QAPI training as required. Review of S13CNA's personnel record revealed, in part, S13CNA had a date of hire of 02/25/2025. Further review revealed S13CNA did not receive QAPI training as required. Review of S14CNA's personnel record revealed, in part, S14CNA had a date of hire of 03/03/2025. Further review revealed S14CNA did not receive QAPI training as required. Review of S15CNA's personnel record revealed, in part, S15CNA had a date of hire of 07/15/2025. Further review revealed S15CNA did not receive QAPI training as required. Review of S16CNA's personnel record revealed, in part,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment included active involvement from direct care staff, residents, and residents' representatives in its development and the current number of residents in the facility at the time of the assessment. Findings:Review of the facility's facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed, in part, direct care staff, including a Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), a resident and resident representatives were not included in the development of the facility's assessment. Further review revealed the average daily census was not documented. In an interview on 08/27/2025 at 1:20PM, S1Administrator confirmed the facility assessment was not developed with direct care staff, including a RN, a LPN, and a CNA, a resident and resident representatives. S1Administrator further indicated he could offer no further explanation as to why an accurate census was not included in the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff wore proper personal protective equipment (PPE) and completed hand hygiene while performing incontinence and/or wound care for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 2 (Resident #1, Resident #3) of 2 (Resident #1, Resident #3) sampled residents observed for incontinence and/or wound care. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Enhanced Barrier Protection policy and procedure, revealed, in part, EBP consisted of, at a minimum, gloves and gown. Further review revealed EBP was indicated for residents with indwelling devices. Review of the facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy and procedure, revised 12/2009, revealed, in part, all personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. Further review revealed, employees must wash their hands with soap and water or sanitize using alcohol based hand sanitizer after handling soiled or used linens, dressings, catheters, and urinals, after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-08-27 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post the required nurse staffing information at the beginning of each shift daily for 3 (08/25/2025, 08/26/2025, 08/27/2025) of 3 (08/25/2025, 08/26/2025, 08/27/2025) days observed for nurse staffing information. Findings:Observation on 08/25/2025 at 10:30AM revealed the facility's posted nurse staffing information dated 08/25/2025 did not include the facility's daily census or the actual hours worked by Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). Observation on 08/26/2025 at 9:47AM revealed the facility's posted nurse staffing information dated 08/26/2025 did not include the facility's daily census or the actual hours worked by RNs, LPNs, and CNAs. Observation on 08/27/2025 at 11:51AM revealed the facility's posted nurse staffing information dated 08/27/2025 did not include the facility's daily census or the actual hours worked by RNs, LPNs, and CNAs. In an interview on 08/27/2025 at 12:45PM, S2Director of Nursing confirmed the above mentioned staffing reports did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-03-10 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the individual designated as the Infection Preventionist had completed specialized infection prevention and control training. Findings: In an interview on 03/03/2025 at 10:15AM, S1Administrator indicated S3Infection Control/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was the facility's designated Infection Preventionist. S1Administrator further indicated S3Infection Control/LPN did not have an Infection Preventionist certificate or specialized infection prevention and control training. In an interview on 03/10/2025 at 2:30PM, S3Infection Control/LPN indicated she had not completed any specialized infection prevention and control training.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$25,002 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $25,002 — penalty dated 2026-03-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GUILLOT, CLINT PAULIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF80%since 01/01/2020
GUILLERA, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
PARIKH, PARIMALIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195645. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next