Heritage Manor Of Mandeville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 114.4 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.34 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident, who exhibited exit-seeking behaviors, was adequately supervised to prevent unsafe wandering and elopement for 1 (#1) of 4 (#1, #3, #4, and #6) residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation for Resident #1, who had severe cognitive impairment and a history of exit seeking behavior, on 06/28/2023 at 8:22 p.m. after Resident #1 was observed on video surveillance entering another resident's room and did not exit the room. Resident #1 had eloped from the facility premises, and was found wandering across a four-lane roadway yelling for help. A concerned citizen contacted the facility and asked if they were missing a resident. While the facility was searching for Resident #1, Law enforcement arrived at the facility with the resident on 6/28/2023 at approximately 8:58 p.m. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (#5) resident out of a total of 23 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was coded accurately for fall with major injury. Review of Resident #5's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Alzheimer's Disease, Muscle Weakness, Lack of Coordination, Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility.Review of Resident #5's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Section J1900: Number of Falls Since Admission/Entry or Reentry or Prior Assessment (OBRA or Scheduled PPS), Section C: Major Injury - bone fractures, joint dislocations, close head injuries with altered consciousness, subdural hematoma was coded as 2. Two or more. Review of Resident #5's fall log and fall investigations from January 2025 to current revealed no falls resulting in major injury. An interview was conducted on 09/24/2025 at 1:26 p.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the services provided met professional standards of quality by failing to ensure nursing staff primed insulin pen needles prior to administering insulin for 1 (#8) of 2 (#8 and #81) residents reviewed for insulin administration.Review of the Novolog insulin pen manufacturer's insert revealed the following, in part:Before each injection small amounts of air may collect in the cartridge during normal use. To avoid injecting air and to ensure proper dosing: Turn the dose selector to select 2 units.Review of Resident #8's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Review of Resident #8's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part:Order date: 07/09/2025; Novolog Flex Pen 100 unit/mL, inject per sliding scale, subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime. Resident #8's Novolog Insulin sliding scale order was 10 units of insulin for a blood glucose level of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for side effects with the use of psychotropic medication was completed for 1 (#65) of 5 (#3, #9, #14, #65 and #98) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Review of Resident 65's current Physician Orders revealed orders the following: 8/25/25- Escitalopram Oxalate Tablet 20mg give 1 tablet via PEG-Tube one time a day09/20/2025-Buspirone HCL Tablet 7.5 mg give 1 tablet via PEG-Tube three times a day09/20/2025-Clonazeepam Tablet 0.5mg give 1 tablet via PEG-Tube two times a day09/22/2025-Depakote Sprinkles Capsule Delayed Release Sprinkle 125mg give 1 capsule via PEG-Tube two times a dayReview of Resident #65's current medication administration record revealed Resident #65 had received the above medications as ordered for 09/01/2025- 09/23/2025. Further review revealed there was no documentation for monitoring psychotropic medication side effects for Resident #65. On 09/23/2025 at 9:12 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8LPN. She stated Resident #65 took psychotropic medications. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored in 1 (Med Cart 2) of 3 (Med Cart 2, Med Cart 3, and Med Cart 4) medication carts observed for medication storage.Review of the Humalog medication insert revealed in part, the following:Storage information:Opened: Total of 28 days.An observation was made on 09/22/2025 at 8:45 a.m. of Med Cart 2 with S3LPN. Observed 1 opened Humalog insulin pen for Resident #81, with a written opened date of 08/09/2025.An interview was conducted on 09/22/2025 at 8:46 a.m. with S3LPN. She confirmed the open date on Resident #81's Humalog insulin pen read 08/09/2025. She stated opened insulin pens should be discarded after 28 days. She confirmed Resident #81's Humalog insulin pen should have been discarded and was available for resident use.An interview was conducted on 09/22/2025 at 12:02 p.m. with S2DON. She stated nurses are responsible for ensuring all insulin pens in their medication carts are discarded 28 days after the open date. She stated Resident #81's Humalog insulin pen with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for side effects with the use of psychotropic medication was completed for 1 (#65) of 5 (#3, #9, #14, #65 and #98) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Review of Resident #47's clinical record revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident #47's Plan of Care Task revealed the following:Start Date- 01/06/2025- Assist Resident with inserting hearing aids in the morning and removing at night to put on charger. Further review revealed Resident #47 was assisted with placement of hearing aids on 09/01/2025, 09/08/2025, 09/12/2025, 09/17/2025, 09/21/2025, 09/22/2025 and 09/23/2025. On 09/24//2025 at 12:32 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3LPN. She stated Resident #47 was hard of hearing and did not wear hearing aids. She verified on 09/08/2025, 09/12/2025, 09/17/2025 and 09/22/2025 she documented she assisted Resident #47 with her hearing aids, and she did not. She confirmed she should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and transmitted timely for 2 (#27 and #101) of a total of 31 sampled residents reviewed for Resident Assessment. Findings: Resident #27 Review of Resident #27's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 10/07/2024, review of Resident #27's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 09/03/2024 revealed the MDS assessment was incomplete and had a status of: In progress. On 10/08/2024, review of Resident #27's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 09/03/2024 revealed a completion date of 10/08/2024, signed by S6MDS. Resident #101 Review of Resident #101's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #101 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. On 10/07/2024, review of Resident #101's Discharge MDS with an ARD of 09/07/2024 revealed it was incomplete and had a status of: In progress. On 10/08/2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's MDS assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 5 (#17, #22, #26, #99, and #114) out of 31 residents reviewed in the final sample. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #17 and Resident #22 were accurately coded for PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review); 2. Resident #26 was not coded for anticoagulant use; 3. Resident #99 was coded correctly for Diabetic foot ulcers; and 4. Resident #114 was coded correctly for discharge. Findings: 1. Resident #17 Review of Resident #17's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Anxiety Disorder, Unspecified Psychosis, and Major Depressive Disorder, Single Episode Mild. Review of Resident #17's 142 Form titled Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals Medicaid Program Notice of Medical Certification dated 10/25/2023, revealed an approval for admission by the state Level II Authority for a temporary period…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident identified with a qualified mental disorder was referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for 1 (#48) of 5 (#17, #22, #30, #48 and #59) residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings: A review of Resident #48's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #48 received a new diagnosis of Psychotic Disorder with Delusions due to Known Physiological Condition on 06/07/2024. A review of Resident #48's Level 1 Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review dated 06/04/2024 revealed Resident #48's new diagnosis of Psychotic Disorder with Delusions due to Known Physiological Condition was not included. Further review revealed no documented evidence a review had been submitted for a Level II evaluation and determination. On 10/08/2024 at 2:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4DON. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's plan of care was revised when code status was changed from full code to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) for 1 (#18) of 31 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. Findings: Review of Resident #18's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #18's care plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: Full code (09/22/2024). Intervention: Respect resident and family wishes. Review and update code status with resident and family as needed. Review of current physician orders for Resident #18 revealed the following, in part: Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). Order date-09/24/2024. An interview was conducted on 10/09/2024 at 8:15 a.m. with S5MDS. S5MDS stated the MDS (Minimum Data Set) nurses were responsible for revising resident care plans when there are changes in resident care. S5MDS stated the staff who completed the LaPOST (Louisiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment) document and had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with accepted principles for 1 (Cart A) of 3 (Cart A, Cart B and Cart C) medication carts and 1(Medication Room A) of 1 medication room observed. The facility failed to ensure expired medications were not available for administration to residents. Findings: The following observations were made and verified by S8LPN on 10/08/2024 at 10:15 a.m. of Medication Room A: Two boxes of 5% Lidocaine Patches with an expiration date of July 2024. One box of 5% Lidocaine Patches with an expiration date of August 2024. The following observations were made and verified by S8LPN on 10/08/2024 at 11:00 p.m. of Medication Cart A: One box of 5% Lidocaine Patches with an expiration date of July 2024. On 10/08/2024 at 11:00 a.m. an interview was conducted with SS8LPN. SS8LPN stated she was responsible for checking the medication carts and the medication storage room monthly for expired medication. SS8LPN confirmed the above expired medications should have been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $900K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA