Oak Woods Home for the Elderly

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 54.9 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 64 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 0.80 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.04 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 0.55 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 0.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 0.90 on weekdays — 37% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.05 to 0.03 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-25 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be free from any chemical restraints by having PRN orders for psychotropic drugs exceeding the 14 day limit for 2 (#1 and #7) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Resident #1 Record review revealed Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmit date of 12/17/2025. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included essential (primary) hypertension, unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, chronic respiratory failure, depression, anxiety, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute on chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, and myocardial infarction. Review of quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition for daily decision making. Review of the March 2026 physician orders revealed an order dated 11/25/2025 for Hydroxyzine HCL 25 mg, give 1 tablet every 6 hours as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide assistance for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) by failing to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 (#2, #42, #57) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living.Findings:Resident #2Review of the medical record for resident #2 revealed the resident had diagnoses in part of left above the knee amputation, nail dystrophy, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities with gangrene, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, cardiomegaly, acute kidney failure, and cerebral infarct.Review of the significant change MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a BIMS that was unable to be assessed. The resident was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Review of the care plan revealed self-care deficit related to resident needs assistance with activities of daily living. Further review revealed the following approaches: resident will be clean, dry, dressed neatly,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure it provided routine drugs and biologicals to its residents by failing to have a medication available for administration for 1 (#57) of 2 residents observed during a medication pass.Findings:On 03/24/2026 at 8:50 a.m., a medication pass was observed with Resident #57.Staff S3LPN reported the medication Losartan 50 mg was due at the morning medication pass but it was not available for administration. Review of the March 2026 physician orders confirmed Losartan 50 mg was due to be administered during the morning medication pass.On 03/24/2026 at 10:45 a.m., S2DON was informed that Resident #57's Losartan 50 mg was not available for administration during the morning medication pass.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs by 1) failing to monitor the heart rate with the administration of metoprolol succinate for Resident #1 and 2) failing to obtain a lipid panel as ordered for Resident #1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings:Record review revealed Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included essential (primary) hypertension, presence of aortocoronary bypass graft, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, chronic respiratory failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute on chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, and myocardial infarction. Review of the current March 2026 Physician Orders revealed the following: Order dated 12/20/2025 - metoprolol succinate ER 25 mg tablet give 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater by having a medication error rate of 17% for 2 (#57, #58) of 2 residents observed for a medication pass.Findings:Resident #57On 03/24/2026 at 8:50 a.m., a medication pass was observed with Resident #57.Staff S3LPN reported the medication Losartan 50 mg was due at the morning medication pass but it was not available for administration. This resulted in an error by omission.After the medication pass was completed, review of the March 2026 physician orders revealed there was an additional omission of the medication Xarelto 10 mg which was due on the morning medication pass. Resident #58On 03/24/2026 at 9:20 a.m., a medication pass was observed with S3LPN for Resident #58.After the medication pass was completed, review of the March 2026 physician orders revealed there was an omission of the medications Lisinopril 20 mg and Tamsulosin 0.4 mg.S3LPN administered Vitamin B-12 during the medication pass. Review of the March 2026 physician orders revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility must establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections.The facility failed to 1) implement enhanced barrier precautions for 1 (#6) of 1 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions and 2) follow facility policy for the cleaning, storage and replacement of piston syringes for 1 (#26) of 1 residents reviewed for tube feedings.Findings: Resident #6 Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy and procedure (undated) revealed the following in part: It is the policy of this facility to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and other infectious agents among residents. EBP will be applied according with current CDC guidelines and applicable federal and state regulations within the Oak…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident was assessed using the quarterly review instrument approved by CMS not less frequently than once every 3 months by failing to ensure a quarterly MDS was completed timely for 1 (#18) of 1 residents reviewed for resident assessments.Findings:Review of the medical record for resident #18 revealed she had an admission date of 11/14/2025. The admission MDS was completed on 11/21/2025. The next quarterly MDS was due on 03/07/2026. There was no documentation that a quarterly MDS was completed by 03/07/2026.On 03/25/2026 at 9:20 a.m., interview with S1Administrator confirmed the MDS for Resident #18 was not completed and submitted by the due date.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies, and skill sets necessary to care for resident needs by having a nurse leave prescription medications at Resident #30's bedside unattended for 1 (#30) of 1 residents reviewed for nurse competency. Findings: Review of the facility's Medication Management Policy and Procedure (undated) revealed the following in part:2. PurposeThe purpose of this policy is to establish standardized procedures for prescribing, ordering, receiving, storing, administering, documenting, monitoring, and disposing of medications in a safe and consistent manner. 6.3 StorageMedications shall be stored securely and in accordance with manufacturer guidelines. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an initial admission date of 11/05/2025 with a readmit date of 11/17/2025. Resident #30 had diagnoses that included COPD, DM, hypertension, and tremors. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-04 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately submit mandatory direct care staffing information, based on payroll, to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 4 2024 (July 1 - September 30). Findings: Review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Report for FY Quarter 4 2024 (July 1- September 30) revealed the facility triggered for Failed to Submit Data for the Quarter, One Star Staffing Rating, Excessively Low Weekend Staffing, No Registered Nurse (RN) hours, and failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 hours/day. On 02/02/2025 at 11:20 a.m. interview with S1Administrator confirmed the former Human Resources Director was not submitting the staffing information based on payroll to CMS.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services were provided to prevent potential complications from enteral feeding by failing to record feedings and water flush amounts for 1 (#7) of 2 (#7 and #22) residents reviewed for tube feedings. Findings: Resident #7 Review of the medical record revealed resident #7 received enteral feedings by way of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for the diagnosis of adult failure to thrive. Further review of the February 2025 physician orders revealed an order for Two-Cal high nutrition (HN) tube feeding at 45 milliliters per hour from 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. There was also an order for the PEG tube to be flushed with 150 milliliters of water every four hours while the feeding was not infusing from 6:00 a.m., to 6:00 p.m. Review of the February medication administration record revealed there was no documentation of the PEG tube flushes or tube feedings. On 02/03/2025 at 4:00 p.m., an interview with S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there should have been documentation of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$18,349 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
• $13,762 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-06-25 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA